Search

The relative magnitude (or intensity) of an event can have direct implications on timing estimation. Previous studies have found that greater magnitude stimuli are often reported as longer in duration than lesser magnitudes, including Arabic digits (Xuan, Zhang, He, & Chen, 2007). One explanation for these findings is that different quantitative dimensions (size, intensity, number) are processed and represented according to a common analog magnitude system (Walsh, 2003). In the current study, we examined whether there were commonalities in how people judge the intervals of time occurring between discrete stimuli of different magnitudes across a variety of quantitative dimensions, which included number, size, and color saturation. It was found that duration judgments increased systematically as the overall magnitude difference between sequentially presented stimuli increased. This finding was robust against manipulations to the direction of the sequence, or whether the sequence followed ordered (continuous) or nonordered (discontinuous) pattern trajectories.

In the current study, we examined how the contextual repetition of magnitude information presented in either symbolic (Arabic digits) or nonsymbolic (numerosities) formats impacted on the perceived duration of a later occurring target number. The results of the current study demonstrated a time-magnitude bias in which, on average, large magnitude target numbers were judged to last for longer durations relative to small magnitude target numbers, regardless of notation (symbolic number and numerosity). Furthermore, context effects were found, in which a greater discrepancy in the target’s magnitude from the initial context led to longer perceived duration ratings. However, this was found to be asymmetrical, occurring only for large magnitude targets. Additionally, the type of context effect was shown to be determined by whether the context was presented in the same notation as the target or a different notation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]