351. Should Vascular Surgery Patients Be Screened Preoperatively for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
- Author
-
Rachel R. Bailey, G. Jonathan Lewis, Bruce Y. Lee, Kenneth J. Smith, Becky Y. K. Tsui, Robert R. Muder, and Lee H. Harrison
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Staphylococcal infections ,medicine.disease_cause ,Preoperative care ,Article ,Internal medicine ,Preoperative Care ,medicine ,Humans ,Computer Simulation ,Decision Making, Computer-Assisted ,Cross Infection ,Vascular disease ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,biochemical phenomena, metabolism, and nutrition ,Vascular surgery ,Staphylococcal Infections ,bacterial infections and mycoses ,medicine.disease ,Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ,Surgery ,Infectious Diseases ,Amputation ,business ,Vascular Surgical Procedures - Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of postoperative infection.1 Patients who are undergoing vascular surgical procedures may be at particular risk for MRSA infection. MRSA can seed vascular graft material, and patients with vascular disease tend to be older and to have comorbidities such as diabetes and poor circulation, factors that may increase susceptibility to infection. A United Kingdom retrospective study found that from 1994 to 2000, the prevalence of patients with positive test results for MRSA in a vascular unit increased from 1% to 6%.2 In fact, studies indicate that MRSA has become the leading cause of infection among vascular surgery patients in the United States and the United Kingdom.1,3–5 Postoperative MRSA infection in vascular surgery patients can cause substantial morbidity and potential mortality.6 MRSA infection is associated with longer hospital stays, increased morbidity and mortality, and higher rates of amputation, revision amputation, and graft removal, compared with those of other infections.1,3,5,7–9 MRSA infection also correlates with lower limb-salvage rates, lower healing power, and delayed healing.3,4 Therefore, reducing the incidence of MRSA infection may be key to improving vascular surgery outcomes.10 Testing patients preoperatively for MRSA colonization and decolonizing patients with positive test results (ie, administering antibiotics or antiseptic medication to remove MRSA colonization) is a potential strategy to prevent postoperative MRSA infection. Patients with MRSA nasal colonization may be at greater risk for postoperative MRSA infection. One study found a 30.7% MRSA infection rate among vascular surgery patients with MRSA nasal colonization, compared with a 0.67% rate among vascular surgery patients without MRSA nasal colonization.11 This suggests that preoperative testing and decolonization may be important. However, studies have not established the cost-effectiveness of such a strategy. In addition, there is no consensus about what decolonization regimen should be used or how effective decolonization may be. Moreover, MRSA colonization prevalence may vary greatly from location to location. We developed a computer simulation model to determine the economic value of the testing and decolonization strategy before vascular operations. The model simulated the decision of whether to perform preoperative MRSA testing on patients who were about to undergo vascular surgical procedures and to decolonize those with positive test results. Sensitivity analyses varied key model parameters and allowed us to delineate how the cost-effectiveness of such a strategy may vary by MRSA prevalence, decolonization success rate, and decolonization cost. The results of our model may help guide policy making and the design of future epidemiological and clinical studies.
- Published
- 2009