Search

Background: A sustained virological response (SVR) rate of 41% has been achieved with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin therapy of chronic hepatitis C. In this randomised trial, peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin was compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin.Methods: 1530 patients with chronic hepatitis C were assigned interferon alfa-2b (3 MU subcutaneously three times per week) plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day orally, peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg each week plus 800 mg/day ribavirin, or peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg per week for 4 weeks then 0.5 microg/kg per week plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the SVR rate (undetectable hepatitis C virus [HCV] RNA in serum at 24-week follow-up). Analyses were based on patients who received at least one dose of study medication.Findings: The SVR rate was significantly higher (p=0.01 for both comparisons) in the higher-dose peginterferon group (274/511 [54%]) than in the lower-dose peginterferon (244/514 [47%]) or interferon (235/505 [47%]) groups. Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the corresponding SVR rates were 42% (145/348), 34% (118/349), and 33% (114/343). The rate for patients with genotype 2 and 3 infections was about 80% for all treatment groups. Secondary analyses identified bodyweight as an important predictor of SVR, prompting comparison of the interferon regimens after adjusting ribavirin for bodyweight (mg/kg). Side-effect profiles were similar between the treatment groups.Interpretation: In patients with chronic hepatitis C, the most effective therapy is the combination of peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg per week plus ribavirin. The benefit is mostly achieved in patients with HCV genotype 1 infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Only 15 to 20 percent of patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virologic response to interferon therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant interferon alfa-2b alone with those of a combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for the initial treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.Methods: We randomly assigned 912 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive standard-dose interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg orally per day, depending on body weight) for 24 or 48 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measurements of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and serum aminotransferases and by liver biopsy.Results: The rate of sustained virologic response (defined as an undetectable serum HCV RNA level 24 weeks after treatment was completed) was higher among patients who received combination therapy for either 24 weeks (70 of 228 patients, 31 percent) or 48 weeks (87 of 228 patients, 38 percent) than among patients who received interferon alone for either 24 weeks (13 of 231 patients, 6 percent) or 48 weeks (29 of 225 patients, 13 percent) (P<0.001 for the comparison of interferon alone with both 24 weeks and 48 weeks of combination treatment). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the best response occurred in those who were treated for 48 weeks with interferon and ribavirin. Histologic improvement was more common in patients who were treated with combination therapy for either 24 weeks (57 percent) or 48 weeks (61 percent) than in those who were treated with interferon alone for either 24 weeks (44 percent) or 48 weeks (41 percent). The drug doses had to be reduced and treatment discontinued more often in patients who were treated with combination therapy.Conclusions: In patients with chronic hepatitis C, initial therapy with interferon and ribavirin was more effective than treatment with interferon alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This international, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind dose-finding study compared peginterferon alfa-2b (PegIntron) to interferon alfa-2b for the initial treatment of compensated chronic hepatitis C. We randomly assigned 1,219 subjects to receive either the standard three-times-weekly (TIW) interferon alfa-2b dose (3 MIU) or the once-weekly (QW) peginterferon alfa-2b (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 microg/kg). Subjects were treated for 48 weeks and then followed for an additional 24 weeks. All 3 peginterferon alfa-2b doses significantly (P < or =.042) improved virologic response rates (loss of detectable serum HCV RNA) after treatment and after follow-up, as compared with interferon alfa-2b. Unlike the end-of-treatment virologic response, the sustained virologic response rate was not dose-related above 1.0 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b because of a higher relapse rate among patients treated with 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b, particularly among patients infected with genotype 1. All 3 peginterferon alfa-2b doses decreased liver inflammation to a greater extent than did interferon alfa-2b, particularly in subjects with sustained responses. No new adverse events were reported, and the majority of adverse events and changes in laboratory values were mild or moderate. In conclusion, peginterferon alfa-2b maintained (0.5 microg/kg) or surpassed (1.0, 1.5 microg/kg) the clinical efficacy of interferon alfa-2b while preserving its safety profile. The higher rate of virologic response during treatment with 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b in patients infected with genotype 1 and high viral levels warrants further evaluation.

We sought to determine whether pretreatment serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) correlate with demographic features and other disease characteristics and whether these values influence response to therapy. A total of 1,744 patients with HCV received either interferon alfa-2b and placebo or combination interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks. Of these, 105 individuals (6%) had minimally raised serum ALT determinations at entry visit of 1.3 x ULN cohort. Baseline ALT was not related to gender, race, baseline viral level, or HCV genotype. Using logistic regression analysis, the only demographic feature associated with ALT 1.3 x ULN, in all treatment groups (26 of 105, 24.8% for ALT 1.3 x ULN). We conclude that HCV patients with minimally raised ALT values (

Objective: Initial therapy with ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b results in a higher sustained virological response than interferon alone, but this regimen is expensive. We aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of 24- or 48-wk initial treatment with combination therapy versus interferon alone for patients who have chronic hepatitis C., Methods: Data from recent randomized clinical trials comparing combination therapy to interferon alone were applied to a previously published computer cohort simulation to project lifelong clinical and economic outcomes. Natural history and economic estimates were based on published literature, expert panel estimates, and actual variable cost and reimbursement data., Results: Using treatment stopping rules, sustained viral negative response rates would be 33.1% and 39.8% for patients receiving 24 versus 48 wk of ribavirin/interferon, compared with 14.3% for 48 wk of interferon alone. Compared to the interferon alone strategy, 24 or 48 wk of combination therapy should prolong life expectancy by 1.4 to 2.0 yr at marginal cost-effectiveness ratios of $4,400 to $5,400 per discounted quality-adjusted life-year (DQALY) gained. Compared to 24 wk of combination therapy, 48 wk of combination therapy should prolong life expectancy by 0.6 yr at a marginal cost-effectiveness ratio of $7,700 per DQALY gained. The results were robust, with 24 or 48 wk of combination therapy remaining preferred and cost-effective in sensitivity analysis compared with interferon alone., Conclusion: For patients with chronic hepatitis C, 24 or 48 wk of ribavirin and interferon should prolong life and be cost-effective when compared with 48 wk, of interferon alone.

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to determine whether intranasal alpha 2-interferon could prevent respiratory illnesses in healthy contacts of ill family members. Beginning within 48 hours of the onset of illness in a family member, contacts self-administered interferon (5 X 10(6) IU) or placebo spray once daily for seven days. Respiratory illness developed during the eight-day period, starting with the second day of spraying, in 52 of 222 persons in the placebo group as compared with 32 of 226 in the interferon group (P = 0.02; efficacy, 39 percent). Among persons exposed to laboratory-documented rhinovirus colds, illness developed in 2 of 27 interferon recipients as compared with 12 of 34 placebo recipients (P = 0.02; efficacy, 79 percent). During the two-week period during and after spraying, rhinovirus colds developed in 1.3 percent of those spraying with interferon and in 15.1 percent of those spraying with placebo (P = 0.003; efficacy, 88 percent). Blood-tinged mucus or nasal mucosal bleeding or both were detected in 7.7 percent of placebo and 13.6 percent of interferon users (P = 0.04), but no evidence of cumulative nasal toxicity was found. We conclude that postexposure prophylaxis with intranasal interferon may in some cases provide an effective strategy for controlling the spread of natural colds, especially those caused by rhinoviruses.

In a double-blind evaluation of alpha 2-interferon as prophylaxis against naturally acquired respiratory infections, 120 adult members of 46 Australian families used 325 courses of intranasal spray during a six-month period, applying 5 million IU to the anterior nasal mucosa daily for seven days when respiratory symptoms developed in another member of the family. Used in this way, the alpha 2-interferon was well tolerated, and the rate of minor nasal bleeding (12 percent) did not increase with repeated courses. By comparison with the control group of 109 members of 49 families who used 319 seven-day courses of placebo spray, the users of alpha 2-interferon experienced 33 percent fewer days with nasal symptoms and 41 percent fewer episodes of "definite" respiratory illness. The users of alpha 2-interferon who were exposed to rhinovirus infections experienced 76 percent fewer days with symptoms and 86 percent fewer "definite" illnesses than their counterparts who used placebo. All of the observed clinical benefits, which suggested prevention of 6.8 "definite" respiratory illnesses per 100 courses of medication used, could be explained by a protective effect against illness associated with rhinoviruses that was not demonstrated for influenza A or B or coronavirus 229E.

Efficacy of intranasal recombinant alpha interferon (IFN-alpha 2b) was evaluated over a four-week period. The first 400 participants received either 1,500,000 IU of IFN-alpha 2b or placebo twice daily. Rhinovirus infections were prevented (protective efficacy, 76%). Parainfluenza infections were not prevented, but symptoms in associated episodes of disease were significantly reduced. The medication was generally well tolerated, but side effects were often observed. The most commonly reported symptom was blood-tinged mucus. A pilot study of IFN-alpha 2b or placebo administered on a once-daily dose schedule was also carried out in 150 participants. There was a suggestion of continued efficacy with reduced side effects. Overall, these findings would limit the use of IFN-alpha 2b on the twice-daily schedule to shorter time periods or to special situations in which the efficacy clearly outweighs side effects, and they encourage further examination of other dosage schedules.