1. Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain
- Author
-
S.M. van Ruth, Yuzheng Yang, J.M.L. Heck, Liu Ningjing, Kasper Hettinga, Wim Huisman, G.H. Schrijver, L. Gaiardoni, Criminology, A-LAB, and Empirical and Normative Studies
- Subjects
Milk adulteration ,SDG 16 - Peace ,Supply chain ,Control (management) ,Vulnerability ,01 natural sciences ,ATV Farm Technology ,0404 agricultural biotechnology ,Order (exchange) ,Vulnerability assessment ,BU Authenticity & Bioassays ,Fraud mitigation ,Marketing ,Organic milk ,Fraud factor ,SDG 2 - Zero Hunger ,health care economics and organizations ,VLAG ,010401 analytical chemistry ,SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions ,food and beverages ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,040401 food science ,Dairy supply chain ,Chain (unit) ,humanities ,Justice and Strong Institutions ,0104 chemical sciences ,Food Quality and Design ,BU Authenticiteit & Bioassays ,Organic farming ,Business ,Organic farm ,Food Science ,Biotechnology - Abstract
Food fraud surfaces regularly, anywhere in the world. Not only the companies involved in food fraud suffer from losses when food fraud occurs, other actors in the supply chain and branch of industry are often painted with the same brush. Milk has been a common fraud target in the past and, therefore, fraud is a concern for companies involved in milk production. In order to manage and prevent fraud in the milk supply chain, a good insight into the vulnerabilities of companies and their supply chain networks is pivotal. The aim of the current study is to understand (a) the fraud vulnerability of the general milk supply chain in the Netherlands and its tiers (farmers, processors, retailers) and (b) the differences in fraud vulnerability of farmers producing organic milk, green intermediate ‘pasture milk’ and conventional milk. The SSAFE food fraud assessment tool was slightly adapted to the milk supply chain and used to examine the fraud vulnerability of the 38 businesses of the three tiers in the study: 30 farmers, 4 milk processors and 4 retailers. Forty-eight fraud factors related to opportunities, motivations and control measures were examined. Subsequently, key fraud factors were identified. The three tier groups showed major similarities in motivation related fraud factors, and large differences in fraud opportunities and controls. There were also differences observed between the organic and non-organic farmers, with organic farmers being slightly more vulnerable than their non-organic counterparts. From this study it appears that the milk supply chain in the Netherlands is low to medium vulnerable to fraud but the key factors contributing to the vulnerability differ between the tiers (farmers, processors, retailers). Management of the fraud risks requires consideration of these differences.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF