Search

Limited evidence regarding multiple casualty outcomes exists. Given resource strain with increasing patient load, we hypothesized that patients involved in a multiple casualty incident have worse outcomes compared to standard trauma patients. Multiple casualty victims from 2006 to 2021 at our institution were identified; admission data and trauma outcomes were then compared to standard trauma patients. Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U -tests were performed for categorical and non-normal continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We identified 39,924 patients, of which 612 were multiple casualty patients (1.5%). Multiple casualty involvement was associated with younger age (29 y versus 44 y, P < 0.001) and higher rates of penetrating trauma (26.1% versus 21.4%; P < 0.001). Multiple casualty involvement was associated with higher injury severity score (ISS) (11.6 versus 7.9, P < 0.001), mortality (2.4% versus 1.5% P < 0.005), and ICU admission (17% versus 13%, P < 0.005). On logistic regression analysis, age, ISS, shock index, presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and mechanism all independently predicted mortality (P ≤ 0.003), while multiple casualty involvement did not (P = 0.302). Although multiple casualty incidents are associated with patient factors that increase hospital resource strain, when controlling for age, ISS, shock index, presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and trauma mechanism, involvement in multiple casualty incident was not independently associated with ICU admission or mortality. Improved understanding of the impact of high-volume trauma may allow us to improve our care of this at-risk population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because trauma patients in class II shock (blood loss of 15%-30% of total blood volume) arrive normotensive, this makes the identification of shock and subsequent prognostication of outcomes challenging. Our aim was to identify early predictive factors associated with worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. We hypothesize that abnormalities in initial vital signs portend worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. A retrospective review was performed from 2006 to 2021 using our trauma database and included trauma patients presenting with penetrating trauma with initial normotensive blood pressures (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg). We compared those with a narrow pulse pressure (NPP ≤25% of systolic blood pressure), tachycardia (heart rate ≥100 beats per minute), and elevated shock index (SI ≥ 0.8) to those without. Outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit admission, and ventilator use. Chi-squared, Mann–Whitney tests, and regression analyses were performed as appropriate. We identified 7618 patients with penetrating injuries and normotension on initial trauma bay assessment. On univariate analysis, NPP, tachycardia, and elevated SI were associated with increases in mortality compared to those without. On multivariable logistic regression, only NPP and tachycardia were independently associated with mortality. Tachycardia and an elevated SI were both independently associated with intensive care unit admission. Only an elevated SI had an independent association with ventilator requirements, while an NPP and tachycardia did not. Immediate trauma bay NPP and tachycardia are independently associated with mortality and adverse outcomes and may provide an opportunity for improved prognostication in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concurrent colonic injury among patients with gunshot-related fractures presents a potential risk for infectious complications. We hypothesized that colon injuries are associated with more infectious orthopedic complications among gunshot victims with concurrent fractures. We reviewed trauma patients arriving at our level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2019 to May 31, 2022 who suffered any gunshot-related fracture and also underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Of these patients, those with colon injuries were compared to those without colon injuries. Baseline characteristics, including antibiotic regimens, were collected in addition to outcomes of length of stay, intensive care unit admission, ventilator requirement, and development of infectious orthopedic complications. Overall, 56 of the 107 included patients had colon injuries. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and Injury Severity Score were similar between groups. Of patients with colonic injuries, 16.1% received early, repeat dosing of broad-spectrum antibiotics, while only 3.9% of patients without colonic injuries received this antibiotic dosing (P = 0.04). Interestingly, only patients with colon injuries developed infectious orthopedic complications and none of the patients without colon injuries developed such complications (10.7% versus 0.0%, P = 0.03). All patients with orthopedic infections had infected pelvic fractures. Length of stay was 3 d longer in the colon injury group (P = 0.04). There was no difference in intensive care unit admission, ventilator requirement, or death. Concurrent colon injuries among patients with gunshot-related fractures are associated with higher risk of infectious orthopedic complications, likely from direct spread of fecal contaminant. Early, broad-spectrum antibiotics may be associated with reduced infectious orthopedic complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This is an invited study for the special edition, "Role of Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancers: Advances, Challenges and Future Strategies". Esophageal cancer is a disease with one of the lowest survival rates. For patients who have resectable tumors, current guidelines recommend treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery if feasible. Recent clinical trials have suggested that treating patients with residual pathologic disease with adjuvant immunotherapy can increase overall survival. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the real-world outcomes of patients at a regionalized esophageal cancer center in a large integrated health system. We found that the majority of patients are unable to complete immunotherapy treatment (82%), most commonly due to disease progression or side effects. In logistic regression, immunotherapy also did not significantly impact 1-year overall survival. Our experience within the first two years of adjuvant immunotherapy being introduced suggests that real-world outcomes vary greatly outside of those seen in a clinical trial. Background: Adjuvant immunotherapy has been shown in clinical trials to prolong the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. We report our initial experience with immunotherapy within an integrated health system. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed reviewing patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy at our institution between 2017 and 2021. The immunotherapy cohort was assessed for completion of treatment, adverse effects, and disease progression, with emphasis on patients who received surgery in 2021 and their eligibility to receive nivolumab. Results: There were 39 patients who received immunotherapy and 137 patients who did not. In logistic regression, immunotherapy was not found to have a statistically significant impact on 1-year overall survival after adjusting for age and receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation. Only seven patients out of 39 who received immunotherapy successfully completed treatment (18%), with the majority failing therapy due to disease progression or side effects. Of the 17 patients eligible for nivolumab, 13 patients received it (76.4%), and three patients completed a full course of treatment. Conclusions: Despite promising findings of adjuvant immunotherapy improving the survival of patients with esophageal cancer, real-life practice varies greatly from clinical trials. We found that the majority of patients were unable to complete immunotherapy regimens with no improvement in overall 1-year survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]