Search

Face à l'utilisation omniprésence et souvent incontournable de sites web, il est nécessaire que ceux-ci présentent la meilleure utilisabilité possible pour satisfaire au mieux les utilisateurs. Le questionnaire Design-Oriented Evaluation of Perceived Usability (DEEP), comprenant 19 items, permet d'évaluer la facilité d'utilisation perçue sur la base de six critères génotypiques : contenu, structure et architecture de l'information, navigation, effort cognitif, cohérence de la mise en page, et guidage visuel. À l'issue de la passation du DEEP, les concepteurs sont alors en mesure d'identifier les principaux facteurs du site web qui posent problème. Le but de cette étude est de proposer une adaptation transculturelle en langue française du DEEP, et d'en évaluer les qualités psychométriques. Quatre cent soixante-dix utilisateurs ont complété une enquête en ligne afin de donner leur avis sur le site web Onisep.fr. Cette enquête comprenait notamment les items traduits en français du DEEP (F-DEEP), ainsi que le questionnaire Net Promoter Score. Une analyse factorielle en composantes principales (ACP) avec rotation oblimin, une analyse de la cohérence interne, plusieurs analyses factorielles confirmatoires (AFC) ainsi qu'une étude de la validité convergente entre le F-DEEP et le NPS ont été menées. L'ACP suggère une structure à 6 facteurs, qui correspond en partie aux 6 facteurs du questionnaire originale. La cohérence interne est très satisfaisante, avec un coefficient alpha de Cronbach de 0,944 et un oméga de McDonalds de 0,945. L'AFC qui obtient les indices d'ajustement les plus satisfaisants correspond au modèle de premier-ordre comprenant les 6 facteurs du F-DEEP. Toutes les corrélations calculées entre les facteurs du F-DEEP et le NPS sont positives et hautement significatives. Le F-DEEP présente de très bonnes qualités psychométriques, ce qui lui permet de pouvoir être utilisé par les chercheurs et les professionnels en psychologie ergonomique des interactions humain-machine, pour l'évaluation des sites web auprès des publics francophones. Ce questionnaire peut également être appliqué à l'évaluation de l'utilisabilité des applications mobiles. With the ubiquitous and often unavoidable use of websites, it is necessary that they present the best possible usability to satisfy users. The Design-Oriented Evaluation of Perceived Usability (DEEP) questionnaire, comprising 19 items, assesses perceived usability on the basis of six genotypic criteria: content, structure and information architecture, navigation, cognitive effort, layout consistency, and visual guidance. After completing the DEEP, designers are then able to identify the main factors of the website that cause problems. The aim of this study was to propose a cross-cultural adaptation of the DEEP in French and to evaluate its psychometric qualities. Four hundred and seventy users completed an online survey to give their opinion on the Onisep.fr website. The survey included the French translation of the DEEP (F-DEEP) and the Net Promoter Score questionnaire. A principal component analysis (PCA) with oblimin rotation, an internal consistency analysis, several confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and a convergent validity study between the F-DEEP and the NPS were conducted. The PCA suggests a 6-factor structure, which partly corresponds to the 6 factors of the original questionnaire. The internal consistency is very satisfactory, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.944 and a McDonalds omega of 0.945. The CFA with the most satisfactory fit indices corresponds to the first-order model including the 6 factors of the F-DEEP. All the correlations calculated between the F-DEEP factors and the NPS are positive and highly significant. The F-DEEP has very good psychometric qualities, which means that it can be used by researchers and professionals in the field of ergonomic psychology of human-computer interaction to evaluate websites for French-speaking audiences. This questionnaire can also be applied to the evaluation of the usability of mobile applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Le leadership d' empowerment a été identifié, dans la littérature scientifique, comme étant un antécédent de l' empowerment psychologique des salariés. Il est ainsi défini par Amundsen et Martinsen (2014) : « le processus consistant à influencer les collaborateurs par le partage du pouvoir, le soutien motivationnel et le soutien au développement dans le but de promouvoir leur expérience d'autonomie, leur motivation et leur capacité à travailler de façon autonome dans les limites des stratégies et des objectifs globaux de l'organisation » (p. 3). Ce style de leadership a fait l'objet de nombreuses théorisations. Récemment, Amundsen et Martinsen (2014) ont développé une conceptualisation intégrative ainsi qu'une échelle de mesure du leadership d' empowerment. La présente étude vise à traduire en langue française et valider psychométriquement l'échelle de mesure du leadership d' empowerment développée par Amundsen et Martinsen (2014). Dans cette optique, l'échelle originale a été traduite de l'anglais vers le français, puis contre traduite par cinq traducteurs bilingues. Ensuite, l'instrument a été administré à deux échantillons indépendants de salariés français. Nous avons exploré puis confirmé la structure factorielle de l'instrument avec deux échantillons distincts (n = 184, n = 185). Enfin, des tests de corrélation ont été effectués afin de vérifier la validité prédictive de l'instrument. Les résultats indiquent que l'instrument francophone présente une structure factorielle bidimensionnelle conforme à la conceptualisation d'Amundsen et Martinsen (2014). De plus, la mesure française du leadership d' empowerment est significativement et positivement corrélée avec l' empowerment psychologique, le LMX, les comportements d'innovation organisationnelle et la satisfaction au travail, confirmant la validité prédictive de l'instrument. Ces résultats suggèrent que la version française de l'échelle peut être utilisée de manière fiable pour mesurer le leadership d' empowerment. Empowering leadership has been identified in the academic literature as an antecedent to employees' psychological empowerment. It is defined by Amundsen and Martinsen (2014) as: "the process of influencing subordinates through power sharing, motivation support, and development support with intent to promote their experience of self-reliance, motivation, and capability to work autonomously within the boundaries of overall organizational goals and strategies" (p. 3). This style of leadership has been the subject of numerous theorizations. Recently, Amundsen and Martinsen (2014) developed an integrative conceptualization and a scale for measuring empowering leadership. This study aims to translate into French and psychometrically validate the empowering leadership measurement scale developed by Amundsen and Martinsen (2014). To this end, the original scale was translated from English into French and then counter translated by five bilingual translators. The instrument was then administered to two independent samples of French employees. We explored and confirmed the factorial structure of the instrument with two independent samples (n = 184, n = 185). Finally, correlation tests were performed to verify the predictive validity of the instrument. The results indicate that the francophone instrument has a two-dimensional factor structure consistent with Amundsen and Martinsen's (2014) conceptualization. In addition, the French empowering leadership measure is significantly and positively correlated with psychological empowerment, LMX, organizational innovation behaviours and job satisfaction, confirming the predictive validity of the instrument. These results suggest that the French version of the scale can be reliably used to measure empowering leadership. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Review of Applied Psychology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of European Review of Applied Psychology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of European Review of Applied Psychology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of European Review of Applied Psychology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: The self-efficacy to return to work is a major psychological factor of the return to work of patients diagnosed with a cancer. However, french investigations in this field do not take this dimension into account due to the lack of a suitable tool for its assessment. The objective of this study was to provide a french translation and adaptation of the "Return to Work Self-Efficacy' scale - 11 items" (RTWSE-11), validated in dutch language in its original version., Methods: After translation-back translation steps, completed by experts' consensus meetings, interviews were conducted with thirteen patients diagnosed with cancer in order to evaluate the degree of clarity, simplicity and ambiguity or the various elements of the french version of the RTW-SE-11., Results: The main modifications inherent to the french adaptation of the questionnaire concerned the modalities of the Likert scale and the inversion of three negative items into positive items., Discussion: The french translation and adaptation of the RTWSE-11 was particularly faithful to the semantic, idiomatic, functional, experiential, conceptual and operational aspects of the original version. Future work can therefore focus on the psychometrics evaluations of the questionnaire. However, this tool can already be used in clinical practice to establish an initial assessment of the ability of patients diagnosed with cancer to return to work., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)