Search

IntroductionIntestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is associated with high mortality and there is an unmet need for novel therapies. The intestinal expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) increases rapidly after mesenteric I/R, but it is still a question of debate whether selective COX-2 inhibitors can mitigate I/R-induced gut injury. Here we aimed to compare the effect of celecoxib and rofecoxib, two selective COX-2 inhibitors, on intestinal I/R-induced injury in rats.MethodsWistar rats were treated with celecoxib (10 and 100 mg/kg), rofecoxib (5 and 50 mg/kg), or vehicle for 8 days via gavage and then were subjected to sham operation or mesenteric I/R. Small intestinal inflammation and tissue damage were assessed by histology and quantification of inflammatory and tight junction proteins. The intestinal activity of COX enzymes was determined by a COX activity assay.ResultsThe higher dose of celecoxib reduced the I/R-associated increase in inflammatory mediators (myeloperoxidase, pentraxin 3, COX-2, interleukin-1β) and loss of tight junction proteins (claudin-1, occludin), whereas the lower dose of celecoxib was only marginally effective. However, even high-dose celecoxib failed to prevent the histological injury of the mucosa. In contrast to celecoxib, rofecoxib did not affect intestinal inflammation and injury at any of the tested doses. Neither celecoxib nor rofecoxib affected the I/R-induced changes of HO-1 and PPAR-γ, known off-targets of COX-inhibitors, but celecoxib increased the I/R-induced elevation of Bax/Bcl-2, a marker of apoptosis, whereas rofecoxib reduced the elevation of phospho-Akt. Importantly, high-dose celecoxib, but not rofecoxib, has already reduced intestinal COX-1 activity.ConclusionOur study provides evidence for the higher anti-inflammatory efficacy of celecoxib compared to rofecoxib in mesenteric I/R injury, which is likely due to its lower selectivity for COX-2. However, even high-dose celecoxib was unable to reduce the mucosal damage. Our results suggest that selective COX-2 inhibitors have only limited therapeutic value in intestinal I/R injury.

Background: Total body irradiation (TBI) 2 × 2 Gy for 3 consecutive days followed by chemotherapy for conditioning pediatric patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) before bone marrow transplantation is superior to chemo-conditioning alone. The globally used anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA) technique is the most referable method, but volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with modern linear accelerators is more precise in terms of ensuring better dose distribution, especially for skin, and higher protection of organs at risk, resulting in less side effects. Method: For TBI, a modern VMAT technique was used. Whole-body immobilization in the supine position was performed using a vacuum mattress with a full body coverage, with a water-equivalent bolus of 1 cm thickness. The design goal was to achieve dose inhomogeneity of less than ±10%. Results: From 2020 to 2022, we performed TBI for five pediatric patients with ALL, with full body bolus and VMAT, who later received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. No acute complications related to TBI were observed during the treatment period with a median follow-up of 1.27 (0.43–2.11) years. Conclusion: Using full body water-equivalent bolus with VMAT for TBI provides a safe method for children with a better organ sparing in the short term follow-up.

Copyright of Gyermekgyógyászat is the property of Semmelweis Kiado and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)