Search

ImportanceSpine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control.ObjectiveTo assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020.InterventionsPatients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord.ResultsA total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, −19 percentage points; 95% CI, −32.9 to −5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974

PURPOSE T2-FLAIR mismatch (T2FM) is a highly specific imaging biomarker for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in low-grade gliomas. Previous T2FM studies are inconsistent for glioblastoma (GBM)/grade-4 glioma, partly due to low IDH-mutation prevalence in high-grade gliomas. We leveraged a large multi-institutional GBM/grade-4 glioma cohort to analyze the association of partial T2FM and IDH-mutation (T2-hyperintense, FLAIR-hypointense, nonenhancing, nonedema). METHODS We analyzed preoperative MRI of 1500 pathologically confirmed GBM/grade-4 gliomas with known IDH-mutation status from the ReSPOND consortium, consisting of the following institutions (sample size): Ivy GBM Atlas Project (33), Catalan Institute of Oncology (132), Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals (132), New York University (55), Ohio State University (25), University of Pennsylvania (641), University Hospital Río Hortega (16), Yonsei University Health System (118), The Cancer Imaging Archive (93), Thomas Jefferson University (48), Tata Memorial Hospital (22), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (156), and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis (57). Sequences were co-registered to a common anatomic atlas. Continuous variables were compared by t-test and categorical variables by Χ 2-test. RESULTS 71 (4.7%) were IDH-mutants, significantly younger (43±1 v. 62±12 years, p=5x10-37), and more likely to exhibit partial T2FM (20% v. 0.4%, p=1x10-43), frontal lobe predominance (68% v. 29%, p=7x10-12), nonenhancing components (T2/FLAIR-intermediate signal, nonedema; 45% v. 9%, p=1x10-22), and cystic components (smooth margins, no/minimal enhancement, homogeneous FLAIR suppression; 17% v. 3%, p=7x10-11) than IDH-wildtypes. 20 cases had partial T2FM (14 IDH-mutant, 6 IDH-wildtype). Sensitivity of partial T2FM for IDH-mutation was 19.7%, specificity 99.6%, positive predictive value 70%, and negative predictive value 96.1%. Subset analysis of 983 IDH-wildtypes with known MGMT methylation status (406 MGMT-hypermethylated) showed frontal lobe predominance was more common in MGMT-hypermethylated than MGMT-unmethylated (39.4% v. 24.3%, p=.02); other imaging characteristics did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS Partial T2FM is a highly specific imaging biomarker for IDH-mutation in GBM/grade-4 glioma.

PURPOSE Glioblastoma is extremely infiltrative with malignant cells extending beyond the enhancing rim where recurrence inevitably occurs, despite aggressive multimodal therapy. We hypothesize that important characteristics of peritumoral tissue heterogeneity captured and analyzed by multi-parametric MRI and artificial intelligence (AI) methods are generalizable in the updated multi-institutional ReSPOND (Radiomics Signatures for PrecisiON Diagnostics) consortium and predictive of neoplastic infiltration and future recurrence. METHODS We used the most recent update of the ReSPOND consortium to evaluate and further refine generalizability of our methods with different scanners and acquisition settings. 179 de novo glioblastoma patients with available T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR, and ADC sequences at pre-resection baseline and after complete resection with subsequent pathology-confirmed recurrence were included. To establish generalizability of the predictive models, training and testing of the refined AI model was performed through Leave-One-Institution-Out-Cross-Validation schema. The multi-institutional cohort consisted of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn, 124), Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals (CWRU/UH, 27), New York University (NYU, 13), Ohio State University (OSU, 13), and University Hospital Río Hortega (RH, 2). Features extracted from pre-resection MRI were used to build the model predicting the spatial pattern of subsequent tumor recurrence. These predictions were evaluated against regions of pathology-confirmed post-resection recurrence. RESULTS Our model predicted the locations that later harbored tumor recurrence with overall odds ratio (99% CI)/AUC (99% CI), 12.0(11.8-12.2)/0.80(0.76-0.85), and per institute, CWRU/UH, 11.0(10.7-11.3)/0.80 (0.64-0.97); NYU, 7.0(6.7-7.3)/0.78(0.56-1.00); OSU, 18.3(17.5-19.1)/0.83(0.54-1.00); RH, 40.0(35.3-45.5)/0.93(0.00-1.00); UPenn, 8.00(7.7-8.3)/0.80(0.75-0.84). CONCLUSION This study provides extensive multi-institutional validated evidence that machine learning tools can identify peritumoral neoplastic infiltration and predict location of future recurrence, by decrypting the MRI signal heterogeneity in peritumoral tissue. Our analyses leveraged the unique dataset of the ReSPOND consortium, which aims to develop and validate AI-based biomarkers for individualized prediction and prognostication and establish generalizability in a multi-institutional setting.

PURPOSE Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, is the most common primary malignant adult brain tumor with median overall survival (OS) of ~14 months, with little improvement over the last 20 years. We hypothesize that AI-based integration of quantitative tumor characteristics, independent of acquisition protocol and equipment, can reveal accurate generalizable prognostic stratification. We seek an AI-based OS predictor using routine clinically acquired MRI sequences, quantitatively evaluated across institutions of the ReSPOND (Radiomics Signatures for PrecisiON Diagnostics) consortium. METHODS We identified a retrospective cohort of 2,293 diffuse glioma (IDH-wildtype/-NOS/-NEC) patients from 22 geographically distinct institutions across 3 continents, with preoperative structural MRI scans. The entire tumor burden was automatically segmented into 3 sub-compartments, i.e., enhancing, necrotic, peritumoral T2-FLAIR abnormality. We developed our AI predictor by multivariate integration of i)patient age, ii)tumor sub-compartment volume normalized to brain volume, iii)spatial distribution characteristics (tumor location, distance to the ventricles, and laterality), and iv)morphologic descriptors (major axes’ length, axes’ ratio, extent, and number of tumors). The AI predictor returns a continuous value between 0-1, defining short-, intermediate-, and long-survivors based on thresholds on the 25th and 75th percentiles. Leave-One-Site-Out-Cross-Validation was used to assess the generalizability of our stratification. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were computed for OS analysis and evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model for statistical significance and hazard ratios. RESULTS Survival analysis yielded a hazard ratio of 2.07 (95%CI, 2.06-2.08, p-value= 4.8e-102) for patient stratification into short-, intermediate-, and long-survivors. Pearson correlation between the predicted and actual OS yielded an R= 0.49. CONCLUSION Multivariate integration of visually quantified tumor characteristics, agnostic to acquisition protocol/equipment, yields an accurate OS surrogate index. Validation of our AI model in the largest centralized glioblastoma imaging dataset, from the ReSPOND consortium, supports its generalizability across diverse patient populations and acquisition settings, potentially contributing to equitable improvements of personalized patient care.

Background Measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) requires an individual’s perspective on their symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Digital health enables remote electronic PRO (ePRO) assessments as a clinical decision support tool to facilitate meaningful provider interactions and personalized treatment. Objective This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of collecting ePROs using validated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires for prostate cancer. Methods Using Apple ResearchKit software, the Strength Through Insight app was created with content from validated HRQoL tools 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) or EPIC for Clinical Practice and 8-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Advanced Prostate Symptom Index. In a single-arm pilot study with patients receiving prostate cancer treatment at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and affiliates, participants were recruited, and instructed to download Strength Through Insight and complete ePROs once a week over 12 weeks. A mixed methods approach, including qualitative pre- and poststudy interviews, was used to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of Strength Through Insight for the collection and care management of cancer treatment. Results Thirty patients consented to the study; 1 patient failed to complete any of the questionnaires and was left out of the analysis of the intervention. Moreover, 86% (25/29) reached satisfactory questionnaire completion (defined as completion of 60% of weekly questions over 12 weeks). The lower bound of the exact one-sided 95% CI was 71%, exceeding the 70% feasibility threshold. Most participants self-identified with having a high digital literacy level (defined as the ability to use, understand, evaluate, and analyze information from multiple formats from a variety of digital sources), and only a few participants identified with having a low digital literacy level (defined as only having the ability to gather information on the Web). Interviews were thematically analyzed to reveal the following: (1) value of emotional support and wellness in cancer treatment, (2) rise of social patient advocacy in online patient communities and networks, (3) patient concerns over privacy, and (4) desire for personalized engagement tools. Conclusions Strength Through Insight was demonstrated as a feasible and acceptable method of data collection for ePROs. A high compliance rate confirmed the app as a reliable tool for patients with localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nearly all participants reported that using the smartphone app is easier than or equivalent to the traditional paper-and-pen approach, providing evidence of acceptability and support for the use of remote PRO monitoring. This study expands on current research involving the value of digital health, as a social and behavioral science, augmented with technology, can begin to contribute to population health management, as it shapes psychographic segmentation by demographic, socioeconomic, health condition, or behavioral factors to group patients by their distinct personalities and motivations, which influence their choices. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NC03197948; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NC03197948

133 Background: The genomic classifier, Decipher, has been validated to predict risk of metastasis after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the cohort size and event rate in the previous studies did not allow for a thorough investigation into performance within individual clinicopathologic or treatment subgroups. In this study, we present the first meta-analysis of the performance of the 22-marker genomic classifier in men with prostate cancer (PCa) post-RP. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Decipher genomic resource information database were searched for published reports of men with PCa treated by RP between 2010 and 2016 where the benefit of the Decipher genomic classifier test was assessed. The primary end point was the ability of Decipher to independently improve prognostication of regional or distant metastasis over routine clinicopathologic factors. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects modeling, and extent of heterogeneity between studies was determined with the I2 test. Results: Five studies (975 total patients, and 855 with individual patient genomic and clinicopathologic data) were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up was 8 years. All patients had clinical high-risk disease, yet 60.9%, 22.6%, and 16.5% of patients were classified as low, intermediate, and high-risk, respectively by Decipher and had 10-year cumulative incidence rates of metastases of 5.5%, 15.0% and 26.7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Adjusting for standard clinicopathologic variables, on multivariable analysis Decipher remained a statistically significant predictor of metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30 per 0.1 unit, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.47, p < 0.001), and the summary HR for metastasis of Decipher across the 5 studies was 1.52 (95% CI 1.39-1.67) per 0.1 unit. Conclusions: The genomic classifier test, Decipher, has the ability to independently improve prognostication of men post-RP, as well as within nearly all clinicopathologic and treatment subgroups. Strong consideration should be given to incorporating the use of genomic testing in clinical decision making and clinical trials to better individualize treatment.

142 Background: Despite documented oncological benefit, postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) utilization in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is still limited in the US. We aimed to develop and internally validate a risk stratification tool incorporating the Decipher score, along with routinely available clinicopathologic features, to identify patients who would benefit the most from aRT. Methods: Our cohort included a total of 512 PCa patients treated with RP at one of four US academic centers between 1990-2010. All patients had ≥ pT3a disease, positive margins, and/or pathologic lymph node invasion (LNI). Multivariable Cox regression analysis (MVA) tested the relationship between available predictors (including Decipher score) and clinical recurrence (CR), which were then used to develop a novel risk stratification tool. Our study adhered to the TRIPOD guidelines for development of prognostic models. Results: Overall, 21.9% patients received aRT. Median follow-up in censored patients was 8.3 years. The 10-year CR rate was 4.9% vs. 17.4% in patients treated with aRT vs. initial observation (p < 0.001). Pathological T3b/T4 stage, Gleason score 8-10, LNI and Decipher score > 0.6 were independent predictors of CR (all p < 0.01) Cumulative number of risk factors was 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 in respectively 46.5, 28.9, 17.2, and 7.4% of patients. Adjuvant RT was associated with decreased CR rate in patients with ≥ 2 risk factors (10-year CR rate 10.1% in aRT vs. 42.1% in initial observation, p = 0.008), but not in those with < 2 risk factors (p = 0.23). Conclusions: Utilizing the novel model to indicate aRT might reduce overtreatment, decrease unnecessary side effects, and reduce risk of CR in the subset of patients (~25% of all patients with aggressive pathological disease) who really benefit from this therapy.

Rationale: 1) Despite intense interest in strategies to predict which tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cancer therapeutics may be associated with cardiotoxicity, current approaches are inadequate. 2) Sorafenib is a TKI of concern since it inhibits growth factor receptors and Raf-1/B-Raf, kinases that are upstream of ERKs and signal cardiomyocyte survival in the setting of stress. Objectives: 1) Explore the potential use of zebrafish as a pre-clinical model to predict cardiotoxicity. 2) Determine whether sorafenib has associated cardiotoxicity and, if so, define the mechanisms. Methods and Results: We find that the zebrafish model is readily able to discriminate a TKI with little or no cardiotoxicity (gefitinib) from one with demonstrated cardiotoxicity (sunitinib). Sorafenib, like sunitinib, leads to cardiomyocyte apoptosis, contractile dysfunction and ventricular dilatation in zebrafish. In cultured rat cardiomyocytes, sorafenib induces cell death. This can be rescued by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of constitutively active MEK1 which restores ERK activity even in the presence of sorafenib. While growth factor-induced activation of ERKs requires Raf, α-adrenergic-induced activation of ERKs does not. Consequently, activation of α-adrenergic signaling virtually abrogates sorafenib-induced cell death. Consistently, inhibition of α-adrenergic signaling with prazosin augments sorafenib-induced contractile dysfunction in zebrafish. Conclusions: 1) Zebrafish may be a valuable pre-clinical tool to predict cardiotoxicity. 2) We identify a here-to-fore unknown pathway that bypasses Raf to activate ERKs, thereby limiting sorafenib cardiotoxicity. Importantly, given that the majority of men over the age of 60 have prostatic hypertrophy, for which α-adrenergic antagonists are the primary therapy, our findings suggest the consequences of the concomitant use of these agents with sorafenib should be explored.

Prostate cancer presents a global public health dilemma. While screening with prostate specific antigen (PSA) has led to more men diagnosed with prostate cancer than in previous years, the potential for negative effects from over-diagnosis and treatment cannot be ignored.We reviewed Medline for recent articles that discuss clinical trials, evidence based recommendations and guidelines from major medical organizations in the United States and worldwide concerning prostate cancer screening.Results from the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, and Göteborg Swedish trials regarding prostate screening are controversial with the ERSPC and Göteborg showing a reduction in prostate cancer mortality and the PLCO trial showing no benefit. Recommendations from the American Urological Association (AUA), Japanese Urological Association (JUA), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have recommended that all men obtain a baseline PSA beginning at age 40. The American Cancer Society (ACS) stratifies screening recommendations based on age and risk, but states that screening should take place only after an informed discussion between provider and patient. The United States Preventative Health Service Task Force (USPSTF) states that evidence is insufficient to assess the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening in men younger than 75 years. Other major international health organizations offer a similar reserved approach or recommend against screening for prostate cancer. Most groups indicate that screening to determine who should undergo prostate biopsy typically includes both a serum PSA and digital rectal examination, with the latest ACS publications noting that the rectal exam is optional. A common theme from all groups is that an informed discussion with the patients is strongly recommended and that screening does increase the number of men diagnosed with non-metastatic, early disease.Prostate cancer screening guidelines vary widely between countries and between different medical organizations within individual countries including the United States. Further, the evidence for and against prostate cancer screening remains highly controversial. Longitudinal follow up of completed screening trials is ongoing and may yield additional findings as the time course of prostate cancer outcomes can be protracted. The literature controversy suggests that no standard of care exists for prostate cancer screening today. Until there is agreement in guidelines between major professional organizations who have weighed in on this topic, patients and physicians should be encouraged to consider engaging in shared and informed decision process concerning screening for prostate cancer.

To determine the frequency of nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 co-expression in prostate cancer specimens from men with locally advanced disease.Paraffin-embedded samples from patients enrolled on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 8610 trial underwent immunohistochemical staining for NFκB and CXCR4. The amount of NFκB and CXCR4 was scored by a 'blinded' pathologist for the percentage of cells stained (0-100%) and staining intensity (0-3 +). Cox proportional hazard models were used for overall survival and disease-free survival to examine if NFκB and/or CXCR4 expression were associated with patient outcomes with and without adjustment for covariates.Available material and successful staining allowed NFκB and CXCR4 status to be determined for 55 and 63 patients, respectively. Both NFκB and CXCR4 status were available for 51 patients. Of these, 53% were 2/3 + for cytoplasmic NFκB staining and 56% were 2/3 + for CXCR4. In all, 18 of the 51 patients were 2/3 + for both NFκB and CXCR4 (P = 0.129). Ten of 11 patients with 3 + NFκB had 2/3 + CXCR4 (P= 0.004). In this small study, neither NFκB nor CXCR4 were associated with prostate cancer outcomes.High NFκB expression is associated with CXCR4 expression and they are co-expressed in about one third of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Larger studies to accurately determine the frequency of co-expression and prognostic utility of NFκB and CXCR4 alone and in combination are warranted.

The p53 family of proteins contains two members that have been implicated in sensitization of cells and organisms to genotoxic stress, i.e., p53 itself and p73. In vitro, lack of either p53 or p73 can protect certain cell types in the adult organism against death upon exposure to DNA damaging agents. The present study was designed to assess the relative contribution of p53 to radiation resistance of an emerging vertebrate model organism, i.e., zebrafish embryos. Consistent with previous reports, suppressing p53 protein expression using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) increased survival and reduced gross morphological alterations in zebrafish embryos exposed to ionizing radiation. By contrast, a pharmacological inhibitor of p53 function [Pifithrin-alpha(PFTalpha)] caused developmental abnormalities affecting the head, brain, eyes and kidney function and did not protect against lethal effects of ionizing radiation when administered at 3 hours post fertilization (hpf). The phenotypic abnormalities associated with PFTalpha treatment were similar to those caused by antisense MO knock down (kd) used to reduce p73 expression. PFTalpha also inhibited p73-dependent transcription of a reporter gene construct containing canonical p53-responsive promoter sequences. Notably, when administered at later stages of development (23 hpf), PFTalpha did not cause overt developmental defects but exerted radioprotective effects in zebrafish embryos. In summary, this study highlights off-target effects of the pharmacological p53 inhibitor PFTalpha related to inhibition of p73 function and essential roles of p73 at early but not later stages of zebrafish development.

24 Background: Numerous studies have reported a significantly higher incidence of PCa and/or adverse pathological features associated with African-American men compared to European-American men. Less however is known about the genomic disparities that exist between these two groups. In this report we compared the race-specific expression of biomarkers linked to PCa pathogenesis in a matched cohort of AA and EA men. Methods: PCa data from AA and EA patients were analyzed from four medical centers. Cases were matched based on CAPRA-S within each institution for a total sample size of 300 (121-AA; 179-EA). The distribution of mRNA expression levels of 20 validated biomarkers associated with PCa initiation and progression was compared by race using a false-discovery-rate adjusted Mann-Whitney U, and logistic regression models. Conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate the interaction between race and biomarker expression for predicting pathologic T3 PCa. Results: Of 20 biomarkers interrogated, 6 showed statistically significant differential expression in AA compared with EA men in one or more statistical models. These include TMPRSS2-ERG (p

168 Background: The optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (post-RP RT) is unclear. We hypothesized that a genomic classifier (GC) would provide prognostic and predictive insight into the development of clinical metastases in men receiving post-RP RT and inform decision-making. Methods: GC scores were calculated from 188 patients with pT3 or margin positive PCa, who received post-RP RT at Thomas Jefferson University and Mayo Clinic, between 1990 and 2009. The primary endpoint was clinical metastasis. Prognostic accuracy of the models were tested using c-index and decision curve analysis. Cox regression tested the relationship between GC and metastasis. Results: The cumulative incidence of metastasis at 5 years post-RT was 0%, 9%, and 29% for low, average, and high GC scores, respectively (p=0.002). In multivariable analysis, GC and pre-RP PSA were independent predictors of metastasis (both p

A comparison of left ventricular function data derived from a low cost, portable electrocardiographic gated scintillation probe (nuclear stethoscope) with conventional scintiangiographic data was performed in 68 patients. Ejection fraction correlation (r = 0.86, p less than 0.005) was better in patients with uniform wall motion than in those with regional asynergy (r = 0.68 p less than 0.01). Probe variables reflecting systolic emptying rates, diastolic filling rates and timing intervals, and relative volumes analyzed in combination provided 100 percent sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in detecting abnormal left ventricular performance. The results suggest that radionuclide angiography with an electrocardiographic gated scintillation probe is a sensitive, rapid and relatively inexpensive portable method of screening for cardiac dysfunction with a yield similar to that from the more costly gamma camera derived scintiangiogram.

Fifteen of 214 patients with an ileostomy constructed during the course of Crohn's disease developed periileostomy fistulae. In each case this was the consequence of recurrent ileal disease. The incidence was higher in female patients as well as those with a prior history of either intraabdominal abscess or any type of fistula. Periileostomy fistulae are frequently multiple. In addition to the clinical features of recurrent disease, periileostomy fistulae cause additional symptoms that are particularly distressing. These result from the proximity of the fistula to the stoma and the difficulty of maintaining the seal of an appliance. All periileostomy fistulae require resection and reconstruction of the stoma. Superficial fistulae with relatively smooth skin around the stoma may be reconstructed using the original stoma site; but deep fistulae with severe peristomal excoriation, induration and inflammation require transposition to a different quadrant. This may, in suitable cases, be carried out by direct stoma-to-stoma transposition, without formal laparotomy. The quality of life following successful reconstruction of the stoma is excellent, even though some patients will develop additional recurrent disease. To date none of these patients have developed another periileostomy fistula.