Search

Purpose: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few treatment options. We designed a phase II randomized trial to determine the activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib or sunitinib in patients with advanced metastatic ASPS. Patients and Methods: Patients 16 years of age and older were randomized to receive cediranib (30 mg) or sunitinib (37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles. Patients could cross over to the other treatment arm at disease progression. The primary endpoint was to measure the objective response rate (ORR) for each agent. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the two arms was also determined. Results: Twenty-nine of 34 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. One patient on each of the initial two treatment arms had a partial response (ORR: 6.7% and 7.1% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). Twenty-four patients had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). There were no significant differences in mPFS for the two treatment arms. Clinical benefit (i.e., objective response or stable disease for a minimum of four or six cycles of therapy) on the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy did not predict benefit on the second-line TKI. Both drugs were well tolerated. As of August 2021, 1 patient (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study. Conclusions: The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. Although both TKIs provided clinical benefit, the outcomes may have been attenuated in patients who had progressed ≤6 months before enrollment, potentially accounting for the low response rates. See related commentary by Wilky and Maleddu, p. 1163

Background Despite more than 2 years having elapsed since the onset of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a level of hesitation around increased SARS-CoV-2 vaccine toxicity in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy (IO) remains. Here, we explore serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients treated with IO and we describe blood cytokines, autoantibody levels and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) post vaccination. Methods Serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies, surrogate viral neutralization test (sVNT), Th1/Th2 cytokines and antibodies against self-antigens were quantified at baseline, between 1st and 2nd vaccine doses, at 1 week (1W), 1 month (1M), 4–6 months and 10–12 months after the 2nd dose. Grade 2 or higher (≥ gr2+) irAEs were captured prospectively. Results Fifty-one evaluable patients were enrolled in this longitudinal study, 35 on immunotherapy (IO) and 16 on non-immunotherapy (non-IO) treatment. Absolute levels and neutralization potential of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were not significantly different in the IO group compared to non-IO. Chemotherapy adversely affects seroconversion when compared to IO and/or targeted treatment with antibody levels of 67.6 U/mL vs 1441 U/mL (p = 0.006) and sVNT of 70.9% vs 94.5% (p = 0.009), at 1M after 2nd vaccine dose. Following vaccination, the prevalence of grade ≥ 2 irAEs in patients treated with IO was not higher than the usual reported IO toxicity. We report, for the first time, that post-vaccination, IgM autoantibodies against beta 2 glycoprotein (p = 0.02), myeloperoxidase (p = 0.03), nucleosome (p = 0.041), SPLUNC2 (p

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascular tumor with few treatment options. We designed a phase 2 randomized trial to determine the activity and tolerability of single-agent cediranib or sunitinib in patients with advanced metastatic ASPS.Patients 16 years of age and older were randomized to receive cediranib (30 mg) or sunitinib (37.5 mg) in 28-day cycles. Patients could crossover to the other treatment arm at disease progression. The primary endpoint was to measure the objective response rate (ORR) for each agent. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the 2 arms was also determined.Results: Twenty-nine of 34 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. One patient on each of the initial 2 treatment arms had a partial response (ORR: 6.7% and 7.1% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). Twenty-four patients had a best response of stable disease (86.7% and 78.6% for cediranib and sunitinib, respectively). There were no significant differences in mPFS for the 2 treatment arms. Clinical benefit (i.e., objective response or stable disease for a minimum of 4 or 6 cycles of therapy) on the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy did not predict benefit on the second-line TKI. Both drugs were well tolerated. As of August 2021, 1 patient (unevaluable for ORR) remains on study.The study did not meet its endpoints for ORR. Although both TKIs provided clinical benefit, the outcomes may have been attenuated in patients who had progressed ≤6 months before enrollment, potentially accounting for the low response rates.

Objectives: Sarcomas are mesodermal cancers of bone and soft tissue of which there are >60 malignant varieties, many of which can be difficult to diagnose or subtype using traditional histopathology. A universal molecular definition of sarcoma types would therefore be an invaluable tool to the diagnostic pathologist. RNA has the potential to offer a complimentary perspective to cytogenetic- and methylation-based diagnostics, as it represents the active state of the disease at sampling and better reveals its phenotype. Recognizing the potential for RNA-based classification, we set out to create a first-generation transcriptional atlas of sarcoma. Methods: To develop transcriptional definitions of cancers with the potential to further subclassify tumor types, we designed a self-optimizing and scale-adaptive unsupervised method (RACCOON), which groups samples into hierarchically organized clusters. We used this approach on the UCSC Treehouse Childhood Cancer Compendium, a set of 2,178 pediatric and 9,400 adult tumors, 1,130 of which are sarcomas, as well as 1,735 non-neoplastic samples. We then trained an ensemble of convolutional neural networks to classify tumors to these transcriptional clusters. We have now added 624 more sarcoma samples from Toronto centers and international collaborators to better represent the breadth of sarcoma. We are actively sequencing 500 additional samples in partnership with the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Program to yield an expanded cohort of >2,200 uniformly processed and analyzed sarcomas. Results: Sarcomas organize into two clusters at the highest hierarchical level: one characterized by entities which occur primarily in adults and resemble mature tissue, the other by primarily pediatric entities which exhibit high stemness and resemble embryonic tissue. Several included entities are not bona fide sarcomas but originate from the mesoderm (e.g., Wilms Tumor) signifying a common transcriptional identity for mesodermal neoplasms. Additionally, we demonstrate the first transcriptional subtypes of central osteosarcoma reflecting its major histotypes and representing divergent clinical courses. We also determine Ewing Sarcoma (ES) to be a distinct entity which clusters separately from all other cancers, raising questions of its origin and affinity to sarcoma. When classifying ongoing patients to the atlas, we correctly classified >85% of tumors and corrected the diagnosis of 7%. We find 14% of ES in our dataset were likely misdiagnosed CIC- or BCOR-driven sarcomas. Critically, assigned subtypes are consistent between primary and relapse pairs. Conclusion: RNA-seq is a promising tool for both subtype discovery and classifying sarcoma in ongoing patients. We have already included this tool in tumor boards to help inform patient care. Our method reveals the overarching organization of sarcoma for the first time and specifies its underlying biology. This atlas is ever-growing and is open to the community to contribute. Citation Format: Joshua O. Nash, Federico Comitani, Rose Chami, Sarah Cohen-Gogo, Astra Chang-Schwertschkow, Yael Babichev, Jodi Lees, Noa Alon, Nalan Gokgoz, Stephen Man Yu, Kyoko Yuki, Miranda Lorenti, Zhanqin Liu, Alaina McGoey, Famida Spatare, Bernarld Castro, Kim Tsoi, Hagit Peretz Soroka, Jack Brzezinski, Anita Villani, Albiruni Razak, Abha Gupta, Elizabeth Demicco, Gino Somers, Brendan C. Dickson, Jay S. Wunder, Irene L. Andrulis, David Malkin, Rebecca A. Gladdy, Adam Shlien. The development of a multiscale transcriptional atlas of sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B027.

Supplemental Methods. (DOCX 30 kb)

Table S1. INSPIRE patient baseline characteristics. Table S2 Optimized flow cytometry panels for INSPIRE. Table S3 Status of patients as of the June 1, 2017 data cut-off. Table S4 Adverse events by cohort. Table S5 c index, p values, and false discovery rates (FDRs) for all parameters that were presented in Figs. 4 and 5. (DOCX 52 kb)

Supplementary methods and Tables S1â S4. (DOCX 148 kb)

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of T4 laryngeal cancers.T4 laryngeal cancers treated with curative intent from January 2003 to December 2010 were analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated in both primary radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) (RT/CRT) and primary surgery cohorts.Among the 65 primary RT/CRT and 42 primary surgery patients included, median follow-up was 4.4 years. There was a trend for improved locoregional control with surgery (74% vs 88%; p = .08). In the RT/CRT group the 3-year laryngectomy-free survival was 67%. The 2-year gastrostomy dependency rate was 23% with RT/CRT versus 6% with primary surgery (p = .07). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was significantly lower in the RT/CRT versus primary surgery group (41% vs 70%; p.01).Laryngeal preservation is achieved in over two thirds of patients with primary RT/CRT. Patients with low volume minimal cartilage involvement T4 disease may be best suited to RT/CRT. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2035-E2040, 2016.

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the pretreatment circulating neutrophil count (CNC), circulating monocyte count (CMC), and circulating lymphocyte count (CLC) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related (HPV+) and HPV-unrelated (HPV-) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).All p16-confirmed HPV+ and HPV- OPC cases treated with chemoradiotherapy from 2000 to 2010 were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared for high and low CNCs, CMCs, and CLCs (dichotomized by median values). A multivariate analysis (MVA) confirmed their prognostic value in HPV+ and HPV- tumors, respectively.Five hundred ten HPV+ OPC cases and 192 HPV- OPC cases were included. The HPV+ cohort had lower CNC and CMC values but a CLC similar to that of the HPV- patients (P .01). The median follow-up was 4.8 years. In the HPV+ cohort, a high CNC or CMC correlated with reduced OS and RFS in comparison with a low CNC or CMC (P .01 for all), but no difference was evident in OS (P = .30) or RFS (P = .10) with the CLC. MVA confirmed that a higher CNC or CMC independently predicted lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] for CNC, 1.14, P .01; HR for CMC, 2.95, P .01) and lower RFS (HR for CNC, 1.11, P .01; HR for CMC, 3.39, P .01), whereas a higher CLC was associated with higher RFS (HR, 0.66, P = .03) and marginally higher OS (HR, 0.80, P = .08). In the HPV- cohort, CNC, CMC, and CLC were not predictive of OS (P = .16, P = .86, and P = .14) or RFS (P = .61, P = .59, and P = .62).This relatively large cohort study demonstrates that a high CNC and a high CMC independently predict inferior OS and RFS, whereas a high CLC predicts better RFS and marginally better OS in HPV+ OPC patients. This association was not apparent in HPV- patients.