Search

About 5%-10% of pregnancies in the US are exposed to cannabis with highest use reported during the first trimester. Two recent meta-analyses presented estimates of the risk of birth defects associated with prenatal exposure to cannabis; the larger and more recent meta-analysis pooled data from 18 cohort and 18 case-control studies with a total sample size of >19 million subjects. The meta-analyses found that prenatal exposure to cannabis was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of any birth defect (pooled odds ratios [ORs], 1.25-1.33); ORs were also significantly elevated for cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, nervous system, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal but not orofacial birth defects. The ORs were smaller and less likely to be statistically significant in adjusted analyses. These meta-analyses had strengths but also shortcomings. The strengths and shortcomings are explained in detail so that readers obtain a better understanding of how to critically assess findings in meta-analyses. One strength was the presentation of both unadjusted and adjusted pooled estimates; the former allow an understanding of risks in the average real world patient and the latter allow an understanding of the unique contribution of the exposure to the outcomes. Another strength was the presentation of cumulative meta-analyses which demonstrated from which calendar year onwards a finding became consistently statistically significant in the scientific literature. One shortcoming, in analyses of subcategories of birth defects, was the repeated representation of the same sample in the same forest plot; the many reasons why this is problematic are explained. Another shortcoming was the pooling of ORs obtained from cohort studies with those obtained from case control studies; conceptual and numerical reasons why this is problematic are also explained., (© Copyright 2024 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Importance: Safety data on tetracycline antibiotic use during pregnancy are limited., Objective: To investigate the association between first trimester exposure to tetracyclines and the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from nationwide registers for singleton infants live-born in Sweden from July 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018, with follow-up through December 2019. Tetracycline-exposed and unexposed infants were matched on propensity scores (ratio 1:10). Data analysis was performed from June 2023 to May 2024., Exposure: First trimester exposure to tetracyclines determined from maternal prescription fills, compared with no exposure., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was any MCM diagnosed in the first year of life; secondary outcomes were 12 major malformation organ system subgroups and 16 individual malformations selected on the basis of prior safety signals and/or fulfillment of prespecified statistical power criteria. Malformations were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes aligned to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) classification. Log binomial regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs., Results: From a source cohort of 1 245 889 eligible infants (640 892 male [51.4%]), a propensity score-matched analytical cohort of 69 656 infants (35 903 male [51.5%]) was generated. Of 6340 infants exposed to tetracyclines during the first trimester (3325 male [52.4%]), 252 received a diagnosis of any MCM (39.75 cases per 1000 infants; 95% CI, 35.14-44.93 cases per 1000 infants) compared with 2454 of 63 316 unexposed infants (38.76 cases per 1000 infants; 95% CI, 37.27-40.30 cases per 1000 infants). Tetracycline exposure was not associated with any MCM (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.16). The RRs for specific tetracycline substances were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.93-1.23) for doxycycline, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.60-1.15) for lymecycline, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.32-1.92) for tetracycline-oxytetracycline. There was no increased risk for 10 of 12 malformation subgroups or for any of the 16 individual malformations analyzed. The higher RRs in the main analysis for nervous system anomalies (1.92; 95% CI, 0.98-3.78) and eye anomalies (1.76; 95% CI, 1.07-2.91) were attenuated in a sensitivity analysis with follow-up extended to age 3 years (nervous system anomalies, RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.52-2.24; eye anomalies, RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.88-2.29)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, first trimester tetracycline exposure was not associated with increased risks of any MCMs. Additional studies are needed to rule out potential risks owing to power limitations for several MCM subgroups and individual malformations.

Mifepristone is an anti-progestational drug that is the first component of the standard medical abortion regimen. For women who take mifepristone and then do not take misoprostol, which is the second component of the medical abortion regimen, it is possible that their pregnancy may continue to live birth. Since mifepristone is commonly used for medical abortion up to 9-10 weeks gestation, any adverse or teratogenic effects on the developing embryo/fetus must be considered, given exposure during the critical time of its development and organogenesis. Toxicology and teratology reports have cited studies demonstrating teratogenic effect of mifepristone in some animals. Current clinical guidelines for women exposed to mifepristone in the first trimester of pregnancy state that it is not known to be teratogenic based on limited published evidence from humans. The aim of this narrative systematic review was to investigate embryonic/fetal exposure to mifepristone and any association with congenital or fetal anomalies. This study was conducted by systematic searches of health databases from inception to February 2024. The references of relevant citations were manually searched to retrieve any additional citations not captured in database searching. Congenital anomalies and adverse outcomes were encountered at various doses of mifepristone exposure. A number of the congenital anomalies encountered in this review were explained by circumstances other than exposure to mifepristone. The present systematic review did not find data to support mifepristone being implicated as a teratogen., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are not recommended during the second and third trimester because of the significant risk of congenital anomalies associated with their use. However, data are scarce, especially regarding their use in the first trimester and about the impact of stopping just before pregnancy. Our study illustrates the profile of the women who used ACE-Is or ARBs during pregnancy and evaluates the impact on perinatal outcomes. The Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease is a prospective, global registry of pregnancies in women with structural heart disease. Outcomes were compared between women who used ACE-Is or ARBs and those who did not. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of ACE-I or ARB use on the occurrence of congenital anomalies. ACE-Is (n = 35) and/or ARBs (n = 8) were used in 42 (0.7%) of the 5,739 Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease pregnancies. Women who used ACE-Is or ARBs more often came from a low-or-middle-income country (57% vs 40%, p = 0.021), had chronic hypertension (31% vs 6%, p <0.001), or a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (33% vs 4%, p <0.001). In the multivariable analysis, ACE-I use during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of congenital anomaly (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 9.6). Therefore, ACE-Is should be avoided during pregnancy, also in the first trimester, because of a higher risk of congenital anomalies. However, there is no need to stop long before pregnancy. Preconception counseling is crucial to discuss the potential risks of these medications, to evaluate the clinical condition and, if possible, to change or stop the medication., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: An increasing number of observational studies have investigated the risk of using drugs during pregnancy on congenital malformations. However, the credibility of the causal relationships drawn from these studies remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the potential methodological issues in existing observational studies., Methods: We used a stepwise approach to investigate this issue. First, we identified observational studies published in 2020 that examined the risk of congenital malformations associated with medication use during pregnancy. We assessed the methodological characteristics for establishing causality, including study design, confounding control, and sensitivity analysis, and compared them between "core clinical journals" and "general journals." For studies reporting an increased risk of congenital malformations in core clinical journals, we searched for subsequent studies addressing the same research question published between January 2021 and May 2023 to assess the consistency of the literature., Results: A total of 40 eligible studies were published in 2020, primarily focused on the safety of vitamin B 12 and folic acid (n = 4), antidepressants (n = 4), and others (n = 32). Our findings suggest that only two (5.00%) studies used causal models to guide the identification of confounding, and only eight (20.00%) studies assessed the potential dose-response relationship. In all, 15 (37.50%) studies used propensity score analysis strategy to achieve "mimic-randomization." In addition, 22 studies (55.00%) performed sensitivity analyses, while 10 (45.45%) showed inconsistency with the primary outcome. Furthermore, 5 studies reported positive outcomes, whereas only 1 out of 11 studies demonstrated a positive correlation between drug usage during pregnancy and major malformations in subsequent studies., Conclusion: A significant portion of the studies has failed to sufficiently consider the essential methodological characteristics required to improve the credibility of causal inferences. The increased risk of congenital malformations documented in core clinical journal was not adequately replicated in subsequent studies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between paternal metformin use and risk of congenital malformations in offspring., Design: Population based, cross national cohort study., Setting: Norway and Taiwan., Participants: 619 389 offspring with paternal data during the period of sperm development (three months before pregnancy) in the Norwegian cohort during 2010-21 and 2 563 812 in the Taiwanese cohort during 2004-18., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was any congenital malformation, and the secondary outcome was organ specific malformations, classified according to the European surveillance of congenital anomalies guidelines. Relative risks were estimated with an unadjusted analysis and with analyses restricted to the cohort of men with type 2 diabetes mellitus and those using overlap propensity score weighting to control for severity of diabetes and other potential confounders. Sibling matched comparisons were conducted to account for genetic and lifestyle factors. Relative risk estimates for Norwegian and Taiwanese data were pooled using a random effects meta-analytical approach., Results: Paternal data on metformin use during the period of sperm development was available for 2075 (0.3%) offspring in Norway and 15 276 (0.6%) offspring in Taiwan. Among these offspring, 104 (5.0%) in Norway and 512 (3.4%) in Taiwan had congenital malformations. Increased risks of any congenital malformation associated with paternal metformin use were observed in the unadjusted analysis and attenuated with increasing control of confounding. The relative risks of any malformations with paternal metformin use were 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.55) in Norway and 1.08 (0.99 to 1.17) in Taiwan in the unadjusted analysis and 1.20 (0.94 to 1.53) and 0.93 (0.80 to 1.07), respectively, in the analysis restricted to fathers with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In the overlap propensity score weighting analysis restricted to fathers with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the relative risks were 0.98 (0.72 to 1.33) in Norway and 0.87 (0.74 to 1.02) in Taiwan, resulting in a pooled estimate of 0.89 (0.77 to 1.03). No associations were observed between paternal metformin use and any organ specific malformations. These findings were consistent in sibling matched comparisons and sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: The findings suggest that paternal use of metformin during the period of sperm development is not associated with congenital malformations in offspring, including organ specific malformations. Metformin can therefore continue to be considered a suitable initial oral agent for managing glucose levels in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus who plan on having children., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at https://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: this work was supported by the Norwegian Research Council and by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. The authors had full access to all the data in this study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Congenital anomalies of the external ear can have a significant impact on a child's development and quality of life. While genetic factors play a crucial role in the etiology of these anomalies, environmental factors such as drug exposure during pregnancy may also contribute to their occurrence. This study aims to investigate the association between drug exposure and congenital anomalies of the external ear using data from an adverse drug reaction report database. Using OpenVigil 2.1, we queried the FAERS database to retrieve adverse event reports from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. To identify relevant cases, we used Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms focusing on congenital anomalies of the external ear. Drug generic names were sourced from the DrugBank database. To assess safety signals and rank drugs by their signal strength, we conducted a disproportionality analysis, generating reporting odds ratios (ROR) and proportional reporting ratios (PRR). A total of 20,754,281 AE reports were identified in the FAERS database from Q1 2004 to Q1 2024, of which 1763 were related to congenital anomalies of the external ear. Valproic acid (122 cases) was associated with the most cases, followed by mycophenolate mofetil (105 cases) and lamotrigine (65 cases). According to the disproportionality analysis, the top five drugs with the highest ROR and PRR were primidone (ROR: 397.05, 95% CI 147.21, 1070.9; PRR: 388.71, 95% CI 145.89, 1035.7), valproic acid (ROR: 239.46, 95% CI 123.75, 463.37; PRR: 236.42, 95% CI 123.82, 451.43), tapazole (ROR: 198.35, 95% CI 63.49, 619.67; PRR: 196.25, 95% CI 62.97, 611.67), nevirapine (ROR: 138.24, 95% CI 82.9, 230.51; PRR: 137.23, 95% CI 82.44, 228.44), and sebivo (ROR: 117.1, 95% CI 48.51, 282.67; PRR: 116.37, 95% CI 48.17, 281.12). This study identified several drugs significantly associated with congenital anomalies of the external ear in the FAERS database using disproportionality analysis. The findings can help healthcare professionals better recognize and manage drug-induced congenital anomalies of the external ear, particularly when prescribing high-risk medications. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations and develop strategies for preventing and mitigating drug-induced congenital anomalies of the external ear., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To analyze the prescription patterns and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy in Belgium, and to investigate their potential association with congenital anomalies., Methods: Using a nationwide linked database, we identified antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics via the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical Classification (ATC) codes. For each medication group, we calculated the overall prevalence and prevalence for the three most used medications at the fifth ATC level. Sociodemographic factors influencing medication use during pregnancy were analyzed, and potential associations with congenital anomalies were investigated through logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations., Results: Overall, 828 016 live births pregnancies associated with 611 094 mothers were identified. We found that the use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics was decreasing with the arrival of pregnancy. Mothers with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to these medications. Antiepileptics used in the first trimester were associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.11-2.45) compared with unexposed women. The three most used antiepileptics were lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam, among them, we found an association with congenital anomalies only for valproate (aOR = 3.92, 95% CI 2.30-6.67)., Conclusions: Psychotropic and antiepileptic drug use decreased during pregnancy. Pregnant women with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to psychotropics and antiepileptics during pregnancy. The elevated risk of congenital anomalies associated with antiepileptics use, particularly valproate, underscores the need for targeted interventions and increased awareness to improve maternal and fetal health outcomes., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Objective: Upadacitinib is indicated for diseases affecting persons of childbearing potential including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, atopic dermatitis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis; however, teratogenicity was observed in animal studies. Given the potential for human fetal risk, pregnancy avoidance measures were required during clinical trials. This analysis describes pregnancy outcomes in patients exposed to upadacitinib during pregnancy., Methods: Clinical trial and postmarketing cases of in utero exposure to upadacitinib were identified in AbbVie's safety database through 25 April, 2023. Analysis of clinical trial cases and postmarketing reports are presented separately; prospective and retrospectively reported pregnancy outcomes are integrated for each. Descriptive rates are presented to summarize outcomes., Results: There were 128 maternal upadacitinib-exposed pregnancies with known outcomes identified; 80 and 48 pregnancies were reported in clinical trials and the postmarketing setting, respectively. In clinical trials (mean in utero exposure of 5 weeks, 3 days), live births (54%), spontaneous abortions (24%), elective terminations (21%), and ectopic pregnancy (1%) were reported. There was one report of a congenital malformation: a 35-week infant with an atrial septal defect. In postmarketing cases, live births (46%), spontaneous abortions (38%), elective terminations (15%), and ectopic pregnancy (2%) were reported., Conclusions: As the data are limited for in utero exposure to upadacitinib, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the effect of upadacitinib on pregnancy outcomes. Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes with upadacitinib exposure were comparable to rates observed in the general population or patients with autoimmune inflammatory diseases. To date, no apparent evidence of teratogenicity exists in the analyses of human pregnancies exposed to upadacitinib during the first trimester., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To examine the association between maternal prescriptions for fibrates and congenital malformations in live births., Methods: Nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted using the data sourced from the Korean National Health Insurance database. A cohort of 756,877 completed pregnancies linked to live-born infants in 215,600 women with dyslipidemia between 2012 and 2021. The study compared data on congenital anomalies between pregnancies who were exposed to fibrates and those who were not exposed to fibrates in the first trimester. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by a multivariable analyses using logistic regression models to adjust for potential confounders., Results: 260 pregnancies (0.12%) were exposed to fibrates during the first trimester. The prevalence of malformations in exposed offspirng was 10.77%, not significantly different compared with 9.68% in offspring of women who were not prescribed fibrates during pregnancy in patients with dyslipidemia (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.75-1.70)., Conclusion: This study implies that the use of fibrates during pregnancy may be safe, as it did not show any association with congenital anomalies. However, caution is warranted due to an elevated risk associated with prolonged exposure., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Buprenorphine combined with naloxone is commonly used to treat opioid use disorders outside of pregnancy. In pregnancy, buprenorphine alone is generally recommended because of limited perinatal safety data on the combination product., Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes following prenatal exposure to buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone., Design, Settings, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using health care utilization data from Medicaid-insured beneficiaries in the US from 2000 to 2018. The cohort was restricted to pregnant individuals linked to their liveborn infants, with maternal Medicaid enrollment from 3 months before pregnancy to 1 month after delivery and infant enrollment for the first 3 months after birth, unless they died sooner., Exposure: Use of buprenorphine with naloxone vs buprenorphine alone during the first trimester based on outpatient dispensings., Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included major congenital malformations, low birth weight, neonatal abstinence syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, small for gestational age, cesarean delivery, and maternal morbidity. Confounder-adjusted risk ratios were calculated using propensity score overlap weights., Results: This study identified 3369 pregnant individuals exposed to buprenorphine with naloxone during the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [4.6] years) and 5326 exposed to buprenorphine alone or who switched from the combination to buprenorphine alone by the end of the first trimester (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [4.5] years). When comparing buprenorphine combined with naloxone with buprenorphine alone, a lower risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome (absolute risk, 37.4% vs 55.8%; weighted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.70-0.84]) and a modestly lower risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (absolute risk, 30.6% vs 34.9%; weighted relative risk, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.98]) and small for gestational age (absolute risk, 10.0% vs 12.4%; weighted relative risk, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]) was observed. For maternal morbidity, the comparative rates were 2.6% vs 2.9%, respectively, and the weighted relative risk was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.68-1.19). No differences were observed with respect to major congenital malformations overall, low birth weight, preterm birth, respiratory symptoms, or cesarean delivery. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses., Conclusions and Relevance: There were similar and, in some instances, more favorable neonatal and maternal outcomes for pregnancies exposed to buprenorphine combined with naloxone compared with buprenorphine alone. For the outcomes assessed, compared with buprenorphine alone, buprenorphine with naloxone during pregnancy appears to be a safe treatment option. This supports the view that both formulations are reasonable options for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy, affirming flexibility in collaborative treatment decision-making.

Teratogens encompass any agent capable of causing a birth defect or elevating the incidence of defects within the population. This category includes substances like drugs, both legal and illegal. These substances cause congenital anomalies depending on the stage of development at the time of exposure, the dose, and the exposure time associated with the embryo. The most sensitive period is the embryonic stage, when the three leaflets give rise to tissues and organs. Susceptibility to teratogenesis decreases during the fetal phase but morphological and functional disturbance of the fetus may still occur. Substance use during pregnancy and its adverse effects are a public health problem and the lay population does not have access to this information. Particularly concerning is the period within the first six weeks of pregnancy, often before a woman realizes she is pregnant. Developmental data for many substances are simply not available, which makes the problem more serious. The aim of this study is to reflect on the teratogenic effects of licit and illicit substances in humans, focusing particularly on the dose that can induce malformations and their incidence in humans.

Many examples of the use of real-world data in the area of pharmacoepidemiology include "big data," such as insurance claims, medical records, or hospital discharge databases. However, "big" is not always better, particularly when studying outcomes with narrow windows of etiologic relevance. Birth defects are such an outcome, for which specificity of exposure timing is critical. Studies with primary data collection can be designed to query details about the timing of medication use, as well as type, dose, frequency, duration, and indication, that can better characterize the "real world." Because birth defects are rare, etiologic studies are typically case‑control in design, like the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, Birth Defects Study to Evaluate Pregnancy Exposures, and Slone Birth Defects Study. Recall bias can be a concern, but the ability to collect detailed information about both prescription and over-the-counter medication use and other exposures such as diet, family history, and sociodemographic factors is a distinct advantage over claims and medical record data sources. Case‑control studies with primary data collection are essential to advancing the pharmacoepidemiology of birth defects. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2024.)

Background and Objectives: Dolutegravir has been used as a first-line anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug because of its better efficacy compared with other counterpart medicines. However, making a unanimous decision on its use during pregnancy has become difficult for stakeholders following congenital anomalies reported with its use. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the risk of congenital anomalies in newborns exposed to dolutegravir-based-regimens compared with those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens during the antenatal period., Methods: An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 30 November, 2023. Studies reporting data on congenital anomalies following antenatal use of dolutegravir were included. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E tools, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed in 'RevMan 5.4.1' using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the 'Q' statistic and I 2 value. A sensitivity analysis was performed for higher heterogeneity/high-risk studies. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] a priori., Results: Of 26 eligible studies, 12 (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a pooled sample of 32,617) were included in a meta-analysis and 14 in a qualitative synthesis only. The meta-analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies between newborns exposed antenatally to dolutegravir-based regimen(s) and those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens [risk ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.53; p = 0.59]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I 2 = 47%). Pooled results for randomized controlled trials and observational studies separately and the sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity provided similar results., Conclusions: The risk of congenital anomalies was not significantly different between dolutegravir-based regimens and non-dolutegravir-based-regimens in newborns exposed during their antenatal period., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Individuals with disabilities may require specific medications in pregnancy. The prevalence and patterns of medication use, overall and for medications with known teratogenic risks, are largely unknown. Methods: This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, 2004-2021, comprised all recognized pregnancies among individuals eligible for public drug plan coverage. Included were those with a physical ( n = 44,136), sensory ( n = 13,633), intellectual or developmental ( n = 2,446) disability, or multiple disabilities ( n = 5,064), compared with those without a disability ( n = 299,944). Prescription medication use in pregnancy, overall and by type, was described. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR) for the use of medications with known teratogenic risks and use of ≥2 and ≥5 medications concurrently in pregnancy, comparing those with versus without a disability, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Results: Medication use in pregnancy was more common in people with intellectual or developmental (82.1%), multiple (80.4%), physical (73.9%), and sensory (71.9%) disabilities, than in those with no known disability (67.4%). Compared with those without a disability (5.7%), teratogenic medication use in pregnancy was especially higher in people with multiple disabilities (14.2%; aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.20). Furthermore, compared with people without a disability (3.2%), the use of ≥5 medications concurrently was more common in those with multiple disabilities (13.4%; aRR 2.21, 95% CI: 2.02-2.41) and an intellectual or developmental disability (9.3%; aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.86-2.45). Interpretation: Among people with disabilities, medication use in pregnancy is prevalent, especially for potentially teratogenic medications and polypharmacy, highlighting the need for preconception counseling/monitoring to reduce medication-related harm in pregnancy.

Objective: To characterize associations of exposure to newer antiretroviral medications in the first trimester with congenital anomalies among infants born to persons with HIV in the United States., Design: Longitudinal cohort of infants born 2012-2022 to pregnant persons with HIV enrolled in the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) study., Methods: First-trimester exposures to newer antiretrovirals (ARVs) were abstracted from maternal medical records. Trained site staff conducted physical exams and abstracted congenital anomalies from infant medical records. Investigators classified anomalies using the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program classification system. The prevalence of major congenital anomalies identified by age one year was estimated for infants exposed and unexposed to each ARV. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of major congenital anomalies for each ARV exposure, adjusting for potential confounders., Results: Of 2034 infants, major congenital anomalies were identified in 135 [6.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.6-7.8%]. Cardiovascular ( n  = 43) and musculoskeletal ( n  = 37) anomalies were the most common. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) of congenital anomalies were 1.03 (0.62-1.72) for darunavir, 0.91 (0.46-1.81) for raltegravir, 1.04 (0.58-1.85) for rilpivirine, 1.31 (0.71-2.41) for elvitegravir, 0.76 (0.37-1.57) for dolutegravir, and 0.34 (0.05-2.51) for bictegravir, compared to those unexposed to each specific ARV. Findings were similar after adjustment for nucleoside/nucleotide backbones., Conclusions: The odds of congenital anomalies among infants with first-trimester exposure to newer ARVs did not differ substantially from those unexposed to these specific ARVs, which is reassuring. Continued evaluation of these ARVs with larger studies will be needed to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies examining antidepressants and congenital-malformations were primarily conducted in western countries, and many were constrained by important methodological limitations. This population-based study identified 465,069 women (including 1,705 redeemed ≥1 prescription of antidepressants during first-trimester) aged 15-50 years who delivered their first and singleton child between 2003 and 2018 in a predominantly-Chinese population in Hong Kong, using territory-wide medical-record database of public-healthcare services, and employed propensity-score fine-stratification-weighted logistic-regression analyses to evaluate risk of any major and organ/system-specific congenital-malformations following first-trimester exposure to antidepressants. Major malformation overall was not associated with any antidepressant (weighted-odds-ratio wOR, 0.88 [95 %CI, 0.44-1.76]), specific drug-class, or individual antidepressants. Exposure to any antidepressant was associated with increased risk of cardiac (wOR, 1.82 [95 %CI, 1.07-3.12]) and respiratory anomalies (wOR,4.11 [95 %CI, 1.61-10.45]). Exposure to selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors (SSRI) and multiple-AD-classes were associated with respiratory and cardiac anomalies, respectively. However, these identified associations were not consistently affirmed across sensitivity analyses, precluding firm conclusion. Observed associations of specific cardiac defects with serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake-inhibitors (SNRI), tricyclic-antidepressants (TCA) and multiple-AD-classes were noted with wide confidence-intervals, suggesting imprecise estimation. Overall, our findings suggest that first-trimester antidepressant exposure was not robustly associated with increased risk of congenital-malformations. Further research clarifying comparative safety of individual antidepressants on specific malformations is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Given the paucity of safety data on fluoroquinolone antibiotics in pregnancy, a prospective observational cohort study was conducted in pregnant women who sought help and advice on drug use at two teratology information institutes in Japan. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of major congenital anomalies. The study population included pregnant women exposed to (i) fluoroquinolones (fluoroquinolone group), (ii) β-lactams (infectious control group), or (iii) other agents considered to be nonteratogenic in humans (nonteratogenic control group) during the first trimester. The frequency of major congenital anomalies was compared across groups using a logistic regression model that adjusted for maternal age, smoking status, drinking status, facility consulted, and time of consultation. The fluoroquinolone group consisted of 411 women who had 383 children born alive. The infectious control and nonteratogenic control groups consisted of 1416 and 1482 women who had 1322 and 1401 children born alive, respectively. The incidence of major congenital anomalies was 1.5%, 2.0%, and 1.6% in the fluoroquinolone group, infectious control, and nonteratogenic control groups, respectively. Logistic regression showed that fluoroquinolone exposure is not a significant risk factor for major congenital anomalies. In conclusion, first-trimester exposure to fluoroquinolone antibiotics was not associated with increased maternal or fetal risks., (© 2024 The Author(s). Congenital Anomalies published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Teratology Society.)

Background: Prescribed opioid analgesics are frequently used to manage pain in pregnancy. However, the available literature regarding the teratogenic potential of opioid use during pregnancy has not been systematically summarised. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the quality of the evidence on these potential risks and calculate a pooled estimate of risk for any opioid analgesic and individual opioids., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and CINAHL for published studies assessing the risk of major congenital malformations in infants following first-trimester exposure to opioid analgesics compared with a reference group, excluding studies examining opioid agonist therapy or illicit opioid use. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Intervention tool. We pooled adjusted risk estimates from studies rated at serious risk of bias or better in a random-effects meta-analysis., Results: Of 12 identified studies, 11 were at high risk of bias (eight serious; three critical). Relative to unexposed infants, those exposed to any opioid use during the first trimester of pregnancy were not at an increased risk of major congenital malformations overall (relative risk 1.04, 95%CI 0.98-1.11); cardiovascular malformations (relative risk 1.07, 95%CI 0.96-1.20); or central nervous system malformations (relative risk 1.06, 95%CI 0.92-1.21). Raised risk estimates were observed for gastrointestinal malformations (relative risk 1.40, 95%CI 0.38-5.16) and cleft palate (relative risk 1.57, 95%CI 0.48-5.13) following any opioid exposure and atrial septal defects (relative risk 1.20, 95%CI 1.05-1.36) following codeine exposure., Conclusions: Although the meta-analysis did not indicate substantial increased risk for most malformations examined, this risk remains uncertain due to the methodological limitations of the included studies. Healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical regulators should be aware of the issues related to the quality of research in this field., (© 2024 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the teratogenic risk to offspring associated with continuing pregnancy after administering mifepristone and/or misoprostol during gestation., Methods: We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and CBM, from their inception to February 2024, with no language restrictions. We included cohort and case-control studies that analyzed the teratogenic effects of mifepristone and/or misoprostol on fetuses and newborns. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The odds ratios (OR) from individual studies were combined using meta-analysis. Sensitivity testing and heterogeneity analysis were conducted., Results: A total of 13 studies were eligible for inclusion, comprising 5193 cases of congenital malformations and 12,232 controls., Conclusion: Our findings indicated that the use of misoprostol during early pregnancy increased the risk of congenital abnormalities in offspring (OR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.57-4.62). However, the potential teratogenic effect of mifepristone during pregnancy cannot be ruled out. Additionally, the use of mifepristone and/or misoprostol has been linked to a higher risk of certain congenital anomalies, such as hydrocephalus (OR = 3.41; 95% CI: 1.17-9.97), Möbius syndrome (OR = 26.48; 95% CI: 11.30-62.01), and terminal transverse limb defects (OR = 10.75; 95% CI: 3.93-29.41). (PROSPERO, CRD42024522093, 03182024)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Clomiphene citrate is an ovulation inductor for which inadvertent post-conceptional exposures may occur in early pregnancy. In preclinical studies, post-conceptional exposures showed a teratogenic effect in different species. In humans, to date, little is known about the outcomes of inadvertently post-conceptionally exposed pregnancies., Objectives: The objectives of our study were to assess the association between post-conceptional exposures to clomiphene citrate and major and minor congenital malformations in the offspring., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively ascertained cases was undertaken, based on clinical data from the Centre de Référence sur les Agents Tératogènes (CRAT), Paris, France. Women with post-conceptional exposure to clomiphene citrate (n = 309), and unexposed pregnant women (n = 1236, 1:4 ratio) with prospectively collected data, known pregnancy outcome and delivery date prior to 01/02/2022, were matched by calendar year. An adjudication committee classified major and minor congenital malformations according to the EUROCAT (European Registration of Congenital Anomalies and Twins) classification., Results: Among post-conceptional exposed women, no increased risk of major malformation was found (crude relative risk = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.19-2.15) as compared to unexposed women. Three major and ten minor congenital malformations were reported in the exposed group. An increased risk of minor malformations was found (crude relative risk = 4.05, 95% confidence interval 1.70-9.64) although there was no specific clinical pattern., Conclusions: Post-conceptional exposure to clomiphene citrate was not associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations. Given potential confounding and information biases, the results about minor malformations should be interpreted with caution as no specific clinical pattern was identified., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Aims/Background The relationship between drug exposure and pregnancy outcomes is still unclear. The study was designed to characterise the overall condition of drug exposure during pregnancy and uncover related pregnancy outcomes. Methods Pregnant women were enrolled in the study from 1 October 2019 to 31 April 2022, at a tertiary hospital in Jiangsu Province, China. Basic maternal information and data regarding drug exposure during different pregnancy trimesters were gathered using the 'Eugenic Baby' platform. Based on drug use data and the pregnancy and lactation labelling rule, pregnant women were divided into three groups to explore the relationship between drug exposure and pregnancy outcomes. Results Analysis revealed that fetal protection drugs were used in 43.99% of early pregnancy cases. Pregnant women utilised more unrecommended drugs (according to the pregnancy and lactation labelling rule) in the first trimester than in the following trimesters. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, 56 of the 837 live infants had a malformation, and congenital heart disease was the main type. Gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight, height, and head circumference were significantly different ( p < 0.05) among the three groups. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, preterm birth (odds ratio=3.226, 95% confidence intervals: 1.447-7.194, p =0.004) and low birth weight (odds ratio=4.270, 95% confidence intervals: 1.299-14.034, p =0.017) predicted increased risk of maternal drug exposure after adjusting for covariates. Conclusion Drug exposure of various types is common during pregnancy. Compared to the second and third trimester, unrecommended drugs are used more frequently in the first trimester. Drug exposure is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and these associations need to be further confirmed. It is vital to fully consider treatment benefits and potential risks before medication initiation during pregnancy.

Background: In observational medication pregnancy safety studies, children are often followed from birth to 1 year of age. However, some major congenital malformations (MCM) may take longer to diagnose., Objectives: We aimed to investigate the proportion of children with detected MCMs at different lengths of follow-up and compare them to the proportion detected at 1 year after birth., Methods: This population-based register study included all singleton children liveborn in Sweden from 2006 to 2016. MCM were identified by ICD-10 codes in the Medical Birth Register and National Patient Register, aligned to the EUROCAT classification system. Cumulative proportion of children with detected MCM at birth, 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years was calculated and compared between children born preterm and at term., Results: In 1,138,113 liveborn children, the cumulative proportion of children with a detected MCM increased from 1.9% at birth to 3.1%, 3.9%, 4.4% and 4.7% at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after birth, respectively, and varied by MCM subgroup. MCMs of the eye, ear-face-neck, nervous system and genitals were detected with the longest delay, with 31%-59% more detected at 3- versus 1-year follow-up. Compared to children born at term, the proportion of children with any MCM was 2.5 times higher amongst preterm children, with a higher proportion detected over the first 90 days for most MCM subgroups., Conclusions: The proportion of children with a detected MCM varied by MCM subgroup and follow-up time. In pharmacoepidemiology studies of medication safety in pregnancy using Swedish national data, the length of child follow-up should be chosen in accordance with the expected age at detection if a specific subgroup of MCM is under investigation, for example, eye and genital MCM require longer follow-up for detection than abdominal wall and digestive system MCM. However, in most circumstances, 1 year of follow-up is sufficient., (© 2023 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In 2018, a significant neural tube defects (NTD) signal was reported after pre-conceptional exposure to dolutegravir, but was not confirmed in further analysis. Since 2019, dolutegravir-based regimen, an integrase inhibitor (INI), is recommended by WHO as the most-effective first-line therapy in all patients living with HIV. To explore the potential INI-related teratogenic effect, we searched disproportionate signals between exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies, compared to non-INI drugs, using the international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®. We selected all the reports registered in VigiBase® between 01/01/2007 and 30/03/2021 on any antiretroviral drug-related fetal or neonatal adverse drug reactions, declared either in children (<2 years) exposed in utero or in pregnant women (12-50 years). A case/non-case study was conducted to detected signals between congenital anomalies and prenatal exposure to any INI-class drug, compared to non-INI drugs, by estimating adjusted reporting odds ratios (aROR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We identified 2521 unique reports, among which 664 (26.3%) were related to INI-class use. Overall, 520 congenital anomalies were cited from 327 unique reports, of whom 31.0% were INI-related. Compared to non-INI drugs, no significant disproportionate reporting signal between prenatal exposure to INI-class drugs and congenital anomalies was found (aROR 1.13; 95% CI:0.85-1.51). However, specific significant signals were reported for raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir drug exposure and urinary malformations (aROR 2.43; 95%CI:1.08-5.43), digestive malformations (aROR 3.09; 95%CI:1.22-7.84), and NTDs (aROR 3.02; 95%CI:1.09-8.37). Although specific congenital anomalies signals associated with raltegravir/elvitegravir/dolutegravir exposure were notified, causal relationship needs to be further investigated in prospective studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Data on the use of golimumab (GLM) during pregnancy are limited. This study evaluated pregnancy outcomes in women treated with GLM during pregnancy. Cumulative data on GLM-exposed pregnancies from the Company's global safety database (GSD) are summarized. Cases were medically confirmed maternal exposures to GLM during pregnancy or within 3 months prior to conception with a reported pregnancy outcome. Pregnancy outcomes (e.g., live births) and congenital anomalies in prospectively reported cases (i.e., pregnancy outcome not known when first reported to the company) are presented in a descriptive manner. As of May 31, 2022, 261 prospectively reported pregnancies exposed to GLM were reported in the GSD: 214 (82.0%) live births (including six sets of twins), 31 (11.9%) spontaneous abortions (including one set of twins), 13 (5.0%) induced/elective abortions, 2 (0.8%) reported intrauterine death/still birth, and 1 (0.4%) fetal adverse event in an ongoing pregnancy. The majority of pregnancies had exposure to GLM at least in the first trimester of pregnancy. In total, seven congenital anomalies (7/261; 2.7%) were reported. Of these seven congenital anomalies, five were considered major according to EUROCAT classification version 1.4. Among the five prospectively reported congenital anomalies noted in live births (5/214; 2.3%), four were classified as major (4/214; 1.8%). The rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes and major congenital anomalies in prospectively reported pregnancy cases with exposure to GLM in the Company's GSD were consistent with published background rates for the general population., (© 2024 Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The increasing and prevalent use of gabapentin among pregnant people highlights the necessity to assess its neonatal safety., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the foetal safety of gabapentin during pregnancy using a cohort study and scoping review with a meta-analysis of published evidence., Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Manitoba health databases between 1995 and 2019. We examined the association between gabapentin use during pregnancy and the prevalence of major congenital malformations, cardiac and orofacial malformations, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions using multivariate regression models. We searched the literature in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to October 2022 to identify relevant observational studies and conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects models, including our cohort study results., Results: Of the 289,227 included pregnancies, 870 pregnant people were exposed to gabapentin. Gabapentin exposure during the First trimester was not associated with an increased risk of any malformations (adjusted relative risk [aRR]) 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 1.46), cardiac malformations (aRR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72, 2.29), orofacial malformations (aRR 1.37, 95% CI 0.50, 3.75), and major congenital malformations (aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73, 1.36). whereas exposure during any trimester was associated with an increased NICU admission risk (aRR, 1.99, 95% CI 1.70, 2.32). The meta-analysis of unadjusted results revealed an increased risk of major congenital malformations (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.28, 1.61, I 2  = 0%), cardiac malformations (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11, 2.47, I 2  = 68%), and NICU admissions (RR 3.15, 95% CI 2.90, 3.41, I 2  = 10%), and increased trend of orofacial malformations (RR 1.98, 95% CI 0.79, 5.00, I 2  = 0%)., Conclusions: Gabapentin use was associated with an increased risk of NICU admissions in the cohort study and pooled meta-analysis. Clinicians should prescribe gabapentin with caution during pregnancy and further studies are warranted., (© 2024 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Despite the frequent co-administration of antidepressants and benzodiazepines, the association between such concomitant use during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations remains inadequately explored. This study aims to examine the association between concomitant use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines during the first trimester and organ-specific congenital malformations., Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using Taiwan's National Birth Certificate Application database, the Maternal and Child Health database, and Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. Pregnant people aged 15-50 years with singleton births between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2018, were included. Use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines was defined as at least one prescription during the first trimester, and concomitant use was defined as the overlapping prescription of both drugs with an overlapping prescription period. The primary outcomes were overall congenital malformations and eight organ-specific malformations, consisting of the nervous system, heart, respiratory system, oral cleft, digestive system, urinary system, genital system, and limb malformations. Logistic regression models with propensity score fine stratification weighting approach were used to control for measured confounders. Analyses controlling for confounding by indication and sibling comparison analyses were done to address unmeasured confounders. No individuals with lived experience participated in the research or writing process., Findings: The cohort included 2 634 021 singleton pregnancies, and 8599 (0·3%) individuals were concomitant users of antidepressants and benzodiazepines during the first trimester (mean age at delivery was 31·8 years [SD 5·2] for pregnancies with exposure to antidepressants and benzodiazepines vs 30·7 years [SD 4·9] for pregnancies without exposure). All study participants were female, and information about ethnicity was not available. Absolute risk of overall malformations was 3·81 per 100 pregnancies with exposure, compared with 2·87 per 100 pregnancies without exposure. The propensity score-weighted odds ratios (weighted ORs) did not suggest an increased risk for overall malformations (weighted OR 1·10, 95% CI 0·94-1·28), heart defects (1·01, 0·83-1·23), or any of the other organ-specific malformations, except for digestive system malformations, for which the weighted OR remained statistically significant after adjustment (1·63, 1·06-2·51). The absence of an increased risk for overall congenital malformations associated with concomitant use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines was supported by the analyses controlling for confounding by indication and sibling-matched comparisons., Interpretation: The findings of this study suggest that the concomitant use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines during the first trimester is not associated with a substantial increase in risk for most malformation subtypes. However, considering other potential adverse effects of using both medications concomitantly, a thorough assessment of the risks and benefits is crucial for clinical decision making., Funding: National Science and Technology Council., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: To present the main findings of a post-authorization safety study assessing pregnancy and infant outcomes after prenatal golimumab exposure in a real-world setting., Methods: This observational population-based cohort study included data from pregnancies ending in 2006-2018 (Finland) or 2019 (Denmark, Sweden). Infants born to women with rheumatic diseases or ulcerative colitis diagnoses were identified. Based on prescription fills from 90 days prior to pregnancy until delivery, infants were assigned to one of the four drug-exposure cohorts: golimumab, other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, and nonbiologic systemic therapy, and the general population. Prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, mortality, diagnoses of major congenital anomalies (MCA), and inpatient infections in the infants' first year of life were assessed. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated for MCA and infection., Results: Among 134 infants in the golimumab cohort, none were stillborn or died in the first year of life. MCA were diagnosed in 4.5% of the infants in the golimumab cohort, versus 6.8%, 10.9%, 5.5%, and 4.6% in the other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, nonbiologic systemic therapy and general population cohorts, respectively. Inpatient infections were diagnosed in 11% of golimumab-exposed infants, compared with 9%-11% of infants in the other cohorts. Unadjusted and selected adjusted comparisons showed no association between prenatal golimumab exposure and MCA or infection compared with the other exposure cohorts or general population., Conclusions: The number of infants with prenatal golimumab exposure was low, but results are reassuringly consistent with the evidence available for other anti-TNF biologics. Continued monitoring is needed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Women with epilepsy (WWE) are usually advised antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment even during pregnancy. It is therefore important to know what the major congenital malformation (MCM) risks might be with untreated epilepsy, and with first-trimester exposure to different AEDs in monotherapy. This article reviews recent findings from a large multinational registry, a large multinational population based study, and a large meta-analysis. In summary, data from the meta-analysis suggest that the MCM rate is 2%-3% in women without epilepsy and about 3% in WWE who were unexposed to AEDs during pregnancy. Data from the meta analysis also suggest that the MCM rate is approximately population level at 2.6%-3.5% with levetiracetam and lamotrigine and that it is about 4%-5% with carbamazepine, 2.8%-4.8% with oxcarbazepine, about 4% with topiramate, about 5%-7% with phenytoin, about 6%-9% with phenobarbital, and nearly 10% with valproate. The MCM risk with valproate is significantly higher than that with other AEDs (including topiramate and phenobarbital) that significantly increase the risk. Data from the registry suggest that risks are dose-dependent with valproate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine and that the risk with valproate may be as high as 25% at doses >1,450 mg/d. Valproate is also associated with a wide range of MCMs. Data from the population-based study were generally confirmatory. Strengths and limitations of the studies are considered. The findings of these studies encourage the consideration of levetiracetam or lamotrigine monotherapy for WWE who are pregnant and strongly discourage the consideration of the older AEDs, especially phenytoin and phenobarbitone, and most especially valproate. These considerations also apply to all WWE of childbearing age because it may not be easy to change AEDs when pregnancy is planned and because pregnancy is often unplanned., (© Copyright 2024 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: Metformin is the most used oral antidiabetic medication. Despite its established safety profile, it has known antiandrogenic and epigenetic modifying effects. This raised concerns about possible adverse developmental effects caused by genomic alterations related to paternal use of metformin during the spermatogenesis period preceding conception., Objective: To assess the potential adverse intergenerational effect of metformin by examining the association between paternal metformin use during spermatogenesis and major congenital malformations (MCMs) in newborns., Design: Nationally representative cohort study., Setting: A large Israeli health fund., Participants: 383 851 live births linked to fathers and mothers that occurred in 1999 to 2020., Measurements: MCMs and parental cardiometabolic conditions were ascertained using clinical diagnoses, medication dispensing information, and laboratory test results. The effect of metformin use on MCMs was estimated using general estimating equations, accounting for concurrent use of other antidiabetic medications and parental cardiometabolic morbidity., Results: Compared with unexposed fathers, the prevalence of cardiometabolic morbidity was substantially higher among fathers who used metformin during spermatogenesis, and their spouses. Whereas the crude odds ratio (OR) for paternal metformin exposure in all formulations and MCMs was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.64), the adjusted OR was 1.00 (CI, 0.76 to 1.31). Within specific treatment regimens, the adjusted OR was 0.86 (CI, 0.60 to 1.23) for metformin in monotherapy and 1.36 (CI, 1.00 to 1.85) for metformin in polytherapy, a treatment that was more common in patients with more poorly controlled diabetes., Limitation: Laboratory test results for hemoglobin A 1c to assess underlying diabetes severity were available only for a subset of the cohort., Conclusion: Paternal use of metformin in monotherapy does not increase the risk for MCMs. Association for metformin in polytherapy could potentially be explained by worse underlying parental cardiometabolic risk profile., Primary Funding Source: None., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-1405.

Background: Metformin is a first-line pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes, but there is limited evidence about its safety in early pregnancy., Objective: To evaluate the teratogenicity of metformin use in the first trimester of pregnancy., Design: In an observational cohort of pregnant women with pregestational type 2 diabetes receiving metformin monotherapy before the last menstrual period (LMP), a target trial with 2 treatment strategies was emulated: insulin monotherapy (discontinue metformin treatment and initiate insulin within 90 days of LMP) or insulin plus metformin (continue metformin and initiate insulin within 90 days of LMP)., Setting: U.S. Medicaid health care administration database (2000 to 2018)., Participants: 12 489 pregnant women who met the eligibility criteria., Measurements: The risk and risk ratio of nonlive births, live births with congenital malformations, and congenital malformations among live births were estimated using standardization to adjust for covariates., Results: A total of 850 women were in the insulin monotherapy group and 1557 in the insulin plus metformin group. The estimated risk for nonlive birth was 32.7% under insulin monotherapy (reference) and 34.3% under insulin plus metformin (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]). The estimated risk for live birth with congenital malformations was 8.0% (CI, 5.7% to 10.2%) under insulin monotherapy and 5.7% (CI, 4.5% to 7.3%) under insulin plus metformin (risk ratio, 0.72 [CI, 0.51 to 1.09])., Limitation: Possible residual confounding by glycemic control and body mass index., Conclusion: Compared with switching to insulin monotherapy, continuing metformin and adding insulin in early pregnancy resulted in little to no increased risk for nonlive birth among women receiving metformin before pregnancy. Under conventional statistical criteria, anything between a 49% decrease and a 9% increase in risk for congenital malformations was highly compatible with our data., Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-2038.

Background and Aim: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently affects younger patients and poses various challenges concerning pregnancy and childbirth. Maintaining good disease control throughout pregnancy is crucial, but expectant and pregnant patients may worry about the fetal impact of medications, leading to treatment discontinuation due to uncertainty about this issue. This study investigated the real-world drug-prescribing practices for pregnant patients with IBD in Japan and their potential connection to major congenital malformations (MCMs)., Methods: Overall, 277 female IBD patients who gave birth between 2010 and 2019 were selected from the JMDC claims database. The prescribing patterns of IBD medications and MCMs in the patients' offspring were analyzed., Results: Among pregnant IBD patients, 74.4% received at least one medication from 90 days before pregnancy to 90 days after delivery. Trends in medication prescriptions during pregnancy in 2010-2019 revealed consistent use of oral 5-ASA, variable use of topical medications, a decrease in systemic steroids, and an increase in biologics. The prevalence of MCMs in children born to IBD-affected mothers did not differ significantly between those who did and did not receive IBD medications (8.6% vs 6.8%). Although circulatory system MCMs were slightly more common in the IBD medication group (4.9% vs 1.4%), this difference was not significant. Logistic regression analysis did not reveal an association between MCM risk and first-trimester use of IBD medications, including corticosteroids and biologics., Conclusions: This study provides insights into medication patterns in pregnant IBD patients and suggests no increased risk of MCMs associated with first-trimester IBD medication use., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: The prevalence of benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZRDs) use during pregnancy increased sharply in recent years. Thus, there are concerns regarding the pregnancy outcomes following exposure to BZRDs., Methods: Two electronic databases were thoroughly searched to identify related clinical studies published from inception until June 2023. English-language cohort studies with high-quality comparing antenatal BZRDs exposure to an unexposed group on any delivery outcome were included., Results: Ten cohort studies that estimated adverse neonatal outcomes associated with exposure to BZRDs during pregnancy were included. Exposure to BZRDs during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of congenital malformation [odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.13, p < 0.001], heart malformation (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22, p = 0.003), preterm birth (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.23-1.7, p < 0.001), SGA (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.29, P < 0.001), LBW (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25-1.6, p = 0.001) or low Apgar score (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.87, p = 0.011),compared with no exposure. Further analyses limited to the first trimester exposure yielded consistent results., Conclusions: Exposure to BZRDs during pregnancy may be associated with several adverse neonatal outcomes. However, we could not rule out the potential indication confounding factor, further studies with high-quality that control for important confounders are still needed to verify our findings., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Concerns exist about teratogenic and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis., Objective: To evaluate the association between paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis and offspring risk of congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders., Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study included 1 235 353 singletons born in Denmark between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2017, identified in the Medical Birth Register; 1336 children had fathers who had filled prescriptions for valproate during spermatogenesis. Congenital malformations were identified in the first year of life and neurodevelopmental disorders were identified from 1 year of age until December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed March 2024., Exposures: Paternal valproate exposure was defined as fathers who filled 1 or more prescriptions for valproate immediately before or during the time of spermatogenesis (ie, 3 months prior to conception)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Children with major congenital malformations in the first year of life and with neurodevelopmental disorders before death or end of follow-up were identified in Danish health registers. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (ARRs) of congenital malformations, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazards ratios (AHRs) of neurodevelopmental disorders, adjusted for relevant confounders., Results: Among 1 235 353 live births (634 415 boys [51.4%] and 600 938 girls [48.6%]), 1336 children (0.1%) had fathers who filled prescriptions for valproate during spermatogenesis. The median follow-up was 10.1 years (IQR, 5.1-14.8 years) for valproate-exposed children and 10.3 years (IQR, 5.2-15.6 years) for valproate-unexposed children. A total of 43 903 children (3.6%) received a diagnosis of major congenital malformations in the first year of life, and 51 633 children (4.2%) received a diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders during follow-up. When comparing the risk among valproate-exposed children with that among unexposed children, the ARR of major congenital malformations was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.67-1.18), the AHR of neurodevelopmental disorders was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.88-1.37), and the AHR of autism spectrum disorder was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.65-1.30). In analyses addressing the robustness of the findings (ie, dose-response analyses, sibling analyses, analyses restricted to children of fathers with epilepsy, analyses that used children with paternal lamotrigine exposure as active comparator, and analyses that used children with paternal exposure to valproate only before spermatogenesis as a negative control exposure), there still was no increased risk of any of the included end points., Conclusions and Relevance: In all analyses based on this large Danish cohort study, results suggest that exposure to valproate during spermatogenesis was not associated with offspring risk of congenital malformations or neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder.

Purpose: Antiretrovirals (ARVs) are life-saving drugs used for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection and antiviral drugs (AVs) for the treatment of chronic HBV infection. ARVs have proven highly effective in reducing perinatal HIV transmission, however the risk of birth defects from prenatal exposure to ARVs/AVs is an ongoing concern. The Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR), an international, prospective exposure-registration cohort study, monitors ARV and AV use in pregnancy for early signals of teratogenicity. This communication reports results of 30-years' experience of ARV/AV exposure during pregnancy and lessons learned through continuous quality improvement., Methods and Results: Birth defect prevalence is estimated and compared to internal and external groups. Statistical inference is based on exact methods for binomial proportions. Between 2006 and 2023, cumulative enrollment more than tripled from 6893 to 25 960 pregnancies and ARVs/AVs monitored increased from 29 to 222. Through January 2023, there were 21 636 live births and 631 outcomes with birth defects, for overall prevalence of 2.9/100 live births (95% CI 2.7, 3.2). The birth defect prevalence was 3.0% (95% CI 2.7%, 3.3%) among first trimester exposures and 2.8% (95% CI 2.5%, 3.2%) among second/third trimester exposures (prevalence ratio 1.04 [95% CI 0.89, 1.21])., Conclusions: Birth defect prevalence is not statistically significantly different between first trimester ARV/AV pregnancy exposures compared to second/third trimester exposures and is also not different from two population-based surveillance systems: 2.72/100 live births reported in the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP); and 4.17/100 live births from the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR)., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To describe ocular anomalies (OAs) in children and fetuses in a French general population, to estimate their prevalence, and to investigate a possible association between prenatal medication exposure and the occurrence of OA in utero or in early childhood., Methods: We conducted a case-control study using the EFEMERIS cohort, a database containing pregnancies registered in Haute-Garonne and their outcomes. We collected OA descriptions of fetuses at the time of pregnancy termination or of children at birth and the results of eye examinations of children at 9 months and 2 years of age., Results: The prevalence of overall OAs was 2.13%, of which 0.04% were congenital ocular malformations (COMs). A total of 2,968 cases and 136,619 controls were selected for analysis. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to prenatal exposure to medications for the digestive tract and metabolism, the cardiovascular system, and the respiratory system. Multivariable analysis revealed an increased risk of OA in children of mothers exposed to magnesium during and 1 month before pregnancy (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.38)., Conclusions: This first pharmaco-epidemiological study on OA in France suggests that OA may be associated with exposure to commonly used medications. Given the rarity of COM, larger, international studies are warranted., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: There is growing concern regarding teratogenic effect of antipsychotics. Previous research assessing association between antipsychotics and congenital malformations (CMs) yielded mixed results and were all derived from Western countries. We aimed to examine risk of major and organ/system-specific CMs associated with prenatal antipsychotic exposure in Hong Kong., Methods: This population-based study identified women aged 15-50 years who delivered their first/singleton child between 2003-2018 from public healthcare service database. Propensity score (PS)-weighted logistic-regression analyses were performed to examine risk of CMs following first-trimester exposure to antipsychotic classes (second- and first-generation antipsychotic; SGA and FGA) and six most frequently-prescribed individual antipsychotics., Results: Of 465,069 women, 419 and 420 redeemed ≥1 prescription of SGA and FGA during first-trimester, respectively. Prevalence of any CMs was 4.9% (95%CI:4.9-5.0%) in unexposed-infants, 9.1% (6.7-12.3%) in SGA-exposed infants, and 6.2% (4.3-9.0%) in FGA-exposed infants. SGA exposure (adjusted-odds-ratio: 2.11 [95%CI:1.19-3.86]) was associated with increased risk of CMs. This finding was consistent with sensitivity analyses addressing exposure misclassification and confounding by treatment indication, but not with PS-matched sensitivity analysis. Elevated risk of CMs was observed in infants exposed to high-dose olanzapine (7.50 [1.65-36.13]) and high-dose quetiapine (15.03 [4.86-56.72]), but with wide-CIs. Organ/system-specific malformations were not associated with SGA, FGA or individual antipsychotics., Conclusion: We observed a small increased risk of major malformations associated with SGA, but was not consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses, precluding firm conclusions. Research with large sample size clarifying comparative safety of individual antipsychotics on specific malformations is warranted.

Objective: In pregnancy, it is important to balance the risks of uncontrolled epileptic seizures to the mother and fetus against the potential teratogenic effects of antiseizure medications. Data are limited on pregnancy outcomes among patients taking lacosamide (LCM), particularly when taken as monotherapy. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes of LCM-exposed pregnancies., Methods: This analysis included all reports in the UCB Pharma pharmacovigilance database of exposure to LCM during pregnancy from spontaneous sources (routine clinical settings) or solicited reports from interventional clinical studies and noninterventional postmarketing studies. Prospective and retrospective reports were analyzed separately., Results: At the data cutoff (August 31, 2021), there were 202 prospective pregnancy cases with maternal exposure to LCM and known outcomes. Among these cases, 44 (21.8%) patients received LCM monotherapy and 158 (78.2%) received LCM polytherapy. Most patients received LCM during the first trimester (LCM monotherapy: 39 [88.6%]; LCM polytherapy: 143 [90.5%]). From the prospective pregnancy cases with maternal LCM exposure, there were 204 reported outcomes (two twin pregnancies occurred in the polytherapy group). The proportion of live births was 84.1% (37/44) in patients who received LCM as monotherapy, and 76.3% (122/160) for LCM polytherapy. The overall proportion of abortions (for any reason) was 15.9% (7/44) with LCM monotherapy, and 22.5% (36/160) with LCM polytherapy. Congenital malformations were reported in 2.3% (1/44) of known pregnancy outcomes with maternal exposure to LCM monotherapy, and 6.9% (11/160) with polytherapy., Significance: Our preliminary data do not raise major concerns on the use of LCM during pregnancy. Most pregnancies with LCM exposure resulted in healthy live births, and no new safety issues were identified. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as additional data are needed to fully evaluate the safety profile of LCM in pregnancy., (© 2024 UCB Biopharma SRL. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Importance: Women with epilepsy (WWE) require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy, which may be associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in their offspring., Objective: To investigate the prevalence of MCMs after prenatal exposure to 8 commonly used ASM monotherapies and changes in MCM prevalence over time., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study conducted from June 1999 to October 2022. Since 1999, physicians from more than 40 countries enrolled ASM-treated WWE before pregnancy outcome was known and followed up their offspring until 1 year after birth. Participants aged 14 to 55 years who were exposed to 8 of the most frequently used ASMs during pregnancy were included in this study. Data were analyzed from April to September 2023., Exposure: Maternal use of ASMs at conception., Main Outcomes and Measures: MCMs were assessed 1 year after birth by a committee blinded to type of exposure. Teratogenic outcomes across exposures were compared by random-effects logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders and prognostic factors., Results: A total of 10 121 prospective pregnancies exposed to ASM monotherapy met eligibility criteria. Of those, 9840 were exposed to the 8 most frequently used ASMs. The 9840 pregnancies occurred in 8483 women (mean [range] age, 30.1 [14.1-55.2] years). MCMs occurred in 153 of 1549 pregnancies for valproate (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.5%-11.5%), 9 of 142 for phenytoin (6.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%-11.6%), 21 of 338 for phenobarbital (6.2%; 95% CI, 4.1%-9.3%), 121 of 2255 for carbamazepine (5.4%; 95% CI, 4.5%-6.4%), 10 of 204 for topiramate (4.9%; 95% CI, 2.7%-8.8%), 110 of 3584 for lamotrigine (3.1%; 95% CI, 2.5%-3.7%), 13 of 443 for oxcarbazepine (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.0%), and 33 of 1325 for levetiracetam (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.8%-3.5%). For valproate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of MCMs associated with increasing dose of the ASM. Overall prevalence of MCMs decreased from 6.1% (153 of 2505) during the period 1998 to 2004 to 3.7% (76 of 2054) during the period 2015 to 2022. This decrease over time was significant in univariable logistic analysis but not after adjustment for changes in ASM exposure pattern., Conclusions and Relevance: Of all ASMs with meaningful data, the lowest prevalence of MCMs was observed in offspring exposed to levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine. Prevalence of MCMs was higher with phenytoin, valproate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital, and dose dependent for the latter 3 ASMs. The shift in exposure pattern over time with a declining exposure to valproate and carbamazepine and greater use of lamotrigine and levetiracetam was associated with a 39% decline in prevalence of MCMs, a finding that has major public health implications.

To assess the risk of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol during pregnancy, we conducted a prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug use during pregnancy provided by the Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy and Toranomon Hospital. Counseling information, including drug usage and participants' demographic information, was collected between April 1988 and December 2017. Pregnancy outcome data, including major birth defects, were obtained using a questionnaire administered 1 month after delivery. The risks of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine (n = 588) and ambroxol (n = 341) were compared with those of nonteratogenic drug use during the first trimester (n = 1525). The adjusted odds ratio (aORs) for major birth defects was calculated using a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. The incidence of major birth defects was 1.2% (7/588) and 2.1% (7/341) in the carbocisteine and ambroxol groups, respectively, which was comparable to the control group (26/1525, 1.7%). Results of multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant risks for both carbocisteine (aOR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.1, p = 0.11) and ambroxol (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.18-7.2, p = 0.88). No specific major birth defects were reported in the carbocisteine or ambroxol groups. This study demonstrated that carbocisteine and ambroxol exposure during the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. These results could help in counseling for the use of these drugs during pregnancy and further alleviate anxiety in patients., (© 2024 The Authors. Congenital Anomalies published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Teratology Society.)

Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and more recently for weight loss. The aim of this study was to assess the risks associated with GLP1-RA exposure during early pregnancy., Design: This multicentre, observational prospective cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP1-RA in early pregnancy either for diabetes or obesity treatment with those in two reference groups: (1) women with diabetes exposed to at least one non-GLP1-RA antidiabetic drug during the first trimester and (2) a reference group of overweight/obese women without diabetes, between 2009 and 2022., Setting: Data were collected from the databases of six Teratology Information Services., Participants: This study included 168 pregnancies of women exposed to GLP1-RA during the first trimester, alongside a reference group of 156 pregnancies of women with diabetes and 163 pregnancies of overweight/obese women., Results: Exposure to GLP1-RA in the first trimester was not associated with a risk of major birth defects when compared with diabetes (2.6% vs 2.3%; adjusted OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.16 to 5.82)) or to overweight/obese (2.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted OR 0.54 (0.11 to 2.75)). For the GLP1-RA group, cumulative incidence for live births, pregnancy losses and pregnancy terminations was 59%, 23% and 18%, respectively. In the diabetes reference group, corresponding estimates were 69%, 26% and 6%, while in the overweight/obese reference group, they were 63%, 29% and 8%, respectively. Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models indicated no increased risk of pregnancy losses in the GLP1-RA versus the diabetes and the overweight/obese reference groups, in both crude and adjusted analyses., Conclusions: This study offers reassurance in cases of inadvertent exposure to GLP1-RA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Due to the limited sample size, larger studies are required to validate these findings., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

There is a high global prevalence of NSAIDs during pregnancy. However, current evidence is largely conflicting regarding the safety of gestational NSAIDs use both for the pregnancy and offspring health. The aim of this study is to systematically review the relationship between NSAIDs use during pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and congenital abnormalities. Cohort studies and case control studies on congenital malformations, miscarriage and preterm birth in infants born to mothers who were exposed to NSAIDs during pregnancy were identified via PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library databases and the Reprotox® database from inception to 26 March 2021, and updated on 6 April 2023. On the whole, compared with the unexposed group, infants exposed to NSAIDs during early pregnancy showed a 28% increased risk of overall congenital anomalies (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.16-1.40), and 19% for major birth defects (OR 1.19, 95%CI 1.08-1.30). Contrary to previous beliefs, there appeared to be a trend towards a higher risk of miscarriage among women who were exposed to NSAIDs during pregnancy, but the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.93-1.55). According to our study findings, the use of NSAIDs by pregnant women has been linked to a higher risk of congenital anomalies and a negative impact on preterm birth. Therefore, we advise pregnant women to carefully consider the potential benefits and risks before using NSAIDs during pregnancy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate rates of occurrence of pregnancies associated with a foetal malformation (FM pregnancy rates) following simultaneous intrauterine exposure to two antiseizure medications in 524 pregnancies in women with epilepsy from the Australian Pregnancy Register who were treated simultaneously with various combinations and dosages of two antiseizure medications (duotherapy)., Results: FM pregnancy rates tended to be higher in those exposed simultaneously to two antiseizure medications, each of which was a statistically significant teratogen (valproate, topiramate, or carbamazepine), than when there was exposure to only one such teratogen. When there was exposure to only one such teratogen together with clonazepam or levetiracetam, for neither of which there was statistically significant evidence of heightened teratogenicity, the FM pregnancy rates also tended to be higher, but less so. When lamotrigine was the other component of the duotherapy with an established teratogen, FM pregnancy rates tended to be lower than that for the teratogen used as monotherapy., Conclusion: Leaving aside issues in relation to seizure control, our data suggest that it would be best to avoid using established teratogenic antiseizure medications (carbamazepine, valproate and topiramate) in combination with each other due to the increased FM risks. When combining an established teratogenic medication with a less teratogenic one, i.e. lamotrigine, levetiracetam or clonazepam, lamotrigine appears to be the safer option., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest FJE Vajda has received research support for the Australian Pregnancy Register from the Epilepsy Society of Australia, NHMRC, RMH Neuroscience Foundation, Epilepsy Action, Sanofi-Aventis, Eisai, UCB Pharma, and Sci-Gen. T O’Brien has received research support from the Epilepsy Society of Australia, NHMRC, RMH Neuroscience Foundation, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB Pharma, and Sci-Gen and Eisai. P Perucca is supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1163708), the Epilepsy Foundation, The University of Melbourne, Monash University, Brain Australia, and the Weary Dunlop Medical Research Foundation. He has also received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees given to his institution from Chiesi, Eisai, LivaNova, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Supernus, and UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work. He is an Associate Editor for Epilepsia Open. JE Graham, AA Hitchcock, CM Lander, and MJ Eadie have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Exposure to isotretinoin during pregnancy must be avoided due to its teratogenicity, but real-world data on its use are scarce. We aimed to describe (i) isotretinoin use in women of childbearing age in Germany; (ii) the occurrence of isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies; and (iii) malformations among children exposed in utero., Methods and Findings: Using observational data from the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD, claims data from approximately 20% of the German population), we conducted annual cross-sectional analyses to determine age-standardized prevalence of isotretinoin use between 2004 and 2019 among girls and women aged 13 to 49 years. In cohort analyses, we estimated the number of exposed pregnancies by assessing whether there was prescription supply overlapping the beginning of pregnancy (estimated supply was varied in sensitivity analyses) or a dispensation within the first 8 weeks of pregnancy. Data of live-born children classified as exposed in a critical period according to these criteria were reviewed to assess the presence of congenital malformations. The age-standardized prevalence of isotretinoin use per 1,000 girls and women increased from 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 1.24) in 2004 to 1.96 (95% CI: 1.92, 2.01) in 2019. In the base case analysis, we identified 178 pregnancies exposed to isotretinoin, with the number per year doubling during the study period, and at least 45% of exposed pregnancies ended in an induced abortion. In sensitivity analyses, the number of exposed pregnancies ranged between 172 and 375. Among live-born children, 6 had major congenital malformations. The main limitation of this study was the lack of information on the prescribed dose, i.e., the supply had to be estimated based on the dispensed amount of isotretinoin., Conclusions: Isotretinoin use among girls and women of childbearing age increased in Germany between 2004 and 2019, and there was a considerable number of pregnancies likely exposed to isotretinoin in a critical period. This highlights the importance of monitoring compliance with the existing risk minimization measures for isotretinoin in Germany., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. JR, NW, KP, BK, and UH are working at an independent, non-profit research institute, the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS. Unrelated to this study, BIPS occasionally conducts studies financed by the pharmaceutical industry. These are post-authorization safety studies (PASS) requested by health authorities. The design and conduct of these studies as well as the interpretation and publication are not influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. The study presented was not funded by the pharmaceutical industry., (Copyright: © 2024 Reinold et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

There is much debate about continuing antipsychotic medication in patients who need it when they become pregnant because benefits must be weighed against potential teratogenic and malformation effects related to antipsychotics themselves. To address this, we conducted a systematic review on the PubMed, PsycINFO and CINHAL databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov register using the following strategy: (toxicity OR teratogenicity OR malformation* OR "birth defect*" OR "congenital abnormality" OR "congenital abnormalities" OR "brain changes" OR "behavioral abnormalities" OR "behavioral abnormalities") AND antipsychotic* AND (pregnancy OR pregnant OR lactation OR delivery OR prenatal OR perinatal OR post-natal OR puerperium) on September 27, 2023. We found 38 studies to be eligible. The oldest was published in 1976, while most articles were recent. Most studies concluded that the antipsychotics, especially the second-generation antipsychotics, were devoid of teratogenic potential, while few studies were inconclusive and recommended replication. Most authoritative articles were from the Boston area, where large databases were implemented to study the malformation potential of psychiatric drugs. Other reliable databases are from Northern European registers. Overall conclusions are that antipsychotics are no more related to malformations than the disorders themselves; most studies recommend that there are no reasons to discontinue antipsychotic medications in pregnancy.

Cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride is an antibiotic often used by women who are or may be pregnant. However, the safety of exposure to it during the first trimester of pregnancy has not been assessed. In this study, we aimed to clarify the effects of exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Data were obtained from pregnant women who were counseled on drug use during pregnancy at two Japanese facilities from April 1988 to December 2017. The incidence of major malformations in singleton pregnancy was compared between neonates born to women who took cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride (n = 270) and control drugs (n = 1594) during their first trimester. The adjusted odds ratio of the incidence of major malformations was calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and maternal age. The incidence of major malformations was 2.6% in the cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride group and 1.8% in the control group. There were no significant differences in the incidence between the cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride and control groups (adjusted odds ratio: 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-3.42], p = 0.36). This prospective cohort study showed that exposure to cefcapene pivoxil hydrochloride during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of major malformations in infants. Our findings will help healthcare providers in choosing appropriate medicines.

Objectives: Teratogens are responsible for 5% of all known causes of congenital anomalies. Isotretinoin, a retinoic acid-derived agent, leads to congenital anomalies in 21-52% of cases when exposure occurs during pregnancy according to studies conducted before 2006. However, rates of congenital anomalies were much lower in later studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rates of congenital anomalies in isotretinoin exposure during pregnancy, isotretinoin exposure before pregnancy, and a control group unexposed to any teratogenic agents., Study Design: In this cohort study, we divided pregnant women admitted to our center between 2009 and 2020 into two groups: isotretinoin exposure before and during the pregnancy (n = 77) and isotretinoin exposure before the pregnancy (n = 75). We selected the control group from among the non-teratogen exposed pregnant women with a simple random sampling method. Obstetricians calculated the ages of all pregnancies via ultrasound (USG) (crown-rump diameter for the first trimester; biparietal diameter and femur length for the second trimester). After birth, a pediatric genetics specialist examined all babies. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on the babies who displayed complex phenotypes., Results: Among the isotretinoin exposure before and during the pregnancy, isotretinoin exposure before the pregnancy, and the control groups, there were statistically significant differences in live births (respectively, 64.3 %, 88 %, 93.3 %), congenital anomalies (respectively, 28.6 %, 6.1 %, 1.4 %), miscarriages (respectively, 13 %, 2.7 %, 4 %), terminations (respectively, 32.5 %, 9.3 %, 2.7 %), and premature births (11.9 %, 16.7 %, 2.9 %) (respectively, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.014, p < 0.001). We detected novel phenotypical features in five patients., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that study design, long-term follow-up, teratological counseling, and implementation of advanced molecular analysis in complex phenotypes with novel phenotypical features are beneficial for understanding the association of congenital anomalies with isotretinoin exposure. While evaluating congenital anomalies, we detected statistically significant differences between isotretinoin exposure before and during the pregnancy vs control, but we did not detect any statistically significant differences between isotretinoin exposure before the pregnancy and controls. Another finding of the study is that WES might be an efficient way to evaluate complex phenotypes in isotretinoin-exposed babies; however, further research is required., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)