Search

Purpose: Treatment options for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are limited. A recent phase 2 study found that proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) was well-tolerated and improved survival. We report our experience with pCSI for solid-tumor LM., Methods and Materials: This is a retrospective review of patients treated with pCSI for solid-tumor LM from December 2020 to January 2024 at our center. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Median overall survival and median central nervous system progression-free survival from the first day of pCSI were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves., Results: We identified 45 patients who completed pCSI. The median age was 54 years (range, 23-79); 73% were female, and 53% lived more than 100 miles from our center. Breast cancer (53%), lung cancer (20%), and melanoma (9%) were the most common primary cancers; 51% of patients had stable systemic disease at LM diagnosis. All had imaging evidence of LM, and 64% of cases were confirmed using cytologic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid. Eighty percent had symptomatic LM, and the median Karnofsky performance scale at LM diagnosis was 80. The median time from primary cancer diagnosis to LM detection was 23.1 months (range, 0-221.3). Fifty-three percent of patients had active brain metastasis at LM diagnosis; 33% of all patients had received prior intracranial radiation. The median time from simulation to pCSI start was 12 days. At the first visit following pCSI, the median Karnofsky performance scale score was 70. During or right after radiation, 76% of patients reported nausea, 51% headache, and 31% fatigue. Following pCSI, 4% received intrathecal chemotherapy, 67% systemic therapy, and 9% hospice care; 18% were observed and 2% lost to follow-up. Median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to not reached), and median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.9-12.8)., Conclusions: The outcomes in our cohort are comparable to those recently reported in a phase 2 trial. Further study is indicated to determine the optimal candidates for pCSI and sequential therapies., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reinvigorate anti-tumor immune responses by disrupting co-inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Although ICIs have had unprecedented success and have become the standard of care for many cancers, they are often accompanied by off-target inflammation that can occur in any organ system. These immune related adverse events (irAEs) often require steroid use and/or cessation of ICI therapy, which can both lead to cancer progression. Although irAEs are common, the detailed molecular and immune mechanisms underlying their development are still elusive. To further our understanding of irAEs and develop effective treatment options, there is pressing need for preclinical models recapitulating the clinical settings. In this review, we describe current preclinical models and immune implications of ICI-induced skin toxicities, colitis, neurological and endocrine toxicities, pneumonitis, arthritis, and myocarditis along with their management., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Keam, Turner, Kugeratski, Rico, Colunga-Minutti, Poojary, Alekseev, Patel, Li, Sheshadri, Loghin, Woodman, Aaroe, Hamidi, Iyer, Palaskas, Wang and Nurieva.)

Background: We observed rapid tumor progression following COVID-19 infection among patients with glioblastoma and sought to systematically characterize their disease course in a retrospective case-control study., Methods: Using an institutional database, we retrospectively identified a series of COVID-19-positive glioblastoma cases and matched them by age and sex 1:2 to glioblastoma controls who had a negative COVID-19 test during their disease course. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Hyperprogression was defined using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Thirty-two glioblastoma cases with positive COVID-19 testing were matched to 64 glioblastoma controls with negative testing; age, sex, and molecular profiles did not differ between groups. Progression events occurred in 27 cases (84%) and 46 controls (72%). Of these, 14 cases (52%) presented with multifocal disease or leptomeningeal disease at progression compared with 10 controls (22%; P  = .0082). Hyperprogression was identified in 13 cases (48%) but only 4 controls (9%; P  = .0001). Cases had disease progression at a median of 35 days following COVID-19 testing, compared with 164 days for controls ( P  = .0001). Median survival from COVID-19 testing until death was 8.3 months for cases but 17 months for controls ( P  = .0016). Median overall survival from glioblastoma diagnosis was 20.7 months for cases and 24.6 months for controls ( P  = .672)., Conclusions: Patients with glioblastoma may have accelerated disease progression in the first 2 months after COVID-19 infection. Infected patients should be monitored vigilantly. Future investigations should explore tumor-immune microenvironment changes linking tumor progression and COVID-19., Competing Interests: V.K.P. reports the following disclosures: Advisory board role and honoraria from Servier, Insightec, Novocure, and Orbus therapeutics, and equity in Moderna, Amarin and Gilead. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. As it is increasingly introduced into routine clinical practice, immune-related complications have become more frequent. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential, with the goal of reduced patient morbidity. This review aims to discuss the various clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatments, and prognosis of neurologic complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and T-cell redirecting therapies. We also outline a suggested clinical approach related to the clinical use of these agents.

An Editor-in-Chief leads the editorial team and supervises the daily tasks required to prepare articles for publication while managing the overall content and style of the journal. To become Editor-in-Chief, one must have dedicated work ethic, close attention to detail, passion for the editorial process, and a keen ability to work with and give feedback to section editors and authors. For this article, we interviewed Dr. Steven L. Lewis, Dr. Joseph E. Safdieh, and Dr. S. Andrew Josephson about their collective experience of becoming Editors-in-Chief of Continuum , Neurology Today , and JAMA Neurology , respectively. We have compiled tips for aspiring medical writers and editors, based on their expert advice, to guide trainees in this potential career path., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: To determine whether cerebrovascular risk factors are associated with subsequent diagnoses of Parkinson disease, and whether these associations are similar in magnitude to those with subsequent diagnoses of Alzheimer disease., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 to 2015. The exposures were stroke, atrial fibrillation, coronary disease, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, sleep apnea, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, valvular heart disease, tobacco use, and alcohol abuse. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson disease. The secondary outcome was a new diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Marginal structural Cox models adjusting for time-dependent confounding were used to characterize the association between exposures and outcomes. We also evaluated the association between cerebrovascular risk factors and subsequent renal colic (negative control)., Results: Among 1,035,536 Medicare beneficiaries followed for a mean of 5.2 years, 15,531 (1.5%) participants were diagnosed with Parkinson disease and 81,974 (7.9%) were diagnosed with Alzheimer disease. Most evaluated cerebrovascular risk factors, including prior stroke (hazard ratio = 1.55; 95% confidence interval = 1.39-1.72), were associated with the subsequent diagnosis of Parkinson disease. The magnitudes of these associations were similar, but attenuated, to the associations between cerebrovascular risk factors and Alzheimer disease. Confirming the validity of our analytical model, most cerebrovascular risk factors were not associated with the subsequent diagnosis of renal colic., Interpretation: Cerebrovascular risk factors are associated with Parkinson disease, an effect comparable to their association with Alzheimer disease. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:572-581., (© 2019 American Neurological Association.)

Purpose of Review: Peripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell neoplasms comprise approximately 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. There are 27 different subtypes of peripheral NK and T cell neoplasms, each of which is relatively uncommon. Treatment has been largely extrapolated from case series, retrospective reports, and paradigms developed for the aggressive B cell lymphomas. This review explores the current knowledge of the characteristics, outcome, and treatment of CNS T cell and NK neoplasms., Recent Findings: Primary and secondary CNS NK and T cell malignancies confer significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Despite clinical heterogeneity between the 27 subtypes, high-dose methotrexate-based regimens seem most effective overall. The role of prophylaxis against secondary CNS involvement remains controversial. Autologous stem cell transplant and immunotherapy are potential for promising future therapies. Current understanding of incidence, outcome, and optimal treatment strategies for CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is limited, in large part due to their diversity and rarity. Prognosis is poor, except in a few reports of long-term survival in patients most often treated with combination therapy including high-dose methotrexate. A future prospective study on treatment and outcome in CNS T cell and NK neoplasms is needed to better define these diseases.