Search

Background: Currently, no medical therapy is effective in limiting progression of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA; ≤5.5 cm). Previously, we have demonstrated safety and efficacy of exercise training in patients with AAA. However, the impact of exercise training on vascular markers of AAA progression, such as lipid accumulation product and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9, linked to destruction of aortic matrix), is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of exercise training on AAA diameter, lipid accumulation product, MMP-9, and other risk markers of vascular disease.Methods: In this randomized trial, complete data of 96 patients (male: n = 87, female: n = 9; exercise training (exercise) n = 42, usual care n = 54) were studied. Changes in AAA diameter, exercise capacity, lipid accumulation product (men = [waist circumference 65] × fasting triglycerides; women = [waist circumference -58] × triglycerides) and MMP-9 were performed.Results: The exercise group demonstrated a significant increase in maximal exercise time and estimated metabolic equivalent of tasks. Lipid accumulation product decreased in exercise and increased in usual care (P < .001 between groups); MMP-9 remained statistically unchanged in exercise, but increased significantly in usual care (P = .005; between groups P = .094). In both groups, there was a significant increase in transverse diameter, but no difference between groups; neither group assignment nor level of fitness correlated with AAA enlargement. No adverse clinical events occurred.Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that in AAA, exercise beneficially modifies lipid accumulation product and MMP-9, both markers of vascular disease, without inducing aneurysmal growth beyond what is otherwise observed during usual care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is still unpredictable. The issue of optimal frequency of computed tomography angiography for surveillance and its measurement method accuracy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the value of abdominal aneurysm sac volume measurement for detecting expansions and the association of preprocedural intraluminal thrombus (ILT) volume with aneurysm sac growth following EVAR. Material and methods: A total of 107 patients underwent elective EVAR. Inclusion criteria provided a cohort of 39 patients. Changes of postoperative maximum aneurysm sac diameter and AAA volume were calculated. Volumetric AAA changes and demographic data of the cases with clinically irrelevant AAA diameter enlargement were evaluated. Preoperative ILT volumes were collected. ILT and AAA sac volume ratio was calculated. Statistical data analysis was performed using standard methods. Results: The mean changes of maximum AAA diameter and volume in percentage after EVAR were -5.08 ± 8.20 mm and -13.39 ± 23.32%, respectively. A moderate positive linear correlation between those changes was found (R2 = 0.731; p < 0.0001). The mean relative AAA volume increase in cases without clinically relevant diameter enlargement was 11.50 ± 8.27%. The means of ILT and AAA sac ratios were 0.59 ± 0.17 and 0.52 ± 1.8 in growing AAA sac and in stable or shrinking AAA sac groups, respectively (p = 0.308). Conclusions: Volumetric AAA measurement may be useful as an additional method to diameter measurement after EVAR to identify clinically relevant sac growth. Preoperative volume of ILT may not significantly affect the growth rate of AAA after EVAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: To examine whether indices other than the traditionally used abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameter, such as AAA volume, intraluminal thrombus (ILT) thickness and ILT volume, may be superior to evaluate aneurismal enlargement. Materials and methods: Thirty-four small AAAs (initially presenting a maximum diameter <5.5cm which is the threshold for surgical repair) with an initial and a follow-up CT were examined. Median increase and percentile annual change of these variables was calculated. Correlation between growth rates as determined by the new indices under evaluation and those of maximum diameter were assessed. AAAs were divided according to outcome (surveillance vs. elective repair after follow-up which is based on the maximum diameter criterion) and according to growth rate (high vs. low) based on four indices. Contingency between groups of high/low growth rate regarding each of the four indices on one hand and those regarding need for surgical repair on the other was assessed. Results: A strong correlation between growth rates of maximum diameter and those of AAA and ILT volumes could be established. Evaluation of contingency between groups of outcome and those of growth rate revealed significant associations only for AAA and ILT volumes. Subsequently AAAs with a rapid volumetric increase over time had a likelihood ratio of 10 to be operated compared to those with a slower enlargement. Regarding increase of maximum diameter, likelihood ratio between AAAs with rapid and those with slow expansion was only 3. Conclusion: Growth rate of aneurysms regarding 3Dimensional indices of AAA and ILT volumes is significantly associated with the need for surgical intervention while the same does not hold for growth rates determined by 2Dimensional indices of maximum diameter and ILT thickness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]