Search

Combination vaccines improve parental and provider satisfaction and schedule compliance by decreasing the number of injections. In a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, we compared four formulations of a liquid, hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate-hepatitis B virus (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) vaccine in 708 infants immunized at 2, 3, 4, and 12-14 months of age. The formulations contained identical DTaP and IPV components, differing in the contents of Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) conjugate component (tetanus-toxoid [PRP-T, 12microg] or Neisseria meningitidis outer-membrane-protein-complex [PRP-OMPC, 3microg or 6microg]), and in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg, 10microg or 15microg). A minimum acceptable postdose 3 antibody response rate was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeding a prespecified target. Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar among groups, with a trend for increased solicited injection-site reactions (pain, redness, swelling) with increasing PRP-OMPC and HBsAg concentration. Serious AEs reported by eight subjects were not considered to be vaccine related. All PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified acceptability criteria for postdose 3 immunogenicity for all antigens: PRP, HBsAg, pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus and polio. Apart from the Hib response, the postdose 3 responses obtained with the PRP-T formulation met the acceptability criterion for each antigen. Postdose 4 responses were acceptable for all antigens in all formulations. All vaccine formulations were well tolerated. The three PRP-OMPC formulations met prespecified immunogenicity criteria, and the one with the lowest PRP-OMPC concentration was selected for further optimization of immunogenicity.

Challenges facing seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination include: increasing the immunogenicity of seasonal vaccines for the most vulnerable, increasing vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza, and developing vaccines against pandemic strains that are immunogenic with very low quantities of antigen to maximize the number of people who can be vaccinated with a finite production capacity. We review Sanofi Pasteur’s epidemic and pandemic influenza research and development programmes with emphasis on two key projects: intradermal influenza vaccine for seasonal vaccination of both elderly and younger adults, and pandemic influenza vaccine.

Combination vaccines decrease the number of injections and improve parental satisfaction and vaccination schedule compliance. In a phase 1, randomized, partially-blinded, single-dose booster study, we evaluated two formulations of an investigational liquid hexavalent vaccine containing diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (5-component), inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate and hepatitis B surface antigen (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HBV) in 60 healthy toddlers, 15 to 18 months of age, who had been primed with three doses of a licensed pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (5-component), inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae b conjugate (DTaP-IPV//PRP-T) vaccine. The DTaP-IPV//PRP-T vaccine was used as a control in 30 subjects. The investigational formulations, which contained the same DTaP-IPV components, differed only in Hib (content and conjugate) and HBV (content) (PRP-T/HBV10 = 12 mug Hib tetanus toxoid conjugate with 10 microg HBsAg; PRP-OMPC/HBV15 = 6 microg Hib Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex with 15 microg HBsAg). Injection-site pain, redness and swelling were reported by 46.7%, 46.7%, and 20.0% of the licensed vaccine recipients, 43.3%, 43.3%, and 26.7% of PRP-T/HBV10 recipients and 70.0%, 46.7%, and 46.7% of PRP-OMPC/HBV15 recipients, respectively. Fever > or = 37.8 degrees C and irritability were reported by 0% and 16.7% of licensed vaccine recipients, 10.3% and 23.3% of PRP-T/HBV10 recipients and 30.0% and 16.7% of PRP-OMPC/HBV15 recipients, respectively. There were no apparent differences between the groups in the proportion of participants achieving predefined, threshold or seroprotective immune responses. Geometric mean antibody levels for all antigens were similar except for anti-PRP levels, which were 19.0 microg/mL in recipients of the licensed vaccine, 40.8 microg/mL in PRP-T/HBV10 recipients and 9.4 microg/mL in PRP-OMPC/HBV15 recipients. We conclude that the hexavalent formulations appear generally well tolerated and immunogenic as a booster dose in these toddlers.

Objectives: To assess the safety, immunogenicity and lot consistency of a liquid hexavalent combined vaccine (DTaP-IPV-PRP~T-HBs, HEXAVAC®) (Sanofi-Pasteur MSD, France) administered to infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.Methods: A total of 1028 infants were vaccinated with one of 3 vaccine lots, in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Equivalence testing was used to compare post-vaccination seroprotection/seroconversion rates and geometric mean titers (GMTs) for each antigen between the three lots. Blood samples were drawn before vaccination and one month after the third dose. Local and systemic adverse events were monitored for 3 days following each injection.Results: Equivalence between lots was demonstrated for all antigens, on post-dose 3 seroprotection/seroconversion rates and GMTs. Reported rates of local and systemic adverse events tended to increase with subsequent doses. Altogether, 11.8% of the infants reported at least one adverse local event (mainly redness and induration/swelling) after the ...

To reduce the number of injections needed to comply with paediatric vaccination requirements, a liquid, hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-PRP-T-HBs; Hexavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD) has been developed for primary and booster vaccination of infants and toddlers. In extensive clinical studies, Hexavac has been shown to be highly immunogenic. Seroconversion or seroprotective titres of antibodies against all antigens were achieved in the majority of infants following a primary series of three doses administered at 1-2-month intervals from 2 months of age. Hexavac also induced immunologic memory, as evidenced by the anamnestic response to booster vaccination at 12-18 months of age. These responses were comparable with those seen following concomitant administration of Pentavac (DTaP-IPV//PRP-T) and monovalent hepatitis B vaccine (H-B-Vax II), and were also within the ranges observed for other relevant licensed vaccines. Clinical studies comparing the immunogenicity of Hexavac administered at either 2, 3 and 4 months or 2, 4 and 6 months demonstrated that it can be used by either vaccination schedule. A further study also supported the use of primary doses of Hexavac at 3 and 5 months with a booster at 12 months of age. Hexavac demonstrated a good reactogenicity and tolerability profile. The most frequently reported adverse events after both primary and booster doses were local reactions of redness and swelling/induration and a systemic response of mild fever, irrespective of the vaccine used for priming. Hexavac provided immunity against six important childhood diseases with a single injection at each visit.

Combined pediatric vaccines have the advantages of conferring protection against multiple common infectious diseases with a reduced number of injections. Their use should lead to better compliance to recommended vaccination schedules. Diphtheria (D), tetanus (T) and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (P) have been successfully combined, with or without inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in the same syringe for many years. Recently developed acellular pertussis (aP) Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), inactivated poliomyelitis virus and hepatitis B vaccines are ideal candidates for inclusion in current combined vaccines. Nevertheless, the development of new combinations has to face preclinical and clinical issues: the appropriate formulation of the new antigen(s) and other vaccine components needs to be determined to ensure compatibility and guard against potential additive or unexpected adverse reactions; potential immunological interference between antigens and the negative impact of other vaccine components on immunogenicity may occur, and these have to be examined also. Whole-cell pertussis vaccines are highly protective against whooping cough, but the severe adverse reactions that these vaccines sometimes produce have led to hesitation over their use, including the decision of some countries to stop pertussis immunization. To increase the acceptability of pertussis vaccination, Pasteur Mérieux Connaught has developed a combined D, T and a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), composed of purified pertussis toxoid (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), which has been shown to be effective in an efficacy trial conducted in Senegal. Acellular DTaP vaccines are immunogenic and have a better safety profile than DTP vaccines, when given either for the primary series, for the booster vaccination or for both. In order to meet worldwide demands, the combined DTaP-IPV or DTP-IPV has been developed for countries where IPV is recommended. Following the encouragement of the WHO, an H. influenzae type B tetanus-conjugated (Act-HIB) vaccine, has been combined in a full liquid formulation with the whole-cell DTP. This vaccine showed a good safety and immunogenicity profile in infants and in toddlers. A combined DTaP-IPV-PRP-T vaccine (where the Act-HIB vaccine is reconstituted by the full-liquid DTaP-IPV) also has been successfully developed both for the primary series and for booster vaccination; although, a reduced immunogenicity against PRP observed after the primary series, this did not affect vaccine priming. Hepatitis B immunization campaigns targeting high-risk groups have failed to control the disease in areas of low endemicity. In 1992, the WHO recommended that hepatitis B vaccination should be integrated into the EPI in all countries by 1997-1999. For that purpose, hepatitis B vaccine is currently evaluated in pediatric combined vaccines. Developing new combination vaccines is a difficult but essential process for maintaining high immunization rates worldwide against infectious diseases, provided that the costs are acceptable. New combined vaccines including pneumococcal and meningococcal component are under wide-scale development.

Vaccines were urgently needed in 2009 against A/H1N1 pandemic influenza. Based on the H5N1 experience, it was originally thought that 2 doses of an adjuvanted vaccine were needed for adequate immunogenicity. We tested H1N1 vaccines with or without AF03, a squalene-based adjuvant, in children. Two randomized, open-label, trials were conducted. Participants 3-17 y received two injections of 3.8 µg or 7.5 µg hemagglutinin (HA) with adjuvant or 15 µg HA without adjuvant. Participants aged 6-35 mo received two injections of 1.9 µg or 3.8 µg HA with full or half dose adjuvant or 7.5 µg HA without adjuvant. All subjects 3 to 17 y reached seroprotection (hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer ≥ 40) after the first dose of the adjuvanted vaccine, and 94% and 98% in the 3-8 and 9-17 y groups respectively with the non-adjuvanted vaccine. In children aged 6-35 mo responses were modest after one dose, but after two doses virtually all children were seroprotected regardless of HA or adjuvant dose. In this age group, antibody titers were 5 to 7 times higher after adjuvanted than non-adjuvanted vaccine. The higher responses with the adjuvanted vaccine were also reflected as better antibody persistence. There was no clustering of adverse events that would be suggestive of a safety signal. While a single injection was sufficient in subjects from 3 y, in children aged 6-35 mo two injections of this A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine were required. Formulation of this vaccine with adjuvant provided a significant advantage for immunogenicity in the latter age group.

An enzyme immunoassay for the detection of total anti-HBc antibodies in undiluted serum samples was developed. This assay utilizes an anti-HBc monoclonal antibody and a recombinant HBc antigen. The results of the clinical validation are now reported. A total of 1,301 sera were tested using both the Recombinant TOTAL HBc Ab EIA and a reference assay. The specificity was evaluated on a panel of 573 normal human sera and human sera from subjects with pathological findings unrelated to a hepatitis B virus infection. The sensitivity was studied on a total of 455 sera from HBV infected patients at different stages of infection. The final results indicate 99.8% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. In addition, 273 sera with either isolated anti-HBc antibodies or with anti-HCV antibodies were tested. The agreement between the Recombinant and the reference assay for these two populations, 96.6 and 90.1%, respectively, is discussed.

Pandemic influenza vaccines have been manufactured using the A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) strain as recommended by the World Health Organization. We evaluated in mice the immunogenicity of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine and the impact of prior vaccination against seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) on antibody responses against pandemic (H1N1) 2009. In naïve mice, a single dose of unadjuvanted H1N1 vaccine (3 microg of HA) was shown to elicit hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers40, a titer associated with protection in humans against seasonal influenza. A second vaccine dose of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine strongly increased these titers, which were consistently higher in mice previously primed with TIV than in naïve mice. At a low immunization dose (0.3 microg of HA), the AF03-adjuvanted vaccine elicited higher HI antibody titers than the corresponding unadjuvanted vaccines in both naïve and TIV-primed animals, suggesting a potential for antigen dose-sparing. These results are in accordance with the use in humans of a split-virion inactivated pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine formulated with or without AF03 adjuvant to protect children and young adults against influenza A (H1N1) 2009 infection.

A study was conducted to assess the safety of a new, liquid hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac, Aventis Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) in a large population of 1783 children in Germany vaccinated at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14 months of age. Immediate reactions, local and systemic reactions, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were monitored. The frequencies of rednessor = 2 cm and swellingor = 2 cm were 6.7 and 7.1% after all doses of the primary series combined and 13.4 and 12.0% following the booster dose, respectively. Transient swelling of the entire thigh was reported in seven infants after all doses of the primary series (0.1%) and in four children after the booster dose (0.2%). The most frequent systemic adverse events within 3 days after vaccination were irritability (19.3% after primary series and 13.2% after booster) and feveror = 38.0 degrees C (15.4% after primary series and 28.5% after booster). Fever above 40.0 degrees C was reported in 0.1% of the infants post-primary series and in 0.9% of the children after the booster immunization. Only 3 of 144 SAE were considered to be vaccine related and were seen to resolve spontaneously and without sequelae. The liquid hexavalent vaccine was generally well tolerated when given to children as a primary immunization series at 2, 4 and 6 months and as a booster dose at 12-14 months.

Following a study in Senegal (1990-1995) in which the relative efficacy of a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) was compared with that of a diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis vaccine in children given a simultaneous injection of Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, this subsequent study was conducted to evaluate the possible adjuvant effect of the BCG vaccine on acellular pertussis vaccine components. A second objective was to compare the immunogenicity of these components when administered in accordance with a 2-4-6-month (spaced) schedule or an accelerated 2-3-4-month schedule. In all, 390 healthy Senegalese infants were randomly divided into three groups of 130 infants. Antibodies to acellular pertussis components were measured in serum samples obtained within 2 days of the first DTaP dose and 1 month after the third dose. BCG vaccine, given simultaneously with the DTaP vaccine, did not influence the immunogenicity of the acellular pertussis vaccine components when compared with separate adminstration of the two vaccines. Infants immunised according to a 2-4-6-month schedule had a significantly higher immune response than those immunised according to a 2-3-4-month schedule with respect to the response to pertussis toxoid assessed by seroneutralisation on Chinese hamster ovary cells (P is less than 0.0001). These results suggest that BCG and DTaP vaccines can be given simultaneously without interference or enhancement and that more optimal immunogenicity is achieved with an extended than with an accelerated schedule. (Résumé d'auteur)

The idea of combining more than one vaccine into a single product to be administered by injection or by other means is far from new, as the first attempts were made over 70 years ago. The obvious advantage of combining vaccines against diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), pertussis (P), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), poliomyelitis and hepatitis B (HB) into a single product for use in children has promoted the further study in recent years of both pharmaceutical and immunological interactions between vaccines. On the pharmaceutical side, factors such as pH and ionic strength of the medium, the presence and type of adjuvant, and the type of preservative used influence the immunogenicity of the different components making up a combination vaccine. The rules of the game are only partly known: consider that while adsorption of D and T toxoids to aluminum compounds is needed in order to enhance their immunogenicity (1), conversely adsorption of Hib polysaccharide (PRP) conjugates to aluminum salts decreases Hib immunogenicity (2). Another example is the decreased immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in the presence of thiomersal (also known as thimerosal), which is used as a preservative in diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell-pertussis combination vaccines (DTwP) (3).

In recent years additional parenteral vaccines have been recommended for routine immunization of infants in the US and elsewhere. The ability to administer multiple vaccines as a single injection without unacceptably increasing reactogenicity or decreasing immunogenicity of any component would offer many practical advantages.A randomized, open, controlled trial was conducted to assess the tolerance profile and immunogenicity, as well as to identify potential antigenic interferences, resulting from administration of a parenteral combination vaccine for infants. The vaccine contains diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP), enhanced inactivated poliovirus (eIPV) and Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T). Infants (n=711) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 5 regimens as the primary series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, by group: (1) DTaP plus oral polio vaccine (OPV); (2) DTaP plus eIPV (separate injections); (3) DTaP-eIPV combined as a single injection; (4) DTaP-eIPV combined, plus a separate injection of PRP-T; or (5) DTaP-eIPV combined and reconstituting PRP-T, as a single injection. At 3, 5 and 7 months Groups 1, 2 and 3 received PRP-T. At 12 months all infants received a booster dose of DTaP reconstituting PRP-T as a single injection, plus a separate injection of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. Groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 received OPV at 7 months, and all infants received OPV at 13 months. Serum immune responses were measured to the primary series at 2 and 7 months and to the booster dose at 12 and 13 months.Reaction rates were similar among groups. In the primary series combining eIPV with DTaP decreased geometric mean titers (GMTs) to diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. In addition concomitant PRP-T (either simultaneous or combined) with DTaP-eIPV lowered anti-PRP and further decreased tetanus GMTs. Nonetheless in 100% of infants protective titers were achieved against diphtheria and tetanus (0.01 IU/ml each) and against the poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3 after eIPV (Groups 2 to 5); 99% of infants (Groups 4 and 5) had protective titers against PRP (or = 0.15 microg/ml). After boosting with DTaP/PRP-T decreased GMTs to diphtheria and PRP antigens were observed in the groups that received DTaP and eIPV combined. Nonetheless protective titers to diphtheria, tetanus and PRP occurred consistently. In contrast concomitant PRP-T with DTaP-eIPV enhanced the pertussis GMTs.We conclude that combined DTaP, eIPV and PRP-T in a single injection is well-tolerated and elicits an acceptable immune response to each component.

A randomized, double-blind trial comparing a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) (pertussis toxoid and filamentous hemagglutinin) with a whole-cell vaccine (DTwP) was conducted. A case-contact study was nested in the trial to estimate absolute efficacy. From 1990 through 1994, 4181 children were randomized to receive one of the vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months. Severe adverse events were monitored weekly during two visits after vaccination. Fewer serious adverse events were observed after DTaP. Surveillance for cough illnesses persisting more than 7 days, in children under 15 years of age, was made by weekly home visits. Examining physicians, blind to vaccination status, took samples for culture and serologic testing. Pertussis was defined as 21 or more days of cough confirmed by culture, serology, or contact with a culture-confirmed person. Beginning 28 days after the third vaccine dose, the overall ratio of pertussis incidence in the DTaP group relative to the DTwP group (RRac/wc) was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.23-1.93). In children younger than 18 months of age, RRac/wc was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.77-1.73) and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.33-2.33) in children older than 18 months, which suggests a shorter duration of protection with the acellular vaccine (P = 0.090). Absolute efficacy estimates derived from the case-contact study confirmed the lower protection afforded by the acellular vaccine compared with the whole-cell vaccine: 31% (95% CI, 7-49) versus 55% against the protocol case definition, and 85% (95% CI, 66-93) versus 96% for the more severe WHO case definition. Although vaccination with DTaP provided a lower degree of protection than the highly effective DTwP, this difference was less prominent before 18 months of age, the customary age for a fourth dose. The safer DTaP vaccine may prove a valuable substitute for whole-cell vaccines when used in a schedule that includes a booster-dose.