Search

HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (BNAbs) develop after several years of infection through a recursive process of memory B cell adaptation and maturation against co-evolving virus quasispecies. Advances in single-cell sorting and memory B cell antibody cloning methods have identified many new HIV BNAbs targeting conserved epitopes on the HIV envelope (env) protein. 3D crystal structures and biophysical analyses of BNAbs bound to invariant virus structures expressed on monomeric gp120, epitope scaffolds, core structures, and native trimers have helped us to visualize unique binding interactions and paratope orientations that have been instrumental in guiding vaccine design. A paradigm shift in the approach to structure-based design of HIV-1 envelope immunogens came recently after several laboratories discovered that native viral envelopes or "env-structures" reverse-engineered to bind with high affinity to a handful of broadly neutralizing antibodies did not in fact bind the predicted germline precursors of these broadly neutralizing antibodies. A major challenge for HIV-1 B cell vaccine development moving forward is the design of new envelope immunogens that can trigger the selection and expansion of germline precursor and intermediate memory B cells to recapitulate B cell ontogenies associated with the maturation of a broadly neutralizing antibody response. Equally important for vaccine development is the identification of delivery systems, prime-boost strategies, and synergistic adjuvant combinations that can induce the magnitude and quality of antigen-specific T follicular helper (TFH) cell responses needed to drive somatic hypermutation (SHM) and B cell maturation against heterologous primary virus envelopes. Finding the combination of multi-protein envelope immunogens and immunization strategies that can evolve a potent broadly neutralizing antibody response portends to require a complex vaccine regimen that might be difficult to implement on any scale. This perspective strives to integrate recent insights into mechanisms associated with the evolution of an HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody response with current immunogen design and proffers a novel immunization strategy for skewing TH17/TFH cell responses that can drive B cell adaptation and affinity maturation associated with a broadly neutralizing antibody response.

Natural transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) occurs through gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosa. These mucosal tissues are major reservoirs for initial HIV replication and amplification, and the sites of rapid CD4(+) T cell depletion. In both HIV-infected humans and SIV-infected macaques, massive loss of CD4(+) CCR5(+) memory T cells occurs in the gut and vaginal mucosa within the first 10-14 days of infection. Induction of local HIV-specific immune responses by vaccines may facilitate effective control of HIV or SIV replication at these sites. Vaccines that induce mucosal responses, in particular CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), have controlled viral replication at mucosal sites and curtailed systemic dissemination. Thus, there is strong justification for development of next generation vaccines that induce mucosal immune effectors against HIV-1 including CD8(+) CTL, CD4(+) T helper cells and secretory IgA. In addition, further understanding of local innate mechanisms that impact early viral replication will greatly inform future vaccine development. In this review, we examine the current knowledge concerning mucosal AIDS vaccine development. Moreover, we propose immunization strategies that may be able to elicit an effective immune response that can protect against AIDS as well as other mucosal infections.

Mucosal tissues are major sites of HIV entry and initial infection. Induction of a local mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocyte response is considered an important goal in developing an effective HIV vaccine. In addition, activation and recruitment of memory CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in systemic lymphoid circulation to mucosal effector sites might provide the firewall needed to prevent virus spread. Therefore a vaccine that generates CD4(+) and CD8(+) responses in both mucosal and systemic tissues might be required for protection against HIV. However, optimal routes and number of vaccinations required for the generation of long lasting CD4(+) and CD8(+) CTL effector and memory responses are not well understood especially for mucosal T cells. A number of studies looking at protective immune responses against diverse mucosal pathogens have shown that mucosal vaccination is necessary to induce a compartmentalized immune response including maximum levels of mucosal high-avidity CD8(+) CTL, antigen specific mucosal antibodies titers (especially sIgA), as well as induction of innate anti-viral factors in mucosa tissue. Immune responses are detectable at mucosal sites after systemic delivery of vaccine, and prime boost regimens can amplify the magnitude of immune responses in mucosal sites and in systemic lymphoid tissues. We believe that the most optimal mucosal and systemic HIV/SIV specific protective immune responses and innate factors might best be achieved by simultaneous mucosal and systemic prime and boost vaccinations. Similar principals of vaccination may be applied for vaccine development against cancer and highly invasive pathogens that lead to chronic infection.

CD4(+) T cells occupy a central role in the induction and regulation of adaptive immune responses. Activated CD4(+) T helper (Th) cells exert immediate effector functions by producing cytokines and chemokines, providing help for the induction of CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and memory, and providing help for immunoglobulin class switching, affinity maturation of antibody and B cell memory. Inherent in naïve CD4(+) T cells is the flexibility to adopt alternate lineage potentials, which depend upon regulatory mechanisms that change with tissue microenvironment and upon infection. Here, we discuss lineage instructive programs that regulate CD4(+) T cell differentiation and memory and how to translate this knowledge into vaccines and immunotherapies that promote protective immune responses., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

CD8+ CTL responses are critical for eliminating virus infected cells in acute infection and in controlling virus replication during chronic infection. Despite evidence of potent HIV-1-specific CD8+ CTL responses during the earliest stage of acute infection leading to replacement of founder virus sequence(s) and resolution of peak viral load, in the majority of infected individuals, these responses are inadequate to prevent the establishment or control of persistent infection. Protective CD8+ CTL responses have yet to be achieved by vaccine approaches for HIV-1 or other viruses causing persistent infections, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, malaria, and cancer. Understanding the limitations of CD8+ CTL responses to keep pace with the diversity of rapidly evolving virus in the case of HIV-1 and HCV and to overcome the diverse and complex mechanisms persistent pathogens employ to escape immune recognition should lead to more effective prophylactic and therapeutic approaches for these diseases. Recent technological advances including single genome amplification (SGA) of plasma viral RNA along with direct amplicon sequencing to identify virus quasispecies, bioinformatics, and statistical methods for the systematic identification of HLA-class I associated escape mutations, and mathematical models that better define the kinetics of virus replication and decay, have provided significant insight into mechanisms of viral transmission and sequence evolution, virus-host interactions, and HIV-1 pathogenesis. In this review we attempt to integrate recent findings from studies in HIV-1, persistent virus infections, and cancer that predict effective T cell responses and suggest approaches that could shift the balance of control in favor of the host immune response. Here, we highlight factors considered essential for effective HIV-1 vaccine CD8+ T cell responses: vaccine antigens, quality, magnitude and breadth, mucosal targeting, and formation of CD8+ T cell mucosal memory.

For acute self-limiting infections a vaccine is successful if it elicits memory at least as good as the natural experience; however, for persistent and chronic infections such as HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), human papillomavirus (HPV), and human herpes viruses, this paradigm is not applicable. At best, during persistent virus infection the person must be able to maintain the integrity of the immune system in equilibrium with controlling replicating virus. New vaccine strategies are required that elicit both potent high-avidity CD8(+) T-cell effector/memory and central memory responses that can clear the nidus of initial virus-infected cells at mucosal surfaces to prevent mucosal transmission or significantly curtail development of disease. The objective of an HIV-1 T-cell vaccine is to generate functional CD8(+) effector memory cells at mucosal portals of virus entry to prevent viral transmission. In addition, long-lived CD8(+) and CD4(+) central memory cells circulating through secondary lymphoid organs and resident in bone marrow, respectively, are needed to provide a concerted second wave of defense that can contain virus at mucosal surfaces and prevent systemic dissemination. Further understanding of factors which can influence long-lived effector and central memory cell differentiation will significantly contribute to development of effective T-cell vaccines. In this review we will focus on discussing mechanisms involved in T-cell memory and provide promising new approaches toward expanding current vaccine strategies to enhance antiviral memory.

CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses are crucial in establishing the control of persistent virus infections. Population studies of HIV-1-infected individuals suggest that CD8(+) CTL responses targeting epitopes that take the greatest toll on virus replication are instrumental in immune control. A major question for vaccine design is whether incorporating epitopes responsible for controlling a persistent virus will translate into protection from natural infection or serve solely as a fail-safe mechanism to prevent overt disease in infected individuals. Here, we discuss qualitative parameters of the CD8(+) CTL response and mechanisms operative in the control of persistent virus infections and suggest new strategies for design and delivery of HIV vaccines., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The route of vaccination is important in influencing immune responses at the initial site of pathogen invasion where protection is most effective. Immune responses required for mucosal protection can differ vastly depending on the individual pathogen. For some mucosal pathogens, including acute self-limiting infections, high-titer neutralizing Abs that enter tissue parenchyma or transude into the mucosal lumen are sufficient for clearing cell-free virus. However, for pathogens causing chronic infections such as HIV, hepatitis C virus, herpes viruses, mycobacteria, and fungal and parasitic infections, a single arm of the immune response generated by systemic vaccination may be insufficient for protection. Induction of the mucosal innate and adaptive immune systems, including CD4+ T help, Th17, high avidity CD8+ CTL, and secretory IgA and IgG1 neutralizing Abs, at the site of pathogen entry may be required for effective protection against highly invasive pathogens that lead to chronic infection and may be generated predominantly by mucosal vaccination.

Effective frontline defenses against HIV-1 will require targeting vaccines to mucosal tissue in order to induce alphabeta CD8(+) lymphocytes in mucosal effector sites (lamina propria and intraepithelial compartment) as well as antibody secreting plasma cells that can neutralize and limit free virus. A concerted second wave of assault against the virus will require the activation and recruitment of antigen specific memory CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in mesenteric lymph nodes and distal secondary lymphoid organs. New delivery strategies targeting the "right" DC subsets in combination with delivery of mucosal adjuvants and innate signals for activating DC will be essential for mucosal vaccines in order to circumvent the naturally tolerogenic environment and the induction of Tregs. Mucosal delivery of antigen in combination with inflammatory signals has been shown to empower systemic immunization by directing responses to mucosal sites for imprinting optimum mucosal memory. Here, we discuss novel vaccine strategies and adjuvants for optimizing mucosal delivery of HIV vaccines.

The natural immune response against HIV and other pathogens that cause chronic infection is insufficient for protection. Novel vaccine design and delivery strategies for optimization of HIV vaccines are urgently needed. These will require a better understanding of a number of factors including: the interplay between dendritic cells (DCs) and multiple cell types in linking innate signals that orchestrate subsequent adaptive immune responses; the regulation of DC function by viral and bacterial vectors, adjuvants and immunomodulatory molecules; and the temporal and synergistic relationships between C-type lectins, Toll-like receptors, NOD-like receptors and RIG-1-like receptors, chemokines and cytokines in enhancing immune responses. Here, we discuss current vaccine strategies for optimizing the induction of immune responses by the recruitment of DCs and the targeting of vaccine antigens to DCs.

Gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosa are major sites of entry in natural HIV infection and therefore the preferred sites to elicit high-avidity CD8+ CTL by vaccination. We directly compare systemic and mucosal immunization in mice after DNA priming and boosting with rgp160 env expressed either in MVA or Ad for their ability to induce mucosal as well as systemic HIV-specific CTL. The optimal CTL response in the gut mucosa was observed after priming with the HIV-1 gp160 env DNA vaccine and boosting with rMVA or rAd encoding the same envelope gene all administered intrarectally (IR). Maximum levels of high-avidity CD8+ T cells were seen in intestinal lamina propria following this regimen. When the prime and boost routes were distinct, the delivery site of the boost had a greater impact than the DNA priming. IM DNA prime and IR rMVA boost were more effective than IR DNA prime and IM rMVA boost for eliciting mucosal CD8+ T-cell avidity. A systemic DNA-prime-followed by systemic rMVA boost induced high levels of high-avidity CD8+ T cells systemically, but responses were undetectable in mucosal sites. A single systemic immunization with rMVA was sufficient to induce high-avidity IFN-gamma secreting CD8+ T cells in systemic organs, whereas a single mucosal immunization with rMVA was not sufficient to elicit high-avidity CD8+ T cells in mucosa. Thus, a heterologous mucosal DNA prime-viral vectored boost strategy was needed. The requirement for a heterologous DNA prime-recombinant viral boost strategy for generation of high-avidity CD8+ T cells in mucosal sites in mice may be more stringent than for the induction of high-avidity CD8+ T cells in systemic compartments.

The gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosa are the major routes of natural HIV transmission, with the former being the primary reservoir for virus replication. The crucial need for a global HIV vaccine underscores the effort to develop vaccines capable of eliciting mucosal immune responses. Vaccines that induce high levels of effective mucosal immunity should impact viral replication rate and prevent dissemination of virus from the mucosa into the systemic circulation. In our opinion, the major effort for effective HIV vaccine should be concentrated on generating protective immunity at the site of viral entry (i.e. the gastrointestinal and vaginal mucosae). Here we examine the current information regarding the role of mucosal immunity in prevention of HIV transmission and discuss strategies for mucosal AIDS vaccine development.

CD8 can serve as a co-receptor or accessory molecule on the surface of CTL. As a co-receptor, CD8 can bind to the alpha3 domain of the same MHC class I molecules as the TCR to facilitate TCR signaling. To evaluate the role of the MHC class I molecule alpha3 domain in the activation of CD8(+) CTL, we have produced a soluble 227 mutant of H-2D(d), with a point mutation in the alpha3 domain (Glu227 --> Lys). 227 mutant class I-peptide complexes were not able to effectively activate H-2D(d)-restricted CD8 T cells in vitro, as measured by IFN-gamma production by an epitope-specific CD8(+) CTL line. However, the 227 mutant class I-peptide complexes in the presence of another MHC class I molecule (H-2K(b)) (that cannot present the peptide) with a normal alpha3 domain can induce the activation of CD8(+) CTL. Therefore, in order to activate CD8(+) CTL, the alpha3 domain of MHC class I does not have to be located on the same molecule with the alpha1 and alpha2 domains of MHC class I. A low-avidity CD8(+) CTL line was significantly less sensitive to stimulation by the 227 mutant class I-peptide complexes in the presence of the H-2K(b) molecule. Thus, low-avidity CTL may not be able to take advantage of the interaction between CD8 and the alpha3 domain of non-presenting class I MHC molecules, perhaps because of a shorter dwell time for the TCR-MHC interaction.

Natural transmission of HIV occurs through mucosal surfaces. New information in immunology, virology and vaccinology has emerged regarding strategies for development of new mucosal vaccines against HIV. The intestinal mucosa represents a major site of HIV replication and amplification, and the initial site of CD4+ T-cell depletion. Local mucosal CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and mucosal antibody can control AIDS virus replication within local tissues prior to systemic dissemination and can be more effective than a systemic immune response. Mucosal HIV vaccine delivery should be considered among the most effective immunization routes in the induction of mucosal antibody and CD8+ CTLs and protection against mucosal infection. New mucosal vaccine strategies, such as prime-boost, using a new generation of mucosal adjuvants, a synergistic combination of cytokines, chemokines, costimulatory molecules, CpG oligodeoxynucleotides, and targeting lymph nodes which drain mucosal sites, show promise to improve the efficacy of mucosal vaccines.

Among the most cost-effective strategies for preventing viral infections, vaccines have proven effective primarily against viruses causing acute, self-limited infections. For these it has been sufficient for the vaccine to mimic the natural virus. However, viruses causing chronic infection do not elicit an immune response sufficient to clear the infection and, as a result, vaccines for these viruses must elicit more effective responses--quantitative and qualitative--than does the natural virus. Here we examine the immunologic and virologic basis for vaccines against three such viruses, HIV, hepatitis C virus, and human papillomavirus, and review progress in clinical trials to date. We also explore novel strategies for increasing the immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines.

In recent years, great strides in understanding and regulating the immune system have led to new hope for harnessing its exquisite specificity to destroy cancer cells without affecting normal tissues. This review examines the fundamental immunologic advances and the novel vaccine strategies arising from these advances, as well as the early clinical trials studying new approaches to treat or prevent cancer.

Transcutaneous immunization (TCI), the application of vaccines on the skin, induces robust systemic and mucosal antibodies in animal models and in humans. The means by which mucosal immune responses to vaccine antigens are elicited by TCI has not been well characterized. We examined the effect of TCI with an HIV peptide vaccine on the induction of mucosal and systemic CTL responses and protective immunity against mucosal challenge with live virus in mice. Robust HIV-specific CTL responses in the spleen and in the gut mucosa were detected after TCI. The responses were dependent upon the addition of an adjuvant and resulted in protection against mucosal challenge with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding HIV gp160. Although it is clear that adjuvant-activated DCs migrated mainly to draining lymph nodes, coculture with specific T cells and flow cytometry studies with DCs isolated from Peyer's patches after TCI suggested that activated DCs carrying skin-derived antigen also migrated from the skin to immune-inductive sites in gut mucosa and presented antigen directly to resident lymphocytes. These results and previous clinical trial results support the observation that TCI is a safe and effective strategy for inducing strong mucosal antibody and CTL responses.

The concern about bioterrorism with smallpox has raised the possibility of widespread vaccination, but the greater prevalence of immunocompromised individuals today requires a safer vaccine, and the mechanisms of protection are not well understood. Here we show that, at sufficient doses, the protection provided by both modified vaccinia Ankara and NYVAC replication-deficient vaccinia viruses, safe in immunocompromised animals, was equivalent to that of the licensed Wyeth vaccine strain against a pathogenic vaccinia virus intranasal challenge of mice. A similar variety and pattern of immune responses were involved in protection induced by modified vaccinia Ankara and Wyeth viruses. For both, antibody was essential to protect against disease, whereas neither effector CD4+ nor CD8+ T cells were necessary or sufficient. However, in the absence of antibody, T cells were necessary and sufficient for survival and recovery. Also, T cells played a greater role in control of sublethal infection in unimmunized animals. These properties, shared with the existing smallpox vaccine, provide a basis for further evaluation of these replication-deficient vaccinia viruses as safer vaccines against smallpox or against complications from vaccinia virus.

Understanding key intervention points in developing immune responses may allow the rational inclusion of biological adjuvants into vaccines that could potentiate the immune response both quantitatively and qualitatively and enhance effective memory responses. Cytokine and chemokine combinations can potentially help target antigen to the appropriate antigen presenting cell and initiate maturation of these presenting cells, attract cells expressing different chemokine receptors, steer cellular immune responses toward Th1 and CD8 CTL, and enhance systemic and mucosal IgG and secretory IgA antibodies and determine their isotype balance. Animal protection studies suggest that synergistic combinations of cytokines and immunomodulating molecules may be required to protect from a viral challenge. For example, GM-CSF has been shown to be synergistic with IL-12 or CD40 ligand for induction of CTL and for antiviral protection, and the triple combination of GM-CSF, IL-12, and TNF alpha appears to induce the most effective protection in some mouse models. Chemokine-antigen fusions have also been shown to enhance immunogenicity of the antigen. Combinations of costimulatory molecules have been found to be synergistic when incorporated in a vaccine. Combined use of newer more potent vaccine constructs, containing codon optimized epitopes, relevant CpG motifs, cytokines, costimulatory molecules and chemokines, used in heterologous prime-boost strategies with viral vector vaccines or recombinant proteins, might afford the most potent vaccine approaches yet developed. In this review we will discuss the application and delivery of cytokines, costimulatory molecules, and chemokines toward improving current vaccine strategies.

High avidity CTL are most effective at clearing viruses and cancer cells. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms involved in induction of high avidity CTL is critical for effective vaccines. However, no vaccine approach to selectively induce high avidity CTL in vivo has been discovered. In a new approach, signals from MHC class I (signal 1) and costimulatory molecules (signal 2) were adjusted by varying Ag dose and by use of recombinant poxvirus expressing a triad of costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3), respectively. Independent of CTL avidity, a strong signal 1 resulted in an increased frequency of CD8(+) CTL. However, a strong signal 2 was necessary for the induction of high avidity CD8(+) CTL that killed target cells more efficiently, and signal 2 played a more crucial role in the absence of a strong signal 1. Only CTL induced with strong signal 2 killed tumor cells endogenously expressing low levels of Ag. Signal 2 contributed to the induction of high avidity CD8(+) CTL in both primary and secondary responses. Thus, although signal 2 has been known to increase the quantity of CTL response, in this study we show that it also improves the quality of CTL response. Our data also suggested that dendritic cells play an important role in induction of high avidity CD8(+) CTL in vivo. This strategy to selectively induce higher avidity CTL may lead to more effective vaccines for viruses and cancer.

Although a role for CD4(+) helper cells in CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) induction by vaccines is widely recognized, much less is known about a counterbalancing role of CD4(+) T cells in down-modulating this response, or about ways to optimize vaccine responses through abrogation of this negative regulatory mechanism. Here, we discovered a synergistic enhancement of vaccine-mediated CTL induction and protection by the relief of suppression through depletion of regulatory CD4(+) cells, including CD4(+) NKT cells, or blockade of IL-13 made by these cells, combined with the cytokine granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and the costimulatory molecule CD40L. Indeed, in the absence of helper epitopes, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and the helper-mimetic molecule CD40L are not sufficient to replace help to induce CTL without abrogation of CD4(+) T cell-mediated suppression, suggesting a role for T cell help in overcoming suppression. The increased CTL induction translated to striking protection against viral infection by a vaccine by using this synergistic combined approach. These results argue for a push-pull approach to maximize vaccine efficacy, especially for HIV and cancer.

Detection of the functional CD8(+) CTL response usually requires in vitro restimulation. The differences between the CD8(+) CTL repertoire in freshly isolated precursor cells and CD8(+) CTL after short-term in vitro expansion have been generally assumed to be minimal, but have never been defined experimentally. Using staining with P18-I10/H-2D(d) tetramers and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against Vbeta, we show the surprising result that there was significant skewing of the CD8(+) CTL repertoire after just 7 days of stimulation. In contrast, we found that overnight incubation of precursor cells with peptide allows the functional assessment of CD8(+) CTL (which cannot be detected ex vivo from freshly isolated cells) without changing the absolute number of antigen-specific CTL as measured by tetramer staining or the repertoire of TCR analyzed with mAb. This study affords a better understanding of the differences between the ex vivo and in vitro stimulated CTL repertoire, and provides an approach to reveal a more faithful representation of the functional in vivo CTL response without skewing of the repertoire of T cells detected.

Natural viral proteins do not always make optimal vaccines. We have found that sequence modification to increase epitope affinity for class II MHC molecules (epitope enhancement) can improve immunogenicity. Here we show first that a higher-affinity helper epitope-enhanced HIV vaccine not only induces more cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), but also skews helper cells toward Th1 cytokine production and protects against HIV-1 recombinant vaccinia viral challenge. Furthermore, we elucidate a novel mechanism in which the higher-affinity vaccine induces dramatically more effective helper cells with a higher level of CD40L per helper cell and more positive cells, which in turn more effectively conditions dendritic cells (DCs) for CTL activation in a second culture. The improved helper cells also induce much greater IL-12 production by DCs, accounting for the reciprocal T helper polarization to Th1, and increase costimulatory molecule expression. Thus, increasing affinity for class II MHC results in a complementary interaction in which T helper and antigen-presenting cells polarize each other, as well as increase CTL, and provide greater vaccine efficacy against viral infection.

Given the mucosal transmission of HIV-1, we compared whether a mucosal vaccine could induce mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and protect rhesus macaques against mucosal infection with simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) more effectively than the same vaccine given subcutaneously. Here we show that mucosal CTLs specific for simian immunodeficiency virus can be induced by intrarectal immunization of macaques with a synthetic-peptide vaccine incorporating the LT(R192G) adjuvant. This response correlated with the level of T-helper response. After intrarectal challenge with pathogenic SHIV-Ku2, viral titers were eliminated more completely (to undetectable levels) both in blood and intestine, a major reservoir for virus replication, in intrarectally immunized animals than in subcutaneously immunized or control macaques. Moreover, CD4+ T cells were better preserved. Thus, induction of CTLs in the intestinal mucosa, a key site of virus replication, with a mucosal AIDS vaccine ameliorates infection by SHIV in non-human primates.

Although the field of immunology developed in part from the early vaccine studies of Edward Jenner, Louis Pasteur and others, vaccine development had largely become the province of virologists and other microbiologists, because the model for classic vaccines was to isolate the pathogen and prepare a killed or attenuated pathogen vaccine. Only recently has vaccinology returned to the realm of immunology, because a new understanding of immune mechanisms has allowed translation of basic discoveries into vaccine strategies.

Regulation of the IL-12 receptor (IL-12R) beta2 chain has been suggested to function as a molecular switch in determining T cell phenotype. However, because most studies have been carried out under conditions in which cell proliferation was occurring, it has been difficult to distinguish between instructive and selective mechanisms in regulating this key receptor. Here, in the course of trying to understand the mechanism for synergy between IL-12 and TNF-alpha in up-regulating IFN-gamma production, we find that when the stimulus through the TCR is too weak to induce cell proliferation, which would be needed for selection, IL-12 and TNF-alpha synergize to up-regulate not only IFN-gamma, but also the IL-12Rbeta2 chain, which triggers IFN-gamma production. Neither cytokine alone was sufficient. This observation held true both in the absence of antigen-presenting cells (APC), when the stimulus was anti-CD3 on plastic, and in the presence of APC presenting ovalbumin peptide to TCR-transgenic T cells. In contrast, when the TCR signal was stronger, no cytokines were necessary to up-regulate the IL-12R. Our results support the strength of signal model in instructing Th phenotype, and suggest both an instructive role and, later, through the production of IFN-gamma, a selective role, of this synergistic combination of cytokines in the preferential differentiation and expansion of Th1 cells.

The ability of cytokines to steer CD4(+) T(h) cell responses toward a T(h)1 or T(h)2 phenotype and enhance the magnitude of both CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and antibody responses has clearly been demonstrated by our lab and others, but the influence of cytokines on protective immune responses is much less clear. Here we show an essential role for CD4(+) T(h)1 helper cell induction and IFN-gamma production in protection from viral challenge with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing HIV-1MN viral envelope glycoprotein gp160. Complete protection from viral challenge is achieved only when the triple combination of exogenous cytokines granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha are co-administered with the peptide vaccine. In vivo depletion of CD4(+) cells or immunization of IFN-gamma-deficient mice abrogates protection. GM-CSF, IL-12 and TNF-alpha also synergize for the enhanced induction of CTL; however, adoptive transfer of a CD8(+) CTL line afforded only partial protection in this viral challenge model. As a possible mechanism of in vivo protection we show that GM-CSF increases the percentage and activity of antigen-presenting dendritic cells in draining lymph nodes where the immune response is initiated. We further demonstrate synergy between IL-12 and the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha in driving IFN-gamma production. Thus, a combination of IL-12 and TNF-alpha is essential for the optimal development of T(h)1 responses and help for CTL induction in BALB/c mice, and is complemented by a third cytokine, GM-CSF, which enhances antigen presentation.

We examined the interplay between cytokines and adjuvants to optimize the induction of CTL by a mucosal HIV peptide vaccine. We show synergy between IL-12 and GM-CSF when administered together with the HIV peptide PCLUS3-18IIIB and cholera toxin (CT) in the induction of CTL activity and protection against mucosal viral transmission. Further, we examine the efficacy of mutant Escherichia coli labile toxin, LT(R192G), as a less toxic adjuvant than CT. LT(R192G) was as effective as or more effective than CT at inducing a mucosal CTL response. Moreover, LT(R192G) was as effective without IL-12 as CT was when combined with IL-12, and the response elicited by LT(R192G) with the vaccine was not further enhanced by the addition of IL-12. GM-CSF synergized with LT(R192G) without exogenous IL-12. Therefore, LT(R192G) may induce a more favorable cytokine response by not inhibiting IL-12 production. In particular, less IL-4 is made after LT(R192G) than CT immunization, and the response is less susceptible to anti-IL-12 inhibition. Thus, the choice of mucosal adjuvant affects the cytokine environment, and the mucosal response and protection can be enhanced by manipulating the cytokine environment with synergistic cytokine combinations incorporated in the vaccine.

We used several approaches to develop enhanced vaccines for chronic viral infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). 1) Selected epitopes were used to avoid potentially harmful immune responses. 2) Linkage between helper and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes was found to be important. 3) We developed an "epitope enhancement" approach modifying the sequences of epitopes to make more potent vaccines, including examples for HIV and HCV epitopes presented by murine class II and human class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. 4) CTL avidity was found to be important for clearing viral infections in vivo, and the mechanism was examined. High-avidity CTLs, however, were found to undergo apoptosis when confronted with high-density antigen, through a mechanism involving tumor necrosis factor (TNF), TNF-RII, and a permissive state induced through the T-cell receptor. 5) We employed cytokines in the adjuvant to steer immune responses toward desired phenotypes, and showed synergy between cytokines. 6) Intrarectal immunization with peptide vaccine induced mucosal and systemic CTL. Local mucosal CTL were found to be critical for resistance to mucosal viral transmission and this resistance was enhanced with mucosally delivered interleukin-12. 7) We used an asymmetry in induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses to circumvent pre-existing vaccinia immunity for use of recombinant vaccinia vaccines.

Understanding immune mechanisms influencing cancer regression, recurrence, and metastasis may be critical to developing effective immunotherapy. Using a tumor expressing HIV gp160 as a model viral tumor Ag, we found a growth-regression-recurrence pattern, and used this to investigate mechanisms of immunosurveillance. Regression was dependent on CD8 T cells, and recurrent tumors were resistant to CTL, had substantially reduced expression of epitope mRNA, but retained the gp160 gene, MHC, and processing apparatus. Increasing CTL numbers by advance priming with vaccinia virus expressing gp160 prevented only the initial tumor growth but not the later appearance of escape variants. Unexpectedly, CD4 cell depletion protected mice from tumor recurrence, whereas IL-4 knockout mice, deficient in Th2 cells, did not show this protection, and IFN-gamma knockout mice were more susceptible. Purified CD8 T cells from CD4-depleted mice following tumor regression had more IFN-gamma mRNA and lysed tumor cells without stimulation ex vivo, in contrast to CD4-intact mice. Thus, the quality as well as quantity of CD8+ CTL determines the completeness of immunosurveillance and is controlled by CD4 T cells but not solely Th2 cytokines. This model of immunosurveillance may indicate ways to enhance the efficacy of surveillance and improve immunotherapy.

Although crucial to mucosal vaccine development, the mechanisms of defense against mucosal viral infection are still poorly understood. Protection, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), and neutralizing antibodies have all been observed, but cause and effect have been difficult to determine. The ability of CTL in the mucosa to mediate protection against mucosal viral transmission has never been proven. Here, we use an HIV peptide immunogen and an HIV-1 gp160-expressing recombinant vaccinia viral intrarectal murine challenge system, in which neutralizing antibodies do not play a role, to demonstrate for the first time that long-lasting immune resistance to mucosal viral transmission can be accomplished by CD8(+) CTL that must be present in the mucosal site of exposure. The resistance is ablated by depleting CD8(+) cells in vivo and requires CTL in the mucosa, whereas systemic (splenic) CTL are shown to be unable to protect against mucosal challenge. Furthermore, the resistance as well as the CTL response can be increased by local mucosal delivery of IL-12 with the vaccine. These results imply that induction of local mucosal CTL may be critical for success of a vaccine against viruses transmitted through a mucosal route, such as HIV.

To improve the safety of recombinant vaccinia virus vaccines, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) has been employed, because it has a replication defect in most mammalian cells. Here we apply MVA to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine development by incorporating the envelope protein gp160 of HIV-1 primary isolate strain 89.6 (MVA 89.6) and use it to induce mucosal cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) immunity. In initial studies to define a dominant CTL epitope for HIV-1 89.6 gp160, we mapped the epitope to a sequence, IGPGRAFYAR (from the V3 loop), homologous to that recognized by HIV MN loop-specific CTL and showed that HIV-1 MN-specific CTLs cross-reactively recognize the corresponding epitope from strain 89.6 presented by H-2Dd. Having defined the CTL specificity, we immunized BALB/c mice intrarectally with recombinant MVA 89.6. A single mucosal immunization with MVA 89.6 was able to elicit long-lasting antigen-specific mucosal (Peyer's patch and lamina propria) and systemic (spleen) CTL responses as effective as or more effective than those of a replication-competent vaccinia virus expressing 89.6 gp160. Immunization with MVA 89.6 led to (i) the loading of antigen-presenting cells in vivo, as measured by the ex vivo active presentation of the P18-89.6 peptide to an antigen-specific CTL line, and (ii) the significant production of the proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha) in the mucosal sites. These results indicate that nonreplicating recombinant MVA may be at least as effective for mucosal immunization as replicating recombinant vaccinia virus.

Mucosal tissues are major sites of HIV entry and initial infection. Thus, the induction of a mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response is an important feature for an effective HIV vaccine. However, little is known about approaches to induce such a protective CTL response in the mucosa. Here for the first time we show that intrarectal immunization with a synthetic, multideterminant HIV peptide plus cholera toxin adjuvant induced long-lasting, antigen-specific CTL memory in both the inductive (Peyer's patch) and effector (lamina propria) mucosal sites, as well as in systemic sites (spleen), whereas systemic immunization induced specific CTL only in the spleen. Cholera toxin adjuvant, while enhancing the response, was not essential. The CTL recognized target cells either pulsed with HIV peptide or expressing endogenous whole envelope glycoprotein of Mr 160,000 (gp160). Exploring the requirements for CTL induction, we show that mucosal CTL responses are both interleukin 12 and interferon-gamma dependent by using antibody-treated and knock-out mice. Finally, to determine whether a mucosal response is actually protective against local mucosal challenge with virus, we show that intrarectal immunization with the synthetic HIV peptide vaccine protected mice against infection via mucosal challenge with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing HIV-1IIIB gp160. These studies provide an approach to development of an HIV vaccine that induces CTL immunity in the mucosal and systemic immune systems and protects against mucosal infection with a virus expressing HIV-1 gp160.

Viral proteins are not naturally selected for high affinity major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding sequences; indeed, if there is any selection, it is likely to be negative in nature. Thus, one should be able to increase viral peptide binding to MHC in the rational design of synthetic peptide vaccines. The T1 helper peptide from the HIV-1 envelope protein was made more immunogenic for inducing T cell proliferation to the native sequence by replacing a residue that exerts an adverse influence on peptide binding to an MHC class II molecule. Mice immunized with vaccine constructs combining the more potent Th helper (Th) epitope with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) determinant developed greatly enhanced CTL responses. Use of class II MHC-congenic mice confirmed that the enhancement of CTL response was due to class II-restricted help. Thus, enhanced T cell help is key for optimal induction of CTL, and, by modification of the native immunogen to increase binding to MHC, it is possible to develop second generation vaccine constructs that enhance both Th cell activation and CTL induction.

To enhance and steer immune responses to synthetic peptide vaccines toward selected functional types and to understand the cooperative action of cytokines in fine-tuning the immune response, we attempted to influence the in vivo cytokine environment by delivering cytokines directly to the microenvironment in which the immune response is initiated. Here we study the effects of IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-1beta, IL-12, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) incorporated with peptide in adjuvant on a variety of responses elicited: CTL, T cell proliferation, cytokine production and message, and Ab isotype. We show GM-CSF to be the single most effective cytokine for enhancing both cellular and humoral immunity to two previously characterized HIV-1 MN vaccine constructs. Novel synergies were also detected. GM-CSF synergized with IL-12 for CTL induction in BALB/c mice concomitant with suppression of Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-10. TNF-alpha also synergized with IL-12, but by a different mechanism, inducing IFN-gamma production in BALB/c mice and thus shifting the response to a Th1 phenotype. The results presented here suggest that in addition to IL-2, optimum induction of CD8+ CTL in vivo requires a combination of cytokines, including GM-CSF (probably acting to enhance Ag presentation and CD4+ cell help) and IL-12 (steering the Th response toward Th1 cytokines).

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and Th1 cells have been suggested to play a critical role in the control of HIV infection. It is therefore considered that a vaccine that induces a strong Th1 response and CTL response would be more efficacious than one that does not in providing protection against infection and progression toward AIDS. In this study we show that immunization with vaccine constructs consisting of multideterminant cluster peptides containing Th epitopes from the HIV-1IIIB envelope colinearly synthesized to peptide 18MN, is capable of inducing a Th1 response in mice and, dependent on this help, both cytotoxic T cell responses and neutralizing antibody toward the homologous strain of HIV. Moreover, the cytotoxic T cell response elicited by immunization with a mixture of cluster peptide-P18MN vaccine constructs was at least as cross-reactive against known viral variant P18 target sequences as a CTL line produced by immunization with a vaccinia construct expressing recombinant gp160 MN. Four adjuvants were compared to optimize both CTL and antibody responses. A single adjuvant formulation of peptide in ISA 51 could elicit all three: Th1 cells, CTLs, and neutralizing antibody. Thus, immunization directed toward the development of a cytotoxic T cell response does not preclude the development of neutralizing antibody and vice versa, i.e., the responses are not mutually exclusive. The immunization protocol described here should be directly applicable for study in clinical trials aimed at HIV-1 immunotherapy or prophylaxis.

To identify B-cell epitopes of the Plasmodium falciparum 25-kDa ookinete protein, Pfs25, 41 overlapping synthetic peptides spanning the entire length of the protein were used individually to immunize CAF1 (F1 hybrid of BALB/c female and A/J male) mice. Antipeptide sera were tested for reactivity to live intact zygote/early ookinete (post-fertilization stage) by immunofluorescence, and by Western blot analysis under nonreducing and reducing conditions, immunoprecipitation of 35S-cysteine-labeled antigen, and ELISA using a vaccinia recombinant Pfs25 antigen. Fourteen B-cell epitopes were identified. These peptides were immunogenic only when administered with high-dose recombinant interleukin-2. Antibodies to 11 peptides recognized only the native conformational structure, one peptide induced antibodies that recognized both reduced and native protein, and two other peptides, after primary immunization, made antibodies to denatured Pfs25, but after boosting the antibodies reacted to both denatured and native Pfs25. Anti-sera to peptides in the first (peptide 7) and fourth (peptide 34) epidermal growth factor-like domains of Pfs25 reacted most strongly with zygotes/ookinetes by immunofluorescence assay. The antibodies elicited by immunization with peptide 34 suppressed infectivity of the parasite to mosquitoes. We further observed that the secondary structure of Pfs25 may be important for immunogenicity because monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 1C7 and 1D2, both transmission-blocking MAbs, protected enzyme cleavage sites in Pfs25 from proteolysis, suggesting that discontinuous segments of Pfs25 may come together to form immunogenic epitopic sites. Thus, definition of B- and T-cell epitopes may be required to construct a Pfs25 vaccine for optimum immunogenicity.

Although several peptides have been found to bind to both class I and class II molecules, the basis for this binding of the same peptide to two classes of MHC molecules has not been compared previously. We have analyzed one such peptide, P18 from the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp160, which we have previously shown to be recognized by CD8+ CTL with the class I molecule H-2Dd, and by CD4+ Th cells with the class II molecule I-Ad. With the use of truncated and substituted peptides, we found that the minimal core peptides are very similar, that the residues required for class I binding precisely fit the recently identified consensus motif for peptides binding to Dd (XGPX[R/K/H]XXX(X) [L/I/F]), and that at least three of the same residues are involved in binding to class II I-Ad. In addition, several of the same residues are involved in TCR interaction when the peptide is presented by class I and class II molecules. Modeling shows results to be consistent with the crystal structure of a peptide-class II MHC complex. Thus, the recognition of this versatile peptide by CD4+ Th cells with class II MHC molecules and by CD8+ cytotoxic T cells with class I MHC molecules is remarkably similar in both the core peptide used and the role of different residues in the ternary complex.

Peptide constructs comprised of multideterminant Th peptides from the envelope glycoprotein of HIV previously identified to induce proliferative responses in four different haplotypes of mice and IL-2 responses in 52 to 73% of HIV positive, Ag-responsive patients, were colinearly synthesized with the peptide 18 of the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp 160, corresponding to the principal neutralizing determinant of HIV-IIIB. The segments containing clusters of overlapping Th epitopes were called cluster peptides. Cognate help for peptide 18 antibody was elicited after a single immunization in all strains of mice that had previously responded to a T cell epitope encompassed by the cluster peptides. Animals boosted with cluster peptide-peptide 18 constructs 36 to 52 wk later displayed secondary antibody responses. Cluster peptide 3-peptide 18 induced antibody that neutralized homologous virus in one strain of mice although strong peptide 18 antibody responses were detected in all four strains of mice. The most promising construct, cluster peptide 6-peptide 18, induced neutralizing antibody in all strains of mice tested, and in two strains the level of neutralizing antibody achieved was comparable to levels adequate for protection from homologous viral challenge in chimpanzees. After a single boost, antibody titers for 90% neutralization in the range of 1/1000 to 1/16,000 were achieved. These neutralizing titers against the homologous viral strain, after just two immunizations, are at least four- to eightfold higher than the highest titered other polyclonal V3-specific immune sera we have ever observed in our laboratories. We also asked why some sera neutralized and others with similar ELISA titers did not. No correlation was found between neutralization and isotype or affinity for peptide or gp 120. We could not account for neutralization by antibodies to the helper sites. Substitutions made in the central loop region of peptide 18, amino acid residues PGRAF, dramatically reduced binding of both neutralizing and non-neutralizing sera although some fine specificity differences between neutralizing and nonneutralizing sera were noted. These results have implications for the design of synthetic peptide vaccines for HIV.