351. Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of breast cancers diagnosed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers in intensive screening programs including magnetic resonance imaging.
- Author
-
Chéreau E, Uzan C, Balleyguier C, Chevalier J, de Paillerets BB, Caron O, Rimareix F, Mathieu MC, Koskas M, Bourgier C, André F, Dromain C, and Delaloge S
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms mortality, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heterozygote, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mass Screening methods, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Radiotherapy, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms therapy
- Abstract
Background: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with conventional screening methods improves sensitivity in high-risk patients without benefits on specific survival. We evaluated the characteristics, treatments, and prognostic features of breast cancers diagnosed among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers either inside or outside screening programs that included MRI., Patients and Methods: Two groups of patients diagnosed with a new breast cancer between 2001 and 2007 were compared: group 1, patients included in an intensive screening program; and group 2, patients outside of this program., Results: Twenty-one patients met inclusion criteria for group 1, and 102 for group 2. Seventy-four percent and 65%, respectively, were BRCA1 mutation carriers. Tumors in both groups had the same characteristics (pN, grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 expression), except for smaller tumor size in group 1 (median, 6 mm vs. 22 mm; P < .0001). Group 1 patients had more frequent sentinel node procedures (57% vs. 28%; P = .021) and less commonly received chemotherapy (43% vs. 86%; P < .0001). The 3-year disease-free survival (93% vs. 74%; P = .1) and the 3-year overall survival (100% vs. 92%; P = .2) did not differ between groups., Conclusion: MRI might provide improvement in BRCA1/2 carriers in terms of smaller tumor size and treatment morbidity. However, because of aggressive intrinsic characteristics, this does not turn into significant survival benefits.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF