Search

Background: Our aim was to investigate oral health in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients in relation to long-term survival. We assessed whether the level of alveolar bone loss due to periodontitis at diagnosis, measured from orthopantomogram (OPG), and reported dental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores obtained at diagnosis contain prognostic information for HNSCC patients., Methods: A total of 79 patients from a consecutive cohort of 106 diagnosed with HNSCC between November 2002 and June 2005 were included. All patients reported dental HRQoL, OPG-determined alveolar bone loss were measured in 79 patients at diagnosis. Reduced alveolar bone loss (≥ 4 mm) from cement-enamel junction on at least two molars or premolars registered both horizontally and vertically served as indicator of periodontal disease., Results: With alveolar bone loss, we determined increased mortality by univariate analysis (RR = 2.28, CI: 1.22-4.28, p = 0.01) and a strong trend by multivariate analyses adjusted for standard clinical information (RR = 1.95, CI: 0.98-3.87, p = 0.056). Reported lowered dental HRQoL scores predicted long-term survival in both univariate (RR = 3.58, CI: 1.99-6.45, p < 0.001) and multivariate adjusted for standard clinical information (RR = 2.17, CI: 1.17-4.01, p = 0.014). When analyzed with Cox regression, including alveolar bone loss and dental HRQoL, both factors, adjusted by clinical variables, were significant predictors of long-term survival: dental HRQoL (p = 0.007) and present alveolar bone loss (p = 0.034). Non-HNSCC disease-specific long-term survival predicted was also predicted when alveolar bone loss and dental HRQoL were analyzed simultaneously and adjusted for standard clinical information., Conclusions: The degree of alveolar bone loss, as determined by OPG, and dental HRQoL both obtained at the time of HNSCC diagnosis, predicted long-term survival. When analyzed simultaneously, both factors remained significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusted by pertinent clinical variables, highlighting their unique prognostic value., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The study was approved by the Norwegian regional ethics committee (REK VEST 2011 − 125) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all the participants in the study. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of transition interventions to safeguard patient safety and satisfaction during patients' transition from hospital to home health care., Design: Systematic review., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Ovid Nursing Database, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Clinical Trials and SveMed+ was systematic searched in January 2019 and September 2020 to identify peer-reviewed papers. No language, geographical or publication date restrictions., Review Methods: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used. Data analysis focused on aggregated data and a descriptive synthesis. Risk of bias was rated using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool., Results: In total, 10,524 references were identified in the literature search, twenty-six articles were included. The interventions were divided into three main groups: (i). systematic patient education pre-discharge; (ii). establishment of contact with the local healthcare services pre-discharge and (iii). follow-up initiated by nurses from the hospital at home post-discharge. The studies either used one intervention or combined two or three interventions. We considered the intervention to improve patient safety or satisfaction when they reported statistically significant results. Only four interventions increased both patient safety and satisfaction, seven interventions increased patient safety and thirteen increased patient satisfaction. Interventions that appear to be quite similar, with the same duration, measured different effects on patients' satisfaction and safety. Interventions that ensured patient safety did not necessarily facilitate patient satisfaction and vice versa., Conclusion: Interventions can improve patient safety and satisfaction during transfer. However, interventions that improve patient safety or satisfaction do not always match., Impact: This review suggests that transition interventions can improve patients' safety and satisfaction. However, to compare the impact of future interventions is it important to use standardized measurement tools of satisfaction. There is a need to try out tailored interventions, where interventions are customized to the needs of each patient., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Data on preoperative distress and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is lacking for patients with newly diagnosed renal tumors. This study aims to compare HRQoL within this group with the general population and to study the relationship between distress, HRQoL, personality, coping, and patient/tumor-related factors. Materials and methods: Between January 2011 and June 2014, 153 patients (100 males/53 females), scheduled for surgery were prospectively included. Distress was determined by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), HRQoL by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, personality by Eysenck Personality Inventory and coping by COPE questionnaire. HRQoL-data from an age and gender matched Norwegian reference population was used for comparison. Results: The study patients had significantly poorer HRQoL than the reference population. GHQ and HRQoL sum scores had a common variance (CV = r 2 ) of 29-35%. In regression models, the measured variables accounted for 33% of the variance for the GHQ score. Significant predictors of the measured variance were neuroticism (18%), education level (3%) and avoidant coping (2%). Similarly, the measured variables accounted for 33-44% of the variance for the HRQoL sum scores. For all HRQoL sum scores, neuroticism predicted 17-28%, while education predicted 4-11% of the measured variance. Large tumor size, comorbidity, performance status and CRP predicted 2-7% of individual sum scores. Conclusions: For both preoperative distress and HRQoL, personality traits such as neuroticism and education level were the most important predictors. Tumor-related factors and other preexisting conditions seemed to be of lesser importance. Thus, preoperatively screening of psychological factors could be helpful to identify those at risk of poor outcomes.

Purpose: To study the 10-year overall survival predictions, and mechanisms behind, of head and neck (HN) quality of life (QoL) scores obtained at diagnosis and 6, 9, and 12 months following diagnosis in a cohort of HN squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients., Methods: Consecutive HNSCC patients (N = 109) subjected to standard workup and treatment self-reported their QoL measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) H&N-35 between November 2002 and June 2005. Each QoL index was calculated and additionally aggregated to one sum score. The included patients were at diagnosis younger than 78 years, judged adequately cognitive functioning, and scheduled for curative treatment. Self-reported smoking, alcohol consumption, and socio-demographic information were registered. Twenty-two patients were high-risk (hr)-HPV DNA tumor positive. If the treatment goal was changed to palliative, no new QoL information was collected. All living patients were followed until 10 years after diagnosis., Results: Median survival was 105 months. Significant overall survival predictions were found from the EORTC H&N-35 QLQ sum scores continuously measured at diagnosis (p = 0.006) and obtained at 6 (p = 0.02), 9 (p = 0.002) and 12 (p = 0.05) months. Lower QoL predicted lower overall survival. These sum score survival predictions were in part independent of TNM stage, hr-HPV status, gender, age, alcohol and smoking status. The indices "pain", "swallowing", "social eating", and "feeling ill" were predictive of survival at 3 out of 4 measuring points (diagnosis, 6, 9 and 12 months) in univariate analyses., Conclusion: EORTC H&N-35 QLQ scores at diagnosis and throughout the first year thereafter harbor prognostic power.

Objectives: To evaluate the 5- and 10-year survival prediction of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores obtained at diagnosis and at 6, 9 and 12 months after diagnosis in a cohort of curable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients., Materials and Methods: HNSCC patients (n = 109) reported their HRQoL measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) general (C30) questionnaire. At diagnosis, the included patients were below 78 years of age and at diagnosis planned treated with curative intent. Clinical variables and self-reported smoking, alcohol consumption and socio-demographic information were registered. From diagnostic blocks, we found 22 patients to be human papillomavirus (HPV) positive. New HRQoL scores were not obtained if the patient treatment changed from curative to palliative throughout the HRQoL data acquisition. Survival was determined from the National Population Register of Norway., Results: Decreased survival with low HRQoL scores from EORTC QLQ scores was demonstrated with HRQoL scores obtained from different time points of the four time points studied. These survival predictions were mostly independent of HPV status, gender, age, TNM stage, tumor site, alcohol consumption, present smoking status and whether comorbidities were present at diagnosis; as well as to some extent with an adjustment of the same HRQoL score/index obtained at diagnosis. The specific indices "physical function", "general pain" and "sleep disturbance" were in particular predictive of survival., Conclusion: HRQoL scores obtained throughout the first year after diagnosis contained prognostic power to overall survival when measured both at 5 and 10 years of observation.

Objectives: To evaluate the predictive effect of level of perceived distress on survival in a cohort of newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients., Materials and Methods: One hundred and one (N=101) consecutive HNSCC patients self-reported their levels of distress, measured with the general health questionnaire 30 (GHQ-30) at the time of diagnosis. All included patients were younger than 78years of age, cognitive adequate functioning, and scheduled for curative treatment. At the time of diagnosis self-reported levels of neuroticism, problem and avoidance focused coping, smoking and alcohol consumption, and sociodemographic information were registered. Clinical characteristics and comorbidities were determined from the patient hospital records., Results: The 5-year overall survival of the cohort was 68.3%. Thirty-two deaths occurred during the 5-year observation period. The Likert analyzed GHQ sum score, as well as a dichotomized GHQ score were found to predict survival in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The hazard ratios were 1.04 (p=.04) and 2.78 (p=.01), respectively. The predictive effect of the GHQ scores remained significant throughout sequential multivariate analyses with adjustments for all the above mentioned covariates. Even a post hoc analysis including all covariates demonstrated an evident survival prediction., Conclusion: Self-reported distress measured pretreatment in newly diagnosed HNSCC patients predict survival. Further studies are warranted to elucidate mechanisms and possible interventions., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)