Search

Background: Impaired kidney function is associated with different diseases. However, its impact on colorectal cancer has not been clarified. In order to understand the effect of preoperative kidney function on the outcome of patients with cancer, we analyzed colorectal cancer patients with localized or regional diseases.Materials and Methods: In total, 3731 stage I to III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were analyzed in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was used for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for kidney function cut-off value; Chi-square method, independent t test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) method for clinicopathological factors; Kaplan-Meier method for disease-free survival (DFS); Cox proportional hazard model for multivariate analysis.Results: Among colon cancer patients, low eGFR (MDRD <70) was associated with more male patients, T2 stage, patients without adjuvant chemotherapy, and patients with elevated creatinine level. Low eGFR is a significant risk factor only for stage III colon cancer (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.26; P < 0.001). Furthermore, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly increase 5-year DFS for both high and low eGFR groups in stage II patients (5 yrs DFS, 94.8% vs. 84.1%, P = 0.098 for high eGFR subgroup; and 75.0% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.379 for low eGFR subgroup). However, significant improvement of 5-yrs DFS after chemotherapy was found in low eGFR stage III colon cancer patients (64.7% vs. 39.4%, P < 0.001 for low eGFR subgroup). In contrast, no significant DFS difference was caused by chemotherapy for high eGFR stage III subgroup (70.5% vs. 63.9%, P = 0.110).Conclusions: Although low eGFR is an independent risk factor for stage III colon cancer. However, the adjuvant chemotherapy impacts on stage III colon cancer patients differently according to eGFR status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: As the effect of laparoscopic surgery on elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear, this propensity score–weighted cohort study revealed that laparoscopic surgery is a favorable method for elderly patients with CRC than open surgery in terms of less pulmonary-related postoperative morbidity and mortality, less hospital stay and similar oncological outcomes. Advanced age is a risk factor for major abdominal surgery due to a decline in physical function and increased comorbidities. Although laparoscopic surgery provides good results in most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), its effect on elderly patients remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with CRC. Total 1350 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent curative resection for stage I–III primary CRC were enrolled retrospectively and were divided into open surgery (846 patients) and laparoscopy (504 patients) groups. After propensity score weighting to balance an uneven distribution, a competing risk analysis was used to analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes. Postoperative mortality rates were lower in the laparoscopy group, especially due to pulmonary complications. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the open surgery group. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and competing risk analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with CRC significantly decreased pulmonary-related postoperative morbidity and mortality in this large cohort study. Laparoscopic surgery is a favorable method for elderly patients with CRC than open surgery in terms of less hospital stay and similar oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evidence regarding postoperative CEA for predicting long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer remains controversial, especially in patients with normal postoperative CEA., Objective: To investigate the risk difference among different postoperative CEA trajectories in patients with normal postoperative CEA after curative colorectal cancer resection., Design: This cohort study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center and included data retrieved from a prospectively collected database between January 2006 and December 2018., Settings: Retrospective cohort study., Patients: Patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery for primary stage I to III colorectal adenocarcinoma were included and those with postoperative CEA >5 ng/mL were excluded., Interventions: Standard curative radical resection was performed., Main Outcome Measures: Ten-year overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed., Results: The study population (n = 8156) was categorized into 6 trajectories: persistent-ultralow (n = 2351), persistent-low (n = 2474), gradually decrease (n = 401), persistent-medium (n = 1727), slightly increase (n = 909), and around-upper-limit (n = 394). The median follow-up time was 7.8 years, and the median time frame in which CEA was measured to determine trajectory was 2.6 years. The persistent-ultralow group had the highest 10-year overall survival (85.1%) and disease-free survival (82.7%). The around-upper-limit group had the lowest 10-year overall survival (55.5%) and disease-free survival (53.4%). The adjusted HR trend was comparable to the crude HR of the persistent-ultralow group. Consequently, the higher initial serum CEA groups had higher HRs of overall survival and disease-free survival. The adjusted HR of overall survival was 2.96 (95% CI, 2.39-3.66) and of disease-free survival was 2.66 (95% CI, 2.18-3.69) for the around-upper-limit groups., Limitations: Retrospective design., Conclusions: The postoperative serum CEA trajectory is an independent factor associated with long-term outcomes. Although CEA levels were all within normal range, higher levels of postoperative serum CEA trajectory correlated with worse long-term oncological outcomes. See Video Abstract., Trayectorias De Marcadores Tumorales Y Anlisis De Supervivencia En Pacientes Con Rangos Normales De Antgeno Carcinoembrionario Posterior a Reseccin De Cncer Colorrectal: ANTECEDENTES:La evidencia sobre el CEA post operatorio para la predicción de los resultados a largo plazo del cáncer colorrectal sigue siendo controversial, especialmente en pacientes con CEA post quirúrgico normal.OBJETIVO:Investigar la diferencia de riesgo entre diferentes trayectorias postoperatorias del CEA en pacientes con CEA post quirúrgico normal tras la resección curativa del cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO:Este estudio de cohorte se realizó en un centro oncológico integral e incluyó datos recuperados de una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.AJUSTES:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes con el diagnostico de CCR que fueron sometidos a cirugía por adenocarcinoma colorrectal primario en estadio I-III. Se excluyeron pacientes con CEA postoperatorio >5 ng/mL.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una resección radical curativa estandarizada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se analizaron la supervivencia general a diez años y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.RESULTADOS:La población de estudio (n = 8156) fue clasificada en seis trayectorias, que incluyeron ultrabajo persistente (n = 2351), bajo persistente (n = 2474), disminución gradual (n = 401), medio persistente (n = 1727), aumento leve (n = 909) y alrededor del límite superior (n = 394). La mediana del tiempo de seguimiento fue de 7,8 años y la mediana del período de tiempo en el que el CEA fue medido para determinar la trayectoria fue de 2,6 años. El grupo ultrabajo persistente tuvo la mayor supervivencia general a 10 años (85,1 %) y supervivencia libre de enfermedad (82,7 %). El grupo alrededor del límite superior tuvo la supervivencia general a 10 años más baja (55,5 %) y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (53,4 %). La tendencia del índice de riesgo ajustado fue comparable al índice de riesgo bruto del grupo ultrabajo persistente. En consecuencia, los grupos con CEA sérico iniciales más altos tenían índices de riesgos más altos de supervivencia general y supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Los índices de riesgos ajustados de supervivencia general/supervivencia libre de enfermedad fueron 2,96/2,66 (intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 2,39-3,66/2,18-3,69) para los grupos cercanos al límite superior.LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La trayectoria del CEA sérico postoperatorio es un factor independiente asociado con resultados a largo plazo. Aunque los niveles de CEA se encontraban todos dentro del rango normal, los niveles más altos de trayectoria del CEA en suero posoperatorio se correlacionaron con peores resultados oncológicos a largo plazo. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2023.)

Background: Despite their lack of protein-coding potential, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as key determinants in gene regulation, acting to fine-tune transcriptional and signaling output. These noncoding RNA transcripts are known to affect expression of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) via epigenetic and post-transcriptional regulation. Given their widespread target spectrum, as well as extensive modes of action, a complete understanding of their biological relevance will depend on integrative analyses of systems data at various levels., Findings: While a handful of publicly available databases have been reported, existing tools do not fully capture, from a network perspective, the functional implications of lncRNAs or circRNAs of interest. Through an integrated and streamlined design, circlncRNAnet aims to broaden the understanding of ncRNA candidates by testing in silico several hypotheses of ncRNA-based functions, on the basis of large-scale RNA-seq data. This web server is implemented with several features that represent advances in the bioinformatics of ncRNAs: (1) a flexible framework that accepts and processes user-defined next-generation sequencing-based expression data; (2) multiple analytic modules that assign and productively assess the regulatory networks of user-selected ncRNAs by cross-referencing extensively curated databases; (3) an all-purpose, information-rich workflow design that is tailored to all types of ncRNAs. Outputs on expression profiles, co-expression networks and pathways, and molecular interactomes, are dynamically and interactively displayed according to user-defined criteria., Conclusions: In short, users may apply circlncRNAnet to obtain, in real time, multiple lines of functionally relevant information on circRNAs/lncRNAs of their interest. In summary, circlncRNAnet provides a "one-stop" resource for in-depth analyses of ncRNA biology. circlncRNAnet is freely available at http://app.cgu.edu.tw/circlnc/., (© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background/aims: To evaluate outcome and prognostic factors of patients with anorectal melanoma., Methodology: Twenty-two consecutive patients with anorectal melanoma received operation from 1993 through 2011 were reviewed. The definitions of stage I, II and III are local disease, locoregional lymphadenopathy and metastatic disease, respectively., Results: The patients included 8 men and 14 women, aged from 36 to 83 years (mean, 58.4 years). At the end of the follow-up period, 19 patients died of disease and only 3 patients were alive with disease. Only two patients were alive longer than 5 years after operation. For stage I and II tumors that underwent clinical curative resection (n=17), stage II (p=0.04), tumor size >3 cm (p=0.008) and invasion depth to muscle (p=0.021) all showed poorer prognosis in overall survival. Though wide local excision (WLE) were performed in the patients with earlier tumors, there was no statistical difference in overall (p=0.063) and disease-free survival (p=0.333) between WLE and radical surgery. Furthermore, patients with WLE had more chance of local recurrence than radical surgery (6/7 vs. 3/10, p=0.050). Four salvage radical operations could be performed after local recurrence in WLE group., Conclusions: WLE increases the chance of local recurrence more than radical surgery. Care should be taken to avoid microseeding during performed WLE.

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) and to compare them with those of nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMC) of the colon., Methods: From January 1995 to December 2003, 45 patients with SCC and 332 with MC were identified from prospectively collected medical records. The clinical data and outcomes were compared with those of 2984 consecutive patients with NMC in the same period., Results: The mean age at onset of SCC was 54.3 years. This was significantly lower than those for MC (mean 59.5 years, p = 0.038) and NMC (62.4 years, MC vs. NMC, p < 0.01). The rate of spread of tumors in TNM stage IV via hematogenous routes (liver, lung, bone, and brain) was significantly lower in SCC patients (5/28, 17.9%) than in MC (40/104, 38.5%) and in NMC patients (417/694, 60.1%). The rate of tumor spread via lymphatic drainage (systemic node) or seeding to the peritoneum was higher in SCC (23/28, 82.1%) and MC patients (79/104, 76.0%), than in NMC patients (343/694, 49.4%, p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of poorly differ-entiated tumors in SCC (32/42, 71.1%) than in MC (26/332, 7.8%) and NMC (203/2984, 6.8%). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with SCC were 77.8%, 26.7%, and 11.9%, of those with MC, 81.6%, 65.9%, and 49.4% and of those with NMC, 84.1%, 73.3%, and 58.7%, respectively., Conclusion: The prognosis of SCC is poorer than that of MC and NMC. SCC patients had more locally advanced and almost no early-detected tumors, less hematogenic spread, and very poor surgical outcomes. The role of resection for late stage SCC should be carefully evaluated.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on local recurrence of primary rectal cancer after open curative sphincter-saving resection., Background: Increasing BMI was reported to be associated with a higher likelihood of local recurrence in male patients with rectal cancer. However, it remained unclear whether BMI exerts the same effects on local recurrence of rectal cancer in the upper and lower rectum., Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2002, we investigated 1873 patients with well-documented body height and body weight who underwent curative anterior resection for primary rectal cancer in a single institution. The patients were assigned to 4 groups according to their BMI: underweight, normal, overweight, and obese., Results: The frequency of local recurrence increased with an increase in the BMI in patients with lower rectal cancer. The local recurrence rates were 2.5% (2 of 79), 6.1% (48 of 782), 9.2% (39 of 424), and 13.8% (9 of 65) in underweight, normal, overweight, and obese patients with lower rectal cancer, respectively. These results were different from those of patients with upper rectal cancer. Independent risk factors for local recurrence in the lower rectal cancer group were BMI, resection margin, histologic grade of differentiation, depth of tumor invasion, and status of lymph node metastases. In the upper rectal cancer group, the depth of tumor invasion and histologic grade of differentiation reached statistical significance., Conclusions: BMI exerted different effects on local recurrence of rectal cancer in the upper and lower rectum. Further, more aggressive adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant treatments should be considered for patients with tumor in the lower rectum and with higher BMI.

Background/aims: Although synchronous and metachronous colorectal cancers are now well known to all colorectal surgeons, second other-site primary cancers following colorectal cancer are unfamiliar to most colorectal physicians. Knowledge of the clinical characteristics of these second other-site primary cancers becomes important especially during their follow-up surveillance., Methodology: Information from a computer database was retrieved. Medical records were reviewed and all histopathological data were confirmed., Results: Forty-seven (1.26%) patients developed second other-site primary cancers. Of these patients, 22 (46.8%) patients were diagnosed concordantly while 25 (53.2%) patients were discordant cases. Twelve of 25 (45%) discordant cases were found within one year postoperatively. Regarding the clinical features of these 47 patients, male patients more frequently develop discordant cases (p=0.031). A significantly higher proportion of Dukes' B patients developed second other-site primary cancer than that of patients of other stages (p=0.017). Liver, 8 (17%) cases, was the most common site followed by the prostate, 6 (13%), stomach, 6 (13%), lung, 5 (11%), head and neck cancers, 5 (11%), and kidney, 3 (6.4%). However, there was not a significantly increased risk for these sporadic colorectal patients statistically., Conclusions: We described clinical features of second other-site primary cancers and emphasized that knowledge of these is important for their postoperative surveillance.