Search

Background: The superiority of paclitaxel/ramucirumab over alternative therapeutic regimens in patients with gastric cancer has yet to be defined. Our aim was to evaluate whether second-line treatment with paclitaxel/ramucirumab is superior compared with other therapies. Patients and methods: Retrospective real-world data from patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastroesophageal junction, or distal esophagus, treated at Departments of Medical Oncology, affiliated with the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), were collected. All patients had received at least 2 months of second-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival 1 (PFS1). Results: From March 2015 to March 2023, 179 patients received second-line treatment (median age 61.3 years). Of those, 77 (43%) received paclitaxel/ramucirumab, 21 (11.7%) irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, 16 (8.9%) docetaxel, and 65 (36.3%) other treatments. The efficacy of paclitaxel/ramucirumab was assessed by histological subtype: diffuse, intestinal, and mixed. For diffuse histology, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for PFS1 was 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-2.16] and for overall survival (OS) was 1.71 (95% CI 0.79-3.68). For intestinal histology, the aHR for PFS1 was 0.53 (95% CI 0.28-1.01) and for OS was 0.44 (95% CI 0.22-0.88), indicating a statistically significant OS benefit. Mixed histology showed no significant differences in PFS1 (aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.23-4.37) or OS (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.32-3.82). Toxicity, dose reduction, and discontinuation rates were similar between paclitaxel/ramucirumab and other regimens. Conclusions: Second-line treatment with paclitaxel/ramucirumab was independently associated with OS compared with other regimens in patients with advanced intestinal-type gastric cancer. Identification of the most effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer remains a challenge.

Although European fatherhood is "in the process of reconstruction and transformation" (O'Brien 2004, as cited in Lero, Ashbourne and Whitehead 2006, p. 5) and there is a need to create a clear picture about paternal involvement, few studies have explored perceptions of actual father involvement as well as the factors predicting and relating to father involvement, especially in Southeastern European countries. The present study explored the role of the father and the types of paternal involvement in Greece, Cyprus and Turkey from the mothers' and fathers' perspectives. The study hypotheses are that fathers are involved differently across countries and that in more partiarchically oriented countries both mothers and fathers consider father involvement as less important. Thus, we hypothesized that parental style adopted by each parent and their social cognitions would be correlated with father involvement and that paternal involvement is a multidimensional concept. Research results confirm most of our hypotheses and reveal statistically significant differences in terms of the role of the father and the parental styles adopted in a country level and in the way fathers are involved in a parent level.

Identification of chiral molecules in multi-component mixtures of unknown compositions remains a challenge. Here, the authors show that microwave three-wave mixing that uses broad-spectrum fields can detect chiral molecules in enantiomeric excess without prior chemical knowledge of the sample.

Simple Summary: The standard of care for most women with advanced ovarian cancer is primary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy is not inferior, according to prospective randomized trials. Ovarian cancer has a low mutational load but exhibits a high detection rate of molecular alterations in various genes. It remains unclear whether this is an intrinsic feature of ovarian cancer or if it is due to the administration of a platinum combination during NACT. Our study aimed to determine whether NACT affects the tumor's molecular profile. Any modifications in these areas would need to be identified in the initial therapeutic planning, especially in the era of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy is a therapeutic choice for women with advanced ovarian cancer. Whether NACT affects the tumor's molecular profile has not been determined. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer treated with NACT at oncology departments affiliated with the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG). Tumor molecular profiling was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor pre- and post-NACT tissues. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor molecular alterations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) via next-generation sequencing analysis were assessed. Results: Overall, tumors from 36 patients were assessed, and molecular profiling was evaluated in 20 paired tumor samples. HRD positivity exhibited no significant change between pre- and post-NACT tumors. The BRCA1/2 mutational status remained constant, irrespective of the treatment administration. Pre-NACT tumors tended to exhibit a lower percentage of intratumoral TILs compared to post-NACT tumors (p = 0.004). Differences in the mutation profile between pre- and post-treatment tissue were observed in 33.33% (6/18) of the cases. The mean tumor cell content (TCC) (p-value: 0.0840) and the mean genomic instability score (p-value: 0.0636) decreased slightly numerically after therapy. A moderate inverse relationship was observed between the pre-NACT TMB and the chemotherapy response score (p-value: 0.038), indicating this correlation is statistically significant. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the effect of NACT on the tumor molecular landscape. While BRCA1/2 and HRD status remained stable, an increase in TIL proportion and changes in the mutational profiles were observed post-treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Real-world evidence regarding molecular epidemiology and management patterns of patients with EGFR exon-20 mutated, advanced NSCLC outside the context of clinical trials is lacking. Methods: We created a European registry for patients with advanced EGFR exon 20-mutant NSCLC diagnosed from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients enrolled in clinical trials were excluded. Clinicopathologic and molecular epidemiology data were collected, and treatment patterns were recorded. Clinical end points according to treatment assignment were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. Results: Data on 175 patients from 33 centers across nine countries were included in the final analysis. Median age was 64.0 (range: 29.7–87.8) years. Main features included female sex (56.3%), never or past smokers (76.0%), adenocarcinoma (95.4%), and tropism for bone (47.4%) and brain (32.0%) metastases. Mean programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportional score was 15.8% (range: 0%–95%) and mean tumor mutational burden was 7.06 (range: 0–18.8) mutations per megabase. Exon 20 was detected in the tissue (90.7%), plasma (8.7%), or both (0.6%), using mostly targeted next-generation sequencing (64.0%) or polymerase chain reaction (26.0%). Mutations were mainly insertions (59.3%), followed by duplications (28.1%), deletions-insertions (7.7%), and the T790M (4.5%). Insertions and duplications were located mainly in the near loop (codons 767–771, 83.1%) and the far loop (codons 771–775, 13%) and only in 3.9% within the C helix (codons 761–766). Main co-alterations included mutations in TP53 (61.8%) and MET amplifications (9.4%). Treatment on mutation identification included chemotherapy (CT) (33.8%), CT-immunotherapy (IO) (18.2%), osimertinib (22.1%), poziotinib (9.1%), mobocertinib (6.5%), mono-IO (3.9%), and amivantamab (1.3%). Disease control rates were 66.2% with CT plus or minus IO, 55.8% with osimertinib, 64.8% with poziotinib, and 76.9% with mobocertinib. Corresponding median overall survival was 19.7, 15.9, 9.2, and 22.4 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, type of treatment (new targeted agents versus CT ± IO) affected progression-free survival (p = 0.051) and overall survival (p = 0.03). Conclusions: EXOTIC represents the largest academic real-world evidence data set on EGFR exon 20-mutant NSCLC in Europe. Indirectly compared, treatment with new exon 20-targeting agents is likely to confer survival benefit than CT plus or minus IO.

Giannis Mountzios,1 Sofia Lampaki,2 Georgia-Angeliki Koliou,3 Athanassios Vozikis,4 Ioannis Kontogiorgos,4 Panagiotis Papantoniou,4 Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki,4 Eleni Res,5 Anastasios Boutis,6 Athina Christopoulou,7 Nicoleta Pastelli,8 Anastasios Grivas,9 Gerasimos Aravantinos,10 Efthalia Lalla,11 Georgios Oikonomopoulos,12 Anna Koumarianou,13 Dionisios Spyratos,2 Dimitrios Bafaloukos Snr,14 Georgios Rigakos,15 Pavlos Papakotoulas,6 George Fountzilas,16– 18 Helena Linardou19 1Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece; 2Pulmonary Department, Lung Cancer Oncology Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 3Section of Biostatistics, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Athens, Greece; 4Laboratory of Health Economics and Management, Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece; 5Third Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 6First Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 7Medical Oncology Unit, S. Andrew Hospital, Patras, Greece; 8Department of Pathology, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 9Second Department of Internal Medicine, Agios Savvas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 10Second Department of Medical Oncology, Agii Anargiri Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece; 11Third Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; 12Second Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece; 13Hematology-Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 14First Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece; 15Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece; 16Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Hellenic Foundation for Cancer Research/Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 17Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 18Department of Medical Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus; 19Fourth Oncology Department, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, GreeceCorrespondence: Giannis MountziosFourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Messoghion Av. 107, Athens, 11526, GreeceTel +2106972000Email gmountzios@gmail.comPurpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred first-line option for patients with advanced, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Afatinib, a second-generation irreversible EGFR-TKI, has been extensively used in Greece in this setting; however, real-world data regarding molecular epidemiology and financial implications of afatinib use are lacking.Materials and Methods: This was an observational, non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, based on real-world data collected from the medical charts/records of patients treated with afatinib between 15/03/2015 and 25/06/2020 and were recorded on a web-based data capture system. Cox models were used to assess the prognostic significance of clinicopathological parameters with respect to clinical outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was conducted from a public third-payer perspective, and only direct medical costs reimbursed by the payer were considered.Results: A total of 59 patients were treated with afatinib for their EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC; the median age was 61 years (range: 37– 91). Performance status was zero in 61%, and brain metastases were present in 13.6%. Forty-four patients (74.6%) had a deletion in exon 19 only, while nine (15.3%) had a mutation in exon 21, 8 of them in L858R and one in L861Q. At a median follow-up of 41.8 months (95% CI 35.9– 51.4), the median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI 12.2– 16.4), and the median OS was 29 months (95% CI 25.6– 33.4). Corresponding values for patients with deletion 19 only were 14.3 months (95% CI 11.5– 18.5) and 28.1 months (95% CI 21.1– 32.6), respectively. The mean expenditure for the treatment of each patient equals € 25,333.68; with € 21,865.06 being attributed to drug acquisition costs, € 3325.35 to monitoring costs and € 143.27 to adverse event treatment-related costs.Conclusion: Long-term data in the real-world setting in Greece confirm activity, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of afatinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04640870.Keywords: lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, afatinib, molecular epidemiology, cost-effectiveness

Several individual olive oil phenols (OOPs) and their secoiridoid derivatives have been shown to exert anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity in treatments of human cancer cell lines originating from several tissues. This study evaluated the synergistic anti-proliferative/cytotoxic effects of five olive secoiridoid derivatives (oleocanthal, oleacein, oleuropein aglycone, ligstroside aglycone and oleomissional) in all possible double combinations and of total phenolic extracts (TPEs) on eleven human cancer cell lines representing eight cell-culture-based cancer models. Individual OOPs were used to treat cells for 72 h in half of their EC50 values for each cell line and their synergistic, additive or antagonistic interactions were evaluated by calculating the coefficient for drug interactions (CDI) for each double combination of OOPs. Olive oil TPEs of determined OOPs’ content, originating from three different harvests of autochthonous olive cultivars in Greece, were evaluated as an attempt to investigate the efficacy of OOPs to reduce cancer cell numbers as part of olive oil consumption. Most combinations of OOPs showed strong synergistic effect (CDIs < 0.9) in their efficacy, whereas TPEs strongly impaired cancer cell viability, better than most individual OOPs tested herein, including the most resistant cancer cell lines evaluated.

Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an oral antimetabolite agent comprised of trifluridine, a thymidine-based nucleoside analogue that inhibits cell proliferation following its incorporation into DNA, and tipiracil that helps maintain the blood concentration of trifluridine by inhibiting the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase which inactivates trifluridine. It is approved as a third-line treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and is administered at 35 mg/m2 two times daily from day 1 to 5 and from day 8 to 12 every 28 days. The aim of this investigator-initiated retrospective study (RETRO-TAS; NCT04965870) was to document real-world data on the clinical efficacy of FTD/TPI in patients with chemorefractory mCRC. Methods: The clinical characteristics of patients with mCRC treated with FTD/TPI in 8 Cancer Centres were collected to assess physician’s choice in the third or beyond line of treatment as well as the duration of treatment, dose modification, and toxicity. In addition, other important prognostic features related to mCRC such as molecular profile, performance status (PS), and primary site were analyzed. Statistical analysis for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 6-/8-month PFS rate and disease control rate (DCR) along with Cox regression model, Kaplan–Meier curves, and log-rank tests were carried out by using Stata/MP 16.0 for Windows. Results: From October 2018 to October 2021, a total of 200 patients with mCRC and a median age of 67.0 (IQR 58.0, 75.0) years were treated with FTD/TPI. Τhe median follow-up time was 14 months (IQR 7, 23), 158 PDs and 106 deaths were reported at the time of this analysis. Of all the patients, 58% were males and 58% had mCRC at diagnosis. The molecular analysis identified mutations in KRAS (52%), NRAS (5%), HER2 (3.5%), BRAF (3.5%), and MSI (9%). Previous treatments included radical surgery in 51.5% and adjuvant chemotherapy in 39.5% of patients. FTD/TPI was administered in the third- (70.5%), fourth- (17.0%), or fifth-line (12.5%) treatment setting. Serious adverse events related to FTD/TPI included neutropenia (2%), anaemia (1%), thrombocytopenia (0.5%), diarrhoea (0.5%), nausea (0.5%), and fatigue (4%). A reduction of FTD/TPI dose, delay of next cycle initiation, and shorter duration were reported in 25%, 31%, and 14.5% of patients, respectively. Of all the patients 71.5% received FTD/TPI as monotherapy, 24.5% in combination with bevacizumab, and 4.0% with an anti-EGFR agent. The median FTD/TPI treatment duration was 119.5 days and 81% of patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. The DCR recorded by investigators’ assessment was 45.5%. The median PFS was 4.8 and the median OS was 11.4 months. The 6- and the 8-month PFS rate was 41.4% and 31.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, PS > 1 and presence of liver and lung metastasis were adversely associated with PFS and OS whereas mutational status and tumor sidedness were not. Conclusions: RETRO-TAS is a real-world observational study that confirms and adds on the findings of the pivotal RECOURSE Phase III study in relation to the efficacy of FTD/TPI in the third-line setting and in all subgroups of patients regardless of mutational status and sidedness.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prominent tumor type among women, accounting for 32% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. BC risk factors include inherited germline pathogenic gene variants and family history of disease. However, the etiology of the disease remains occult in most cases. Therefore, in the absence of high-risk factors, a polygenic basis has been suggested to contribute to susceptibility. This information is utilized to calculate the Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) which is indicative of BC risk. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the clinical usefulness of PRS integration in BC risk calculation, utilizing a group of patients who have already been diagnosed with BC. The study comprised 105 breast cancer patients with hereditary genetic analysis results obtained by NGS. The selection included all testing results: high-risk gene-positive, intermediate/low-risk gene-positive, and negative. PRS results were obtained from an external laboratory (Allelica). PRS-based BC risk was computed both with and without considering additional risk factors, including gene status and family history. A significantly different PRS percentile distribution consistent with higher BC risk was observed in our cohort compared to the general population. Higher PRS-based BC risks were detected in younger patients and in those with FH of cancers. Among patients with a pathogenic germline variant detected, reduced PRS values were observed, while the BC risk was mainly determined by a monogenic etiology. Upon comprehensive analysis encompassing FH, gene status, and PRS, it was determined that 41.90% (44/105) of the patients demonstrated an elevated susceptibility for BC. Moreover, 63.63% of the patients with FH of BC and without an inherited pathogenic genetic variant detected showed increased BC risk by incorporating the PRS result. Our results indicate a major utility of PRS calculation in women with FH in the absence of a monogenic etiology detected by NGS. By combining high-risk strategies, such as inherited disease analysis, with low-risk screening strategies, such as FH and PRS, breast cancer risk stratification can be improved. This would facilitate the development of more effective preventive measures and optimize the allocation of healthcare resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung carcinoid tumours are neuroendocrine neoplasms originating from the bronchopulmonary tract's neuroendocrine cells, accounting for only 1%–3% of all lung cancers but 30% of all neuroendocrine tumours. The incidence of lung carcinoids, both typical and atypical, has been increasing over the years due to improved diagnostic methods and increased awareness among clinicians and pathologists. The most recent WHO classification includes a subgroup of lung carcinoids with atypical morphology and higher mitotic count and/or Ki67 labelling index. Despite appropriate surgery, the 5‐year survival rate for atypical carcinoids barely exceeds 50%–70%. The role of adjuvant therapy in lung carcinoids is not well‐defined, and clinical decisions are generally based on the presence of high‐risk features. Long‐term follow‐up is essential to monitor for recurrence, although the optimal follow‐up protocol remains unclear. To address the lack of consensus in clinical management decisions, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) initiated a survey among 20 expert centres. The survey identified varied opinions on approaches to imaging, surgery, use of adjuvant therapy, and follow‐up protocols. Notably, the absence of dedicated multidisciplinary lung neuroendocrine tumour boards in some centres was evident. Experts agreed on the need for a prospective adjuvant trial in high‐risk patients, emphasizing the feasibility of such a study. In conclusion, the study highlights the need for a more uniform adoption of existing guidelines in the management of lung carcinoid tumours and emphasizes the importance of international collaboration to advance research and patient care. Close collaboration between healthcare providers and patients is vital for effective long‐term surveillance and management of these rare tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Gliomas are highly heterogeneous malignancies originating from diverse cell types within the brain. Although their precise etiology is frequently unknown, risk factors, such as chemical exposure, radiation, and specific uncommon genetic disorders have been identified. Diagnosis typically entails imaging tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, complemented by a biopsy for confirmation, which may be further validated through genetic testing. Case Report: Next-generation sequencing technology revealed germline co-deletion deletion of cyclindependent kinase inhibitor 2 A and B genes (CDKN2A and CDKN2B) in a patient diagnosed with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma based on the tumor's molecular characteristics. Following this result, we performed focused genetic analysis with use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technology for the mother that revealed the same co-deletion. Moreover, due to the father's neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer, application of the NGS technology detected a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1-interacting helicase 1 (BRIP1) gene. Comprehensive multi-gene testing conducted within the familial context, marked by a varied spectrum of cancer type, revealed a constellation of genetic predispositions. Conclusion: This case study underscores the critical importance of molecular testing for tumor characterization and highlights the pivotal role of genetic testing in facilitating early intervention and screening for at-risk family members. Furthermore, the identification of germline co-deletions in cancer lays the foundation for the development of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring normal cellular regulation and improving patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Sarcomas represent a group of rare tumors consisting of more than 100 different entities. A precise diagnosis is crucial to optimal treatment. In addition, a significant proportion of sarcomas are characterized by a specific genetic abnormality. This study was designed by the Hellenic Group of Sarcoma and Rare Cancers to assess the effect of expert pathology review, coupled with the application of molecular methods to detect genetic abnormalities, on the diagnosis and management of sarcoma patients in Greece. We found that histological diagnosis review by a sarcoma pathologist led to modifications in diagnosis in almost one-third of patients, resulting in modifications in management in 14% of patients. The use of molecular tests led to modifications in diagnosis in 26% of patients, resulting in modifications in management in almost 11% of patients. Our study highlights the importance of expert pathologists, assisted in some cases by molecular methods, in sarcoma diagnosis and treatment. Precise classification of sarcomas is crucial to optimal clinical management. In this prospective, multicenter, observational study within the Hellenic Group of Sarcoma and Rare Cancers (HGSRC), we assessed the effect of expert pathology review, coupled with the application of molecular diagnostics, on the diagnosis and management of sarcoma patients. Newly diagnosed sarcoma patients were addressed by their physicians to one of the two sarcoma pathologists of HGSRC for histopathological diagnostic assessment. RNA next-generation sequencing was performed on all samples using a platform targeting 86 sarcoma gene fusions. Additional molecular methods were performed in the opinion of the expert pathologist. Therefore, the expert pathologist provided a final diagnosis based on the histopathological findings and, when necessary, molecular tests. In total, 128 specimens from 122 patients were assessed. Among the 119 cases in which there was a preliminary diagnosis by a non-sarcoma pathologist, there were 37 modifications in diagnosis (31.1%) by the sarcoma pathologist, resulting in 17 (14.2%) modifications in management. Among the 110 cases in which molecular tests were performed, there were 29 modifications in diagnosis (26.4%) through the genomic results, resulting in 12 (10.9%) modifications in management. Our study confirms that expert pathology review is of utmost importance for optimal sarcoma diagnosis and management and should be assisted by molecular methods in selected cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to health systems, and has significantly affected the healthcare of lung cancer patients. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on early lung cancer patients’ surgical treatment. Methods: All consecutive patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer eligible for surgical treatment stage I/II and resectable stage III, referred to our department during the first wave of COVID-19 between February to May 2020, were included and compared with those on the exact corresponding quarter in 2019, one year before the pandemic. Waiting time to surgical treatment, increase of tumor’s size and increase on lung cancer stage were recorded and compared. All subjects were followed up for 12 months. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were applied to assess the differences in the management of the studied groups adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Sixty-one patients with early-stage lung cancer were included in the study; 28 (median age 67 years, SD: 7.1) during the pandemic and 33 (median age 67.1 years, SD: 7.5) one year earlier. A significantly longer period of waiting for treatment and an increase in tumor size were observed during the pandemic compared to before the pandemic [median time 47 days, interquartile rate (IQR): 23–100] vs. [median time 18 days, IQR: 11–23], p < 0.001. No significant differences were detected in the increase of the stage of lung cancer between the subgroups. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on surgical and oncological care, leading to significant delays on treatment and an increase in tumor size in early-stage lung cancer patients.

Olive oil phenols (OOPs) are associated with the prevention of many human cancers. Some of these have been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. However, no systematic comparative study exists for all the investigated compounds under the same conditions, due to difficulties in their isolation or synthesis. Herein are presented innovative methods for large-scale selective extraction of six major secoiridoids from olive oil or leaves enabling their detailed investigation. The cytotoxic/antiproliferative bioactivity of these six compounds was evaluated on sixteen human cancer cell lines originating from eight different tissues. Cell viability with half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) was evaluated after 72 h treatments. Antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects were also assessed for the most bioactive compounds (EC50 ≤ 50 μM). Oleocanthal (1) showed the strongest antiproliferative/cytotoxic activity in most cancer cell lines (EC50: 9–20 μM). The relative effectiveness of the six OOPs was: oleocanthal (1) > oleuropein aglycone (3a,b) > ligstroside aglycone (4a,b) > oleacein (2) > oleomissional (6a,b,c) > oleocanthalic acid (7). This is the first detailed study comparing the bioactivity of six OOPs in such a wide array of cancer cell lines, providing a reference for their relative antiproliferative/cytotoxic effect in the investigated cancers.

Treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in patients with breast cancer can lead to dry eye disease (DED). The purpose of the study is to determine the prevalence and risk factors of DED in patients treated with AIs for breast cancer. Participants in this cross-sectional study were patients with breast cancer treated with AIs. Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, type of cancer, stage, grade, duration of treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were collected. All patients underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination, as well as Tear Break up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer test, while Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaires were administered. Based on the clinical findings, a diagnosis of DED was made, and prevalence was calculated. Univariate analysis of the association of different variables with DED was performed. A logistic regression analysis was done to identify risk factors for DED among study population. A total of 102 participants were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 62.4 ± 10.8 years. A total of 77 out of 102 patients (75.5%) had ductal, 16 (15.7%) lobular and 9 (8.8%) other types of breast cancer. A total of 83 patients (81.4%) received chemotherapy and 70 patients (68.6%) received radiotherapy. The mean duration of treatment was 24.4 ± 18.9 months. The prevalence of DED in the study sample was 69.6%. Patients who received radiotherapy (OR = 3.31, 95%CI = 1.30–7.82, p = 0.01) or were under treatment with AIs for more than 24 months (OR = 3.53, 95%CI = 1.47–9.21, p = 0.002) were found to have an increased risk of DED. There was a high prevalence of DED among the study population. Radiotherapy and duration of treatment with AIs were independently associated with DED. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]