Search

We consider logics derived from Euclidean spaces $\mathbb{R}^n$. Each Euclidean space carries relations consisting of those pairs that are, respectively, distance more than 1 apart, distance less than 1 apart, and distance 1 apart. Each relation gives a uni-modal logic of $\mathbb{R}^n$ called the farness, nearness, and constant distance logics, respectively. These modalities are expressive enough to capture various aspects of the geometry of $\mathbb{R}^n$ related to bodies of constant width and packing problems. This allows us to show that the farness logics of the spaces $\mathbb{R}^n$ are all distinct, as are the nearness logics, and the constant distance logics. The farness and nearness logics of $\mathbb{R}$ are shown to strictly contain those of $\mathbb{Q}$, while their constant distance logics agree. It is shown that the farness logic of the reals is not finitely axiomatizable and does not have the finite model property.

We develop a method for showing that various modal logics that are valid in their countably generated canonical Kripke frames must also be valid in their uncountably generated ones. This is applied to many systems, including the logics of finite width, and a broader class of multimodal logics of `finite achronal width' that are introduced here.