Search

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the field of cancer treatment, changing the standard of care to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Radiotherapy can boost anti-tumour immune responses by changing the tumour microenvironment, but it also can cause radiotherapy-induced lymphopenia (RIL), a decrease in circulating lymphocyte counts. RIL has been associated with lower survival in patients undergoing radiotherapy, and new studies have suggested that it can also affect immunotherapy outcome. To study RIL’s effects and to explore mitigation treatment strategies, preclinical models closely mimicking the clinical situation are needed. State-of-the-art image-guided small animal irradiators now offer the possibility to target specific organs in small animals to induce RIL, aiding research on its molecular mechanisms and prevention. This review covers the relationship between radiotherapy and RIL, its impact on patient survival, and future directions to generate models to investigate and prevent RIL.

Abstract Numerous human cancers, especially hypoxic solid tumors, express carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), a transmembrane protein with its catalytic domain located in the extracellular space. CAIX acidifies the tumor microenvironment, promotes metastases and invasiveness, and is therefore considered a promising anticancer target. We have designed a series of high affinity and high selectivity fluorescein-labeled compounds targeting CAIX to visualize and quantify CAIX expression in cancer cells. The competitive binding model enabled the determination of common CA inhibitors’ dissociation constants for CAIX expressed in exponentially growing cancer cells. All tested sulfonamide compounds bound the proliferating cells with similar affinity as to recombinantly purified CAIX. The probes are applicable for the design of selective drug-like compounds for CAIX and the competition strategy could be applied to other drug targets.

The extracellular matrix protein fibronectin contains a domain that is rarely found in healthy adults and is almost exclusively expressed by newly formed blood vessels in tumours, particularly in solid tumours, different types of lymphoma and some leukaemias. This domain, called the extra domain B (ED‐B), thus has broad therapeutic potential. The antibody L19 has been developed to specifically target ED‐B and has shown therapeutic potential when combined with cytokines, such as IL‐2. In this review article, we discuss the preclinical research and clinical trials that highlight the potential of ED‐B targeting for the imaging and treatment of various types of cancer. ED‐B‐centred studies also highlight how proper patient stratification is of utmost importance for the successful implementation of novel antibody‐based targeted therapies.

Abstract Background About 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have metastatic disease at initial diagnosis, which limits their treatment options and, consequently, the 5-year survival rate (15%). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have become standard of care (SOC) for most good performance status patients. However, most patients will not obtain long-term benefit and new treatment strategies are therefore needed. We previously demonstrated clinical safety of the tumour-selective immunocytokine L19-IL2, consisting of the anti-ED-B scFv L19 antibody coupled to IL2, combined with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods This investigator-initiated, multicentric, randomised controlled open-label phase II clinical trial will test the hypothesis that the combination of SABR and L19-IL2 increases progression free survival (PFS) in patients with limited metastatic NSCLC. One hundred twenty-six patients will be stratified according to their metastatic load (oligo-metastatic: ≤5 or poly-metastatic: 6 to 10) and randomised to the experimental-arm (E-arm) or the control-arm (C-arm). The C-arm will receive SOC, according to the local protocol. E-arm oligo-metastatic patients will receive SABR to all lesions followed by L19-IL2 therapy; radiotherapy for poly-metastatic patients consists of irradiation of one (symptomatic) to a maximum of 5 lesions (including ICI in both arms if this is the SOC). The accrual period will be 2.5-years, starting after the first centre is initiated and active. Primary endpoint is PFS at 1.5-years based on blinded radiological review, and secondary endpoints are overall survival, toxicity, quality of life and abscopal response. Associative biomarker studies, immune monitoring, CT-based radiomics, stool collection, iRECIST and tumour growth rate will be performed. Discussion The combination of SABR with or without ICI and the immunocytokine L19-IL2 will be tested as 1st, 2nd or 3rd line treatment in stage IV NSCLC patients in 14 centres located in 6 countries. This bimodal and trimodal treatment approach is based on the direct cytotoxic effect of radiotherapy, the tumour selective immunocytokine L19-IL2, the abscopal effect observed distant from the irradiated metastatic site(s) and the memory effect. The first results are expected end 2023. Trial registration ImmunoSABR Protocol Code: NL67629.068.18; EudraCT: 2018–002583-11 ; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03705403 ; ISRCTN ID: ISRCTN49817477 ; Date of registration: 03-April-2019.

Background: Nitroglycerin is proposed as an agent to reduce tumour hypoxia by improving tumour perfusion. We investigated the potential of nitroglycerin as a radio-sensitizer in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the potential of functional imaging for patient selection. Material and methods: Trial NCT01210378 is a single arm phase II trial, designed to detect 15% improvement in 2-year overall survival (primary endpoint) in stage IB-IV NSCLC patients treated with radical (chemo-) radiotherapy and a Transiderm-Nitro 5 patch during radiotherapy. Patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CTs (DCE-CT) and HX4 (hypoxia) PET/CTs before and after nitroglycerin. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, toxicity and the prognostic value of tumour perfusion/hypoxia at baseline and after nitroglycerin. Results: The trial stopped after a futility analysis after 42 patients. At median follow-up of 41 months, two-year and median OS were 58% (95% CI: 44–78%) and 38 months (95% CI: 22–54 months), respectively. Nitroglycerin could not reduce tumour hypoxia. DCE-CT parameters did not correlate with OS, whereas hypoxic tumours had a worse OS (p = 0.029). Changes in high-uptake fraction of HX4 and tumour blood flow were negatively correlated (r = -0.650, p = 0.022). The heterogeneity in treatment modalities and patient characteristics combined with a small sample size made further subgroup analysis of survival results impossible. Toxicity related to nitroglyerin was limited to headache (17%) and hypotension (2.4%). Conclusion: Nitroglycerin did not improve OS of NSCLC patients treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy. A general ability of nitroglycerin to reduce hypoxia was not shown. Keywords: Nitroglycerin, HX4, NSCLC, Hypoxia, Perfusion, Mitochondria

Tumour hypoxia has been associated with increased resistance to various cancer treatments, particularly radiation therapy. Conversely, tumour hypoxia is a validated and ideal target for guided cancer drug delivery. For this reason, hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) have been developed, which remain inactive in the body until in the presence of tissue hypoxia, allowing for an activation tendency in hypoxic regions. We present here an experimentally motivated mathematical model predicting the effectiveness of HAPs in a variety of clinical settings. We first examined HAP effectiveness as a function of the amount of tumour hypoxia and showed that the drugs have a larger impact on tumours with high levels of hypoxia. We then combined HAP treatment with radiation to examine the effects of combination therapies. Our results showed radiation-HAP combination therapies to be more effective against highly hypoxic tumours. The analysis of combination therapies was extended to consider schedule sequencing of the combination treatments. These results suggested that administering HAPs before radiation was most effective in reducing total cell number. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the drug-related parameters was done to examine the effect of drug diffusivity and enzyme abundance on the overall effectiveness of the drug. Altogether, the results highlight the importance of the knowledge of tumour hypoxia levels before administration of HAPs in order to ensure positive results.

Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) are designed to specifically target the hypoxic cells of tumors, which are an important cause of treatment resistance to conventional therapies. Despite promising preclinical and clinical phase I and II results, the most important of which are described in this review, the implementation of hypoxia-activated prodrugs in the clinic has, so far, not been successful. The lack of stratification of patients based on tumor hypoxia status, which can vary widely, is sufficient to account for the failure of phase III trials. To fully exploit the potential of hypoxia-activated prodrugs, hypoxia stratification of patients is needed. Here, we propose a biomarker-stratified enriched Phase III study design in which only biomarker-positive (i.e. hypoxia-positive) patients are randomized between standard treatment and the combination of standard treatment with a hypoxia-activated prodrug. This implies the necessity of a Phase II study in which the biomarker or a combination of biomarkers will be evaluated. The total number of patients needed for both clinical studies will be far lower than in currently used randomize-all designs. In addition, we elaborate on the improvements in HAP design that are feasible to increase the treatment success rates. Keywords: Hypoxia-activated prodrugs, Phase III clinical trial, Biomarker, Hypoxia

Background Poorly immunogenic tumors are hardly responsive to immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and are, therefore, a therapeutic challenge. Combination with other immunotherapies and/or immunogenic therapies, such as radiotherapy (RT), could make these tumors more immune responsive. We have previously shown that the immunocytokine L19–IL2 combined with single-dose RT resulted in 75% tumor remission and a 20% curative abscopal effect in the T cell-inflamed C51 colon carcinoma model. This treatment schedule was associated with the upregulation of inhibitory immune checkpoint (IC) molecules on tumor-infiltrating T cells, leading to only tumor growth delay in the poorly immunogenic Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) model.Methods We aimed to trigger curative therapeutic responses in three tumor models (LLC, C51 and CT26) by “pushing the accelerator” of tumor immunity with L19–IL2 and/or “releasing the brakes” with ICB, such as antibodies directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1), combined with single-dose RT (10 Gy or 5 Gy). Primary tumor endpoint was defined as time to reach four times the size of tumor volume at start of treatment (4T×SV). Multivariate analysis of 4T×SV was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model comparing each treatment group with controls. Causal involvement of T and natural killer (NK) cells in the anti-tumor effect was assessed by in vivo depletion of T, NK or both cell populations. Immune profiling was performed using flow cytometry on single cell suspensions from spleens, bone marrow, tumors and blood.Results Combining RT, anti-PD-L1 and L19–IL2 cured 38% of LLC tumors, which was both CD8+ T and NK cell dependent. LLC tumors were resistant to RT +anti-PD-L1 likely explained by the upregulation of other IC molecules and increased T regulatory cell tumor infiltration. RT+L19–IL2 outperformed RT+ICB in C51 tumors; effects were comparable in CT26 tumors. Triple combinations were not superior to RT+L19–IL2 in both these models.Conclusions This study demonstrated that combinatorial strategies rationally designed on biological effects can turn immunotherapy-resistant tumors into immunologically responsive tumors. This hypothesis is currently being tested in the international multicentric randomized phase 2 trial: ImmunoSABR (NCT03705403).

Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) present a conceptually elegant approach to not only overcome, but better yet, exploit intra-tumoural hypoxia. Despite being successful in vitro and in vivo, HAPs are yet to achieve successful results in clinical settings. It has been hypothesised that this lack of clinical success can, in part, be explained by the insufficiently stringent clinical screening selection of determining which tumours are suitable for HAP treatments. Taking a mathematical modelling approach, we investigate how tumour properties and HAP-radiation scheduling influence treatment outcomes in simulated tumours. The following key results are demonstrated in silico: (i) HAP and ionising radiation (IR) monotherapies may attack tumours in dissimilar, and complementary, ways. (ii) HAP-IR scheduling may impact treatment efficacy. (iii) HAPs may function as IR treatment intensifiers. (iv) The spatio-temporal intra-tumoural oxygen landscape may impact HAP efficacy. Our in silico framework is based on an on-lattice, hybrid, multiscale cellular automaton spanning three spatial dimensions. The mathematical model for tumour spheroid growth is parameterised by multicellular tumour spheroid (MCTS) data.