Search

To define the prevalence and clinical phenotype of anti-cortactin autoantibodies in adult and juvenile myositis.In this longitudinal cohort study, anti-cortactin autoantibody titers were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 670 adult myositis patients and 343 juvenile myositis patients as well as in 202 adult healthy controls and 90 juvenile healthy controls. The prevalence of anti-cortactin autoantibodies was compared among groups. Clinical features of patients with and those without anti-cortactin autoantibodies were also compared.Anti-cortactin autoantibodies were more common in adult dermatomyositis (DM) patients (15%; P = 0.005), particularly those with coexisting anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (24%; P = 0.03) or anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies (23%; P = 0.04). In adult myositis, anti-cortactin was associated with DM skin involvement (62% of patients with anti-cortactin versus 38% of patients without anti-cortactin; P = 0.03), dysphagia (36% versus 17%; P = 0.02) and coexisting anti-Ro 52 autoantibodies (47% versus 26%; P = 0.001) or anti-NT5c1a autoantibodies (59% versus 33%; P = 0.001). Moreover, the titers of anti-cortactin antibodies were higher in patients with interstitial lung disease (0.15 versus 0.12 arbitrary units; P = 0.03). The prevalence of anti-cortactin autoantibodies was not different in juvenile myositis patients (2%) or in any juvenile myositis subgroup compared to juvenile healthy controls (4%). Nonetheless, juvenile myositis patients with these autoantibodies had a higher prevalence of "mechanic's hands" (25% versus 7%; P = 0.03), a higher number of hospitalizations (2.9 versus 1.3; P = 0.04), and lower peak creatine kinase values (368 versus 818 IU/liter; P = 0.02) than those without anti-cortactin.The prevalence of anti-cortactin autoantibodies is increased in adult DM patients with coexisting anti-Mi-2 or anti-NXP-2 autoantibodies. In adults, anti-cortactin autoantibodies are associated with dysphagia and interstitial lung disease.

COVID-19; Registries; Vaccination COVID-19; Registros; Vacunación COVID-19; Registres; Vacunació Vaccine hesitancy is considered a major barrier to achieving herd immunity against COVID-19. While multiple alternative and synergistic approaches including heterologous vaccination, booster doses, and antiviral drugs have been developed, equitable vaccine uptake remains the foremost strategy to manage pandemic. Although none of the currently approved vaccines are live-attenuated, several reports of disease flares, waning protection, and acute-onset syndromes have emerged as short-term adverse events after vaccination. Hence, scientific literature falls short when discussing potential long-term effects in vulnerable cohorts. The COVAD-2 survey follows on from the baseline COVAD-1 survey with the aim to collect patient-reported data on the long-term safety and tolerability of COVID-19 vaccines in immune modulation. The e-survey has been extensively pilot-tested and validated with translations into multiple languages. Anticipated results will help improve vaccination efforts and reduce the imminent risks of COVID-19 infection, especially in understudied vulnerable groups. HC is supported by the National Institution for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health.

Objectives The COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) study aimed to assess short-term COVID-19 vaccination-related adverse events (AEs) in RA patients. Methods An online self-reported questionnaire (March–December 2021) was used to capture data related to COVID-19 vaccination-related AEs in RA, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) (excluding RA and inflammatory myositis), non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs) and healthy controls (HCs). Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results Of the 9462 complete respondents, 14.2% (n = 1347) had been diagnosed with RA; they had a mean (s.d.) age of 50.7 (13.7) years, 74.2% were women and 49.3% were Caucasian. In total, 76.9% and 4.2% of patients with RA reported minor and major AEs, respectively. Patients with active and inactive RA had similar AE and hospitalization frequencies. Overall, AEs were reported more frequently by BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 recipients and less frequently by BBV152 recipients compared with the rest. Major AE and hospitalization frequencies were similar across recipients of different vaccines. Patients receiving methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine reported fewer minor AEs than those patients not on them. Compared with HCs and patients with other AIRDs, patients with RA reported similar total AEs, overall minor AEs, and hospitalizations. Compared with nrAIDs, patients with RA reported lower frequencies of overall AEs, minor AEs (both odds ratio [OR] = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9), and injection site pain (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.8) with similar major AE and hospitalization frequencies. Conclusion Despite the differences in AE frequency across different COVID-19 vaccines, all were well tolerated in patients with RA and were comparable to HCs, providing reassurance as to the safety of COVID-19 vaccination.

Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) is defined as when cancer appears within 3 years of myositis onset. Dermatomyositis and seronegative immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy are the phenotypes mostly related to cancer. In general, treatment principles in myositis patients with and without CAM are similar. However, some aspects of myositis management are particular to CAM, including (a) the need for a multidisciplinary approach and a close relationship with the oncologist, (b) the presence of immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drug interactions, and (c) the role of the long-term immunosuppressive therapy as a risk factor for cancer relapse or development of a second neoplasm. In this review, we will also discuss immunotherapy in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors as a treatment for their cancer.Studies on cancer risk in patients treated with long-term immunosuppressive drugs, in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, and in solid organ transplant recipients have shed some light on this topic. Immunotherapy, which has been a great advance for the treatment of some types of malignancy, may be also of interest in CAM, given the special relationship between both disorders.Management of CAM is a challenge. In this complex scenario, therapeutic decisions must consider both diseases simultaneously.The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40674-022-00197-2.

There is an intriguing relationship between cancer and myositis. The immunosuppressive agents commonly used to treat myositis patients are known to favor the development of cancer, but this factor does not seem to be the main cause of the association. Most myositis patients who develop cancer are considered to have cancer-associated myositis, which suggests that there are some types of etiopathogenic relationship between these two conditions. The malignancy usually appears within 3 years of the myositis diagnosis, and the risk of cancer depends on the myositis phenotype, with classic or amyopathic dermatomyositis (DM) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy being the main associated phenotypes. Several considerations regarding the pathogenesis of this association and strategies to detect occult malignancy in these patients are discussed here, with special emphasis on the role of autoantibodies as markers of this condition. Anti- TIF1g (Transcription Intermediary Factor 1 gamma) antibodies have been extensively studied in patients with cancer-associated DM. In addition, we discuss the peculiarities of treating patients with cancer-associated myositis and suggest some good treatment options, and finally, we examine the cancer–myositis relationship with regard to the recently described concept of myositis as an immune-related adverse event derived from the use of checkpoint immune inhibitors to treat cancer.

Purpose of the review Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders. The presence of different autoantibodies allows clinicians to define distinct phenotypes. Antibodies against the melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 gene, also called anti-MDA5 antibodies, are associated with a characteristic phenotype, the clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. This review aims to analyze the different pharmacological options for the treatment of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies. Recent findings Evidence-based therapeutic recommendations suggest that the best initial approach to treat these patients is an early combination of immunosuppressive drugs including either glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors or a triple therapy adding intravenous cyclophosphamide. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, could be useful according to recent reports. High ferritin plasma levels, generalized worsening of pulmonary infiltrates, and ground-glass opacities should be considered predictive factors of a bad outcome. In this scenario, clinicians should consider rescue therapies such as therapeutic plasma exchange, polymyxin-B hemoperfusion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or even lung transplantation. Summary Combined immunosuppressive treatment should be considered the first-line therapy for patients with anti-MDA5 rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Aggressive rescue therapies may be useful in refractory patients.

There is a well-recognized association between cancer and myositis, so cancer screening at diagnosis is recommended. We aim to report the results of our cancer screening strategy and to ascertain the reliability of using PET/CT to identify cancer-associated myositis (CAM) in a large cohort of patients with myositis from a single center over 10 years.This retrospective observational study included all patients diagnosed with any type of myositis except for inclusion body myositis. Cancer screening strategy was individualized according to clinical and serological data, including PET/CT as the main test to detect occult cancer (OC). Procedures derived from a positive PET/CT were registered. Qualitative data expressed as percentages, and quantitative data as the median with the interquartile range were analyzed. A ROC curve was used to estimate the reliability of PET/CT for CAM diagnosis.Seventy-seven out of 131 patients underwent a PET/CT for OC screening. The performance of the PET/CT in patients with myositis at disease onset yielded an area under the curve ROC of 0.87 (0.73-0.97) for CAM diagnosis. Invasive procedures in 7 (9%) patients without a final diagnosis of cancer did not cause derived complications. Patients not evaluated for OC did not develop cancer after a median follow-up of 3.3 years (1.7-6.7).Cancer screening strategy should be individualized. PET/CT at myositis onset seems to be an efficient approach to rule out CAM. This practice does not seem to significantly increase harm to patients related to the additional tests needed to clarify inconclusive results.

Strategies to determine who could be safely discharged home from the Emergency Department (ED) in COVID-19 are needed to decongestion healthcare systems.To describe the outcomes of an ED triage system for non-severe patients with suspected COVID-19 and possible pneumonia based on chest X-ray (CXR) upon admission.Retrospective, single-center study performed in Barcelona (Spain) during the COVID-19 peak in March-April 2020. Patients with COVID-19 symptoms and potential pneumonia, without respiratory insufficiency, with priority class IV-V (Andorran triage model) had a CXR upon admission. This approach tried to optimize resource use and to facilitate discharges. The results after adopting this organizational approach are reported.We included 834 patients, 53% were female. Most patients were white (66%) or Hispanic (27%). CXR showed pneumonia in 523 (62.7%). Compared to those without pneumonia, patients with pneumonia were older (55 vs 46.6 years old) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (1.9 vs 1.3). Patients with pneumonia were at a higher risk for a combined outcome of admission and/or death (91 vs 12%). Death rates tended to be numerically higher in the pneumonia group (10 vs 1). Among patients without pneumonia in the initial CXR, 10% reconsulted (40% of them with new pneumonia).CXR identified pneumonia in a significant number of patients. Those without pneumonia were mostly discharged. Mortality among patients with an initially negative CXR was low. CXR triage for pneumonia in non-severe COVID-19 patients in the ED can be an effective strategy to optimize resource use.La pandemia de COVID-19 conlleva una alta ocupación de los servicios de urgencias (SU). Se requieren nuevas estrategias para optimizar la gestión de estos recursos.Describir los resultados de un sistema de triaje en urgencias para pacientes no graves con sospecha de COVID-19 y posible neumonía, basado en la radiografía de tórax (RT).Estudio retrospectivo, unicéntrico realizado en Barcelona (España) entre marzo y abril de 2020. Se realizó una RT al ingreso en SU de pacientes con síntomas de COVID-19 y sospecha de neumonía, sin insuficiencia respiratoria, con una prioridad clase IV-V (sistema andorrano de triaje). Esta medida pretende optimizar los recursos y facilitar las altas. Se reportan los resultados tras adoptar esta estrategia.Se incluyeron 834 pacientes (53% mujeres, 66% caucásicos, 27% hispánicos). La RT mostró neumonía en 523 (62,7%). Comparados con los pacientes sin neumonía, los que sí la padecían eran mayores (55 vs. 46,6 años), con un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más elevado (1,9 vs. 1,3) y con mayor riesgo de ingreso y/o muerte (91 vs. 12%). La mortalidad fue numéricamente mayor en el grupo con neumonía (10 vs. 1). El 10% de los pacientes sin neumonía en RT consultaron de nuevo al SU (40% con neumonía).La RT identificó neumonía en múltiples pacientes. Los que no tenían neumonía fueron mayoritariamente dados de alta. La mortalidad entre pacientes con RT negativa fue baja. La RT como triaje para neumonía en pacientes con COVID-19 no grave puede ahorrar recursos.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to be a cause of unprecedented global morbidity and mortality. Whilst COVID-19 vaccination has emerged as the only tangible solution to reducing poor clinical outcomes, vaccine hesitancy continues to be an obstacle to achieving high levels of vaccine uptake. This represents particular risk to patients with autoimmune diseases, a group already at increased risk of hospitalization and poor clinical outcomes related to COVID-19 infection. Whilst there is a paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune diseases, the current evidence strongly suggests that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of adverse effects and disease flares. Herein, we report the protocol of the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) study, an ongoing international collaborative study involving 29 countries and over 110 investigators. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00296-021-05046-4.

Purpose of Review Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (CT) has proven useful as a cancer screening technique in patients with inflammatory myopathy, mainly dermatomyositis. In this review, we focus on advances in this direction and other potential applications of PET/CT in patients with inflammatory myopathy. Recent Findings Cancer screening by PET/CT seems suitable and cost-effective in patients with myositis. It has also shown value as a hybrid technique for diagnosing myositis versus controls and could be of interest for differentiating between polymyositis and sporadic inclusion body myositis. Quantification of muscle activity by PET/CT seems reliable. Preliminary data suggest that it could also be used to diagnose and measure the activity of the disease in the lung. Summary PET/CT should be in the toolbox of physicians managing patients with myositis. The multiple applications of PET/CT include its value for cancer screening, measuring the activity of the disease in muscle, and helping to differentiate between myositis phenotypes. The possibility to diagnose and monitor inflammatory lung activity remains to be demonstrated in welldesigned studies.

Cancer-associated dermatomyositis provides a unique opportunity to explore the relationship between autoimmunity and cancer. In this review, we describe the related epidemiological issues, considering the various currently accepted myositis phenotypes, their link with cancer, and the possible mechanisms leading to this relationship. We discuss current evidence regarding the role of molecular mimicry, somatic DNA tumor mutations, and the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in the association between cancer and myositis. We also review tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a relevant factor to be evaluated in cancer-associated myositis, their interaction with tumor neoantigens, and the tumor mutational burden, all of which have implications for the treatment of these patients with immunotherapy. Finally, we discuss clinical scenarios related to the relationship between cancer and myositis, delineating a comprehensive theory linking autoimmunity and cancer.