Search

Human survival is facilitated by medicinal herbs with their unique properties but it shows variation in their properties due to climate change and has a significant influence in production. Thus, this study was objectively conducted to assess the impact of climate change and the trend of production on Ophiocardyceps Sinensis, Agarcus Bisporu, Fritillaria cirrhosu, and Paris polyphylla in the Far-Western Himalayan region of Nepal. The research was based on qualitative and quantitative approaches with data analyzed using Microsoft EXCEL. The minimum and maximum temperature was in increasing trend at an average of -0.0193°C and 0.038°C where precipitation was in decreasing trend at an average of 10.88mm from 1999-2021. The total record of ANCA and DFO, the highest production of Ophiocordyceps scinensis was 1056kg in 2021 and the production of 327kg in 2020 was lowest ever recorded in ANCA. In 2018, the production of Paris polyphylla was the highest i.e., 8992kg, and 1,630 kg in 2016 was the lowest ever recorded. Apart from this, 7,196kg was the highest production of Fritillatia cirrhosu in 2018, and the lowest production was recorded 40kg in 2016. The highest production of Agarcus bisporus was 6,857kg in 2018 and only 645kg production in 2017 was recorded lowest. In 2017 Agarcus bisporus, Ophiocordyceps scinensis, in 2018 Ophiocordyceps scinensis, in 2019 Fritillatia cirrhosu, Agarcus bisporus, Ophiocordyceps scinensis, in 2020 Fritillatia cirrhosu, Ophiocordyceps scinensis in 2021 Fritillatia cirrhosu, and no species production in 2015, 2016 in DFO record. In contrast, people's response and recorded data in DFO and ANCA shows the negative impact of climate change on medicinal herbs in Darchula. This paper will be useful for academicians and policymakers to monitor the production and trend of medicinal herbs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peer-reviewed journal publication is the main means for academic researchers in the life sciences to create a permanent public record of their work. These publications are also the de facto currency for career progress, with a strong link between journal brand recognition and perceived value. The current peer-review process can lead to long delays between submission and publication, with cycles of rejection, revision, and resubmission causing redundant peer review. This situation creates unique challenges for early career researchers (ECRs), who rely heavily on timely publication of their work to gain recognition for their efforts. Today, ECRs face a changing academic landscape, including the increased interdisciplinarity of life sciences research, expansion of the researcher population, and consequent shifts in employer and funding demands. The publication of preprints, publicly available scientific manuscripts posted on dedicated preprint servers prior to journal-managed peer review, can play a key role in addressing these ECR challenges. Preprinting benefits include rapid dissemination of academic work, open access, establishing priority or concurrence, receiving feedback, and facilitating collaborations. Although there is a growing appreciation for and adoption of preprints, a minority of all articles in life sciences and medicine are preprinted. The current low rate of preprint submissions in life sciences and ECR concerns regarding preprinting need to be addressed. We provide a perspective from an interdisciplinary group of ECRs on the value of preprints and advocate their wide adoption to advance knowledge and facilitate career development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is evidence of a geographical imbalance of reviewers, leading to concerns about the sustainability of peer review to ensure high‐quality, timely publications. This research evaluated articles submitted during 2016 to 149 Wiley‐owned journals in two disciplines: medicine (112 journals), and agricultural and biological sciences (37). We compared the reviewer location with the location of the author and the Editor‐in‐Chief, the size and rank of the journal, and whether the journal had difficulty in obtaining reviews. We found that reviewers mostly came from the USA, but there was a correlation between the reviewer location and the country and region of the Editor‐in‐Chief and that of the corresponding author. Reviewers were also more likely to accept invitations to review articles when the corresponding author was from their region and were more likely to be positive about such articles. We found no difference between journals of different disciplines and of different rank or size or difficulty in obtaining reviews. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study analyzes the current state of gold Open Access (OA) in India based on papers published in the Web of Science indexed journals. It specifically focuses on research output published in OA journals and examines the difference between gold OA and general research output for papers authored by Indian researchers. In order to analyze the Indian contribution of gold OA literature and compares with other countries, Web of Science™-Core Collection was used. There is an increasing trend of contributing research papers in OA journals by Indian researchers. Among the top 20 publishing countries India ranks 10th place in terms of the general research output, but secures 8th place in terms of gold OA papers. However, India's position in terms of share of gold OA publications is relatively higher than other leading countries of the world. Researchers in India mostly prefer to contribute their gold OA papers in Indian journals rather foreign journals and the proportion of gold OA research output in Clinical, Preclinical, Health, Life Sciences and Physicals Sciences is much higher than other disciplines such as Arts & Humanities and Social Sciences. Since most of the research output in India is published in local journals, the study suggests further analyses of publications which are not published in Web of Science indexed journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the author's opinion on the prospects for life sciences industry startups in Israel. The author notes that Israel has the highest number of scientists, technicians, and engineers per capita, which is 135 per 10000 employees in Israel compared to 80 per 10000 in the U.S. The author cites statistics from the Samuel Neaman Institute at the Technion, which revealed that 45% of 58,210 Israeli scientific publications during 2007-2011 were associated with life science.

The article lists the reviewers whom author is acknowledging for their contribution in the journal including J. Arnould, A. Abourachid, and D. Aanen.

A reprint of the article "Living in a Physical World" by Steven Vogel published in December 2004 issue of the journal "Journal of Biosciences" is presented. It focuses on the features of biology that reflects the physical world for organism rather than ecosystems or organelles and provide the author's personal experience towards mechanical matters and discusses Péclet number, a class of dimensionless numbers and kidney tubules, the size of plant cells and sinking speeds of phytoplankton.

This article analyzes shares and rankings of Russian bioscience publications and journals in international bibliometric databases. Studying scholarly output, international collaboration, and the share of Russian papers both in national and international journals enables the authors to highlight the current state of biological science and journals in Russia and outline some pronounced trends. A comparative analysis with the leading countries confirms good representation of Russian bioscience journals among other international serials. Certain problems remain unsolved, however: low impact factors, overrepresentation of national papers, and poor online services. Thus, Russian publishers should correct their editorial policy to improve availability and performance of serials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a report of the editors of the journal for 2016. A brief information about the journal, along with its promotion of the use of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences. Other features include information about the editorial board, submission and acceptance statistics, and review times. Also discussed are sessions held by the journal at leading statistical conferences.

Copyright of Natura Croatica is the property of Natura Croatica and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

large and growing network ('cloud') of interlinked terms and records of items of Systems Biology knowledge is available from the web. These items include pathways, reactions, substances, literature references, organisms, and anatomy, all described in different data sets. Here, we discuss how the knowledge from the cloud can be molded into representations (views) useful for data visualization and modeling. We discuss methods to create and use various views relevant for visualization, modeling, and model annotations, while hiding irrelevant details without unacceptable loss or distortion. We show that views are compatible with understanding substances and processes as sets of microscopic compounds and events respectively, which allows the representation of specializations and generalizations as subsets and supersets respectively. We explain how these methods can be implemented based on the bridging ontology Systems Biological Pathway Exchange (SBPAX) in the Systems Biology Linker (SyBiL) we have developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The consolidation of scientific knowledge proceeds through the interpretation and then distillation of data presented in research reports, first in review articles and then in textbooks and undergraduate courses, until truths become accepted as such both amongst ''experts'' and in the public understanding. Where data are collected but remain unpublished, they cannot contribute to this distillation of knowledge. If these unpublished data differ substantially from published work, conclusions may not reflect adequately the underlying biological effects being described. The existence and any impact of such ''publication bias'' in the laboratory sciences have not been described. Using the CAMARADES (Collaborative Approach to Meta-analysis and Review of Animal Data in Experimental Studies) database we identified 16 systematic reviews of interventions tested in animal studies of acute ischaemic stroke involving 525 unique publications. Only ten publications (2%) reported no significant effects on infarct volume and only six (1.2%) did not report at least one significant finding. Egger regression and trim-and-fill analysis suggested that publication bias was highly prevalent (present in the literature for 16 and ten interventions, respectively) in animal studies modelling stroke. Trim-and-fill analysis suggested that publication bias might account for around one-third of the efficacy reported in systematic reviews, with reported efficacy falling from 31.3% to 23.8% after adjustment for publication bias. We estimate that a further 214 experiments (in addition to the 1,359 identified through rigorous systematic review; non publication rate 14%) have been conducted but not reported. It is probable that publication bias has an important impact in other animal disease models, and more broadly in the life sciences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the 130 current full-text titles in the BioOne.1 and BioOne.2 collections to determine whether they are peer-reviewed, contain book reviews, and are supplied by document delivery vendors. We identified indexing coverage in 11 major databases in agriculture and life sciences: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Current Contents, Environmental Sciences and Pollution Abstracts, GeoRef, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Zoological Record. We concluded that the majority of the titles in BioOne collections are refereed and scholarly, indexed in several of the major indexing and abstracting journals in the field of agriculture and life sciences, and available via several major document delivery vendors. We find both BioOne collections to be valuable, useful, cost-effective journal aggregations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents information regarding the periodical "Engineering in Life Sciences". It mentions that Thomas Bley and An-Ping Zeng are its Editors-in-Chief and Atanas Pavlov and Michael Jewett and Georg Gubitz are its Co-Editors. The aims and scope and the disclaimer information regarding the periodical are mentioned.

Information on the journal is presented including its editorial board members, aims and scope and copyright.

A preface to the "Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences" is presented.

The author offers her message as she departs from the editorship of the "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences" in 2015. Topics include the role of the journal in the academic community, number of theme issues published each year, and the author's main priority during her editorship of the journal. Also mentioned is the celebration of the 350th anniversary of the publication.

An introduction to this issue of "History and Philosophy of Life Sciences" is presented.

The article presents an editorial which discusses on experiences of the periodical editor who has announced his resignation from the post of Editor-in-Chief. The topics addressed include details on Kursad Turksen from the Ottawa Health Research Institute at the University of Ottawa who will replace the author.

The first editorial for Brain Impairment was entitled ‘Landmark development’. Published in May 2000, the editorial both told a story and painted a context. In two paragraphs it recounted the pioneering work of Professor John Walsh and the history of the first two decades of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment (ASSBI), culminating in the foundation of the journal. In telling this story, the context for the journal was also outlined. Reflecting the nature of ASSBI, the journal would aim to be multidisciplinary and to address the full range of conditions that affect brain function across the lifespan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the May 2015 issue of "Engineering in Life Sciences."

This section offers information on the periodical "Engineering in Life Sciences," including its editors, editorial board members, and aims and scope.

The article offers information about the present issue of the periodical which contain several papers on field of natural sciences, and mentions that the journal is also available on internet and can be accessed via databases services as EBSCO, Agro and Index Copernicus.

The author shares his vision as editor-in-chief of the "Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences."

An editorial preface is presented wherein the editor mentions the topics being published by the journal, the scholars who have agreed to serve on the editorial board, and institutions that indexed the journal.

The article presents front cover of the January 2017 issue of periodical "Engineering in Life Sciences".

An introduction to this special issue of "Engineering in Life Sciences," is presented.

Information on this special issue of "Engineering in Life Sciences," is presented.

An introduction to the journal is presented in which the authors discuss its focus on the social analysis of the life sciences, application of disciplinary concepts and the resignation of its editor Adele Clarke.

The editor discusses the changes in the periodical "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences" in 2014, including increasing coverage in health and disease cluster, the adoption of a continuous publication model, and a slight increase to 26 issues a year.