Search

In recent years we have witnessed a series of changes that make it both necessary and urgent to redefine the limits of the architectural discipline, and in particular those of its teaching. The traditional profile of the architect as a builder has been radically transformed and has evolved towards other scenarios. The traditional teaching tools and procedures do not offer a response to the professional reality that the architect must assume in the face of the new approaches, services and considerations that contemporary society demands for this century. The aim of this article is to offer a reflection, from an educational perspective, on the challenges that the teaching of architectural project must face in order to provide future architects with the tools that will allow them to both approach new professional scenarios and respond to untested problems and unforeseen situations in a complex world. Training professionals to think for themselves with a critical and innovative spirit, encouraging the practice of creative and flexible thinking that enables them to define proposals and make imaginative decisions, developing work skills in co-production and co-creation environments or incorporating digital technology in the training of professionals are some of the challenges that this research addresses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article forms part of the debate regarding the relevance of using industrial heritage as an engine for territorial and urban development. It begins by studying the concept of industrial heritage and recognition of the same as cultural heritage and, subsequently, using the city of Malaga as a case study, analyses the industrialisation process that the city experienced from the 19th to the end of the 20th century and the current state of conservation of its built industrial heritage. It also undertakes a study of the specific instruments, for the most part strategic planning, that have been implemented as a means to incorporate cultural heritage as an asset for a new urban model for the city in an effort to understand how these instruments envisage the revitalisation and recovery of industrial heritage. The study concludes that this heritage, despite constituting one of the city's principal hallmarks, has received only partial and biased attention in terms of the numerous urban reclassification projects that have been undertaken, and has yet to find its role in the new urban model. This raises the need to revitalise these heritage resources in an effort to encourage fairer, more equitable urban and economic development processes that contemplate the reasonable use of the industrial heritage that constitutes the bedrock of the city's identity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Today, the industrial landscape constitutes an extraordinarily complex phenomenon, the study of which has been approached belatedly by the scientific community in general. This has given rise to a situation of conceptual and methodological insufficiency in the field of landscape study, making necessary both a reconsideration of the ways these studies have been approached to date and the development of a methodological framework that takes into account the specific nature of these landscapes. With this in mind, the objective of this article is to present a specific methodology for the identification and characterisation of industrial landscapes based on both their heritage and cultural considerations. The methodology contemplates an initial in-depth study of both the landscapes in question and the most relevant methodological trends applied to landscape study, in an effort to ascertain to what extent these methodological approaches respond to the needs of the study. On the basis of the results obtained, this article attempts to make an advance in the contribution of methodological improvements and innovations that materialise in the design of an industrial landscape identification and characterisation methodology, that contemplates a holistic, integrational approach that operates across the various dimensions attributable to these landscapes and advocates a transdisciplinary approach to the study of the same. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Today we will see the need to rethink the teaching and learning models at Schools of Architecture, reconsidering the ways of teaching and learning. In this sense, the teaching of architectural design should step away from the attitude that is still prevalent in many schools, consisting of conveying predetermined teaching or a closed and complete architectural culture, which attempts to exhaust all the avenues of knowledge, showing a strict and infallible method. What is needed, though, is an active and plural education that considers the complexity of architecture, based on ongoing research and part of an open, flexible and dynamic disciplinary discourse. An education that allows students to develop skills and generate new knowledge from the creation of learning situations which stimulate independent learning, facilitate subsequent ongoing training and enable a more critical and profound intellectual development. Undoubtedly, students must acquire lots of knowledge and skills, and there are many learning processes which must be simultaneously present at the beginning of their training. These can be grouped into the following: learning how to see, learning how to think, learning how to build, learning how to communicate and learning how to learn. The aim of this paper has been to develop each one of them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article aims to reflect on the importance of the eye in the creative process of architectural projects. All creation is based on a watchful eye, which acts as an instrument of knowledge and reflection; an active and creative eye that contains a thought. But creation is also in the hands of those who put these thoughts down onto paper and materialise them. In this sense, teaching architectural design should fundamentally consider educating the eye, so that students develop a perceptual ability allowing them to address all kinds of architectural projects creatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]