Search

Background: Coronary artery dissection is a feared and potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We examined the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, and outcomes of coronary dissection at a tertiary care institution., Results: Between 2014 and 2019, unplanned coronary dissection occurred in 141 of 10,278 PCIs (1.4%). Median patient age was 68 (60, 78) years, 68% were men, and 83% had hypertension. The prevalence of diabetes (29%), and prior PCI (37%) was high. Most target vessels were significantly diseased: 48% had moderate/severe tortuosity and 62% had moderate/severe calcification. The most common cause of dissection was guidewire advancement (30%), followed by stenting (22%), balloon angioplasty (20%), and guide-catheter engagement (18%). TIMI flow was 0 in 33% and 1-2 in 41% of cases. Intravascular imaging was used in 17% of the cases. Stenting was used to treat the dissection in 73% of patients. There was no consequence of dissection in 43% of patients. Technical and procedural success was 65% and 55%, respectively. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 23% of patients: 13 (9%) had an acute myocardial infarction (MI), 3 (2%) had emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and 10 (7%) died. During a mean follow up of 1612 days, 28 (20%) patients died, and the rate of target lesion revascularization was 11.3% (n=16)., Conclusion: Coronary artery dissection is an infrequent complication of PCI, but is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, such as death and acute MI.

Background: Although discouraged, ad hoc chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is occasionally performed., Methods: We examined the clinical, angiographic characteristics, and procedural outcomes of patients who underwent ad hoc CTO PCI in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436)., Results: Of the 10,998 patients included in the registry, 899 (8.2%) underwent ad hoc CTO PCI. The incidence of ad hoc CTO PCI decreased from 18% in 2016 to 3% in 2022. Ad hoc CTO PCI patients had a lower prevalence of comorbidities and less complex angiographic characteristics demonstrated by lower J-CTO score (1.9±1.2 vs 2.4±1.3, P < .001). In these patients, PROGRESS-CTO major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (1.9±1.4 vs 2.5±1.7), mortality (1.2±1.0 vs 1.6±1.1), and perforation (1.5±1.2±2.2 vs 1.5) scores were lower (P < .001). Technical success was similar between the groups (86%). MACE were lower in the ad hoc CTO PCI group (.8% vs 2.0%, P=.009). Ad hoc CTO PCI was not associated with MACE after adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratio: .69 (95% confidence interval, .30-1.57). In patients with higher J-CTO scores, planned CTO PCI was associated with higher technical success (P < .001)., Conclusion: Approximately 8% of CTO PCI procedures are performed ad hoc, usually in less complex lesions and patients with lower complication risk. While ad hoc CTO PCI might be appropriate for carefully selected cases, a staged approach is recommended for most CTO PCI.

Background: Distal vessel quality is a key parameter in the global chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing algorithm., Objectives: The study sought to evaluate the association of distal vessel quality with the outcomes of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 10,028 CTO percutaneous coronary interventions performed at 39 U.S. and non-U.S. centers between 2012 and 2022. A poor-quality distal vessel was defined as <2 mm diameter or with significant diffuse atherosclerotic disease. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, urgent repeat target vessel revascularization, tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgery, and stroke., Results: A total of 33% of all CTO lesions had poor-quality distal vessel. When compared with good-quality distal vessels, CTO lesions with a poor-quality distal vessel had higher J-CTO (Japanese chronic total occlusion) scores (2.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 1.3; P < 0.01), lower technical (79.9% vs 86.9%; P < 0.01) and procedural (78.0% vs 86.8%; P < 0.01) success, and higher incidence of MACE (2.5% vs 1.7%; P < 0.01) and perforation (6.4% vs 3.7%; P < 0.01). A poor-quality distal vessel was independently associated with technical failure and MACE. Poor-quality distal vessels were associated with higher use of the retrograde approach (25.2% vs 14.9%; P < 0.01) and higher air kerma radiation dose (2.4 [IQR: 1.3-4.0] Gy vs 2.0 [IQR: 1.1-3.5] Gy; P < 0.01)., Conclusions: A poor-quality distal vessel in CTO lesions is associated with higher lesion complexity, higher need for retrograde crossing, lower technical and procedural success, higher incidence of MACE and coronary perforation, and higher radiation dose., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors are grateful for the philanthropic support of the generous anonymous donors, and the philanthropic support of Drs Mary Ann and Donald A. Sens, Mrs. Diane and Dr Cline Hickok, Mrs Wilma and Mr Dale Johnson, the Mrs Charlotte and Mr Jerry Golinvaux Family Fund, the Roehl Family Foundation, and the Joseph Durda Foundation. The generous gifts of these donors to the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation and Center for Coronary Artery Disease helped support this research project. Dr Allana has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation. Dr Alaswad has served as a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, and Abiomed; and owns equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Jaffer has conducted sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific, HeartFlow, and Amarin; has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, International Medical Device Solutions, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging, and DurVena; owns equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc and DurVena; and his employer, Massachusetts General Hospital, has licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave, for which he has the right to receive royalties. Dr Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking for Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Poommipanit has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Asahi Intecc, Abbott Vascular, and Boston Scientific. Dr Patel has received consulting honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr Mahmud has served as a consultant for Abiomed, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific; and has served as chair for multiple Data, Safety and Monitoring Boards. Dr Nicholson has served as a proctor and on the Speakers Bureau and advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc; and owns reports intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr Jaber received received research and educational funds from Medtronic, Inari Medical; has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Inari Medical; has received a proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular; and has served on the advisory board for Medtronic. Dr Rinfret has served as a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific Corporation, SoundBite Medical, and Teleflex. Dr Abi-Rafeh has served as a proctor for and received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr ElGuindy has received consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Abbott; proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo; and educational grants from Medtronic. Dr Sandoval has served on the advisory board for Roche Diagnostics and Abbott Diagnostics without personal compensation; and as a speaker without personal financial compensation for Abbott Diagnostics. Dr Burke has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor for Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates LLC; and is a shareholder for MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) can be lengthy procedures. We sought to investigate the effect of procedural time on CTO PCI outcomes. We examined the procedural time required for the various steps of CTO PCI in 6,442 CTO PCIs at 40 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2022. The mean and median procedure times were 129 ± 76 and 112 minutes, respectively, with no significant change over time. The median times from access to wire insertion, guidewire manipulation time, and post crossing were 20, 32, and 53 minutes, respectively. Lesions crossed in <30 minutes were less complex, as reflected by lower Japanese CTO score (1.89 ± 1.19, p <0.001) than lesions that were not successfully crossed (2.88 ± 1.22) and lesions that were crossed in ≥30 minutes (2.85 ± 1.13). The likelihood of successful crossing if crossing was not achieved after 30, 90, and 180 minutes were a 76.7%, 60.7%, and 42.7%, respectively. The parameters independently associated with ≥30 minutes guidewire manipulation time in patients with a primary antegrade approach included left anterior descending target vessel, proximal cap ambiguity, blunt/no stump, occlusion length, previous failed attempt, medium/severe calcification, and medium/severe tortuosity. The mean duration of CTO PCI is approximately 2 hours (∼20% of time for access to wire insertion, ∼30% wire manipulation time, and ∼50% postwiring time). Guidewire crossing time was shorter in less complex lesions and in cases without complications., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation's Science Center for Coronary Artery Disease (CCAD) helped support this research project. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Death is a rare but devastating complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients who died periprocedurally in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Interventions (PROGRESS-CTO)., Results: Of the 12 928 patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention between 2012 and 2022, 52 (0.4%) died during the index hospitalization. Patients who died were more likely to have a history of heart failure (43% versus 28%; P =0.023). The J-CTO ([Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan]; 2.8±1.1 versus 2.4±1.3; P =0.019), PROGRESS-CTO mortality (2.6±0.9 versus 1.6±1.1; P <0.001), and PROGRESS-CTO pericardiocentesis (2.9±1.1 versus 1.9±1.3; P <0.001) scores were higher in patients who died. In these patients, the use of left ventricular assist devices was also higher (41% versus 3.5%; P <0.001), and retrograde crossing was more often the first crossing strategy (33% versus 13%; P <0.001). The cause of death was cardiac in 43 patients (83%) and noncardiac in 9 patients (17%). Complications leading to cardiac death were: tamponade in 30 patients (58%), acute myocardial infarction in 9 (17.3%), and cardiac arrest/shock in 4 (7.7%). Noncardiac causes of death were: stroke in 3 (5.8%), renal failure in 2 (3.8%), respiratory distress in 2 (3.8%), and hemorrhagic shock in 2 (3.8%)., Conclusions: Approximately 0.4% of patients who underwent CTO percutaneous coronary intervention died during the index hospitalization. The main cause of death was tamponade in 58%. PROGRESS-CTO complication scores might help in risk stratification and procedural planning in patients undergoing CTO percutaneous coronary intervention., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02061436., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Alaswad is a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr Jaffer performed sponsored research: Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific; Consultant: Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging. Equity interest—Intravascular Imaging, Inc, DurVena. Massachusetts General Hospital—licensing arrangements: Terumo, Canon, Spectrawave, for which FAJ has right to receive royalties. Dr Doshi participated in speaker’s bureau for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and research support from Biotronik. Dr Davies received honoraria/consulting from Medtronic, Seimens Healthineers and Asahi intec. Dr ElGuindy received consulting Honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott; proctorship fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo; and eEducational grants: Medtronic. Dr Patel received consulting Honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr Potluri is speaker in advisory board, proctor for Boston Scientific, medtronic, Abbott, Terumo, Shockwave. Dr Burke is Shareholder for Egg Medical and MHI Ventures. Dr Brilakis received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The retrograde strategy is a common approach used in complex chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The ERCTO Retrograde score is a tool that aims to predict the likelihood of technical success for retrograde CTO PCI procedures by evaluating 5 parameters: calcification, distal opacification, proximal tortuosity, collateral connection classification, and operator volume., Methods: We evaluated the performance of the ERCTO Retrograde score using data from 2341 patients enrolled in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) at 35 centers between 2013 and 2023., Results: Retrograde CTO PCI was the primary crossing strategy in 871 cases (37.2%) and a secondary crossing strategy in 1467 cases (62.8%). Technical success was achieved in 1,810 cases (77.3%). The technical success rate was higher for primary retrograde cases compared with secondary retrograde cases (79.8% vs 75.9%; P=.031). The ERCTO Retrograde score was positively associated with the likelihood of procedural success. The c-statistic of the ERCTO retrograde score was 0.636 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: .610-.662) for all cases and 0.651 (95% CI: .607-.695) for primary retrograde cases., Conclusions: The ERCTO Retrograde score has modest predictive capacity for technical success in retrograde CTO PCI.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Allana is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Bortnick, Boston Scientific, the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), Cardiovascular Systems, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Boston Scientific and GE Healthcare; is the owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, and Stallion Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can assist percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO)., Methods: We analyzed 8,983 CTO PCIs performed in 8,771 patients between 2012 and 2022 at 39 centers., Results: Overall, IVUS was used in 44.5% of the cases, for crossing in 11.5% and for stent optimization in 33.1%. IVUS for stent optimization was used more often for complex lesions with higher prevalence of calcification (51.2% vs 34.3%; P<.001); was associated with lower air kerma radiation dose (1.78 [1.00, 3.09] vs 2.30 (1.35, 3.91) min, P<.001) and contrast volume (190 [138, 258] vs 220 [160, 300] ml, P<.001). Among cases with successful guidewire crossing, those that used IVUS for stent optimization had higher technical (99.3% vs 96.3%; P<.001) and procedural (96.1% vs 94.6%, P=.002) success rates and similar major adverse complication event rates (2.04% vs 1.62%; P=.176). The use of IVUS for stent optimization significantly increased over time., Conclusion: In a contemporary, multicenter registry, IVUS was used in 44.5% and its use for stent optimization significantly increased over time. Cases where IVUS was used for stent optimization had higher technical and procedural success and similar risk of complications compared with cases where IVUS was not used for stent optimization.

Background: The incidence, indications, and outcomes of coronary angiography (CAG) performed within 30 days following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have received limited study., Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent CAG within 30 days following CABG between April 2018 and September 2021 at a large quaternary healthcare system., Results: Of 2209 patients who underwent CABG during the study, 111 (5%) underwent CAG within 30 days following CABG. Mean age was 65 ± 10 years and they had high prevalence of comorbidities. Graft utilization was as follows: left internal mammary artery (LIMA) (84%); saphenous vein graft(s) (SVG) (81%); and right internal mammary artery (RIMA) (22%). The most common presentations/indications for angiography were cardiogenic shock (41%), ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (32%), and achieving complete revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (16%). The LIMA, RIMA, and SVGs were completely/partially occluded in 41 (44%), 10 (42%), and 11 (50%) of patients, respectively. Of the 111 patients who underwent CAG, 55 (50%) underwent PCI, including 47 (85%) to the native vessel and 8 (15%) to the bypass graft, and 19 (17%) underwent repeat sternotomy. Overall, 29 patients (26%) required 30-day readmission following CAG and 19 (17%) died., Conclusion: The incidence of CAG within 30 days following CABG is approximately 5%. Patients who need CAG following CABG have high complication rates (26% readmission and 17% mortality, respectively, at 30 days).

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with high incidence of complications. We queried PubMed and the Cochrane Library (last search: October 26, 2022) for CTO PCI-specific periprocedural complication risk scores. We identified 8 CTO PCI-specific risk scores: (1) Angiographic coronary artery perforation (OPEN-CLEAN [Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency iN (OPEN) Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) Hybrid Procedures - CABG, Length (occlusion), EF <50%, Age, CalcificatioN] perforation, c-statistic 0.75): previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, occlusion length 20 to 60 mm or ≥60 mm, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, age 50 to 70 years or ≥70 years, heavy calcification. (2) Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (PROGRESS-CTO complication, c-statistic 0.76): age >65 years, lesion length ≥23 mm, retrograde strategy, and (3) MACE (PROGRESS-CTO MACE, c-statistic 0.74): age ≥65 years, female gender, moderate/severe calcification, blunt/no stump, anterograde dissection and re-entry (ADR) or retrograde strategy. (4) All-cause mortality (PROGRESS-CTO mortality, c-statistic 0.80): age ≥65, moderate/severe calcification, LVEF ≤45%, ADR or retrograde strategy. (5) Perforation requiring pericardiocentesis (PROGRESS-CTO pericardiocentesis, c-statistic 0.78): age ≥65 years, moderate/severe calcification, female gender, ADR or retrograde strategy. (6) Acute myocardial infarction (PROGRESS-CTO acute myocardial infarction, c-statistic 0.72): previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery, atrial fibrillation, blunt/no stump. (7) Perforation requiring any treatment (PROGRESS-CTO perforation, c-statistic 0.74): age ≥65 years, moderate/severe calcification, blunt/no stump, ADR, or retrograde strategy. (8) Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (c-statistic 0.84): age ≥75, LVEF <40%, serum creatinine >1.5 mg/100 ml, serum albumin ≤30, 3040 g/L. There are 8 CTO PCI periprocedural risk scores that may facilitate risk assessment and procedural planning in patients who underwent CTO PCI., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr. Azzalini received consulting fees from Teleflex, Abiomed, GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), Asahi Intecc, Philips, Abbott Vascular, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr. Kearney received consulting fees from Abiomed, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Teleflex, and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr. Hirai received consulting fees from Siemens Healthineers, Asahi Intecc, and Zeon Medical. Dr. Burke: shareholder, Egg medical shareholder, MHI Ventures. Dr. Brilakis received consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The impact of a previous failure on procedural techniques and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 9,393 patients who underwent 9,560 CTO PCIs at 42 United States and non-United States centers between 2012 and 2022. A total of 1,904 CTO lesions (20%) had a previous failed PCI attempt. Patients who underwent reattempt CTO PCI were more likely to have a family history of coronary artery disease (37% vs 31%, p <0.001) and dyslipidemia (87.9% vs 84.3%, p <0.001) but were less likely to have heart failure (25.1% vs 29.5%; p <0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (8.7% vs 10.4%, p = 0.04). Patients with previous failure had a higher Japanese CTO (3.33 ± 1.16 vs 2.12 ± 1.19, p <0.001) score and required longer procedure (120 vs 111 minutes, p <0.001) and fluoroscopy (46.9 vs 40.4 minutes, p <0.001) times and higher air kerma radiation dose (2.3 vs 2.1 gray, p = 0.013). Technical success rates (84.3% vs 86.5%, p = 0.011) were lower in patients with a previous failure compared with patients who underwent first-attempt CTO PCI with no significant difference in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events. After adjusting for potential confounders, a previous failure was not associated with technical failure. Operators performing >30 CTO PCIs annually were more likely to achieve technical success in patients with previous failure. In conclusion, a previous failed CTO PCI attempt was associated with higher lesion complexity, longer procedure time, and lower technical success; however, the association with lower technical success did not remain significant in multivariable analysis., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr. Choi reports Medtronic advisory board. Dr. Poommipanit: consultant for Asahi Intecc, and Abbott Vascular. Dr. Khatri has received personal honoraria for proctoring and speaking from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Terumo, Shockwave, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Jaber has received fees from Medtronic and proctoring fees from Abbott. Dr. Rinfret has received fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, and SoundBite Medical and has been a consultant for Teleflex. Dr. Nicholson has been a proctor for and on the speaker bureau and advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Asahi Intecc and he reports intellectual property with Vascular Solutions. Dr. Jaffer has done sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, and Boston Scientific and has been a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, and Intravascular Imaging Inc; has equity interest in Intravascular Imaging Inc, DurVena; and has the right to receive royalties through Massachusetts General Hospital licensing arrangements with Terumo, Canon, and Spectrawave. Dr. Ybarra reports consultant for SoundBite Medical; speaker honoraria for Abbott Vascular. Dr. Rinfret reports consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and SoundBite Medical Dr. Alaswad has been a consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr. Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abiomed, and Abbott Vascular and has equity in Saranas, SoundBite Medical, Nanowear, and Traverse Vascular. Dr. Brilakis reports consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, Medicure, Medtronic, Siemens, Teleflex, and Terumo; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions can be challenging to perform. In the present review we summarize recent publications in this rapidly evolving area grouped according to indications, outcomes, technique, and complications.

Transradial access may lead to anatomical and functional changes on the vessel wall due to puncture or material-associated trauma, inflammation and loss of endothelium's nitric oxide vasodilatory response. Despite the superficial and palpable radial artery course, caution and dexterity are important assets when puncturing, wiring, inserting the sheath, or maneuvering the catheters. Radial artery anatomic variations, tortuosity, and radial artery spasm are related with femoral access switch. The outer diameter of sheaths and catheters needs to match radial artery internal diameter; otherwise, friction or vascular stretch will occur, activating the surface endothelium and the coagulation cascade. Friction between the arterial wall and the equipment worsens endothelial function and precipitates patient discomfort, radial artery spasm, and ultimately, radial artery occlusion.

Background: There are limited data on the use of bivalirudin for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We compared CTO-PCIs performed using bivalirudin vs unfractionated heparin in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO; NCT02061436). The primary endpoint was net adverse cardiac events (NACE), defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and vascular complications., Results: Between 2012 and 2022, a total of 73 of 9723 procedures (0.75%) were performed using bivalirudin. The J-CTO score (2.4 ± 1.2 vs 2.4 ± 1.3; P=.73) and the PROGRESS-CTO score (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 1.2 ± 1.0; P=.31) were similar in both groups, and the retrograde approach was used less often in the bivalirudin group (15% vs 30%; P<.01). Procedural success (89% vs 85%; P=.35), in-hospital NACE (1.4% vs 2.1%; P>.99), incidence of MACE (0% vs 0.76%; P=.64), and vascular access complications (1.4% vs 0.9%; P=.48) were not different between the 2 groups. On multivariable analysis, use of bivalirudin was not associated with an increased risk of NACE (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-7.27)., Conclusion: Bivalirudin is infrequently used during retrograde CTO-PCI. While the incidence of adverse events was similar with unfractionated heparin, larger studies are needed to assess the safety of bivalirudin.

Background: Balloon uncrossable lesions are defined as lesions that cannot be crossed with a balloon after successful guidewire crossing. Methods: We analyzed the association between balloon uncrossable lesions and procedural outcomes of 8671 chronic total occlusions (CTOs) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed between 2012 and 2022 at 41 centers. Results: The prevalence of balloon uncrossable lesions was 9.2%. The mean patient age was 64.2 ± 10 years and 80% were men. Patients with balloon uncrossable lesions were older (67.3 ± 9 vs. 63.9 ± 10, p < 0.001) and more likely to have prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (40% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (50% vs. 42%, p < 0.001) compared with patients who had balloon crossable lesions. In-stent restenosis (23% vs. 16%. p < 0.001), moderate/severe calcification (68% vs. 40%, p < 0.001), and moderate/severe proximal vessel tortuosity (36% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) were more common in balloon uncrossable lesions. Procedure time (132 (90, 197) vs. 109 (71, 160) min, p < 0.001) was longer and the air kerma radiation dose (2.55 (1.41, 4.23) vs. 1.97 (1.10, 3.40) min, p < 0.001) was higher in balloon uncrossable lesions, while these lesions displayed lower technical (91% vs. 99%, p < 0.001) and procedural (88% vs. 96%, p < 0.001) success rates and higher major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates (3.14% vs. 1.49%, p < 0.001). Several techniques were required for balloon uncrossable lesions. Conclusion: In a contemporary, multicenter registry, 9.2% of the successfully crossed CTOs were initially balloon uncrossable. Balloon uncrossable lesions exhibited lower technical and procedural success rates and a higher risk of complications compared with balloon crossable lesions.

Background: Although high body mass index (BMI) is a known risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases, people who are overweight or obese often have better outcomes after cardiac procedures. Whether this "obesity paradox" is observed in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Therefore, we examined the association of BMI with the outcomes of CTO-PCI in patients from the large, multicenter PROGRESS-CTO registry after stratifying patients into 3 BMI groups.

Coronary artery perforation is one of the most common and feared complications of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated the utility of the recently presented OPEN-CLEAN (Coronary artery bypass graft, Length of occlusion, Ejection fraction, Age, calcificatioN) perforation score in an independent multicenter CTO PCI dataset. Of the 2,270 patients who underwent CTO PCI at 7 centers, 150 (6.6%) suffered coronary artery perforation. Patients with perforations were older (69 ± 10 vs 65 ± 10, p <0.001), more likely to be women (89% vs 82%, p = 0.010), more likely to have history of previous coronary artery bypass graft (38% vs 20%, p <0.001), and unfavorable angiographic characteristics such as blunt stump (64% vs 42%, p <0.001), proximal cap ambiguity (51% vs 33%, p <0.001), and moderate-severe calcification (57% vs 43%, p = 0.001). Technical success was lower in patients with perforations (69% vs 85%, p <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the OPEN-CLEAN perforation risk model was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.79), with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.72). We found that the CTO PCI perforation risk increased with higher OPEN-CLEAN scores: 3.5% (score 0 to 1), 3.1% (score 2), 5.3% (score 3), 7.1% (score 4), 11.5% (score 5), 19.8% (score 6 to 7). In conclusion, given its good performance and ease of preprocedural calculation, the OPEN-CLEAN perforation score appears to be useful for quantifying the perforation risk for patients who underwent CTO PCI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary artery perforation is a feared complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and often leads to serious adverse clinical events., Aims: We sought to develop a risk score to predict clinical coronary artery perforation in patients undergoing CTO PCI., Methods: We analysed clinical and angiographic parameters from 9,618 CTO PCIs in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO). Logistic regression prediction modelling was used to identify variables independently associated with clinical perforation, and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Clinical coronary artery perforation was defined as any perforation requiring treatment., Results: The incidence of clinical coronary perforation was 3.8% (n=367). Five factors were independently associated with perforation and were included in the score: patient age ≥65 years +1 point (odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-2.33), moderate/severe calcification +1 point (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.41-2.42), blunt/no stump +1 point (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.10-1.92), use of antegrade dissection and re-entry +1 point (OR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.61-3.69), and use of the retrograde approach +2 points (OR 4.02, 95% CI: 2.95-5.46). The resulting score showed acceptable performance on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.712-0.773). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good fit (p=0.991), and internal validation with bootstrapping demonstrated good agreement with the model with observed AUC: 0.736 (95% bias-corrected CI: 0.706-0.767)., Conclusions: The PROGRESS-CTO perforation score may be a useful tool for predicting clinical coronary perforation during CTO PCI.

Background: The prevalence and outcomes of patients who presented with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and underwent chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study., Methods: We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of ACS patients who underwent CTO-PCI in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO; NCT02061436)., Results: Of the 8826 patients who underwent CTO-PCI between 2012 and 2022 at 38 centers, 558 (6.3%) presented with ACS. ACS presentation was with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) in 54%, unstable angina in 33%, and ST-segment elevation MI in 6.5%. ACS patients were older (66 ± 11 years vs 64 ± 10 years; P<.001) and had higher prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (48% vs 42%; P=.02), prior MI (52% vs 45%; P<.01), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (49 ± 14% vs 51 ± 13%; P<.01). While the PROGRESS-CTO score (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 1.2 ± 1.0; P<.001) was higher in the ACS group, the J-CTO score was comparable (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.4 ± 1.3; P=.68). Technical success (88% vs 86%; P=.12) and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (0.9% vs 2.1%; P=.06) and adverse events at 3-month follow-up (3.4% vs 7.2%; Kaplan-Meier log-rank P=.16) were similar between ACS and non-ACS patients, respectively., Conclusion: Approximately 6% of patients who underwent CTO-PCI presented with an ACS. Technical success, in-hospital MACE, and the incidence of adverse events up to 3 months were similar between patients who presented with vs without an ACS.

Background: Whether saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) should be occluded after successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the corresponding native vessel remains controversial., Methods: We analyzed the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 51 patients who underwent SVG occlusion following successful CTO-PCI of the corresponding native vessel between 2015 and 2022 at 14 centers., Results: Mean patient age was 71 ± 8 years and 80% were men. The most common CTO target vessel was the right coronary artery (41%), followed by the left circumflex (37%). Retrograde crossing through the SVG was the successful crossing strategy in 40 cases (78%). SVG occlusion was achieved with coils (1.9 ± 1.0) in 35 of 51 patients (69%) and vascular plugs in the other 16 cases (31%). All procedures were technically successful and the SVG was occluded completely (TIMI 0 flow) in 38 of the cases (75%), with the remaining cases having TIMI 1 flow. Follow-up was available for 37 patients (73%); during a mean follow-up of 312 days from CTO-PCI, the incidence of target-lesion failure due to restenosis was 5.4% (n = 2) with no other major events reported., Conclusion: Following native vessel CTO-PCI, SVG occlusion is often performed and is associated with favorable mid-term outcomes.

Background: Preprocedural coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be useful in procedural planning for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: We examined the clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics and outcomes of cases with vs. without preprocedural CCTA in PROGRESS-CTO (NCT02061436). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding factors., Results: Of 7034 CTO PCI cases, preprocedural CCTA was used in 375 (5.3%) with increasing frequency over time. Patients with preprocedural CCTA had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (39% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and angiographically unfavorable characteristics including higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity (52% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) and moderate/severe calcification (59% vs. 41%, p < 0.001) compared with those without CCTA. CCTA helped resolve proximal cap ambiguity in 27%, identified significant calcium not seen on diagnostic angiography in 18%, changed estimated CTO length by >5 mm in 10%, and was performed as part of initial coronary artery disease work up in 19%. CCTA cases had higher J-CTO (2.6 ± 1.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.3 ± 1.0 vs. 1.2 ± 1.0 p = 0.027) scores. After adjusting for potential confounders, cases with preprocedural CCTA had similar technical success (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.67) and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR: 1.47, 95% CI, 0.72-3.00)., Conclusion: Preprocedural CCTA was used in ~5% of CTO PCI cases. While CCTA may help with procedural planning, especially in complex cases, technical success and MACE were similar with or without CCTA., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Jaffer: Sponsored research: Canon, Siemens, Shockwave, Teleflex, Mercator, Boston Scientific; Consultant: Boston Scientific, Siemens, Magenta Medical, IMDS, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Philips, Intravascular Imaging. Equity interest – Intravascular Imaging Inc., DurVena. Massachusetts General Hospital – licensing arrangements: Terumo, Canon, Spectrawave, for which FAJ has right to receive royalties. Dr. Doshi: speaker's bureau for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and research support from Biotronik. Dr. Alaswad: consultant and speaker for Boston Scientific, Abbott Cardiovascular, Teleflex, and CSI. Dr. Khatri: Personal Honoria for proctoring and speaking: Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Terumo, Boston Scientific. Dr. Davies: honoraria/consulting from Medtronic, Seimens Healthineers and Asahi intec. Dr. Mitul Patel: Consulting Honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Terumo, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Dr. Rinfret: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and SoundBite Medical. Dr. Jaber: Member of the advisory board for Medtronic and has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Nicholson: reports speakers bureau, consulting, honoraria, advisory board for Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Corindus/Siemens, and Medtronic. Dr. Abi Rafeh: CTO Proctor and consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr. ElGuindy: Consulting Honoraria: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Abbott; Proctorship fees: Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Terumo; Educational grants: Medtronic. Dr. Brilakis: consulting/speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, American Heart Association (associate editor Circulation), Amgen, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (Board of Directors), ControlRad, CSI, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, IMDS, InfraRedx, Medicure, Medtronic, Opsens, Siemens, and Teleflex; research support: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare; owner, Hippocrates LLC; shareholder: MHI Ventures, Cleerly Health, Stallion Medical. Others: None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of balloon undilatable lesions encountered in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study., Methods: We examined the clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of balloon undilatable lesions in the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of CTO Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436)., Results: Of 6535 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2022, 558 (8.5%) lesions were balloon undilatable. In this subset, patients were older (mean age 67 ± 10 vs. 64 ± 10, p < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (54% vs. 40%, p < 0.001), prior PCI (71% vs. 59%, p < 0.001), prior myocardial infarction (52% vs. 45%, p = 0.003), and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (44% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). The CTO lesion length was estimated to be 34 ± 23 mm, mean J-CTO score was 2.9 ± 1.1 and mean PROGRESS-CTO score was 1.4 ± 1.0. A cutting balloon was used in 27%, a scoring balloon in 15%, laser in 14%, rotational atherectomy in 28%, orbital atherectomy in 10%, intravascular lithotripsy in 1% and other modalities/approaches in 5%. Balloon undilatable lesions had lower technical success (90.9% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.007) and higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (composite of in-hospital death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, re-PCI, emergency CABG, and pericardiocentesis) (5.0% versus 1.3%, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 12 CTO (8.5%) lesions are balloon undilatable. Treatment of balloon undilatable lesions is associated with lower technical success and higher in-hospital MACE., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)