1. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment—A systematic literature review.
- Author
-
Abdul, Malika, Ingabire, Ale, Lam, Chin Yu Nicole, Bennett, Bindi, Menzel, Kelly, MacKenzie‐Shalders, Kristen, and van Herwerden, Louise
- Subjects
- *
CINAHL database , *PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems , *SUSTAINABILITY , *CULTURAL identity , *MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems , *FOCUS groups , *FOOD security , *COMMUNITY health services , *INTERVIEWING , *TRANSCULTURAL medical care , *PSYCHOSOCIAL factors , *INTERPROFESSIONAL relations , *QUALITY assurance , *INDIGENOUS peoples , *NATURAL foods , *LITERATURE reviews , *MEDLINE - Abstract
Aims: The aims of this systematic review were to (1) identify assessment approaches of Indigenous food sovereignty using the core domains of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability, (2) describe Indigenous research methodologies when assessing Indigenous food sovereignty. Methods: Guided by Indigenous members of the research team, a systematic review across four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) was performed. Studies in any language from 1996 to 2021, that used one or more of the core domains (identified from a recent scoping review) of community ownership, inclusion of traditional food knowledge, inclusion/promotion of cultural foods and environmental/intervention sustainability were included. Results: From 20 062 records, after exclusion criteria were applied, 34 studies were included. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly qualitative (n = 17) or mixed methods (n = 16), with interviews the most utilised (n = 29), followed by focus groups and meetings (n = 23) and validated frameworks (n = 7) as assessment tools. Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches were mostly around inclusion of traditional food knowledge (n = 21), or environmental/intervention sustainability (n = 15). Community‐Based Participatory Research approaches were utilised across many studies (n = 26), with one‐third utilising Indigenous methods of inquiry. Acknowledgement of data sovereignty (n = 6) or collaboration with Indigenous researchers (n = 4) was limited. Conclusion: This review highlights Indigenous food sovereignty assessment approaches in the literature worldwide. It emphasises the importance of using Indigenous research methodologies in research conducted by or with Indigenous Peoples and acknowledges Indigenous communities should lead future research in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF