Search

Objective To discuss the risk factors of imported food through the multi 一 dimensional comparative analysis of the food information published by the General Administration of Customs and to provide data reference for supervisors, and to improve the supervision of imported food. Methods This paper mainly collected and summarized the 48 periods of non 一 permitted entry food data released by the Import and Export Food Safety Bureau of the General Administration of Customs during 2019 一 2022 and made a comparative analysis of the sources of non - permitted entry food, food production enterprises, product types, non 一 permitted entry facts and other dimensions. Results From 2019 一 2022, there were a total of 9 506 batches of food that were not allowed to enter the country, and the food that was not allowed to enter the country came from 112 countries and regions, with the highest proportion of food batches from Japan. The food came from 3 941 production enterprises, where 11 countries or regions holding non 一 permitted entry food production enterprises, accounting for more than 50% of the total number of enterprises. According to the HS code, there were six categories and 21 chapters of non 一 permitted entry products, and the main non 一 permitted entry foods were HS03, 21, 19 and 22 products, more than 60% of the total unqualified. According to the analysis of the causes of nonconformity, there were 15 kinds, and the top 6 nonconformity causes accounted for 86% of the total nonconformity batches. There was a total of 268 types of unqualified items related to quality and safety, totaling 3 469 items. Conclusion The overall number of batches of unauthorized imported food during the period of 2019 一 2022 is a rising and then falling trend, and the unauthorized imported food is more concentrated in the countries of origin, manufacturers, categories of unauthorized food, reasons for failure, and quality 一 related unqualified items. The multi 一 dimensional comparative analysis provides data reference for regulators and consumers and helps the government to improve the regulation of imported food. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To provides reference for the scientific formulation of sampling plan through the comparison and analysis of local sampling plan and customs port sampling plan as well as the situation of unqualified food. Methods The differences of food classification and detection items were compared between provincial sampling rules and customs sampling plan in 2023. At the same time, the unqualified products publicized by the provincial bureau and the products not allowed to enter the country notified by the General Administration of Customs from January 2022 to May 2023 were analyzed. Results The classification of some products was inconsistent, and the items were crossed or covered. The largest proportion of unqualified products publicized by the provincial smoke and the General Administration of Customs were edible agricultural products, accounting for 29. 7% and 25%. The unqualified items of provincial sampling were the total number of microbial colonies and coliform bacteria (accounting for 33. 3%), and the main unqualified items of customs sampling were phosphate and sulfur dioxide (accounting for 45. 1%). Conclusion There are differences in food classification and detection items between them. The main categories of unqualified food publicized are the same, but the types of unqualified items and items are different. It is suggested that the local sampling inspection plan and the customs sampling inspection plan learn from each other in terms of sampling items and food categories, strengthen targeted sampling inspection, increase the high throughput monitoring of agricultural products, and provide ideas for improving the unqualified rate of food safety sampling monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Computer Measurement & Control is the property of Magazine Agency of Computer Measurement & Control and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society is the property of Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The test report is the test result or supporting document for conclusion, it is issued to consignor by the consigned laboratory, and is the final expression about the testing. The authenticity and trustworthy of the report directly affect the competiveness and the credibility about the laboratory. At present, present social integrity, as well as third party inspection, need to be strengthened, and fraud test reports occur frequently The existing anti-counterfeiting technology can not completely meet the authenticity verification in the test report transferring. The "cloud testing "platform is considered in this paper, the platform combines clients' information, testing sample, testing result, etc., and store the report in laboratory management system. Clients and stakeholders can verify the authenticity of the test report with telephone, website identification, and fax inquiry. The modern network with verification authenticity and supervision on testing report can contribute to preventing false testing reports, to assuring inspect and test market in good environment, it can also be an effective technical support means to push the third party testing market forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]