Search

Background: SELECT was the first global randomised controlled trial of selexipag with standard of care in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension., Methods: SELECT was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, group-sequential, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03689244). Adults aged ≤85 years in World Health Organization Functional Class I-IV, with a 6-min walk distance of 100-450 m, were randomised (1:1) to receive selexipag (200-1600 µg twice daily titration until individual maximum tolerated dose)+standard of care or placebo+standard of care. Patients were recruited into the haemodynamic set (first 91 randomised patients to undergo right heart catheterisation (RHC); week 20) or non-haemodynamic cohort (remaining patients, no RHC required). The primary end-point was percent of baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; week 20). Safety was also assessed., Results: Of 321 patients screened, 128 were randomised (haemodynamic set n=91 (selexipag n=47; placebo n=44)). In the haemodynamic set, 29 (31.9%) patients had previous pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 20 (22.0%) balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 14 (15.4%) both PEA and BPA; 28 (30.8%) were inoperable. The independent data monitoring committee recommended to stop the study for futility as no statistically significant difference was observed for the primary end-point (between-treatment geometric least squares mean ratio of PVR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; p=0.412). Adverse events were reported in 63 (98.4%) and 53 (82.8%) patients for selexipag and placebo, respectively., Conclusions: SELECT was discontinued for futility, as no treatment effect on the primary end-point (PVR) was observed. Safety data were consistent with the established safety profile of selexipag, with no new safety signals identified., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N.H. Kim has consulted for, received research grants from or spoken for Janssen, Bayer, Merck, United Therapeutics, Enzyvant, Gossamer Bio, Polarean and Pulnovo. R. Channick has consulted for, received research grants from or spoken for Janssen, Bayer, United Therapeutics, Respira, Third Pole, Merck, Aria CV and Gossamer. M. Delcroix reports research grants from Janssen, speaker and consultant fees from Altavant, Acceleron, AOP, Bayer, Ferrer, Gossamer, INARI, Janssen, United Therapeutics and MSD, outside the submitted work, and all paid to her institution; and is holder of a Janssen Chair for Pulmonary Hypertension at KU Leuven. M. Madani has served as a consultant and has received fees from Wexler Surgical, Janssen, Bayer and MSD. J. Pepke-Zaba reports research grants from MSD and consultant fees from Ferrer, Gossamer, Janssen, United Therapeutics and MSD. V. Easton, S. Gesang and D. Richard are employees of Johnson & Johnson and own shares in the company. J.I. Borissoff is an employee of Johnson & Johnson. H-A. Ghofrani reports consultancy fees from Gossamer Bio, Inc., Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer AG, Attgeno, Janssen/Actelion, MSD/Acceleron, Pfizer, Liquidia, Morphic and Keros, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer AG, Janssen/Actelion, Gossamer Bio, Keros and MSD/Acceleron, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer AG, Attgeno, Janssen/Actelion, Insmed, MSD/Acceleron and Pfizer; H-A. Ghofrani's spouse is an employee of Liquidia., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Objectives: To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability, including behavior and executive functioning, during adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) treatment in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <18 years of age) with focal-onset or generalized seizures enrolled in 2 open-label, long-term follow-up trials., Methods: Two open-label extension trials (SP848: NCT00938912; EP0034: NCT01964560) were conducted in pediatric patients who had participated in previous trials of adjunctive LCM (SP0847/NCT00938431; SP0966/NCT01969851; EP0060/NCT02710890; SP0967/NCT02477839; SP0969/NCT01921205); SP848 also directly enrolled eligible pediatric patients who had not previously participated in a clinical trial of LCM. Outcomes included retention, efficacy, and safety/tolerability. Patient improvement was assessed with Clinician's and Caregiver's Global Impression of Change scale. Behavior and emotional function was assessed with Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and executive functioning was assessed with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function® (BRIEF)., Results: The pooled dataset from both trials included 905 patients (851 in the focal-onset seizure population and 47 in the generalized seizure population). In the overall population, Kaplan-Meier-estimated 1-year retention was 80 %. From baseline to the end of the treatment period, patients in the focal-onset seizure population had a median percent reduction in focal-onset seizure frequency per 28 days of 60.4 %, 55.4 % of patients were 50 % responders, and 40.8 % of patients were 75 % responders. In patients with ≥12 months of LCM treatment, ≥12 month seizure freedom during the LCM treatment period was achieved by 29.9 % of patients in the focal-onset seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 641 days) and 24.4 % of patients in the generalized seizure population (median duration of first ≥12-month seizure-free interval: 665 days). Improvement during LCM treatment was reported in >75 % of patients by both physicians and caregivers. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 749 (82.8 %) patients, most commonly pyrexia (18.9 %), upper respiratory tract infection (18.6 %), nasopharyngitis (16.2 %), vomiting (15.7 %), and somnolence (11.8 %). The most common drug-related TEAEs were somnolence (8.5 %), dizziness (7.6 %), and vomiting (5.4 %). Behavioral and emotional function was generally stable in patients 1.5-5 years of age and slightly improved in patients ≥6 years of age, and executive functioning was stable in patients <5 years of age and generally slightly improved in patients 5-18 years of age., Conclusions: In this analysis of a large patient pool from 2 open-label trials, long-term adjunctive LCM was efficacious and generally well tolerated in children with epilepsy and focal-onset or generalized seizures. Behavior and executive functioning were generally stable without observable worsening during long-term adjunctive LCM treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MK Farkas and I Makedonska report no conflicts of interest. C Beller, D Bourikas, S Dimova, F Floricel, C McClung, and B Moseley are salaried employees of UCB Pharma and have received UCB Pharma stocks from their employment. C de la Loge (PCOM Analytics, Avallon, France) is contracted by UCB Pharma. S Therriault was an employee of UCB Pharma at the time the trials were conducted. JE Pina-Garza has served as a consultant and speaker for Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Marinus Pharmaceuticals, Neurelis, SK Life Science, and UCB Pharma; and received payment from Elsevier for services as book editor., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and burdensome mental health condition, often resistant to conventional treatments. Agomelatine (Valdoxan), a compound acting on serotonin and melatonin systems, has shown promise in treating those with treatment-resistant OCD based on anecdotal reports and case studies., Methods: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant OCD. Participants were randomized into an intervention group (receiving agomelatine 50 mg/day) and a control group (receiving placebo). OCD symptoms were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) over a 12-week period., Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, or baseline Y-BOCS scores between intervention and control groups. Agomelatine did not demonstrate a significant improvement in OCD symptoms compared to placebo. Adverse events were comparable between groups, and liver enzyme levels remained within the normal range., Conclusion: This study, while not confirming superior efficacy compared to placebo, underscores the need for continued investigation into agomelatine's potential for treating specific subgroups of OCD patients, underscoring the need for more comprehensive and well-controlled trials in the future., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Agomelatine is an antidepressant drug that acts as an agonist of melatoninergic MT1/2 receptors and an antagonist of serotonergic 5-HT2C receptors. Studies suggest that agomelatine has anxiolytic properties in social anxiety, but there are no studies that assessed the effects of this compound in human experimental anxiety induced by a public speaking test. The objective of our investigation was to assess the effects of agomelatine on human experimental anxiety using the Simulation Public Speaking Test (SPST)., Methods: Agomelatine (25 mg, n = 14), citalopram (20 mg, n = 14), venlafaxine (75 mg, n = 14), or placebo (n = 14) were administered in single doses to healthy volunteers in a double-blind study. Subjective anxiety was assessed with the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and blood levels of prolactin and cortisol were also recorded, as well as plasma levels of the 3 drugs., Results: The SPST induced significant subjective, physiological, and hormonal effects in all groups. The SPST also increased the anxiety and decreased mental sedation Visual Analogue Mood Scale factors during the anticipatory and performance phases of the test. Citalopram increased anxiety during the test in females, whereas agomelatine and venlafaxine were not different from placebo., Conclusions: Confirming previous results, a serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, caused an anxiogenic effect in the SPST only in females. Acute administration of a low dose of agomelatine failed to modify the behavioral and physiological changes caused by this test. Future studies using higher doses and repeated administration should investigate if agomelatine behavioral and physiological effects could be detected in human experimental anxiety models., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Raynaud phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DUs) are the main signs of digital vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Selexipag is an oral prostacyclin agonist approved for SSc-related pulmonary arterial hypertension. Following our previous preliminary short-course report, we herein present long-term data on selexipag safety and efficacy in the treatment of SSc digital vasculopathy., Methods: Selexipag was administered to patients with SSc with severe digital vasculopathy refractory or with contraindication to all other vasoactive therapies. Each subject was assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcomes related to RP and DUs were evaluated along with modified Rodnan skin score of the fingers. Digital perfusion was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA). Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) was also performed., Results: Eight patients with SSc (63% female, mean age 50.1 years) received selexipag. After 12 months of treatment, RP was reported to significantly decrease in the number of daily episodes and mean duration ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). All patients achieved a complete healing of their DUs ( P = 0.03) within 6 months. A progressive reduction of fingers skin score was observed ( P = 0.03). No structural changes of capillaries were noted on NVC. Conversely, LASCA revealed an important increase in total digital perfusion ( P = 0.004) despite seasonal variability. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in the literature., Conclusion: We observed a sustained efficacy of selexipag on SSc digital vasculopathy during 1 year of administration. Our promising results encourage the design of a new randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of selexipag on SSc digital vasculopathy., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To describe the safety and effectiveness of treating pediatric patients who have pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with selexipag in a real-world, multicenter cohort, given that data supporting its use in pediatric PAH are sparse., Study Design: We report a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of children with PAH treated with selexipag. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical records. Clinical parameters were analyzed at 3 timepoints: before selexipag, 3-12 months after selexipag, and >12 months follow-up., Results: Eighty-seven patients were included, 32 received selexipag as add-on to background therapy, and 55 transitioned from another prostanoid. The median starting and final doses were 4.7 and 28.5 μg/kg/dose twice daily, respectively. Add-on patients demonstrated improved indexed pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance ratio after selexipag initiation (PVRi/SVRi, 0.62v0.53; P = .034) with a lower average mean pulmonary artery pressure (46 vs 39 mm Hg; P = NS), and oxygen consumption (maximal oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise testing [VO 2 max] 27.8 mL/kg/min vs 30.9 mL/kg/min; P = NS). Transition patients demonstrated stable mean pulmonary artery pressure (47 mm Hg vs 45 mm Hg; P = NS) and a lower mean indexed pulmonary vascular resistance (10.9 Wood units∗m 2 vs 8.2 Wood units∗m 2 ; P = NS) but late functional worsening in some with VO 2 max decreased at follow-up (26.0 mL/kg/min vs 19.5 mL/kg/min). Side effects were noted in 40% of the cohort, but prompted discontinuation in only 2%., Conclusions: In a large, multicenter cohort, the oral prostacyclin agonist selexipag demonstrates favorable tolerability and effectiveness. Add-on patients demonstrated early hemodynamic improvement. Transition patients demonstrated early stability with risk of late functional worsening, highlighting the importance of ongoing monitoring., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The current investigation sought to conduct a real-world analysis of adverse events (AEs) associated with selexipag by utilizing data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Methods: The Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and the Medicines Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method were employed to assess the potential associations between selexipag and AEs. Case reports of adverse drug reaction (ADR) related to selexipag were systematically sourced from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases., Results: Our analysis identified 281 Preferred Terms (PTs) signals across 20 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were found to meet the screening threshold. The most common AEs were consistent with instructions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and case reports. Of significant note, unexpected AEs principally target SOCs of infections and infestations, blood and lymphatic system, renal and urinary disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, including pneumonia, metapneumovirus, decreased hemoglobin. transfusion, iron-deficiency anemia, dialysis hypotension, abnormal creatinine renal clearance, liver function test increased, hepatic function abnormal, hepatic enzyme increased. Within the pediatric population, unexpected signals such as pyrexia, pneumonia, and intussusception necessitate special precautionary measures., Conclusions: The findings contribute valuable insights to clinical practice, reinforcing the importance of vigilant monitoring, and can be instrumental in guiding both therapeutic applications and safety assessments of this particular medication.

Purpose: The pillar for therapeutic decisions in the evolution of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the patients' prognostic stratification., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Spanish real-world setting to assess the clinical improvement of PAH patients treated with selexipag measured as changes in the risk profile. Secondary objectives were to describe their baseline characteristics, initial risk status, and variables used to assess patient survival and adverse events., Findings: Total 42 patients (mean age 52.36 [SD: 15.09] years) were included. All had received initial endothelin receptor antagonist treatment and 95.2% dual therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor or riociguat. At 6 to 12 months from baseline, patients risk stratification tripled the percentage of patients with low risk, and a trend towards improved risk stratification (P = 0.122). World Health Organization functional class changed, with more patients in milder classes (P = 0.003), and symptom progression slowed down (P < 0.0001). At 3-years, survival was 85.7% and the estimated median survival time was 2.73 years (SD: 1.351; 95% CI: 2.51-2.95)., Implications: Selexipag did not achieve a significant improvement in risk profile, although it did show an excellent survival rate, effectively improved functional class, and delayed symptom progression in real life. Selexipag was well tolerated and showed a favorable safety profile, supporting a clinical benefit for PAH patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Rafael Bravo-Marqués potential conflicts of interest are related to collaboration with Janssen and MSD. Dr. Víctor Becerra-Muñoz potential conflicts of interest are related to collaboration with Janssen, MSD, and Novartis. Dr. Francisco Espíldora-Hernández potential conflicts of interest are related to collaboration with Janssen, MSD, and Ferrer. Dr. Alejandro Recio-Mayoral potential conflicts of interest are related to collaboration with MSD and AOP Health., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Agomelatine is effective in the treatment of depression, but its effect for post-stroke depression (PSD) remains unclear. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs in treating PSD. We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cqvip databases for double-blind randomized controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of agomelatine versus SSRIs/SNRIs for PSD until December 2022. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score, and the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of overall adverse reactions. Nine studies comprising 857 patients with PSD were included. After 6-12 weeks of treatment, the HAMD score ( P  = 0.16) and the overall response rates ( P  = 0.20) in the agomelatine group were comparable to that in the SSRIs/SNRIs group. Participants treated with agomelatine achieved higher Barthel Index scores compared with the SSRIs/SNRIs group ( P  = 0.02). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall adverse reactions ( P  = 0.008) and neurological adverse reactions ( P  < 0.0001) in the agomelatine group. The efficacy of agomelatine for treating PSD is probably comparable to that of SSRIs/SNRIs, and it may improve stroke outcomes with better safety., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Primary objective was to evaluate efficacy of lacosamide administered concomitantly with 1-3 antiseizure medications in young children with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures., Methods: Double-blind, parallel-group trial (SP0967: NCT02477839/2013-000717-20) conducted between June 2015 and May 2020 at hospitals and clinics in 25 countries. Patients (aged ≥1 month to <4 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures were randomized 1:1 to adjunctive lacosamide or placebo using an interactive voice/web response system and stratified by age. After a 20-day titration period, patients who reached target-dose range (8-12 mg/kg/day) entered a 7-day maintenance period. Region-specific primary efficacy variables were based on ≤72-h video-electroencephalograms: change in average daily frequency (ADF) of electrographic focal seizures as measured on end-of-maintenance video-electroencephalogram versus end-of-baseline video-electroencephalogram (United States); 50% responder rate (≥50% reduction in ADF of focal seizures) during maintenance (European Union)., Results: In total, 255 patients were randomized (lacosamide/placebo: 128/127) and received ≥1 trial medication dose. Percentage reduction in ADF of focal seizures for lacosamide (116 patients) versus placebo (120 patients) was 3.2% (95% confidence interval = -13.6 to 17.5, p = 0.69). 50% responder rate was 41.4% for lacosamide (116 patients), 37.5% for placebo (120 patients) (p = 0.58). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 44.5% of lacosamide-treated patients (placebo 51.2%)., Interpretation: Adjunctive lacosamide did not show superior efficacy versus placebo in young children with focal seizures. However, efficacy variables were potentially affected by high variability and low reliability between readers in video-electroencephalogram interpretation. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated; safety profile was acceptable and consistent with that in adults and children aged ≥4 years., (© 2024 UCB Biopharma SRL. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of agomelatine for treating the sleep and mood disorders in epilepsy patients., Methods: Retrospective data were derived from 113 epilepsy patients for at least 8 weeks. All the subjects were divided into two groups, one was treated with agomelatine, the other was treated with escitalopram. Their depression and anxiety states were assessed by Hamilton Depression (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) Scales. Sleep quality was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)., Results: The HAMA, HAMD and PSQI scores in both groups significantly declined after the treatments with agomelatine and escitalopram. However, the agomelatine group exhibited greater improvement in terms of HAMA and PSQI scores compared to the escitalopram group. No severe adverse events were observed in agomelatine group., Significance: Agomelatine performed better in HAMA and PSQI scores compared to escitalopram, where no significant increase in seizure frequency or side effects were observed. Possibly, agomelatine presents a promising therapeutic option for treating the sleep or mood disorders in epilepsy patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The maintenance dosage of selexipag is categorized as low, medium or high. In order to assess the efficacy and safety of different dosages of selexipag for the risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis., Methods: Studies assessing PAH risk stratification indices, such as the World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), six-minute walk distance (6MWD), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, right atrial pressure (RAP), cardiac index (CI) and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO 2 ), were included., Results: Thirteen studies were included. Selexipag led to improvements in the 6MWD (MD: 24.20 m, 95% CI: 10.74-37.67), NT-proBNP (SMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.79-0.04), CI (MD: 0.47 L/min/m 2 , 95% CI: 0.17-0.77) and WHO-FC (OR: 0.564, 95% CI: 0.457-0.697). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that all three dosages improved the 6MWD. A moderate dosage led to improvements in the CI (MD: 0.30 L/min/m 2 , 95% CI: 0.15-0.46) and WHO-FC (OR: 0.589, 95% CI: 0.376-0.922). Within 6 months of treatment, only the WHO-FC and CI were significantly improved (OR: 0.614, 95% CI: 0.380-0.993; MD: 0.30 L/min/m 2 , 95% CI: 0.16-0.45, respectively). More than 6 months of treatment significantly improved the 6MWD, WHO-FC and NT-proBNP (MD: 40.87 m, 95% CI: 10.97-70.77; OR: 0.557, 95% CI: 0.440-0.705; SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -1.17-0.05, respectively)., Conclusions: Low, medium, and high dosages of selexipag all exhibited good effects. When treatment lasted for more than 6 months, selexipag exerted obvious effects, even in the low-dosage group. This finding is important for guiding individualized treatments., (© 2023 The Authors. Animal Models and Experimental Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences.)

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the safety, dosing regimen, and efficacy of selexipag for pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH)., Methods: A literature search of the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from inception through February 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently searched and evaluated the quality of the studies and pooled data when appropriate. Full-text articles of studies of children diagnosed with PH and treated with selexipag were eligible. Pediatric patients with PH were classified into 2 groups: the add-on therapy group, in which selexipag was used as a third therapy in addition to the baseline treatment, and the transition therapy group, in which patients were switched from parenteral prostacyclin analogs to selexipag., Findings: Fourteen studies involving 58 pediatric patients with PH were included. All studies were either case reports or case series. Overall, 30 and 28 patients were in the add-on and transition therapy groups, respectively. In both groups, selexipag was initially administered as 50-200 µg twice daily and titrated to a tolerated dosage of 200-1,600 µg twice daily. Prostacyclin analogs were simultaneously weaned for patients in the transition group. In the add-on therapy group, 16 patients (80.0%) were at low risk of the World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC I/II), 12 (76.9%) were at low risk of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; >350 m), and 21 (95.5%) were at low risk of the pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRi; <20 WU/m 2 ). Furthermore, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and mean pulmonary arterial pressure were significantly improved. More than 70% of patients experienced common tolerable side effects, such as headache, nausea, and diarrhea. In the transition therapy group, 5 patients (55.6%) were at low risk according to WHO FC I/II, 6 (66.7%) were at low risk according to 6MWD, and 14 (87.5) were at low risk according to PVRi; however, selexipag had no significant effect on their hemodynamic parameters. Additionally, more than 80% of patients experienced no side effects., Implications: Selexipag as add-on therapy or for transition from prostacyclin analogs may have a favorable safety profile and potential efficacy for pediatric patients with PH. Further high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of selexipag for the treatment of pediatric PH is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim of the Study: To evaluate the safety of lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding., Material and Methods: Patients taking LCM monotherapy treated at the university epilepsy clinic were prospectively followed up during pregnancy, delivery, and breastfeeding. Data on seizure frequency, LCM dosage, pregnancy course, delivery and breastfeeding, birth outcome, congenital malformation, and development of newborns was collected., Results: Four pregnancies in three patients with refractory focal epilepsy treated with LCM monotherapy were reported. One of these pregnancies ended in a miscarriage during the seventh week of gestation. The average daily LCM dose at the time of conception was 300 mg. Treatment with LCM was continued throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding. The dose of LCM was increased in two pregnancies: in one case following a seizure relapse, and in the other case as a preventive measure to avoid an increase in seizure frequency. Seizure frequency remained stable during pregnancy in two cases. All deliveries were carried out via caesarean section, with an average gestational age at birth of 37.6 weeks. The Apgar score was 10 in all newborns, and no congenital malformations were detected. At the age of 12 months, normal developmental milestones were reached. Infants were breastfed without any complications., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: This case series adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting the relative safety of LCM monotherapy throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Objective: To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of agomelatine in the treatment of patients with depressive disorder., Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to agomelatine in the treatment of patients with depressive disorder published in PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and Wangfang were retrieved. Extracted data on the efficacy and safety of agomelatine and placebo in the treatment of depressive disorder, and the collected data were processed by RevMan5.4 software., Results: A total of 10 RCTs were included. Meta-analysis showed that the HAMD-17 total scores of agomelatine group were statistically different from those of placebo group (odds ratio [OR]: 2.04, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 1.71-2.43, P < .001). High heterogeneity was found between agomelatine groups and placebo groups (P < .0001, and I2 = 78%), so a subgroup analysis was further performed, and the heterogeneity became insignificant (P = .33, and I2 = 14%) after excluding the studies, of which course of treatment was 24 weeks or the sample size was relatively small. The adverse events between agomelatine and placebo groups were not statistically significant (OR: 1.15, 95% CIs: 0.69-1.92; P = .05)., Conclusion: Agomelatine was superior comparable to placebo in the treatment of patients with depressive disorder, and has fewer adverse events., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Lacosamide and levetiracetam are antiseizure medications (ASMs) commonly utilized in the treatment and prevention of seizures. Historically, these agents have been administered as slow IV infusions after further dilution. Recent literature suggests that rapid administration via undiluted IV push may be safe and may increase efficiency of administration. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of undiluted IV push lacosamide and levetiracetam over 5 min. Methods: This study was conducted as a single-centered, retrospective, observational cohort that analyzed the rapid administration of undiluted lacosamide and levetiracetam. Adult patients admitted from September 1st, 2019, to May 31st, 2020, receiving at least one administration of IV push lacosamide at any dose or levetiracetam at doses ≤ 1500 mg were evaluated. The primary safety outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia. Results: A total of 86 subjects were evaluated; 36 patients were administered lacosamide, and 50 patients were administered levetiracetam. Hypotension or bradycardia occurred in 6 patients in the lacosamide group (16.6%) and 6 patients in the levetiracetam group (12.0%). There were no reported infusion site reactions. Among the subjects who received lacosamide and had a 12-lead electrocardiogram (EKG), there were no reported incidences of a prolonged PR interval. Conclusions: In this safety-analysis cohort, undiluted lacosamide and levetiracetam were not associated with significant adverse events when administered via IV push over 5 min. This seems to be a safe alternative method of administration to intermittent infusion. A larger, prospective cohort is needed to confirm these findings.

Background: As 40-60% of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not adequately respond to the first-line treatment, finding an effective second-line treatment is required. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of agomelatine (a selective melatonin receptor agonist and a 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)2 C antagonist) augmentation of sertraline in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe OCD., Methods: In this 12-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial, 65 patients with moderate to severe OCD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria and a Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) score of over 21, were included. They were assigned with sertraline (100 mg/day for the first 4 weeks and 200 mg/day for the next 8 weeks) and either agomelatine (25 mg/day) or placebo. The primary outcome was OCD symptoms measured by the Y-BOCS., Results: Fifty patients (24 in agomelatine group and 26 in placebo group) completed the trial. The Y-BOCS scores in total (MD (95% CI) = 12.25 (11.00, 13.49) (P < 0.001) vs. MD (95% CI) = 12.46 (6.65, 15.74) (P < 0.001)), the obsession subscale (MD (95% CI) = 5.04 (4.19, 5.88) (P < 0.001) vs. MD (95% CI) = 5.00 (3.84, 6.16) (P = 0.0001)), and compulsion subscale (MD (95% CI) = 7.21 (6.34, 8.07) (P < 0.001) vs. MD (95% CI) = 7.460 (6.50, 8.42) (P < 0.001)) significantly decreased in both groups. Although, at the end of the trial, no significant difference was observed between the scores of the two groups in total (MD (95% CI) = 0.480 (-1.23, 2.19) (P = 0.78)), the obsession subscale (MD (95% CI) = 1.020 (-0.15, 2.19) (P = 0.38)), and the compulsion subscale (MD (95% CI) = 0.540 (-0.34, 1.42) (P = 0.54)). No major adverse effects were recorded, and the frequency of side effects was not significantly different between the groups., Conclusion: Agomelatine in augmentation with sertraline is safe and tolerable in patients with moderate to severe OCD. However, our study does not support its efficacy in improving OCD symptoms, compared to placebo., Trial Registration: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials on 14/07/2020 ( www.irct.ir ; IRCT ID: IRCT20170123032145N5)., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Depressive disorders constitute a series of debilitating diseases. This study investigated the therapeutic effect of agomelatine (AG) combined with aerobic exercise (AE) on patients with moderate-severe depression (MSD) and the changes of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level in patients after treatment as well as its significance., Methods: A total of 178 MSD patients were randomly assigned to the AG group (N = 90) and AG + AE group (N = 88). The severity of depressive disorders and anhedonia was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory, and Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale scores. The serum CRP level in MSD patients was detected by turbidity assay. Patients were defined as remitters, responders, and nonresponders according to the HAM-D 17 score, and the treatment efficacy was analyzed, followed by evaluation of the serum CRP level in patients with different treatment responses. Finally, the adverse reactions of patients during treatment were statistically analyzed., Results: After treatment, the HAM-D, Beck Depression Inventory, and Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale scores and the serum CRP level of the 2 groups were reduced, and changes in the AG + AE group was more significant than that in the AG group. The clinical efficacy of the AG + AE group was better than that of the AG group. After treatment, the serum levels of CRP in remitters and responders were reduced, but not significantly in nonresponders. The incidence of adverse events in the AG + AE group was lower than that in the AG group., Conclusion: AG + AE reduced the serum level of CRP in MSD patients and had good therapeutic effects on MSD patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Seizures are common in critically ill children and neonates, and these patients would benefit from intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications with few adverse effects. We aimed to assess the safety profile of IV lacosamide (LCM) among children and neonates., Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study examined the safety of IV LCM use in 686 children and 28 neonates who received care between January 2009 and February 2020., Results: Adverse events (AEs) were attributed to LCM in only 1.5% (10 of 686) of children, including rash (n = 3, .4%), somnolence (n = 2, .3%), and bradycardia, prolonged QT interval, pancreatitis, vomiting, and nystagmus (n = 1, .1% each). There were no AEs attributed to LCM in the neonates. Across all 714 pediatric patients, treatment-emergent AEs occurring in >1% of patients included rash, bradycardia, somnolence, tachycardia, vomiting, feeling agitated, cardiac arrest, tachyarrhythmia, low blood pressure, hypertension, decreased appetite, diarrhea, delirium, and gait disturbance. There were no reports of PR interval prolongation or severe cutaneous adverse reactions. When comparing children who received a recommended versus a higher than recommended initial dose of IV LCM, there was a twofold increase in the risk of rash in the higher dose cohort (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-4.38)., Significance: This large observational study provides novel evidence demonstrating the tolerability of IV LCM in children and neonates., (© 2023 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Purpose: The effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) among Chinese children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy has not yet been established. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of LCM among children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy in Xinjiang, Northwest China., Methods: Effectiveness was assessed by measuring changes in seizure frequency at 3, 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. Patients that achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the frequency of all seizures per month, relative to baseline, were considered to be responders., Results: 105 children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy were enrolled in the study. The responder rates were 47.6%, 39.2%, and 31.9%, respectively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Seizure freedom rates were 32.4%, 28.9%, and 23.6% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 92.4%, 78.1%, and 69.5%, respectively. The maintenance dose of LCM within the responder group (8.2 ± 4.5 mg·kg - 1 ·d - 1 ) was significantly higher compared to the non-responder group (7.3 ± 2.3 mg·kg - 1 ·d - 1 ) (p < 0.05). At first follow-up, 44 patients (41.9%) reported experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse events., Conclusion: This real-world study of children and adolescents validated that LCM was both an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the treatment of refractory epilepsy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Lacosamide is a newer antiepileptic medication used in refractory neonatal seizures with limited safety and efficacy data. This case series spans 4 years and includes 38 neonates cared for in the neonatal, pediatric, and cardiovascular intensive care units, who received lacosamide for refractory seizures. Because lacosamide affects atrioventricular node function in adults, among other metrics, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes were monitored closely in these neonates. Within this cohort, 2 neonates were found to have atrial bigeminy on ECG and telemetry. Otherwise, lacosamide was generally well tolerated with sleepiness being the most common symptom noted. This case series reports data on the tolerability of lacosamide and emphasizes the importance of monitoring key cardiac intervals with ECG before and after the use of lacosamide in this population.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous (IV) lacosamide infusion in patients aged ≥1 month to <17 years with epilepsy., Methods: This Phase 2/3 open-label trial (EP0060; NCT02710890) enrolled patients in two age cohorts (cohort 1: ≥8 to <17 years; cohort 2: ≥1 month to <8 years). Eligible patients were receiving oral lacosamide as adjunctive treatment or monotherapy (in an open-label long-term trial or by prescription) or were not receiving lacosamide before enrolment. Patients initiated IV lacosamide (2-12 mg/kg/day or 100-600 mg/day; 15-60 minutes infusion) as a replacement for oral lacosamide or as adjunctive treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations due to TEAEs., Results: In total, 103 patients were enrolled and completed the trial; 55 patients were included in cohort 1 (≥8 to <17 years), 48 in cohort 2 (≥1 month to <8 years). During the 4 weeks before screening, 74 (71.8%) patients had focal seizures, 12 (11.7%) had generalized seizures, and two (1.9%) had unclassified seizures. Most patients (74 [71.8%]) initiated lacosamide as adjunctive IV treatment. The mean overall duration of exposure to IV lacosamide was 1.18 days. Seventy-nine (76.7%) patients had one IV lacosamide infusion, 20 (19.4%) had two, one (1.0%) had three, and three (2.9%) had 10 infusions. Overall, five (4.9%) patients had a total of seven TEAEs. The only TEAEs reported in two or more patients were increased blood triglycerides (two [1.9%]). No serious or severe TEAEs were reported, and no patients discontinued due to TEAEs. No TEAEs were considered drug-related by the investigator. No consistent or clinically relevant treatment-related changes from baseline were observed for hematology, clinical chemistry parameters, vital signs, or 12-lead electrocardiograms., Significance: IV lacosamide was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <17 years) with epilepsy, and no new safety concerns were identified., (© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Belumosudil (BLM) is a ROCK inhibitor that has been firstly developed by Surface Logix, later acquired by Kadmon Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), Psoriasis Vulgaris (PV), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hepatic impairment (HI), diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). BLM received a breakthrough therapy designation and priority review from the FDA, which reviewed the NDA under the real-time oncology review (RTOR) pilot programme and approved it six weeks ahead of the PDUFA deadline of August 30, 2021. On July 16 th , 2021, The USFDA authorized BLM under the brand name REZUROCK TM for the treatment of cGVHD in adults and pediatric patients aged ≥ 12 years after the failure of at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. It has been granted orphan drug status by the FDA on August 9, 2020, for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. The European Union (EU) granted Quality Regulatory Clinical Ireland Limited, Ireland, orphan drug status for BLM (KD025) for the treatment of cGVHD on October 17, 2019. BLM is under regulatory assessment by Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA) Australia, Health Canada, MHRA (UK), and The Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic), Switzerland for cGVHD. A clinical trial is ongoing in the United States for cutaneous systemic sclerosis. This review article summarizes the milestones in the development of BLM chemistry, Chemical synthesis and development, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), adverse effects, regulatory status, and ongoing clinical trials (CT) of BLM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors state that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The relationship between treatment efficacy/tolerability and the dose/blood concentration of lacosamide (LCM) was investigated in a clinical cohort of Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy., Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of patients treated with LCM for >6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University Hospital, from September 2017 to January 2021. The collected data included age, sex, epilepsy type, seizure type, seizure frequency before and after treatment initiation, adverse events leading to LCM discontinuation, dose at any evaluation point, serum concentration, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)., Results: The study included 51 patients (31 male patients) between the ages of 2 and 19 years. All patients were Japanese. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 44 patients, generalized in six patients, and combined generalized and focal in one patient. The 50% responder rate for LCM treatment was 56.9%. Seven patients experienced complete seizure control (absence of seizures for 6 months before the follow-up visit). A relationship between dose and blood concentration was identified. Although the blood LCM concentration was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders (7.86 vs. 6.16 μg/mL; p = 0.028), there was no significant difference in dose between the two groups. Lacosamide showed efficacy at a dose >5 mg/kg/day in more than half of the 50% responders. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included seizure aggravation in five patients, irritability in two patients, and somnolence and drug eruption in one patient each. In six patients with TEAEs, the TEAEs developed within 1 month after treatment initiation and led to LCM discontinuation., Conclusion: In Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy, LCM treatment is effective, particularly at higher doses. The blood concentration may be related more to efficacy than to dose. Lacosamide is generally well-tolerated by pediatric patients, and should be used at the maximum tolerable dose (needed to be gradually increased) in patients with otherwise insufficient seizure control. As TEAEs leading to discontinue treatment likely occur in early phase, it is needed to monitor patients carefully if TEAEs would happen in that phase., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tirbanibulin is a novel tubulin polymerization and Src kinase signaling inhibitor. This study was designed to fully characterize tirbanibulin pharmacokinetics (PK) when applied topically under maximal use conditions. This was an open-label, parallel-group PK safety study of tirbanibulin ointment 1% applied to 25 cm 2 of the face or balding scalp in adults with actinic keratosis (AK). Eligible subjects self-applied tirbanibulin once-daily for 5 days. PK sampling occurred on days 1, 3 and 4 at 0 hour (before dosing), and on day 5 at prespecified time points up to 24 hours after application. Safety assessments included adverse events and local skin reactions were evaluated up to day 29. Eighteen subjects (face or scalp, n = 9 each) completed the study. Subjects were White (100%), of mean [range] age 66.4 [43-83] years, predominantly men (83.3%) with Fitzpatrick skin type I to III (94.4%); baseline AK lesion count, mean [range] 8.2 [6-14]. All subjects had quantifiable but low plasma concentrations of tirbanibulin. On day 5, overall mean (standard deviation) maximum concentration (C max ) was 0.26 (0.23) ng/mL (or 0.60 nM), median time to maximum concentration was 6.91 hours, and mean (standard deviation) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours was 4.09 (3.15) ng ∙ h/mL. Four subjects experienced a total of 5 treatment-emergent adverse events that resolved. Mild to moderate erythema, flaking, or scaling in the treatment area peaked around day 8 before resolving or returning to baseline by day 29. In conclusion, under maximal use conditions, tirbanibulin ointment 1% for 5 days in the treatment of AK on the face or scalp was well tolerated and resulted in low systemic exposure with subnanomolar plasma concentrations., (© 2021, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect and safety of selexipag in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension and to explore the effect of selexipag on cardiac function indexes in PAH patients., Methods: Electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases, were searched. Endnote software X9 was used for study selection, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for literature screening and quality assessment. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and GRADE was used to assess the evidence level., Results: Ten studies were finally selected in accordance with the standard. A total of 10 papers were included. A total of 1322 patients were included, including 723 in the trial group and 599 in the control group. Patients with PAH treated with selexipag were included in the trial group, and patients with PAH treated with placebo were included in the control group. The results of the study showed that selexipag was effective in reducing mortality in patients (WMD=0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.94, P = 0.02). Selexipag effectively increased the 6-min walk distance (WMD=33.79, 95% CI: 2.69-64.90, P=0.03). Selexipag also effectively increased the 6-min distance between baseline and follow-up (WMD = 15.28, 95% CI: 7.76-22.80, P < 0.0001). Selexipag effectively reduced PVR (WMD = -230.96, 95% CI: 445.94 to -15.97, P = 0.04). Selexipag significantly reduced PVR between baseline and follow-up (WMD = -139.62, 95% CI: 215.32 to -63.91, P = 0.0003). The adverse reactions of selexipag were mild with headache, diarrhea and nausea reported as the main symptoms., Conclusion: Selexipag is a new drug with mild adverse reactions and is safe for the treatment of PAH. This drug significantly prolongs the level of 6MWD in PAH patients, reduces the fatality rate, improves WHO FC and reduces PVR. The effects of this drug on CI, mPAP, MRAP, SvO 2 and other indicators still need to be further confirmed., Prospero Registration: CRD42021245557., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Major depressive disorder is a severe illness that frequently manifests before the age of 18 years, often recurring later in life. Paediatric medical treatment options are scarce. The melatonin receptor agonist and 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C receptor antagonist agomelatine is used to treat adults, and could offer a new therapeutic option for paediatric patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the short-term antidepressant efficacy and safety of agomelatine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder., Methods: We performed a 12 week, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial in 46 specialist psychiatric units or centres in Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, and Ukraine. Participants (aged 7-17 years) were eligible if they were unresponsive to psychosocial therapy during the 3-week run-in period (Children's Depression Rating Scale-revised [CDRS-R] score of ≥45). Ethnicity was not recorded. We investigated short-term antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine (10 mg or 25 mg per day) versus placebo with an active control (fluoxetine 10-20 mg depending on symptom severity) after 12 weeks of treatment in children (aged 7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) with major depressive disorder. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to agomelatine 10 mg, agomelatine 25 mg, placebo, or fluoxetine via an interactive response system with permuted-block randomisation. Standardised manualised psychosocial counselling, developed for this trial, was initiated from selection and continued throughout the study, including the open-label extension. All people involved in the conduct of the clinical trial and patients were masked to treatment allocation. Study outcomes were measured using standardised interviews at each study visit. The primary endpoint was change in CDRS-R raw score from baseline to week 12. This study is registered with EudraCT, 2015-002181-23., Findings: Between Feb 23, 2016, and Jan 14, 2020, 466 individuals were assessed for eligibility and of 400 included patients, 396 (247 [62%] girls, 149 [38%] boys; mean age 13·7 years [SD 2·7]) were analysed (full analysis set). The primary objective was met; 25 mg/day agomelatine (n=94, with n=102 receiving 10 mg/day) resulted in an improvement versus placebo (n=101) in CDRS-R raw score of 4·22 (95% CI 0·63-7·82; p=0·040) at 12 weeks, with a similar effect for fluoxetine (n=99), establishing assay sensitivity. The overall effect was confirmed in adolescents (n=317), but not in children (n=79). No unexpected safety signals were observed with agomelatine, with no significant weight gain or effect on suicidal behaviours., Interpretation: This first study in a paediatric population supports the efficacy of 25 mg/day agomelatine, in addition to psychosocial counselling, in treating adolescent patients with major depressive disorder, with no unexpected safety signals. This medication could provide another option in the limited psychopharmaceutical repertoire for management of major depressive disorder., Funding: Servier. VIDEO ABSTRACT., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CA has been a consultant to or has received honoraria or grants from Acadia, Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Minerva, Otsuka, Roche, Sage, Servier, Shire, Schering Plough, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Sunovion, and Takeda. JKB has, in the past 3 years, been a speaker for Takeda/Shire, Medice, and Janssen; on advisory boards for Roche, Medice, Angelini, and Servier; and has been a consultant for Servier. He is not an employee or a stock shareholder of any of these companies. He has no other financial or material support, including expert testimony, patents, and royalties. JMF has for the past 3 years been a consultant only to federal and state ministries and agencies and the EU. VO, P-FP, UM, and DC are employees of Servier. BF has been a consultant for Eli Lilly, BMS, Servier, Sanofi, GSK, HRA, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Almirall, Allergan, Stallergene, Genzyme, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Janssen, Astellas, Biotronik, Daiichi- Sankyo, Gilead, MSD, Lundbeck, Stallergene, Actelion, UCB, Otsuka, Grunenthal, and ViiV., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In the event-driven GRIPHON randomised-controlled trial, the oral prostacyclin receptor agonist selexipag significantly reduced the risk of disease progression (composite primary endpoint of morbidity/mortality), compared with placebo, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The ongoing open-label extension study (GRIPHON OL) collects further data on long-term safety, tolerability, and survival of PAH patients treated with selexipag., Methods: Patients randomised to selexipag or placebo in GRIPHON could enter GRIPHON OL either after experiencing a morbidity event during double-blind treatment or at the end of the study. Patients were followed for adverse events (AE) and survival from selexipag initiation up to 3 days and 30 days after end of treatment, respectively. Data are presented up to a cut-off date of 1 September 2019., Results: Overall, 953 patients in GRIPHON and GRIPHON OL were treated with selexipag. At the time of selexipag initiation, 81.2% of patients were receiving background PAH therapy. Median (min, max) exposure to selexipag was 31.7 months (0, 106), corresponding to a total of 3054.4 patient-years. The most frequently reported AEs were related to known prostacyclin-related effects or underlying disease. There were 305 (32.0%) patients who experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation. Survival during GRIPHON and GRIPHON OL was assessed for the 574 patients randomised to selexipag in GRIPHON. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (95%CI) at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years were 92.0% (89.4, 94.0), 79.3% (75.4, 82.6), 71.2% (66.5, 75.3) and 63.0% (57.4, 68.1), respectively., Conclusions: These results provide the longest follow-up period published to date for a PAH therapy. The safety profile of selexipag over this extended treatment period was consistent with that observed in GRIPHON. A large proportion of the population was receiving background therapy at selexipag initiation, providing further insight into the long-term safety of selexipag as part of a combination therapy regimen., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01106014 and NCT01112306., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Belumosudil, an investigational oral selective inhibitor of Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2), reduces type 17 and follicular T helper cells via downregulation of STAT3 and enhances regulatory T cells via upregulation of STAT5. Belumosudil may effectively treat patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a major cause of morbidity and late nonrelapse mortality after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. This phase 2 randomized multicenter registration study evaluated belumosudil 200 mg daily (n = 66) and 200 mg twice daily (n = 66) in subjects with cGVHD who had received 2 to 5 prior lines of therapy. The primary end point was best overall response rate (ORR). Duration of response (DOR), changes in Lee Symptom Scale score, failure-free survival, corticosteroid dose reductions, and overall survival were also evaluated. Overall median follow-up was 14 months. The best ORR for belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-84) and 77% (95% CI, 65-87), respectively, with high response rates observed in all subgroups. All affected organs demonstrated complete responses. The median DOR was 54 weeks; 44% of subjects have remained on therapy for ≥1 year. Symptom reduction with belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was reported in 59% and 62% of subjects, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those expected in patients with cGVHD receiving corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants. Sixteen subjects (12%) discontinued belumosudil because of possible drug-related AEs. Belumosudil, a promising therapy for cGVHD, was well tolerated with clinically meaningful responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03640481., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Rationale: Liver function monitoring is recommended when agomelatine is prescribed, although liver enzymes are not considered predictive biomarkers. Most patients present with acute liver injury, with only a few presenting with levels of liver enzymes that are over 30 times the upper limit of normal. The patient-specific risk factors that are associated with liver injury remain unclear. Thus, this report provides new insights into the mechanism of agomelatine-induced acute hepatocellular injury based on cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 2 (CYP1A2) polymorphism., Patient Concerns: We present a case of acute hepatocellular injury in a 75-year-old man who was taking agomelatine at a dose of 50 mg/qn. All hepatitis virus test results were negative. No history of liver disease was observed. As CYP1A2 is the main metabolic enzyme of agomelatine, CYP1A2 AA (rs762551) genetic polymorphism was analyzed., Diagnosis: The patient's transaminases level exceeded the critical value on day 72 after starting oral agomelatine., Interventions: The patient received intravenous magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate, a liver cell-protecting agent, followed by the withdrawal of agomelatine., Outcomes: There was an improvement in the levels of the liver enzymes and no subsequent organ dysfunction was observed., Lessons: Here, we report a case of acute hepatocellular injury characterized by a very high aspartate aminotransferase level. Periodic liver function testing throughout the treatment period can help in the rapid and appropriate diagnosis of acute liver injury, particularly in the absence of typical clinical manifestations. Agomelatine hepatic toxicity might be related to an idiosyncratic metabolic reaction that depends on individual patient differences. As it is the main metabolic enzyme of agomelatine, CYP1A2 genetic polymorphism may contribute to liver injury by affecting its metabolites., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Agomelatine is a novel antidepressant that was developed to counter the adverse effects associated with the standard SSRIs and SNRIs that limited their usage. Publication bias was identified in antidepressant trials which can potentially overestimate the treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis was designed to assess the overall antidepressant effect of Agomelatine by pooling all the published and unpublished studies available till date. Studies conducted on adult patients who met with the criteria for MDD that evaluated efficacy of Agomelatine at acute phase (6-12weeks) and at long term phase (24weeks) were included. The primary efficacy measured with SMD of final mean scores of HAM-D and MADRS. Secondary efficacy measures of Response, remission and safety parameters were evaluated with relative risks. RevMan version 5.4 was used for analysis of both continuous (Standardized mean difference) and dichotomous outcomes (response, remission and all cause of discontinuation). Efficacy parameters were presented with 99% confidence intervals while safety parameters were presented with 95% CI. A total of 9233 patients were included from 27 studies. In acute phase placebo controlled studies, Agomelatine had a statistically significant SMD of - 0.24 (-0.39 to -0.09) and response rate of (1.25, 1.07-1.47). In comparison (RR 0.99, 0.92-1.07) Agomelatine is an effective antidepressant having similar efficacy with the currently used antidepressants., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality, and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. Our objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens against MRSAB., Methods: We estimated the cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/daptomycin) for Veterans Health Administration patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure at 7 days and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation after at least 7 days., Results: In base-case analyses, intravenous linezolid was the least expensive regimen at 4 and 6 weeks. Daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than linezolid, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ~$13,000 (4 weeks) per composite failure avoided. With 6 weeks of treatment, daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than vancomycin (ICER ~$21,000 per composite failure avoided). Vancomycin and ceftaroline/daptomycin were dominated strategies at both 4 and 6 weeks. In one-way sensitivity analyses, vancomycin was favored when its microbiological failure risk was less than 20.1% (base-case: 27.2%), assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/composite treatment failure avoided. In two-way sensitivity analyses, intravenous linezolid was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were < 22.5% and < 17.3%, respectively. Daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid were favored in 50%, 31%, and 17% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP., Conclusion: Daptomycin is likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed on the safety of linezolid against MRSAB., (© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiseizure medication, and intravenous (IV) loading of LCM is recently used against status epilepticus. IV loading of LCM is usually well-tolerated; however, there are concerns about LCM-induced serious adverse cardiac events. This study was aimed at investigating whether rapid IV loading of LCM is associated with adverse cardiac or hemodynamic events in cases of epilepsy emergencies in real-world settings., Methods: We reviewed medical records of consecutive adult epilepsy patients who received a single loading dose (400 mg) of IV LCM between January 2019 and December 2020 and included patients who exhibited status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures. Electrocardiography findings, blood pressure, and heart rate before and after the IV infusion of LCM were collected., Results: Of the 85 patients included, 32.9 % (28/85 patients) had experienced at least one cardiac adverse event. The most common adverse events were new-onset first-degree atrioventricular block (19 patients) and hypotension (seven patients). Atrial fibrillation and bradycardia developed in two patients and atrial flutter in one. There were significant increases in the mean PR interval (from 169.3 msec to 184.5 msec, P < 0.01) and decreases in the mean heart rate (from 91.7 to 86.9, P = 0.01) after IV loading of LCM. Older age was significantly associated with a higher magnitude of the PR interval difference between before and after IV loading of LCM., Conclusions: In cases of epilepsy emergencies, adverse cardiac events commonly developed after IV loading of LCM, although most adverse events were mild in severity or not clinically significant. Elderly patients or patients with underlying cardiac diseases were prone to exhibiting a more prolonged PR interval after IV loading of LCM. Thus, the loading dose of IV LCM should be infused under careful ECG monitoring in these patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase-2 (ROCK2) signaling pathway regulates the Th17/regulatory T cells balance and controls profibrotic pathways. Selective ROCK2 inhibition with belumosudil (KD025) may offer a novel approach to the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD)., Patients and Methods: A phase IIa, open-label, dose-finding study of belumosudil enrolled 54 patients with cGVHD who had received one to three prior lines of therapy (LOTs). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR)., Results: The median time from cGVHD diagnosis to enrollment was 20 months. Seventy-eight percent of patients had severe cGVHD, 50% had ≥ 4 organs involved, 73% had cGVHD refractory to their last LOT, and 50% had received ≥ 3 prior LOTs. With an overall median follow-up of 29 months, the ORR (95% CI) with belumosudil 200 mg once daily, 200 mg twice daily, and 400 mg once daily was 65% (38% to 86%), 69% (41% to 89%), and 62% (38% to 82%), respectively. Responses were clinically meaningful, with a median duration of response of 35 weeks, and were associated with quality-of-life improvements and corticosteroid (CS) dose reductions. CS treatment was discontinued in 19% of patients. The failure-free survival rate was 76% (62% to 85%) and 47% (33% to 60%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The 2-year overall survival rate was 82% (69% to 90%). Belumosudil was well-tolerated, with low rates of cytopenia. There were no unexpected adverse events and no apparent increased risk of infection, including cytomegalovirus infection and reactivation., Conclusion: Belumosudil treatment resulted in a high ORR and overall survival rate and demonstrated quality-of-life improvements, CS dose reductions, and limited toxicity. Data from the study indicated that belumosudil may prove to be an effective therapy for patients with treatment-refractory cGVHD., Competing Interests: Madan JagasiaEmployment: Iovance BiotherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Iovance BiotherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon Aleksandr LazaryanStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: EUSA Pharma Carlos R. BachierEmployment: HCA HealthcareConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon, Viracyte, WUGEN, crispr therapeutics, Novartis, Juno/CelgeneResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb Amandeep SalhotraConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon, Syros PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb Daniel J. WeisdorfConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Fate TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Incyte James EssellConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie/Genentech, Celgene/Bristol-Myers SquibbSpeakers' Bureau: Kite/Gilead Laurie GreenEmployment: Kadmon Olivier SchuellerEmployment: Kadmon Jeegar PatelEmployment: Kadmon Corporation LLCStock and Other Ownership Interests: Kadmon Corporation LLCTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Kadmon Alexandra Zanin-ZhorovEmployment: Kadmon HoldingsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Kadmon Holdings Jonathan M. WeissEmployment: KadmonStock and Other Ownership Interests: KadmonConsulting or Advisory Role: StellateResearch Funding: KadmonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Kadmon Zhongming YangEmployment: KadmonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Kadmon David EiznhamerEmployment: KadmonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Kadmon Sanjay K. AggarwalEmployment: Kadmon, Angiocrine BioscienceLeadership: Angiocrine BioscienceStock and Other Ownership Interests: Kadmon, Angiocrine Bioscience, Amgen, AlnylamConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon Bruce R. BlazarStock and Other Ownership Interests: Five Prime Therapeutics, BlueRock Therapeutics, Tmunity Therapeutics, Inc, Magenta TherapeuticsHonoraria: Kadmon, IncyteConsulting or Advisory Role: Kadmon, BlueRock Therapeutics, Magenta TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Fate Therapeutics, BlueRock Therapeutics, Alpine Immune Sciences, AbbViePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Inducible regulatory T cell generation for hematopoietic cell transplants (UMN Z09026), U.S. 9,228,172, Inducible regulatory T cell generation for hematopoietic cell transplants (UMN Z09026), U.S. 9,228,172, TALEN based gene correction, Patent No. 9,393,257, Generation of natural killer cells and lymphoid tissue inducer-like (LTI-like) NK-22 cells, 9,862,928, Method for correcting a genetic sequence, 10,648,002Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Incyte, Magenta Therapeutics, Rheos Medicines Stephanie J. LeeHonoraria: Wolters KluwerConsulting or Advisory Role: Incyte, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Kadmon, MSD Oncology, Sanofi, Genzyme, Regeneron, 4SCResearch Funding: Kadmon, Takeda, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, Syndax, Pfizer, AstraZenecaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent pending for high affinity T cell receptors that target the Merkel polyomavirusNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: The objective of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the loading dose and efficacy of lacosamide (LCM), when used in seizure clusters (SCs)., Methods: A cohort of patients with SC treated with intravenous (IV)-LCM between September 2017 and September 2019 was retrospectively examined. Demographic data, type of seizure emergency, etiology, response rate, previous oral antiepileptic drugs used, total LCM loading dose, and side effects were reviewed., Results: Thirty-nine cases of epileptic emergencies treated with IV LCM were collected. The mean age was 59.25 years (18-88 years), and the median loading dose was 136.5 mg (100-300 mg) with a response rate in the whole population of 29.2%. Nine patients received a loading dose of 200 to 300 mg, and their response rate was 89%. Common side effects (drowsiness and dizziness) were mild. No electrocardiogram changes or other cardiovascular side effects, or unexpected side effects were seen., Conclusions: In adults with SC, a loading dose of IV LCM of 200 mg or more achieved 89% response rate in this cohort. Loading doses of less than 300 mg caused mild side effects only., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor disorder characterized by unpleasant and distressing sensations in the lower limbs that are more pronounced in the evening, commence or worsen at rest, and show partial or complete relief following movement. It can occur as a primary disorder, secondary to medical conditions or treatment with medications including but not limited to antidepressants or antipsychotics., Case Presentation: A 32-year old man with major depressive disorder showed partial response to Escitalopram 10 mg daily. Agomelatine 25 mg at night was added to Escitalopram to treat his residual depressive symptoms, namely insomnia and tiredness. Within two days he developed restlessness and unpleasant sensations in his legs which were worse at night. Symptom severity increased over the following days, prompting an urgent consultation a week later. The patient's presentation met the criteria for RLS. Agomelatine was discontinued leaving the patient on Escitalopram alone. The patient's symptoms improved within 24 h of stopping Agomelatine, with complete resolution four days later. There was no recurrence of RLS during follow-up. The patient scored 6 on Naranjo's adverse drug reaction probability scale, indicating a probable adverse drug reaction caused by Agomelatine., Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of suspected Agomelatine-induced RLS. Clinicians need to be aware of RLS to enable prompt diagnosis and management. We suggest adding Agomelatine to the list of agents that can potentially induce RLS.

Background: The tubulin polymerization and Src kinase signaling inhibitor tirbanibulin is being investigated as a topical treatment for actinic keratosis, a precursor of squamous-cell carcinoma., Methods: In two identically designed double-blind trials, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adults with actinic keratoses on the face or scalp to receive either topical tirbanibulin or vehicle (placebo) ointment. The ointment was applied by the patients to a 25-cm 2 contiguous area containing four to eight lesions once daily for 5 consecutive days. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a complete (100%) reduction in the number of lesions in the application area at day 57. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with a partial (≥75%) reduction in the number of lesions within the application area at day 57. The incidence of recurrence was evaluated at 1 year. Local reactions were scored with the use of 4-point scale (ranging from 0 [absent] to 3 [severe])., Results: A total of 702 patients were enrolled in the two trials (351 patients per trial). Complete clearance in trial 1 occurred in 44% of the patients (77 of 175) in the tirbanibulin group and in 5% of those (8 of 176) in the vehicle group (difference, 40 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 47; P<0.001); in trial 2, the percentages were 54% (97 of 178 patients) and 13% (22 of 173), respectively (difference, 42 percentage points; 95% CI, 33 to 51; P<0.001). The percentages of patients with partial clearance were significantly higher in the tirbanibulin groups than in the vehicle groups. At 1 year, the estimated percentage of patients with recurrent lesions was 47% among patients who had had a complete response to tirbanibulin. The most common local reactions to tirbanibulin were erythema in 91% of the patients and flaking or scaling in 82%. Adverse events with tirbanibulin were application-site pain in 10% of the patients and pruritus in 9%, all of which resolved., Conclusions: In two identically designed trials, tirbanibulin 1% ointment applied once daily for 5 days was superior to vehicle for the treatment of actinic keratosis at 2 months but was associated with transient local reactions and recurrence of lesions at 1 year. Trials comparing tirbanibulin with conventional treatments and that have longer follow-up are needed to determine the effects of tirbanibulin therapy on actinic keratosis. (Funded by Athenex; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03285477 and NCT03285490.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: The oral IP receptor agonist selexipag is approved for the long-term treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatment interruptions should be avoided due to the progressive nature of the disease. An intravenous (IV) formulation of selexipag was developed to provide a treatment option for short-term interruptions to oral selexipag. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study, the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of temporarily switching between oral and IV selexipag were investigated (NCT03187678, ClinicalTrials.gov)., Methods: PAH patients receiving stable oral selexipag doses were enrolled. Following three consecutive IV selexipag infusions patients resumed oral selexipag. Corresponding IV and oral doses were selected to achieve comparable exposure to the active metabolite of selexipag. Safety outcomes were monitored throughout, and pharmacokinetic samples were obtained after oral and IV administration., Results: All 20 patients completed the study. Fifteen patients had adverse events (AEs), most were mild, and none resulted in discontinuation. Headache was the most common AE throughout the study (four patients). Three serious AEs occurred in two patients with underlying comorbidities when oral dosing had resumed. There were no changes in WHO functional class for any patient and no clinically symptomatic changes in blood pressure were observed. Comparable exposure to the active metabolite of selexipag was demonstrated following corresponding oral and IV selexipag doses., Conclusions: Temporarily switching between corresponding doses of oral and IV selexipag was well-tolerated with no unexpected safety findings and comparable exposure to the active metabolite. Treatment with IV selexipag is a feasible option to bridge temporary oral selexipag treatment interruptions.

Objective: Currently recommended dosing of lacosamide often necessitates long titration periods. However, the use of a regimen consisting of initial loading dose of 200 mg followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg/day in practice suggests tolerability of more rapid titration schedules. We aimed to clarify whether the shortened titration schedule affects tolerability of lacosamide., Methods: We evaluated the safety of two rapid titration protocols designed to reach the target dose of 400 mg/day within 1 week, and the conventional weekly titration protocol (reaching the target dose of 400 mg/day in three weeks). The ≥50% responder rate and steady-state plasma concentration of lacosamide were also analyzed. Adverse events were assessed at 1 week and 5 weeks after reaching the target dose., Results: Seventy-five patients with epilepsy were enrolled and evenly distributed to three titration protocols, from which 5 patients were lost to follow-up and excluded from the safety analysis. Discontinuation of lacosamide or dose reductions due to adverse events occurred in 32 patients (46%), of whom a large majority (74%) had experienced adverse events after reaching 400 mg/day, demonstrating apparent dose-dependency. There was no difference in safety outcomes among the three titration groups. Concomitant use of sodium channel blockers significantly increased the risk of adverse events., Conclusion: Rapid titration protocols for lacosamide were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared to the conventional weekly titration protocol. Uptitration of lacosamide at shorter intervals to an effective target dosage may be feasible in appropriate clinical situations., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)