Search

Afatinib (AT), an FDA-approved aniline-quinazoline derivative, is a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining it with cetuximab (CX), a chimeric human-murine derivative immunoglobulin-G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has shown significant improvements in median progression-free survival. Previously, we developed cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib (AT-MLP) and demonstrated their efficacy against NSCLC cells (A549 and H1975). In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of pulmonary delivery to mitigate adverse effects associated with oral administration and intravenous injection. We formulated AT-MLP dry powders (AT-MLP-DPI) via freeze drying using tert-butanol and mannitol as cryoprotectants in the hydration medium. The physicochemical and aerodynamic properties of dry powders were well analyzed firstly. In vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity study revealed concentration- and time-dependent cellular uptake behavior and antitumor efficacy of AT-MLP-DPI, while Transwell assay demonstrated the superior inhibitory effects on NSCLC cell invasion and migration. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed that pulmonary delivery of AT-MLP-DPI significantly increased bioavailability, prolonged blood circulation time, and exhibited higher lung concentrations compared to alternative administration routes and formulations. The in vivo antitumor efficacy study carried on tumor-bearing nude mice indicated that inhaled AT-MLP-DPI effectively suppressed lung tumor growth., (© 2024. Controlled Release Society.)

Objective: To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different afatinib dimaleate formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions and to assess their pharmacokinetic and safety profiles., Materials and Methods: This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 32 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects were assigned to receive a single 40-mg dose of generic or brand-named afatinib dimaleate tablet. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 120 hours after dosing. Healthy subjects orally took the trial preparation (T) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Jiangxi Shanxiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gan Zhou, China) and the reference preparation (R) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Ingelheim, Germany) under fasting conditions in the appropriate period according to the randomization. We measured the blood concentrations, calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two preparations in the human body, and evaluated whether formulations were bioequivalent. Safety of the preparations in healthy subjects was monitored during the whole trial. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, i.e., from the time the subject received the test drug to the end of the last visit., Results: Under fasting conditions, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for afatinib dimaleate were 93.34 - 103.92% for AUC 0-t , 90.26 - 105.52% for C max , and 93.49 - 104.05% for AUC 0-∞ ., Conclusion: The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of C max , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0-∞ were within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. Both products were similar in terms of safety.

Purpose: This study has a purpose to investigate the side effects of three EGFR-TKIs targeted therapeutic agents (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) and all-cause mortality in patients with metastatic lung cancer., Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study. We selected all patients with newly diagnosed metastatic lung cancer between January and November 2019. Main exposure was daytime versus nighttime use of targeted EGFR TKIs. The study outcome was a symptom change using the mobile application, and all-cause mortality between January 2019 and March 2023., Results: Among the 87 study participants, 35 (40%) took their medication at night. Among the 87 study participants, 35 (40%) took their medication at night. At 6 weeks of treatment, acne (1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 1.64; p for interaction = 0.04) and dry skin (1.35; 95% CI 1.09, 1.61, p for interaction = 0.01) in the day group showed a much increase from baseline compared to the night group. In contrast, the night group reported greater reductions in lung cancer-related symptoms from baseline compared to the day. During follow-up (median 43 months), the night group had a lower risk of all-cause death than the day group, especially in younger patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.34; 95% CI 0.13, 0.87)., Conclusions: The group taking EGFR-TKIs at night experienced fewer side effects and had longer overall survival compared to the day group. Clinicians should consider recommending that lung cancer patients take their once-daily oral anticancer drugs in the evening rather than the morning to improve treatment outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

MET exon14 skipping mutations (METex14s) are rarely reported as a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The efficacy of targeted therapy against METex14s emerging after osimertinib resistance is uncertain. Herein, we report a case of EGFR-mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in which METex14 was detected in a re-biopsy upon first-line osimertinib resistance. The patient received capmatinib monotherapy as third-line therapy, which was ineffective, followed by an exceptional response to salvage therapy with afatinib. This report highlights the heterogeneity of EGFR-TKI resistance and that targeting rare resistance mechanisms remains challenging., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To develop a novel nanomicelle system to target and eradicate CD133-expressing lung cancer stem cells (CSCs) while imaging lung cancer., Methods: Averatinib nanomicelles with CD133 aptamers incorporated with gadolinium imaging reagents (M-Afa&Gd-CD133) were synthesized. The anticancer and imaging activities of M-Afa&Gd-CD133 were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo., Results: M-Afa&Gd-CD133 efficiently targeted CD133 + lung CSCs and showed significant antitumor efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, M-Afa&Gd-CD33, as a T1 contrast agent, offers superior and sustained visualization of tumors over an extended period., Conclusion: M-Afa&Gd-CD133 represents a promising strategy for the theranostics of lung cancer.

Background and Aim: Chemotherapy drugs do not work well in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and none of the targeted drugs have been applied in clinic. This study aims to identify effective targeted drugs and related biomarkers for the treatment of ESCC., Methods: The effect of 40 Food and Drug Administration-approved small-molecule inhibitors was first tested in five ESCC cell lines. CCK8 assays and xenografts derived from ESCC cell lines were performed to evaluate the anti-ESCC effects of inhibitors or chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was utilized to analyze the p-EGFR expression in tissues. Western blot combining with gray analysis was conducted to detect the expression of interest protein. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence assay were used to analyze apoptosis, cell cycle, and mitotic changes after drug treatment., Results: Afatinib showed remarkable effects on inhibiting ESCC cells with higher expression of p-EGFR. Results from combinatorial screening in ESCC cells expressing lower phosphorylation level of EGFR showed that paclitaxel and afatinib presented a significant synergistic inhibitory effect (P < 0.001). Molecular analysis revealed that paclitaxel sensitized afatinib by activating EGFR, and afatinib in combination with paclitaxel effectively blocked MAPK pathway and induced G2/M cell arrest and apoptosis that is an indicator of mitotic catastrophe., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that afatinib is an effective drug for patients with ESCC expressing higher phosphorylation level of EGFR. And for patients with lower p-EGFR in tumors, paclitaxel in combination with afatinib might be a promising therapeutic strategy in ESCC., (© 2021 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequences starting with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), afatinib and osimertinib, for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stages IIIB - IV in Colombia., Methods: A partitioned survival model was designed, using information from global and progression-free survival curves. For first and second-generation TKI, second line treatment was assumed according to the presence of T790M mutation to define the use of osimertinib or chemotherapy. The cost of the states without progression and post-progression was estimated using the base case approach, identified through consultation with clinical experts., Results: The cost of treatment starting with afatinib in the first line was of 222,247 USD (1 USD = 3171.99 COP) and produced 1.36 QALYs. The strategy with afatinib was dominant with respect to that of first line TKI (227,289 USD and 1.34 QALY). The strategy with osimertinib resulted in more QALYs and higher costs, with ICERs of 35,062 USD, exceeding the current willingness to pay threshold for Colombia., Conclusions: Treatment starting with afatinib in the first line is dominant with respect to the strategy with first line TKI. The ICER of osimertinib sequence exceeds the threshold when compared with afatinib one.

Background: Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2., Methods: The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy., Results: Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control., Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The ErbB family blocker, afatinib, is approved for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung following platinum-doublet chemotherapy but has not been explored following immunochemotherapy. Here, we assessed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with SqCC of the lung who received second-line afatinib or chemotherapy after first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a "real-world" setting., Methods: In this retrospective, multisite cohort study, community oncologists identified eligible patients and extracted data from electronic health records. Primary outcome measures were patient demographics and clinical characteristics, time on treatment, and incidence of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs)., Results: Two hundred patients were included: 99 received second-line afatinib and 101 received second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 68 and 66 years, respectively; 35% and 3% of patients had mixed histology tumors, and 39% and 5% of tumors were epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (EGFRm + ). Median time on treatment was 7.3 months with afatinib (mixed histology/SqCC tumors: 8.1/5.8 months; EGFRm + /EGFRm - tumors: 7.4/5.9 months) and 4.2 months with chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 irAEs were observed in 6 patients in the afatinib cohort (all had a prior grade 3/4 irAE during first-line therapy) and no patients in the chemotherapy cohort. The most common adverse drug reactions with afatinib were diarrhea (26%), rash (6%), stomatitis, fatigue, and nausea (5% each)., Conclusion: Encouraging time on treatment, and absence of newly diagnosed irAEs, indicate that afatinib is a treatment option following immunochemotherapy in patients with SqCC of the lung, and is currently the only approved oral agent in this setting., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The new second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have superior survival outcome and worse toxicity profile when compared with first-generation TKIs according to the results of clinical trials. However, there are limited studies that investigate the efficacy and safety of the new generation TKIs in real-world patients. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the afatinib, an irreversible inhibitor of ErbB family receptor, and first-generation TKIs in real-world patients., Materials and Methods: We included advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had EGFR exon 19del mutation and treated with afatinib or first-generation TKIs as upfront treatment between 2016 and 2020. All patient's information was collected retrospectively. The study cohort was divided as afatinib arm and erlotinib/gefitinib arm., Results: A total of 283 patients at the 24 oncology centers were included. The 89 and 193 of whom were treated with afatinib and erlotinib/gefitinib, respectively. After 12.9 months (mo) of follow-up, the median PFS was statistically longer in the afatinib arm than erlotinib/gefitinib arm (19.3 mo vs. 11.9 mo, p: 0.046) and the survival advantage was more profound in younger patients (< 65 years). The 24-mo overall survival rate was 76.1% and 49.5% in the afatinib arm and erlotinib/gefitinib arm, respectively. Although all-grade adverse event (AE) rates were similar between the two arms, grade 3-4 AE rates were higher in the afatinib arm (30.7% vs. 15.2%; p: 0.004)., Discussion: In our real-world study, afatinib has superior survival outcomes despite worse toxicity profile as inconsistent with clinical study results and it is the good upfront treatment option for younger patients and elderly patients who have good performance status.

Background: Afatinib has shown favorable response rates (RRs) and longer progression free survival (PFS) in lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. However, serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) limit the clinical application of afatinib., Methods: We designed a retrospective study, enrolling all patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed and treated with 30 or 40 mg daily afatinib as their initial treatment in three Kaohsiung Medical University-affiliated hospitals in Taiwan., Results: A total of 179 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 102 (57%) and 77 (43%) received 30 mg and 40 mg afatinib daily as their initial treatment, respectively. The patients initially using 30 mg afatinib daily had a similar RR (75% vs. 83%, p = 0.1672), median PFS (14.5 vs. 14.8 months, log-rank p = 0.4649), and median OS (34.0 vs. 25.2 months, log-rank p = 0.5982) compared with those initially using 40 mg afatinib daily. Patients initially receiving 30 mg afatinib daily had fewer ADRs compared with those using 40 mg daily. The overall incidence of moderate and severe ADRs was significantly lower in patients receiving 30 mg afatinib daily compared with those using 40 mg daily (49% vs. 77%, p = 0.002); similar findings was observed in terms of severe ADRs (7% vs. 24%, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Patients receiving 30 mg afatinib daily as their initial treatment had similar RR, PFS, OS, but significantly fewer serious ADRs, as compared with those using 40 mg as their starting dose.

Lung cancer is one of the most important and lethal cancers in the world. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) is a member of the erbB receptor tyrosine kinase family. The incidence of HER2 kinase domain mutations in adenocarcinoma of lung ranges from 1% to 3%. HER2 V659D mutation is located in the trans-membrane domain (TMD) with only a few cases reported before, and importantly, there were no more standard and effective ways for this kind of diseases until now. Afatinib irreversibly blocks all kinase-competent HER family members. Apatinib is one of the small-molecule oral anti-angiogenesis-targeted agents developed firstly in China, and it's a highly selective inhibition of the activity of VEGFR-2. This report presents an advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient with HER2 V659D mutation who was treated with combination of Afatinib and Apatinib. He achieved good efficacy and tolerable adverse reactions., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Canine glioma is a common brain tumor with poor prognosis despite surgery and/or radiation therapy. Therefore, newer and more effective treatment modalities are needed. Neuregulin 3 (NRG3) has known to be a ligand of ERBB4. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the NRG3/ERBB4 signaling cascade as a novel therapeutic target in canine glioma. We found out that microRNA (miR)-190a was downregulated in canine brain tumor tissues, including glioma and meningioma. miR-190a directly targeted NRG3 and inhibited the growth of canine glioma cells. The level of p-Akt, which is a downstream target of ERBB4 signaling, was decreased by transfection with miR-190a. NRG3 silencing also suppressed cell growth and decreased the levels of p-Akt and p-ERK1/2, and NRG3 overexpression exhibited opposed effects in canine glioma J3T-1 cells. The mRNA level of erbb4 was significantly upregulated in glioma tissues compared with that in normal brain tissues and meningioma tissues. Furthermore, compared with gefitinib and lapatinib, afatinib exerted a greater inhibitory effect on the growth of canine glioma cells. In conclusion, NRG3/ERBB4 signaling is negatively regulated by miR-190a and contributes to the growth of canine glioma cells, indicating that it may be a promising therapeutic target in canine glioma., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy targets at epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the EGFR mutation-guided target therapy versus empirical chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in the public healthcare setting of Hong Kong., Methods: A Markov model was designed to simulate outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC adult patients with un-tested EGFR-sensitizing mutation status. Four treatment strategies were evaluated: Empirical first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-pemetrexed (empirical chemotherapy group), and EGFR mutation-guided use of a TKI (afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib). Model outcome measures were direct medical cost, progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER) was estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine robustness of model results., Results: Empirical chemotherapy and EGFR mutation-guided gefitinib gained lower QALYs at higher costs than the erlotinib group. Comparing with EGFR mutation-guided erlotinib, the afatinib strategy gained additional QALYs with ICER (540,633 USD/QALY). In 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, EGFR mutation-guided afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib and empirical chemotherapy were preferred strategy in 0%, 98%, 0% and 2% of time at willingness-to-pay (WTP) 47,812 USD/QALY (1x gross domestic product (GDP) per capita), and in 30%, 68%, 2% and 0% of time at WTP 143,436 USD/QALY (3x GDP per capita), respectively., Conclusions: EGFR mutation-guided erlotinib appears to be the cost-effective strategy from the perspective of Hong Kong public healthcare provider over a broad range of WTP., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway remains controversial in pancreatic cancer. Afatinib is an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker approved in non-small-cell lung cancer. This open-label, multicenter, randomised phase II trial evaluated gemcitabine plus afatinib (Gem/afatinib) versus gemcitabine (Gem) alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to either Gem (1000 mg/m 2 weekly for three weeks followed by one week of rest, repeated every four weeks) and afatinib (40 mg orally once daily) or Gem alone. Overall survival (OS) was the primary study end-point. The novel BOTh©™ methodology was implemented to derive a quantitative estimate for the 'Burden of Therapy/Toxicity' (BOTh) for each patient on every day during the clinical study., Results: One hundred nineteen patients from 25 centres were randomised, 79 patients for Gem/afatinib and 40 for Gem. Median OS was 7.3 months in the Gem/afatinib arm versus 7.4 months in the Gem-alone arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, p = 0.80). Median progression-free survival was identical in both arms (3.9 months versus 3.9 months, HR: 0.85, p = 0.43). Adverse events were more frequent in the Gem/afatinib arm, especially diarrhoea (71% vs. 13%) and skin rash (65% vs. 5%). The BOTh©™ analysis revealed a significantly higher burden of toxicity in the combination arm (p = 0.0005)., Conclusion: The addition of afatinib to Gem did not improve treatment efficacy and was more toxic. The BOTh©™ methodology allowed a detailed insight into the course of treatment-related adverse events over the study period. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01728818) and Eudra-CT (2011-004063-77)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement M.H. reports receiving research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. A.A.-A. reports serving as consulting or advisory role for Roche UK; R.S. reports receiving employment from Astellas Pharma. D.T.W. reports receiving Speakers' Bureau from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai Europe, Falk Pharma, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, SERVIER, Shire, Sirtex Medical; reports receiving travel accommodations and expenses from Bayer, Celgene, Ipsen, Novartis, Sirtex Medical. M.S. reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, SERVIER; reports serving as consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Shire; reports receiving travel fees, accommodations and expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, MSD. A.R.-S. reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurikamed, Baxalta, BOVita, Bristol-Myers Sqibb, Celgene, iomedico, Lilly, MCI Global, med public, Merck Serono, MSD, Pfizer, promedicis, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, SERVIER, Shire; reports serving as consulting or advisory role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxalta, Bristol-Myers Sqibb, Celgene, Merck Serono, MSD, onkowissen.de, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, SERVIER; reports receiving research funding from Agricola, AIO Studien gGmbH, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ipsen, Lilly, Mologen Berlin, Pharma Consulting Group AB Sweden, PPD Global Limited, Roche, SERVIER, Syneed medidata GmbH, Universität Erlangen, Universität Köln, Universität München; reports receiving travel, accommodations and expenses from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ipsen, MCI Global, Merck Serono, MSD, onkowissen.de, Pierre Fabre, Roche, SERVIER. N.F. reports receiving research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Roche. T.S reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, Baxalta, Bayer, Celgene, Falk Foundation, Halozyme, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, SERVIER; reports receiving consulting or advisory role for Baxalta, Bayer, Celgene, Halozyme, Merck Serono, Roche/Genentech, Shire; reports research funding from Celgene, Sanofi; reports receiving travel, accommodations, and expenses from Celgene, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi, SERVIER. R.M reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, Novartis, Roche; reports receiving travel, accommodations and expenses from Amgen, Merck, Pfizer. P.M.reports serving as consulting of advisory role for Bayer, Danone, Mayoly-Spindler; reports receiving speakers' bureau from Alfasigma, Bayer, Falk Foundation, Phantom Pharmaceuticals, Takeda. S.K.reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi; reports wserving as consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi; reports receiving travel, accommodations and expenses from Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi. S.B. reports receiving honoraria from Celgene, SERVIER. M.v.B.-B. reports receiving honoraria, speakers' bureau, research funding, travel, accommodations and expenses from Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, MOLOGEN, MSD, Novartis, Roche. V.H. reports receiving honoraria from Amgen, Baxalta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, SERVIER, Sirtex Medical, Taiho Pharmaceutical; reports serving as consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Baxalta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Halozyme, Merck, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, SERVIER, Sirtex Medical; reports receiving research funding from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Merck, Roche, SERVIER, Shire, Sirtex Medical; reports receiving travel, accommodations and expenses from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD, SERVIER, Shire, Sirtex Medical. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review., Results: In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75-91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2-not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported., Conclusion: Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS., Trial Registration: The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

Purpose: Radioresistance is highly correlated with radiotherapy failure in clinical cancer treatment. In the current study, we sought to examine the efficacy of Celecoxib and Afatinib co-treatment as radiosensitizers in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 cells., Materials and Methods: Generally, A549 cells were cultured with the treatment of Celecoxib and/or Afatinib for 24 h. Then, the cells were exposed to irradiation at 2 Gy/min for 1 min. After the end of treatment, cell viability, clonogenic survival, apoptosis and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Elisa assays were performed. Transcriptional levels of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) affected by Celecoxib and/or Afatinib were measured by RT-qPCR. Posttranscriptional level of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related gene was measured by Western blotting analysis., Results: Here, we, for the first time, reported that the co-treatment of Celecoxib and Afatinib regulates the resistance of NSCLC A549 cells to radiation. The co-treatment of Celecoxib and Afatinib sensitized radiotherapy through the radiation-induced loss of cell viability and colony formation, as well as apoptosis. Mechanistically, Celecoxib and Afatinib-treated cells showed the inhibition of COX-2 and EGFR expression, which may be responsible for the A549 cells' increased resistance to radiation., Conclusion: Our results suggested that Celecoxib and Afatinib regulate cell sensitivity to apoptosis, and thus modulate the resistance of NSCLC to radiation.

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether metformin improved the efficacy of standard epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A total of 99 papers were found using the reported search, of which 4 represented the best evidence to answer this clinical question. The authors, journal, publication date, country, study type, treatment regimen, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We concluded that the addition of metformin to EGFR-TKI might improve the survival of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer and diabetes mellitus type 2. However, for non-diabetic non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation, the efficiency of additional metformin in EGFR-TKI treatment remains unclear because of the conflicting results of only 2 available studies., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Afatinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with proven efficacy for treating patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, responses are limited by acquired resistance. Because traditional Korean medicine may have synergistic effects when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, the aim of our study is to elucidate the efficacy and safety of afatinib plus HangAmDan-B1 (HAD-B1) combination therapy in the treatment of patients with NSCLC, as well as EGFR mutations, who need afatinib therapy., Methods/design: This study is a randomized, multi-center, open clinical trial. A total of 178 eligible subjects, recruited at 8 centers, are randomly assigned to take Afatinib (20-40 mg) ± HAD-B1 (0.972 g/day) for 48 weeks. In the test group, HAD-B1 and afatinib will be used in combination. The primary outcome is a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between afatinib monotherapy and afatinib plus HAD-B1 combination therapy in patients with local advanced or metastatic (Stage IIIA, B, C/IV) NSCLC. Secondary outcomes are the overall survival rates, clinical responses, tumor size reductions, health-related qualities of life, and safety., Discussion: The result of this clinical trial will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of using HAD-B1 in the treatment of EGFR-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who require afatinib therapy., Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (ID: KCT0005414), on September 23, 2020.

Purpose: The irreversible ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) afatinib plus the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab was previously shown to overcome resistance to EGFR TKIs. We studied whether the combination of afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naive EGFR -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by preventing or delaying resistance., Methods: Patients with EGFR -mutant NSCLC without prior treatment of advanced disease were enrolled in this phase II, multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive afatinib 40 mg orally daily plus cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 intravenously every 2 weeks or afatinib alone. The primary end point was PFS., Results: Between March 25, 2015 and April 23, 2018, 174 patients were randomly assigned, and 168 (83 on afatinib + cetuximab and 85 on afatinib) were eligible. There was no improvement in PFS in patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with afatinib alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.43; P = .94; median, 11.9 months v 13.4 months). Similarly, there was no difference in response rate (67% v 74%; P = .38) or overall survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.36; P = .44). Toxicity was greater with the combination: grade ≥ 3 adverse events related to treatment occurred in 72% of patients receiving afatinib plus cetuximab compared with 40% of those receiving afatinib alone, most commonly rash and diarrhea. Dose reductions were more common in patients receiving the combination, and 30% of patients in this arm discontinued cetuximab due to toxicity. At interim analysis, there was insufficient evidence to support continued accrual, and the trial was closed., Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to afatinib did not improve outcomes in previously untreated EGFR -mutant NSCLC, despite recognized activity in the acquired resistance setting., Competing Interests: The author(s) meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (BIPI) had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of the results in this study; BIPI was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as it relates to BIPI substances, as well as intellectual property considerations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Introduction Afatinib is used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common EGFR mutations; however, the clinicopathological factors that predict this drug's effectiveness in real-world settings remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of afatinib in such patients and assessed potential prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with NSCLC who received first-line afatinib between July 2014 and August 2018. Variables (including sex, age, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR genotype, smoking status, clinical stage prior to treatment [stage IV vs.. postoperative recurrence], presence or absence of brain metastases, body surface area, any afatinib dose reductions, and afatinib starting dose [40 vs.. 20 or 30 mg]) were subjected to a Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were included; the objective response rate was 62.5% (30 patients). The median PFS was 14.1 months; the PFS periods were 11.8 and 15.9 months for patients receiving 40 mg versus 20-30 mg of afatinib (P = 0.41), respectively, and were 14.5 and 13.8 months for patients who required afatinib dose reduction and those who did not, respectively (P = 0.80). The PFS tended to be longer in patients without brain metastases (albeit not significantly). Ultimately, no significant predictive values for PFS were identified. Conclusions Afatinib is effective for patients with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations irrespective of their clinicopathological backgrounds. A direct comparison of afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients is warranted to determine the optimal standard of care.

Background Osimertinib is one of the first-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, the occurrence rate of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is particularly high in Japanese patients and little information on subsequent cancer treatment options after recovery from osimertinib-induced ILD is currently available. Thus, this study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of afatinib for the treatment of NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD. Methods We retrospectively investigated the clinical courses of all NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations at our facility between August 2018 and September 2019, who received osimertinib as first-line treatment and were subsequently treated with afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. Results Forty-two patients received osimertinib treatment at our facility during the study period, and four patients received afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. All events of ILD improved either spontaneously or with steroid therapy before the initiation of afatinib. For the four patients who were retrospectively reviewed, the overall response rate to afatinib therapy was 75%, and the disease control rate was 100%. During the study period, no ILD recurrence was observed in any of the four patients. Conclusions According to our study findings, afatinib treatment after osimertinib-induced ILD is considered safe and effective and it can be used as one of the treatment options for NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD.

Aim: Final overall survival (OS) and time on treatment analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib. Patients & methods: Patients (n = 203) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months before data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment; OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median time on treatment with afatinib and osimertinib was 27.7 months (90% CI: 26.7-29.9). Median OS was 37.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-41.3); median OS was 41.6 and 44.8 months in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients, respectively. Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Mutations in the EGFR  gene are particularly prevalent among Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Six EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung carcinoma in China, which poses questions about which agent is most suitable for a particular patient. In this article, we review available clinical trial and real-world data with afatinib in Chinese patients. We assess its efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups such as those with uncommon mutations or brain metastases. We also consider possible subsequent therapies following afatinib. Encouragingly, available data suggest that sequential afatinib and osimertinib confer prolonged overall time to failure of almost 4 years in Asian patients, and represents a viable option in this setting.

Background: Only a few randomized trials directly compared the relative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and most trials comprised selected series from Asian populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the overall survival (OS) of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in a large white population and to evaluate variation between different TKIs and identify predictors of survival., Patients and Methods: Information about clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival for 873 patients with stage IV EGFR + NSCLC, diagnosed from 2015 through 2017, was derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS was evaluated by actuarial analysis and multivariable Cox regression. Prognostic factors are reported as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals., Results: A total of 596 (68%) patients received first-line treatment with regular TKIs, providing a median survival of 20.2 months. Forty-five percent of patients were 70 years and older, and 54% of patients had distant metastasis in multiple organs. In the multivariate analysis, survival was significantly worse for men, and patients with higher age, poorer performance, and ≥ 3 organs with metastasis. Compared with erlotinib, OS was worse for gefitinib users (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.64), predominantly in patients with brain metastasis., Conclusion: Dutch patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with regular TKIs have a median OS of 20.2 months in a nationwide real-world cohort. In patients with brain metastasis, erlotinib showed superior results compared with gefitinib and was similar to afatinib., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We describe the treatment rationale and design of our randomized phase III study, the ACHILLES trial (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180175). The aim of this study is to investigate the superiority of afatinib over chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer with sensitizing uncommon or compound epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, with the exception of de novo T790M mutations and exon 20 insertions. Eligible patients will be randomized at a 1:2 ratio to receive either chemotherapy or afatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2  + cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 or carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 or 6 every 3 weeks × 4 cycles, followed by pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks. In the afatinib arm, investigators will choose the starting dose of afatinib (30 mg or 40 mg orally daily). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. A total of 106 patients will be enrolled in this trial over a 30-month registration period with a 15-month follow-up. Enrollment began in March 2019. The results of this trial will establish the superiority of afatinib over chemotherapy in a cohort with a large variety of EGFR mutations., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gastric cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The molecular mechanisms of action for anti-HER-family drugs in gastric cancer cells are incompletely understood. We compared the molecular effects of trastuzumab and the other HER-family targeting drugs cetuximab and afatinib on phosphoprotein and gene expression level to gain insights into the regulated pathways. Moreover, we intended to identify genes involved in phenotypic effects of anti-HER therapies., Methods: A time-resolved analysis of downstream intracellular kinases following EGF, cetuximab, trastuzumab and afatinib treatment was performed by Luminex analysis in the gastric cancer cell lines Hs746T, MKN1, MKN7 and NCI-N87. The changes in gene expression after treatment of the gastric cancer cell lines with EGF, cetuximab, trastuzumab or afatinib for 4 or 24 h were analyzed by RNA sequencing. Significantly enriched pathways and gene ontology terms were identified by functional enrichment analysis. Furthermore, effects of trastuzumab and afatinib on cell motility and apoptosis were analyzed by time-lapse microscopy and western blot for cleaved caspase 3., Results: The Luminex analysis of kinase activity revealed no effects of trastuzumab, while alterations of AKT1, MAPK3, MEK1 and p70S6K1 activations were observed under cetuximab and afatinib treatment. On gene expression level, cetuximab mainly affected the signaling pathways, whereas afatinib had an effect on both signaling and cell cycle pathways. In contrast, trastuzumab had little effects on gene expression. Afatinib reduced average speed in MKN1 and MKN7 cells and induced apoptosis in NCI-N87 cells. Following treatment with afatinib, a list of 14 genes that might be involved in the decrease of cell motility and a list of 44 genes that might have a potential role in induction of apoptosis was suggested. The importance of one of these genes (HBEGF) as regulator of motility was confirmed by knockdown experiments., Conclusions: Taken together, we described the different molecular effects of trastuzumab, cetuximab and afatinib on kinase activity and gene expression. The phenotypic changes following afatinib treatment were reflected by altered biological functions indicated by overrepresentation of gene ontology terms. The importance of identified genes for cell motility was validated in case of HBEGF.

Rationale: Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and sequencing of cell-free DNA has rarely been used to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, which can guide the design of precise, personalized treatment for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma., Patient Concerns: A 42-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma and leptomeningeal metastasis was admitted to our hospital on March 31, 2019. She exhibited no response to treatment with gefitinib, osimertinib, or chemoradiotherapy and was in critical condition, with an expected survival of <4 weeks., Diagnosis: Next-generation sequencing of CSF and peripheral blood samples identified an EGFR complex mutation (exon19del+K754E)., Interventions: On April 10, 2019, the patient started oral afatinib (40 mg po qd), but she developed a grade III oral mucosal reaction 1 week later. The afatinib dose was reduced to 30 mg po qd., Outcomes: At the follow-up examination on May 15, 2019, the patient reported relief from headaches. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a reduction in abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement, and the CSF pressure and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were also reduced. The patient continued to respond to afatinib treatment (30 mg once daily) with minimal adverse effects., Lessons: This is the first case report of clinical improvement after afatinib treatment in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and leptomeningeal metastasis harboring an EGFR complex mutation (exon19del+K754E), and thus provides a clinical reference for treatment with afatinib of cancers harboring EGFR compound mutations.

We constructed a data set of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, and compared the overall survival of first-generation (1G), and second-generation (2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical practice using a propensity score. We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who received EGFR-TKI therapy between January 2008 and August 2017 at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When comparing OS between 1G and 2G EGFR-TKIs, propensity score analyses were performed using 2 methods: matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). (Clinical Trial information: UMIN000030121) In total, 1400 patients from 11 institutions were enrolled in this study, and the data from the 1366 patients who received only EGFR-TKI therapy were analyzed (gefitinib [GEF], N = 732; erlotinib [ERL], N = 416; afatinib, N = 218). Median OS times (months [95%CI]) were 29.7 [27.5-33.5] in the 1G group (gefitinib, 32.0 [28.1-35.8]; erlotinib, 27.5 [23.9-31.7]), and 38.6 [32.2-NR] in the 2G group (afatinib), respectively. The trend of longer OS for afatinib against 1G EGFR-TKIs remained, even after adjusted by propensity score. (unadjusted, hazard ratio [HR] 0.676, P = .0023; adjusted by IPTW, HR 0.685 P < .0001; adjusted by matching, HR 0.725, P = .0418). Exploratory analysis showed that OS using the 2G EGFR-TKI was superior to that of the 1G EGFR-TKIs, suggesting the potential of sequential therapy of 2G EGFR-TKI followed by osimertinib. (HR 0.419, P = .0519) Real-world data analysis using 1354 data records, using propensity scoring, indicated that 2G EGFR-TKI had a trend of longer OS compared with 1G EGFR-TKIs., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

The real-world efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-activating mutations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the claims database of Taipei Veterans General Hospital to perform direct comparisons of these three EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) combined with co-medications (metformin, statins, antacids, and steroids). Stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations receiving EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment for > 3 months between 2011 and 2016 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Patients who had received co-medications (≥ 28 defined daily doses) in the first 3 months of EGFR-TKI therapy were assigned to co-medications groups. A total of 853 patients treated with gefitinib (n = 534), erlotinib (n = 220), and afatinib (n = 99) were enrolled. The median duration of TTF was 11.5 months in the gefitinib arm, 11.7 months in the erlotinib arm, and 16.1 months in the afatinib arm (log-rank test, P < 0.001). After adjustments, afatinib showed lower risk of treatment failure compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.71) and erlotinib (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83). The risk of treatment failure in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs who received concomitant systemic glucocorticoid therapy was higher than in those treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-2.01). Afatinib or erlotinib use was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations compared to gefitinib use. Concurrent use of systemic glucocorticoids was linked to higher risk of treatment failure.

Background: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the cornerstone treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer that harbor oncogenic EGFR mutations. The counterpart of these drugs is the financial burden that they impose, which often creates a barrier for accessing treatment in developing countries. The aim if the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of three different first and second generation TKIs., Methods: We designed a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of three different TKIs (afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib) administered as first-line therapy for patients with NSCLC that harbor EGFR mutations., Results: We included 99 patients with the following TKI treatment; 40 treated with afatinib, 33 with gefitinib, and 26 with erlotinib. Median PFS was not significantly different between treatment groups; 15.4 months (95% CI 9.3-19.5) for afatinib; 9.0 months (95% CI 6.3- NA) for erlotinib; and 10.0 months (95% CI 7.46-14.6) for gefitinib. Overall survival was also similar between groups: 29.1 months (95% CI 25.4-NA) for afatinib; 27.1 months (95% CI 17.1- NA) for erlotinib; and 23.7 months (95% CI 18.6-NA) for gefitinib. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean TKIs costs; being afatinib the most expensive treatment. This difference was observed in the daily cost of treatment (p < 0.01), as well as the total cost of treatment (p = 0.00095). Cost-effectiveness analysis determined that afatinib was a better cost-effective option when compared with first-generation TKIs (erlotinib and gefitinib)., Conclusion: In our population, erlotinib, afatinib, and gefitinib were statistically equally effective in terms of OS and PFS for the treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC population. Owing to its marginally increased PFS and OS, the cost-effectiveness analysis determined that afatinib was a slightly better cost-effective option when compared with first-generation TKIs (erlotinib and gefitinib).

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with EGFR mutation-positive ( EGFR m+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of EGFR m+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon EGFR mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with EGFR m+ NSCLC.

Introduction: Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acting as an irreversible and multitarget blocker of ErbB family members. Afatinib is currently approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common and uncommon sensitizing EGFR mutations and for squamous NSCLC patients progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy., Areas Covered: This review summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of afatinib compared with chemotherapy and other EGFR TKIs, in order to evaluate its characteristics and potential role in the increasingly complex treatment landscape of EGFR -mutant lung cancer. Future perspectives and innovative drug combinations are also discussed., Expert Opinion: Afatinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy and quality of life compared with chemotherapy with a managed toxicity profile. However, in recent years, the increasing availability of different treatment options for advanced EGFR -mutant NSCLC has made the current treatment scenario more complicated, with an increasing need of new and deeper scientific data. In this light, the identification and validation of potential clinicopathological and/or molecular predictors of benefit, as well as the clarification of resistance mechanisms, may help to clarify the most appropriate treatment strategies and sequences for EGFR -mutant patients.

Purpose: Fanconi anemia rare disease is characterized by bone marrow failure and a high predisposition to solid tumors, especially head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients with Fanconi anemia with HNSCC are not eligible for conventional therapies due to high toxicity in healthy cells, predominantly hematotoxicity, and the only treatment currently available is surgical resection. In this work, we searched and validated two already approved drugs as new potential therapies for HNSCC in patients with Fanconi anemia., Experimental Design: We conducted a high-content screening of 3,802 drugs in a FANCA-deficient tumor cell line to identify nongenotoxic drugs with cytotoxic/cytostatic activity. The best candidates were further studied in vitro and in vivo for efficacy and safety., Results: Several FDA/European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved anticancer drugs showed cancer-specific lethality or cell growth inhibition in Fanconi anemia HNSCC cell lines. The two best candidates, gefitinib and afatinib, EGFR inhibitors approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), displayed nontumor/tumor IC 50 ratios of approximately 400 and approximately 100 times, respectively. Neither gefitinib nor afatinib activated the Fanconi anemia signaling pathway or induced chromosomal fragility in Fanconi anemia cell lines. Importantly, both drugs inhibited tumor growth in xenograft experiments in immunodeficient mice using two Fanconi anemia patient-derived HNSCCs. Finally, in vivo toxicity studies in Fanca -deficient mice showed that administration of gefitinib or afatinib was well-tolerated, displayed manageable side effects, no toxicity to bone marrow progenitors, and did not alter any hematologic parameters., Conclusions: Our data present a complete preclinical analysis and promising therapeutic line of the first FDA/EMA-approved anticancer drugs exerting cancer-specific toxicity for HNSCC in patients with Fanconi anemia., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost of patients with first line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sequence of first (1G) and second generation (2G) followed by osimertinib. Materials & methods: Using the French nationwide claims and hospitalization database, we analyzed non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had been treated with osimertinib between April 2015 and December 2017, after a first line treatment with a TKI-1G/2G. Results: The median time on treatment for sequential TKI-1G/2G followed by osimertinib was 34 months (95% CI: 31-46); 13 and 12months, respectively for TKI 1G or 2G and TKI 3G, respectively. The median overall survival for sequential TKI 1G or 2G followed by osimertinib was 37 months (95% CI: 34-42). The mean monthly costs per patient was €5162. Conclusion: These results, in line with those observed during clinical trials, confirm the effectiveness of the sequence TKI-1G/2G followed by osimertinib in EGFR -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Insights into the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) could provide important information for further patient management, including the choice of second-line treatment. The EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Owing to its biologic relevance in the response of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to the selective pressure of treatment, the present study investigated whether the occurrence of T790M at progression differed among patients receiving gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib., Patients and Methods: The present retrospective study included patients with NSCLC with an EGFR activating mutation, who had received gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line treatment. Plasma samples for the analysis of cell-free DNA were taken at disease progression and analyzed using a digital droplet polymerase chain reaction EGFR mutation assay., Results: A total of 83 patients were enrolled; 42 had received gefitinib or erlotinib and 41afatinib. The patient characteristics were comparable across the 2 groups. The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.4 months for the gefitinib and erlotinib group and 10.2 months for the afatinib group (P = .09). Of the 83 patients, 47 (56.6%) were positive for the T790M in plasma. A greater incidence of T790M was observed in patients with progression during gefitinib or erlotinib therapy compared with patients treated with afatinib (33 [79%] vs. 14 [34%], respectively; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-18.5; P = .0001)., Conclusions: Although gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib showed a comparable TTP in patients receiving first-line therapy, the incidence of T790M differed among them, as demonstrated by the present study, which could have implications for the choice of second-line treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We investigated whether head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) reaffirm patient responses to anti-cancer therapeutics., Methods: Tumors from HNSCC patients were transplanted into immunodeficient mice and propagated via subsequent implantation. We evaluated established PDXs by histology, genomic profiling, and in vivo anti-cancer efficacy testing to confirm them as the authentic in vivo platform., Results: From 62 HNSCCs, 15 (24%) PDXs were established. The primary cancer types were tongue (8), oropharynx (3), hypopharynx (1), ethmoid sinus cancer (1), supraglottic cancer (1), and parotid gland (1); six PDXs (40%) were established from biopsy specimens from advanced HNSCC. PDXs mostly retained donor characteristics and remained stable across passages. PIK3CA (H1047R), HRAS (G12D), and TP53 mutations (H193R, I195T, R248W, R273H, E298X) and EGFR, CCND1, MYC, and PIK3CA amplifications were identified. Using the acquisition method, biopsy showed a significantly higher engraftment rate when compared with that of surgical resection (100% [6/6] vs. 16.1% [9/56], P < 0.001). Specimens obtained from metastatic sites showed a significantly higher engraftment rate than did those from primary sites (100% [9/9] vs. 11.3% [6/53], P < 0.001). Three PDX models from HPV-positive tumors were established, as compared to 12 from HPV-negative (15.8% [3/19] and 27.9% [12/43] respectively, P = 0.311), suggesting that HPV positivity tends to show a low engraftment rate. Drug responses in PDX recapitulated the clinical responses of the matching patients with pan-HER inhibitors and pan-PI3K inhibitor., Conclusions: Genetically and clinically annotated HNSCC PDXs could be useful preclinical tools for evaluating biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and new drug discovery.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex biology and a wide number of altered genes such as BRAF, KRAS and PIK3CA. Advances with new-targeted therapies have been achieved and available treating options have prolonged patient's survival. However, BRAF-mutated CRC patients remain unresponsive to available therapies with RAF inhibitors (RAFi) alone or combined with ErbB inhibitors (ErbBi). These unmet needs require further exploitation of oncogenic signaling in order to set up individualized treatments., Methods: To this end, we tested the efficacy of single agent or combined treatments using the BRAFi, vemurafenib and two different ErbBi: panitumumab and afatinib in CRC cells characterized by different molecular phenotypes., Results: Combination strategies with BRAFi and ErbBi achieved a better response in BRAF V600E mutated cells expressing high levels of ErbB2., Conclusions: Our findings support the importance of ErbB2 evaluation in BRAF-mutated CRC patients and its role as a positive predictor factor of response to BRAFi/ErbBi combination.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitizing mutation, exon 19 deletion consists of several molecular variants. Influences of these variants on clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain elusive., Methods: West Japan Oncology Group 8114LTR is a prospective, multi-institutional biomarker study. Treatment naïve, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation received afatinib monotherapy. We conducted a preplanned subset analysis of patients harboring exon 19 deletion. Tumor tissue exon 19 deletion molecular variants were identified by blocking-oligo-dependent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by Luminex Technology. Plasma cfDNA was also obtained before and after the treatment and EGFR mutations were detected with multiplexed, pico-droplet digital PCR assay., Results: Among 57 registered patients, twenty-nine patients were exon 19 deletion. Tissue DNA and cfDNA were available in 26 patients. Among the detected seven molecular variants, the most frequent was p.E746&#95;A750delELREA (65.4%). According to the various classifications of molecular variants, twenty one (80.8%) were classified into 15-nucleotide deletion, one (3.8%) into 18-nucleotide deletion, and four patients (15.4%) into other insertion/substitution variant subgroups. The patient subgroup with 15-nucleotide deletion showed significantly longer progression-free survival than patients in other mixed insertion/substitution variant subgroup (p = 0.0244)., Conclusions: The clinical significance of molecular variants of exon 19 deletion on the first line afatinib monotherapy is reported here for the first time. Further investigation is needed for development of better therapeutic strategies., Trial Registration: This trial was registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry at 2014/12/4 (UMIN000015847).

Aim: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inevitable in non-small-cell lung cancer. To inform subsequent treatment decisions, we retrospectively assessed therapies following afatinib in Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 3. Patients & methods: LUX-Lung 3 was a randomized, open-label, Phase III study of afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in treatment-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive ( EGFR m + ) advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Results: Among 47 Japanese patients who discontinued first-line afatinib, 91/81/62% received ≥one/two/three subsequent therapies. The most common second-line therapies were platinum-based chemotherapy (38%) and a first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (17%). Median overall survival (afatinib vs cisplatin/pemetrexed) was 47.8 versus 35.0 months (not significant). Conclusion: First-line afatinib does not appear to diminish suitability for subsequent therapies in EGFR m + non-small-cell lung cancer.

Compared with other breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with relatively poor outcomes due to its metastatic propensity, frequent failure to respond to chemotherapy, and lack of alternative, targeted treatment options, despite decades of major research efforts. Our studies sought to identify promising targeted therapeutic candidates for TNBC through in vitro screening of 1,363 drugs in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Using this approach, we generated a dataset that can be used to assess and compare responses of various breast cancer PDXs to many different drugs. Through a series of further drug screening assays and two-drug combination testing, we identified that the combination of afatinib (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor) and YM155 (inhibitor of baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5; survivin) expression) is synergistically cytotoxic across multiple models of basal-like TNBC and reduces PDX mammary tumor growth in vivo. We found that YM155 reduces EGFR expression in TNBC cells, shedding light on its potential mechanism of synergism with afatinib. Both EGFR and BIRC5 are highly expressed in basal-like PDXs, cell lines, and patients, and high expression of both genes reduces metastasis-free survival, suggesting that co-targeting of these proteins holds promise for potential clinical success in TNBC.

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed to target the EGFR T790M resistance mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients resistant to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. To investigate the efficacy of afatinib treatment for EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients showing resistance to osimertinib and alterations in somatic mutations and tumor mutation burden (TMB) in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during afatinib treatment, we conducted a prospective study using Cancer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). Nine NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation who showed resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs were enrolled in this study and treated with afatinib. Plasma samples were collected before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and at disease progression. The mutation profile and TMB in plasma ctDNA were analyzed by CAPP-Seq. The objective response rate and median progression-free survival associated with afatinib were 0% and 2.0 months, respectively. The C797S mutation-mediated resistance to osimertinib was observed in one patient and following afatinib treatment in two patients; the C797S mutations occurred in the same allele as the T790M mutation. After afatinib treatment, afatinib-sensitive mutant alleles, such as ERBB2, and TMB decreased. We have demonstrated that detection of mutant allele frequency and TMB of ctDNA by CAPP-Seq could help determine the effectiveness of and resistance to afatinib. Although afatinib monotherapy for T790M-positive NSCLC resistant to osimertinib was less effective, the action for multiclonal mutant alleles and TMB might contribute to further treatment strategy.

Background: Clinical-pathologic predictors of acquired T790M epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in Caucasian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after first-/second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an open field for research. Similarly, the best time point for T790M detection by liquid or tissue biopsy after disease progression is currently matter of debate., Patients and Methods: This is an observational study at 7 Italian centers enrolling patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC progressing after first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs, between 2014 and 2018, aiming at comparing baseline clinical-pathologic features and progression patterns in acquired T790M-positive compared with T790M-negative cases., Results: A total of 235 patients received first-line treatment with gefitinib (N = 126; 53%), erlotinib (N = 51; 22%), or afatinib (N = 58; 25%). In 120 (51%) cases, T790M was detected in liquid biopsy, tissue biopsy, or both. Age younger than 65 years (P = .037), the presence of common mutations (P = .004), and better response to first-line TKI (P = .023) were correlated with T790M positivity. T790M detection was associated with higher number of new progressing sites (P = .04), liver progression (P = .002), and a lower frequency of lung metastases (P = .027). When serial liquid biopsies were performed (N = 15), an oligoprogressive disease was correlated with a negative test outcome, whereas systemic progression was observed at the time of T790M positivity., Conclusion: This study on a Caucasian population showed that age, type of EGFR mutation at diagnosis, response to first-line treatment, and peculiar progression pattern are associated with T790M status. Serial liquid biopsy might be useful for treatment selection, especially when tissue rebiopsy is not feasible., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant adult brain tumor. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the standard of care and is most effective in GBMs that lack the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Moreover, even initially responsive tumors develop a secondary resistance to TMZ and become untreatable. Since aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is widespread in GBM, EGFR inhibition has been tried in multiple clinical trials without success. We recently reported that inhibiting EGFR leads to increased secretion of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and activation of a survival pathway in GBM. Here, we compare the efficacy of TMZ versus EGFR plus TNF inhibition in an orthotopic mouse model of GBM., Methods: We use an orthotopic model to examine the efficacy of TMZ versus EGFR plus TNF inhibition in multiple subsets of GBMs, including MGMT methylated and unmethylated primary GBMs, recurrent GBMs, and GBMs rendered experimentally resistant to TMZ., Results: The efficacy of the 2 treatments was similar in MGMT methylated GBMs. However, in MGMT unmethylated GBMs, a combination of EGFR plus TNF inhibition was more effective. We demonstrate that the 2 treatment approaches target distinct and non-overlapping pathways. Thus, importantly, EGFR plus TNF inhibition remains effective in TMZ-resistant recurrent GBMs and in GBMs rendered experimentally resistant to TMZ., Conclusion: EGFR inhibition combined with a blunting of the accompanying TNF-driven adaptive response could be a viable therapeutic approach in MGMT unmethylated and recurrent EGFR-expressing GBMs., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2019.)

To investigate the exposure-safety relationships of afatinib in Japanese population, we performed population pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis of afatinib in Japanese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Plasma samples were collected at 0.5-1, 2-3, 8-12, and 24 h after oral afatinib (40 mg) administration on day 1 and day 8. Plasma afatinib concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Data was analyzed following the population approach and using the software Phoenix ® NLME TM Version 7.0 software (Certara USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA). From 34 patients, a total of 354 afatinib plasma concentration values were available for the population PK analysis. Significant covariates in the population PK model included aspartate aminotransferase and creatinine clearance on CL/F, and age and body mass index on V/F. Results of simulation based on final PK model indicated that hepatic impairment had a significant effect on afatinib levels in plasma after multiple dosing. Afatinib trough plasma concentrations on day 8 were higher in patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher. The population PK analysis showed that hepatic impairment affected afatinib PK parameters and contributed to the high inter-patient variability and high plasma concentrations of afatinib following multiple treatments.

Afatinib (Afa), a second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor inhibitor for the development of non-small cell lung cancer, has low bioavailability and adverse reactions. Nanoscaled drug delivery systems offer promising alternatives to address these defects and improve therapeutic outcomes. In the present study, a Tf contained, redox-sensitive ligand was synthesized and used for the preparation of afatinib loaded, Tf modified redox-sensitive lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (Tf-SS-Afa-LPNs). Subsequently, studies of biological experiments in vitro and in vivo were performed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the system in lung cancer. The results showed that Tf-SS-Afa-LPNs has particle size of 103.5 ± 4.1 nm and zeta potential of -21.2 ± 2.4 mV. Significantly higher drug release was observed in the presence of glutathione (GSH). The area under the plasma concentration - time curve (AUC), peak concentration (C max ) and terminal half life (T 1/2 ) of Tf-SS-Afa-LPNs were 866.56 mg/L.h, 25.62 ± 3.21 L/kg/h, and 43.25 ± 2.31 h. Tf-SS-Afa-LPNs exhibited the most remarkable in vivo anti-tumor efficiency efficacy, which inhibited the tumor volume from 919 mm 3 to 212 mm 3 . Tf-SS-Afa-LPNs is a promising platform for the lung cancer treatment., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Clinical trials with first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) reported severe adverse events (SAEs) in 6%-49% of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. This study describes incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with real-world management of AEs in this population, with a focus on SAEs., Materials and Methods: Patients receiving erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib as first-line (1L) monotherapy were identified from IQVIA™ Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims-US database (04/01/2012-03/31/2017). Relevant AEs were selected from corresponding prescribing information; SAEs were identified from hospitalization claims. HRU and cost per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were assessed during 1L treatment and compared for patients with and without each AE using multivariate Poisson and linear regression, respectively, adjusting for baseline characteristics., Results: Of 1646 patients, 86.9% were treated with erlotinib, 12.1% with afatinib, and 1.0% with gefitinib. In 1L, 12.2% of patients had ≥1 acute SAE (220.1/1000 patient-years). Patients with any SAE had higher PPPM costs than patients without SAEs (cost difference = $4700, p < 0.001). Incremental costs ranged from $2604 PPPM for diarrhea to $10,143 PPPM for microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), and were statistically significant for all SAEs (all p < 0.001) except MAHA (p < 0.0528). Patients with any SAEs had higher rates of HRU relative to patients without SAEs (hospitalization rate ratio = 6.15; outpatient visits rate ratio = 1.21; all p < 0.001)., Conclusion: More than one-tenth of patients experienced SAEs, resulting in sizeable economic burden with respect to HRU and costs. EGFR-TKIs with more favorable safety profiles may reduce the burden of managing this population., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Trastuzumab is the only clinically approved targeted therapy for HER2 gene-amplified gastric cancer at present. However, the clinical significance of multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HER2-positive gastric cancer remains unclear., Materials and Methods: We examined the anti-tumor activity of lapatinib and afatinib, that are reversible and irreversible TKIs, in HER2 gene-amplified trastuzumab-sensitive and - resistant gastric cancer cells (GLM-1 and GLM-1HerR2) in vitro and in vivo., Results: Afatinib inhibited the growth of GLM-1 and GLM-1HerR2 cells in vitro more efficiently than lapatinib by inducing G 1 cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Preclinical studies in mice revealed that afatinib inhibited growth of intraperitoneal GLM-1 and subcutaneous GLM-1HerR2 tumor more strongly than lapatinib. Afatinib was more effective than lapatinib in blocking PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling in both GLM-1 and GLM-1HerR2 cells., Conclusion: Afatinib could be a potential new molecular-targeted therapy for trastuzumab-sensitive and trastuzumab-resistant HER2 gene-amplified gastric cancers., (Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)