Search

Introduction: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). However, strong evidence for this practice is lacking and there is a dire need for paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess the usefulness of SUP with omeprazole in critically ill children., Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled open-label trial, including 144 children admitted into a PICU with a paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score of less than 16. We randomly allocated patients to SUP with omeprazole or no SUP. The primary outcome was development of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or nosocomial infection., Results: The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27.1%, but clinically significant bleeding developed in only 5.6% of patients. We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the prophylaxis and control groups (27.8% vs 26.4%; P = .85). We also did not find a significant difference between the groups in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (9.6% vs 8.3%; P = .77). The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was higher in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group (30.6% vs 12.5%; P = .014). None of the patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. We did not find significant differences in mortality, length of PICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of bleeding (OR, 6.4; 95%CI, 2.73-14.9)., Conclusion: In PICU patients with mild to moderate organ dysfunction, omeprazole does not seem to be useful for prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while at the same time increasing the risk of CLABSI. Thus, we recommend restricting SUP to mechanically ventilated children., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Introduction: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). However, strong evidence for this practice is lacking and there is a dire need for paediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to assess the usefulness of SUP with omeprazole in critically ill children., Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled open-label trial, including 144 children admitted into a PICU with a paediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score of less than 16. We randomly allocated patients to SUP with omeprazole or no SUP. The primary outcome was development of upper gastrointestinal bleeding or nosocomial infection., Results: The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 27.1%, but clinically significant bleeding developed in only 5.6% of patients. We did not find a significant difference in the incidence of bleeding between the prophylaxis and control groups (27.8 vs. 26.4%; p = 0.85). We also did not find a significant difference between the group in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (9.6 vs. 8.3%; p = 0.77). The incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was higher in the prophylaxis group compared to the control group (30.6% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.014). None of the patients developed Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. We did not find significant differences in mortality, length of PICU stay or duration of mechanical ventilation. Mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of bleeding (OR 6.4; 95% CI, 2.73-14.9)., Conclusion: In PICU patients with mild to moderate organ dysfunction, omeprazole does not seem to be useful for prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while at the same time increasing the risk of CLABSI. Thus, we recommend restricting SUP to mechanically ventilated children., (Copyright © 2021. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Objective: Genetic factors contribute significantly to type 1 diabetes (T1D) etiology. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the CD226 gene (rs763361 C>T) has been associated with T1D susceptibility in European patients, but data from other populations is limited. Our aim was to study the contribution of this polymorphism to T1D susceptibility among Egyptian children., Methods: A case-control study including 74 children with T1D and 82 healthy children as a control group. Genotyping of CD226 gene polymorphism was performed for all participants by DNA extraction followed by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism., Results: The frequency of T allele was 78.4% in patients and 68.3% in controls (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.8; P=0.046). TT, TC, and CC genotypes were found in 62.2%, 32.4%, and 5.4% of the patients, respectively, and in 41.5%, 53.7%, and 4.9% of controls, respectively. Under the recessive model, TT genotype was significantly associated with T1D risk (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.21-4.41; P=0.010). The mean age at diabetes onset was significantly lower in patients carrying T allele compared with C allele (8.03±3.8 year vs. 10.5±2.54 year; P<0.001) and among those with TT genotype compared with the pooled TC+CC genotypes (7.5±2.6 year vs. 10.6±2.6 year; P<0.001). No significant difference was found between genotypes or alleles regarding the HbA1c level., Conclusion: T allele and TT genotype of the CD226 rs763361 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to T1D and with a lower age of disease onset among Egyptian children., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)