Search

The article focuses on grooved axes of exceptional workmanship from east Tennessee, southwest Virginia and some from western North Carolina. It mentions specimens now in the author's collection are herein pictured in vivid colored detail and further described as follows. It also mentions South Carolina are known to have fashioned well-developed grooved stone axes many with exceptional surface polish.

Abstract  Unlike a twig query, an Xtwig query contains some selection predicates with reverse axes which are either ancestor or parent. To evaluate such queries in the stream-based context, some rewriting rules have been proposed to transform the paths with reverse axes into equivalent reverse-axis-free ones. However, the transformation method is expensive due to multiple scanning input streams and the generation of unnecessary intermediate results. To solve these problems, a holistic stream-based algorithm XtwigStack is proposed for Xtwig queries. Experiments show that XtwigStack is much more efficient than the transformation method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemical compositions and magnetic susceptibility data were compared for 12 dolerite bluestone implements including axes, axe-hammers and battle-axes, 11 Stonehenge monoliths (chemical data only), and potential source outcrops in Preseli, South Wales. Most of the studied artefacts are of spotted dolerite, a small number being unspotted dolerite. Bivariate graphs, discriminant analysis and t-tests were used singly and in combination to show, respectively, that the implements found at sites in England are mainly similar to Stonehenge monoliths, while the implements found in Wales have a variety of compositions and are much less similar to Stonehenge monoliths. The dichotomy between English and Welsh dolerite bluestone implements could be explained by exploitation of different Preseli outcrops or erratic assemblages derived from them. A small number of spotted dolerite implements have previously been shown to have chemical compositions atypical of and marginal to Preseli, suggesting the possibility of a source of spotted dolerite outside Preseli. Previously published analytical data in combination with the new implement/outcrop comparisons presented in this paper support derivation of the majority of analysed Stonehenge monoliths at one particular outcrop within the group of four identified by Thorpe et al. 15 years ago. Analysis of all the extant bluestone monoliths at Stonehenge (now possible using non-destructive methods) would allow progress in identifying monolith outcrop sources, and in understanding the links with the bluestone axe trade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on Classic, Pointed Poll and Three-Quarter Raised Ridge Axes and collection are field grade specimens and have sustained damage from agricultural activities. It mentions Classic and Pointed Poll axes are shown with the Classic Axe on the left and Ray Harwood had also visited site three times prior to visits. It also mentions greenstone axe on the left is from Knox County and obtained at an auction and is probably from Tennessee.