Search

The presence of peripheral blasts (PB) is a negative prognostic factor in patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) and PB ≥4% was associated with a particularly unfavorable prognosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the JAK1/2 inhibitor most used for treatment of MF-related splenomegaly and symptoms. Its role has not been assessed in correlation with PB.In 794 chronic-phase MF patients treated with RUX, we evaluated the impact of baseline percentage of PB on response (spleen and symptoms responses) and outcome (RUX discontinuation-free, leukemia-free, and overall survival). Three subgroups were compared: PB-0 (no PB, 61.3%), PB-4 (PB 1%-4%, 33.5%), and PB-9 (PB 5%-9%, 5.2%).At 3 and 6 months, spleen responses were less frequently achieved by PB-4 (P = .001) and PB-9 (P = .004) compared to PB-0 patients. RUX discontinuation-free, leukemia-free, and overall survival were also worse for PB-4 and PB-9 patients (P = .001, P = .002, and P.001, respectively).Personalized approaches beyond RUX monotherapy may be useful in PB-4 and particularly in PB-9 patients.

In 816 patients with 2016 World Health Organization-defined polycythemia vera (PV) enrolled in a multicenter retrospective study, we investigated the predictive value of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and body mass index (BMI) on thrombosis, progression to post-PV myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) and survival. Patients were subgrouped according to CCI=0 (58.1%, no comorbidities) or CCI≥1 (41.9%) and according to normal/underweight (BMI&nbsp

Comorbidities defined by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and body mass index (BMI) are significantly associated with outcome in patients who receive continuous treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We evaluated the impact of CCI and BMI on responses, drug-related toxicities, and outcome in a cohort of 402 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) treated with ruxolitinib in 23 European Hematology Centers. Comorbidities were evaluable in all 402 patients. A higher (≥ 3) CCI did not correlate with a lower spleen reduction at any time (p = 0.68) or symptoms' response (p = 0.11), but influenced the onset of anemia during the first 3months of treatment and later (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively) in patients without anemia baseline. BMI was evaluable in 380 patients and did not correlate with differences in spleen and symptoms response (p = 0.57 and p = 0.49, respectively). A higher CCI and a lower BMI correlated also with a reduced overall survival (p

BACKGROUND: After ruxolitinib discontinuation, the outcome of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is poor with scarce therapeutic possibilities. METHODS: The authors performed a subanalysis of an observational, retrospective study (RUX-MF) that included 703 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib to investigate 1) the frequency and reasons for ruxolitinib rechallenge, 2) its therapeutic effects, and 3) its impact on overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (31.2%) discontinued ruxolitinib for ≥14 days and survived for ≥30 days. In 60 patients (27.4%), ruxolitinib was rechallenged for ≥14 days (RUX-again patients), whereas 159 patients (72.6%) discontinued it permanently (RUX-stop patients). The baseline characteristics of the 2 cohorts were comparable, but discontinuation due to a lack/loss of spleen response was lower in RUX-again patients (P =.004). In comparison with the disease status at the first ruxolitinib stop, at its restart, there was a significant increase in patients with large splenomegaly (P 10 mg twice daily predicted better spleen (P =.05) and symptom improvements (P =.02), the reasons for/duration of ruxolitinib discontinuation and the use of other therapies before rechallenge were not associated with rechallenge efficacy. At 1 and 2 years, 33.3% and 48.3% of RUX-again patients, respectively, had permanently discontinued ruxolitinib. The median overall survival was 27.9 months, and it was significantly longer for RUX-again patients (P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib rechallenge was mainly used in intolerant patients; there were clinical improvements and a possible survival advantage in many cases, but there was a substantial rate of permanent discontinuation. Ruxolitinib rechallenge should be balanced against newer therapeutic possibilities.

ObjectivesThis study compared the burden of fatigue between treatment-naïve patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and the general population and investigated patient factors associated with fatigue severity.MethodsPretreatment patient-reported fatigue was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue questionnaire in a sample of 463 newly diagnosed patients with AML who were enrolled in a clinical trial. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the adjusted mean differences in fatigue between patients with AML and adults from the general population (n=847) by AML disease risk categories. A clinically meaningful difference in fatigue was defined as ≥3 points. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were used to identify sociodemographic, clinical and molecular correlates of worse fatigue in patients with AML.ResultsPatients with AML reported adjusted mean fatigue scores that were 7.5 points worse than the general population (95% CI −8.6 to −6.4, pConclusionsPatients with newly diagnosed AML reported worse fatigue than the general population, and mean differences exceeded twice the threshold for clinical significance. Our findings may help to identify patients with AML most likely to benefit from supportive care interventions to reduce fatigue.

No abstract available

The impact of ruxolitinib therapy on evolution to blast phase (BP) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is still uncertain. In 589 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib, we investigated incidence and risk factors for BP and we described outcome according to disease characteristics and treatment strategy. After a median follow-up from ruxolitinib start of 3 years (range 0.1-7.6), 65 (11%) patients transformed to BP during (93.8%) or after treatment. BP incidence rate was 3.7 per 100 patient-years, comparably in primary and secondary MF (PMF/SMF) but significantly lower in intermediate-1 risk patients (2.3 vs 5.6 per 100 patient-years in intermediate-2/high-risk patients, P

Ruxolitinib (RUX), the first JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for myelofibrosis (MF) therapy, has recently been associated with the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs), mainly lymphomas and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). We analyzed the incidence, risk factors and outcome of SPMs in 700 MF patients treated with RUX in a real-world context. Median follow-up from starting RUX was 2·9years. Overall, 80 (11·4%) patients developed 87 SPMs after RUX start. NMSCs were the most common SPMs (50·6% of the cases). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex [hazard ratio (HR): 2·37, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1·22–4·60, P=0·01] and thrombocytosis>400×109/l at RUX start (HR:1·98, 95%CI: 1·10–4·60, P=0·02) were associated with increased risk for SPMs. Risk factors for NMSC alone were male sex (HR: 3·14, 95%CI: 1·24–7·92, P=0·02) and duration of hydroxycarbamide and RUX therapy>5years (HR: 3·20, 95%CI: 1·17–8·75, P=0·02 and HR: 2·93, 95%CI: 1·39–6·17, P=0·005 respectively). In SPMs excluding NMSCs, male sex (HR: 2·41, 95%CI: 1·11–5·25, P=0·03), platelet>400×109/l (HR: 3·30, 95%CI: 1·67–6·50, P=0·001) and previous arterial thromboses (HR: 3·47, 95%CI: 1·48–8·14, P=0·004) were shown to be associated with higher risk of SPMs. While it is reassuring that no aggressive lymphoma was documented, active skin surveillance is recommended in all patients and particularly after prolonged hydroxycaramide therapy; oncological screening should be triggered by thrombocytosis and arterial thrombosis, particularly in males.

Introduction: Ruxolitinib (Rux) has been recently approved as second-line therapy in patients (pts) with Polycythemia Vera (PV) resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea (HU). Median age of PV pts enrolled in the pivotal Response trials was around 60 yrs; at present, no data is reported on the use of Rux in elderly pts. Aims: In a real-world cohort of PV pts treated with Rux, we investigated whether the efficacy and safety of Rux were comparable in pts who initiated therapy when aged ≥75 years compared with younger pts. Methods: After IRB approval, clinical/laboratory data of 934 WHO2016-defined PV pts followed in 29 Hematology Centers were retrospectively collected. Of them, 168 (17.9%) were considered resistant/intolerant to HU at any time during follow-up by responsible physician and shifted to Rux as second-line therapy. Results: Among the 168 pts treated with Rux, 42 (25%, median age 78.2 years) were aged ≥75 yrs at Rux start, 74 (44%, median age 67.7) were aged 60-74 and 52 (31%, median age 53) were No significant differences were observed between the 3 groups, apart from a lower need for phlebotomies in pts aged ≥75 yrs and lower presence of palpable spleen in older pts (age ≥60), that more frequently switched to Rux due to HU intolerance (Table 1). Median duration of HU treatment was 41.0 months (IQR 14.6 - 85.8), with a trend for a longer median treatment duration in pts aged ≥75 [61.0 months (IQR 21.5 - 89.6) vs 35.9 months (IQR 13.4 - 79.6), p=0.04]. Rux starting dose was similar across age groups; however, more elderly pts underwent Rux dose reductions during follow-up (45.2% in pts aged ≥75 vs 28.6% in younger pts, p=0.04). Responses during Rux therapy are reported in Table 2, with no significant differences between the 3 groups at any time. In the overall cohort, response on PV-related symptoms at 6 and 12 months was significantly higher in pts who switched to Rux because of HU intolerance; however, this difference was not observed in pts aged ≥75 yrs. As to the most common hematologic Rux-related toxicities, grade 3-4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in only 2 (1.2%) and 5 (3%) pts, with no difference across age groups (p=0.45 and p=0.18). However, any grade anemia and thrombocytopenia during Rux were more frequently observed in pts aged ≥75 (68.3% vs 51.7% of anemia, p=0.06 and 12.2% vs 3.5% of thrombocytopenia in younger pts, p=0.04). Nineteen and 4 pts experienced infectious and thrombotic complications during Rux with incidence rates of 0.59 and 0.12 per 100 patient-months, respectively, comparably in younger and older (≥75) pts (p=0.75 and p=0.29, respectively). Notably, 6 infections were herpes simplex/zoster virus, comparably distributed between the 3 groups (p=0.60). Permanent Rux discontinuation was needed in 14 pts (8.3%) after a median Rux exposure of 7.8 months (IQR 4.6 - 17.6) (incidence: 0.41 per 100 pts/months). Discontinuation was comparable between age groups, with Rux stop in 4 pts aged ≥75 yrs and 10 younger pts (2.4% vs 5.2% at 8 months, log-rank p=0.75). At last follow-up, 2 pts had died (1 from 2 nd neoplasia after 19.1 months from Rux start and 1 from acute leukemia after 3.3 years), both pts aged 60-74 yrs. Conclusions. In this real-world analysis, use of Rux in HU resistant/intolerant elderly PV pts was effective and safe despite the more frequent need for dose reductions. Older age should not discourage Rux therapy, but stricter hematological monitoring may be suggested. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Breccia: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Cavo: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palandri: AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: The presence of peripheral blasts (PB) is a negative prognostic factor in patients (pts) with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (PMF/SMF) and PB ≥4% was associated with a particularly unfavorable prognosis (Masarova L et al, Cancer 2020). Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the JAK1/2 inhibitor most used for treatment of MF-related splenomegaly and symptoms. Its role has not been assessed in correlation with PB. Aims: To evaluate the impact of PB percentage on RUX efficacy and prognosis Methods: After IRB approval, the "RUX-MF" retrospective study collected 804 RUX-treated chronic-phase (CP, defined as PB Comparisons of quantitative variables between the 3 groups were carried out by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests while association between categorical variables was tested by the χ2 test. Variables significantly associated to RUX stop/leukemic transformation (LT)/overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (Log-rank test) were considered for multivariable analyses, carried out using the Cox regression model, with evaluation of the model's performance in terms of goodness of fit. Results: Pts were categorized according to PB at RUX start: PB-0 (no PB; n. 487, 61.3%), PB-5 (PB 1-5%; n. 283, 35.8%), and PB-9 (PB 6-9%; n. 24, 2.9%). Pts characteristics at RUX start were: median age 68.1y (24-89); males 58.1%; PMF 52.5%; JAK2, CALR and MPL mutated: 80.5%, 13.1% and 2% (4.4% triple negative), high DIPSS: 7.6%; PLT25 x10 9/l: 10.8%/16.4%; spleen length ≥10 cm: 47.8%, TSS ≥20: 60.6%; ≥1/≥2 high-risk mutation (HMR): 69/18 out of 167 evaluable (41.3%/10.8%); fibrosis grade ≥2: 77.9%; starting/cumulative RUX dose ≥15 mg BID: 61.4%/52.6%. Higher PB count was associated to high DIPSS risk (PB-0: 1.9%, PB-5: 16.2%, PB-9: 21.7%, p At 3 and 6 mos, 26.9% and 30.4% of evaluable pts achieved a SR, while 59.7% and 68.1% were in SyR, respectively. At 3 mos, SR (PB-0: 31.8%, PB-5: 20.6%, PB-9: 10%, p=0.001) and SyR (PB-0: 62.9%, PB-5: 55.5%, PB-9: 36.8%, p=0.02) were less frequently achieved by PB-5 and PB-9 pts compared to PB-0 pts. This association remained significant for SR at 6 mos (PB-0: 35%, PB-5: 23.9%, PB-9: 14.3%, p=0.006) and for both SR (p=0.003) and SyR (p=0.01) at any time. After a median RUX exposure of 1.5 y (0.1-8.9), 491 (61.8%) pts stopped RUX, 110 (13.9%) had a LT and 365 (46%) died. In univariate analysis, at 2y PB-9 pts had higher rates of RUX stop (73.9% vs 40.8% and 34.3% in PB-5 and PB-0 pts, log-rank p In multivariable analysis, PB-9 pts confirmed their association with: 1) RUX stop (HR 3.74, 95%CI 1.51-3.70, p20 (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.05-2.61, p=0.03), and HMR≥2 (HR 2.69, 95%CI 1.26-4.47, p=0.007); 2) LT (HR 3.71, 95%CI 1.71-8.04, p Conclusions: CP-MF pts with PB>5% have a worse response to RUX and a worse outcome. Personalized approaches beyond RUX monotherapy may be useful in this context. Further clinical trials evaluating combination strategies and new drugs are required. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy. Abruzzese: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iurlo: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Bonifacio: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cuneo: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pane: AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis: Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Novartis Pharma SAS;: Research Funding; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK , Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie; Amgen; Novartis, GSK, Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Lemoli: Celgene: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; Jazz, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Servier: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cavo: Bristol-Myers Squib: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Accommodations, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

NA

Introduction: Hydroxyurea (HU) is the most used cytoreductive therapy (tx) for patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV). However, many pts may have suboptimal responses (SubOR) and/or toxicity (TOX) to HU. After HU, Ruxolitinib (RUX) may achieve hematocrit (HCT) and spleen reductions, but other tx are also available, mainly busulfan (BUS) and interferons (IFN). Aims: In a large cohort of PV pts, we investigated if: 1) type of SubOR to HU influenced subsequent tx strategy; 2) differential tx had an impact on overall survival (OS). Methods: After IRB approval, clinical/laboratory data of 2016 WHO-defined PV pts from 21 European Hematology Centers were retrospectively collected. SubOR included ≥1 of the following criteria after ≥3 mos of HU: WBC/PLT count >10/400 x109/l, need for phlebotomies (PHL); splenomegaly and/or symptoms persistence/occurrence (Barosi G et al, Blood 2009). Only pts with stable SubOR were included in this analysis. Since a complete response was never achieved, the index date (ID) was set at 3 mos from HU start in all pts (Barosi G et al, BJH 2009). OS was calculated from the ID by Cox analysis with age>80, adjusted with left truncation from PV diagnosis. Results: At data cut-off date (June 2020), 808 PV pts were collected; 688 received HU. Among the 452 (65.7%) pts who presented a stable SubOR to HU, 41 did not receive any tx for PV due to early death or progression to BP/MF and were excluded from this analysis. Baseline characteristics of the 411 evaluable pts were: median age: 65 yrs (21- 87); males: 54%; median (range) WBC/PLT count, x109/l: 10 (1.1-38)/465 (139-1209); median Hb (g/dl)/HCT (%): 18.6/56 (males); 17.6/54 (females); palpable splenomegaly: 38%; symptoms: 80.5%; pruritus: 42%. A previous thrombosis occurred in 104 (25.3%) pts. At least one cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF: smoke, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and overweight) was present in 325 pts (79.1%). After a median follow-up of 4.8 yrs (0.5-27.6) from HU start, 104 (25.3%) switched to RUX (HU-RUX), 18 (4.4%) switched to another agent (HU-other, including IFN, BUS, PHL only), and 289 (70.3%) continued HU (HU-alone). Pts with baseline palpable spleen (p While 331 (80.5%) pts had a stable SubOR without TOX, 80 (19.5%) had also TOX. Notably, pts with only SubOR more frequently continued HU (p In 45.5% of pts, the SubOR was related only to uncontrolled WBC/PLT/HCT, while 16.1% of pts had an optimal hematological control but presented spleen/symptoms; the remaining 38.4% of pts had both uncontrolled myeloproliferation and spleen/symptoms. The presence of both uncontrolled myeloproliferation and spleen/symptoms significantly predicted RUX switch (p Investigating the SubOR criteria individually among the HU-alone/other and the HU-RUX groups, we found that uncontrolled leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis (p After the ID, 31 pts died. HU-RUX pts presented increased OS compared to HU-alone/other pts (p=0.03). Conclusions. This study revealed a high rate of SubOR to HU, possibly also affected by low HU doses, and a lack of urgency to change the tx in these pts, with >70% of pts continuing HU despite the stable SubOR. Particularly, good tolerance to HU, absence of splenomegaly and pruritus, and older age were the main factors against a tx change. Notably, despite HCT>45% is associated with worse outcome (Marchioli R, NEJM 2013), PHL need did not significantly trigger tx change. The better OS in the HU-RUX group is presumably multifactorial and requires further confirmation. Overall, this analysis points out the need to improve HU management and response evaluations, weighing appropriate tx strategies in case of SubOR. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Benevolo:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Heidel:Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Crugnola:BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Pane:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis pharma SAS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Semenzato:Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Lemoli:Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction: The outcome of patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF) who discontinue ruxolitinib (RUX) is poor with scarce therapeutic possibilities (Palandri et al, 2020). However, some evidences suggest that pts may respond to a rechallenge of RUX after drug stop (Gerds et al, 2018). Aims: To investigate in a real-world context: 1) frequency and reasons for rechallenge; 2) therapeutic effects of rechallenge; 3) impact of rechallenge on overall survival (OS) Methods: After IRB approval, a clinical database was created in 20 European Hematology Centers including now retrospective data of 703 MF pts who started RUX from Jan 2011 to Nov 2019. Only chronic phase (CP) pts who stopped RUX for ≥14 days and survived ≥30 days after discontinuation were included. A specific survey collected clinical/laboratory data at RUX stop and at rechallenge, reasons for discontinuation and treatments before rechallenge. OS was estimated from the date of the first/only RUX discontinuation to last contact (log-rank test). Results: A total of 219 CP pts was evaluable for this study. In 60 (27.4%) pts, RUX was re-challenged for ≥14 days after the first discontinuation (RUX-again), while 159 (72.6%) pts discontinued RUX permanently (RUX-stop). The median time from RUX start to stop was of 16.5 and 12.3 mos for RUX-again and RUX-stop pts, respectively (p=0.41). At RUX start, characteristics of RUX-again were: median age 67y (24-88); males 61.7%; PMF 53.3%; median Hb 10.2 g/dl; median PLT/WBC: 249/12.6 x109/l; median RUX starting dose: 15mg BID. Baseline characteristics of RUX-again and RUX-stop pts were comparable. In the 60 RUX-again pts, reasons for discontinuation included loss of/inadequate response (18 pts, 30%) and toxicity (42 pts, 70%). Toxicity included G3-4 thrombocytopenia (38.1%), anemia (26.2%), infections (21.4%), other (14.3%). Conversely, RUX-stop pts discontinued RUX mainly due to loss of/inadequate response (75 pts, 47.2%), while intolerable toxicity occurred in 69 pts (43.4%) (p=0.004) and other causes in 9.4%. At first RUX discontinuation, 35.7% of RUX-again pts presented with large (>10 cm) splenomegaly; median Total Symptoms Score (TSS) was 10 (TSS>20 in 30.4% of pts). The median duration of temporary RUX discontinuation was 2 mos (range 0.5-71.1). During RUX stop, 65% of RUX-again pts did not receive any therapy, 15% received only palliation (steroids, hydroxyurea), while 11.7% switched to investigational agents, 3.3% underwent splenectomy and 5% allogeneic transplantation. Compared to disease status at first RUX stop, at RUX restart there was a significant increase of pts with large splenomegaly and high TSS, while the PLT count was higher and RUX dose significantly lower (Table 1). The median duration of RUX rechallenge was 7.5 mos (0.5-72.7). During the rechallenge, 44.6% and 48.3% pts improved spleen and symptoms, and there was a significant increase in pts with TSS reduction (p=0.01); 8 pts (13.3%) continued RUX with stable/worsening spleen size and improvement in TSS. Conversely, 26.8% and 20% of pts had increase in spleen size and in symptoms, respectively. While Hb levels remained stable, PLT count significantly decreased during rechallenge (p The reasons for temporary discontinuation had no impact on the reduction of spleen/symptoms during rechallenge and on OS. However, comparing RUX-again and RUX-stop pts, RUX-again pts showed a better OS, with a median survival of 41.1 mos and 23.7, respectively in the 2 cohorts (Fig. 1). Conclusions: This real-world study highlights that RUX rechallenge is quite common in CP-MF pts, involving almost 30% of treated pts, particularly when the discontinuation is due to toxicity. The temporary discontinuation, while improving PLT count, generally caused a significant increase in disease burden. After rechallenge, almost 50% of pts achieved clinical responses regardless of reason of first discontinuation. This residual disease control activity, that correlated with improved OS, should be weighed up also given the new therapeutic possibilities available in these pts. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Benevolo:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfize: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Heidel:CTI: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pane:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Novartis pharma SAS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo:janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Semenzato:Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Lemoli:AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction Hydroxyurea (HU) is worldwide used in the current clinical practice as first line treatment in high risk patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV). However, its efficacy has been seldom evaluated in the real-life setting. Aims The present study aims to address the role of Complete Peripheral Recovery (CPR) as useful response criteria in PV patients treated with HU in a large cohort of unselected patients. Methods After IRB approval, data of 846 PV patients, revised according to WHO2008/2016 and followed in 21 European Hematology Centers, were retrospectively collected. Definition of CPR during HU treatment included all the following criteria: hematocrit (Ht) level ≤45% (≤3 phlebotomies per year allowed), white blood cells (WBC) count ≤10 x109/l, platelets (PLT) count ≤ 400 x109/l. Spleen size and symptoms were not considered in the definition of CPR. Event-free survival (EFS), considering as event evolution into blast phase (BP) or myelofibrosis (MF) and death from any cause, was calculated from HU start to last contact/event by Cox analysis with age≥70y. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of HU to last contact/death (log-rank p). Results Among the 846 patients of the entire cohort, 724 (85.5%) were treated with HU after a median time from PV diagnosis of 2.6 months [interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 - 19.6]: the main clinical features of these 724 patients at diagnosis are reported in the Table 1. Starting doses of HU, available in 709 patients, were 1000 mg/day in 38 (5.4%). Twenty-five patients were not evaluable for response to HU. Among the remaining 699 patients, 426 (60.9%) achieved a CPR after a median time from HU start of 4.9 months (IQR 2.1 - 15.7) while 273 (39.1%) never achieved a CPR. Among the 426 patients who achieved CPR, 115 (26.9%) needed a treatment period >12 months before obtaining the CPR. The main baseline clinical features of patients achieving or not CPR are reported in the Table 1: female sex, older age at diagnosis and at HU start, lower WBC count, no phlebotomies need and no palpable spleen were all associated in univariate analysis with CPR achievement. During HU treatment, a thrombotic episode occurred in 36 patients achieving CPR (8.4%) compared to 16 patients without CPR (5.8%) (p=0.162). Among 426 patients achieving CPR, 20 (4.6%) evolved in MF and 10 (2.3%) evolved in BP: among 273 patients without CPR, 20 (7.3%) evolved in MF and 9 (3.3%) evolved in BF (p=0.134 and 0.451, respectively). Ten-year EFS was 79.2% [95%Confidence Interval (CI) 72.1 - 84.8] in patients achieving CPR compared to 67.3% (95%CI 56.9 - 75.7) in patients without CPR (p=0.001) (Fig. 1). Ten-year OS was 80.5% (95%CI 73.9 - 87.1) in patients achieving CPR compared to 74.4% (95%CI 65.6 - 83.2) in patients without CPR (p=0.116). Conclusions In the current clinical practice, HU is effective in inducing CPR in about two thirds of patients with PV treated front-line. CPR is more frequently achieved by patients with lower disease burden, including lower WBC count, and less frequent PHL need and palpable spleen. Notably, >25% of responding patients achieved CPR after >12 months from HU start, suggesting the need for a long period of HU therapy before efficacy evaluation. The clinical importance of CPR is highlighted by a significantly longer EFS in patients achieving this type of response. Disclosures Breccia: Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Benevolo:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Pane:AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis pharma SAS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Semenzato:Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Palandri:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that may control myelofibrosis (MF)-related splenomegaly and symptoms and can be prescribed regardless of age. While aging is known to correlate with worse prognosis, no specific analysis is available to confirm that ruxolitinib is suitable for use in older populations. A clinical database was created in 23 European Haematology Centres and retrospective data on 291 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib when aged ≥65 years were analysed in order to assess the impact of age and molecular genotype on responses, toxicities and survival. Additional mutations were evaluated by a next generation sequencing (NGS) approach in 69 patients with available peripheral blood samples at the start of ruxolitinib treatment. Compared to older (age 65-74 years) patients, elderly (≥75 years) showed comparable responses to ruxolitinib, but higher rates of drug-induced anaemia and thrombocytopenia and worse survival. Nonetheless, the ruxolitinib discontinuation rate was comparable in the two age groups. Number and types of molecular abnormalities were comparable across age groups. However, the presence of high molecular risk (HMR) mutations significantly affected survival, counterbalancing the effect of aging. Indeed, elderly patients with

Although infectious complications represent a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), little is known about their incidence, outcome and risk factors. We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 507 MF patients, diagnosed between 1980 and 2014 in five Italian hematology centers, to define the epidemiology of infections and describe the impact of ruxolitinib (RUX) treatment. Overall, 112 patients (22%) experienced 160 infectious events (grade 3-4, 45%) for an incidence rate of 3.9% per patient-year. Infections were mainly bacterial (78%) and involving the respiratory tract (52% of cases). Also, viral (11%) and fungal infections (2%) were recorded. Overall, infections were fatal in 9% of the cases. Among baseline features, high/intermediate-2 IPSS category (HR 1.8, 95%CI:1.2-2.7; p=0.02) and spleen length ≥10 cm below left costal margin (HR 1.6, 95%CI:1.1-2.5; p=0.04) were associated with higher infectious risk in multivariate analysis. Overall, the rate of infections was higher in the cohort of 128 RUX-treated patients (44% vs. 20%, p

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) are prone to the development of second cancers, but the factors associated with these events have been poorly explored. In an international nested case-control study, we recruited 647 patients with carcinoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma diagnosed concurrently or after MPN diagnosis. Up to 3 control patients without a history of cancer and matched with each case for center, sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of diagnosis, and MPN disease duration were included (n = 1234). Cases were comparable to controls for MPN type, driver mutations and cardiovascular risk factors. The frequency of thrombosis preceding MPN was similar for cases and controls (P = .462). Thrombotic events after MPN and before second cancer were higher in cases than in controls (11.6% vs 8.1%; P = .013), because of a higher proportion of arterial thromboses (6.2% vs 3.7%; P = .015). After adjustment for confounders, the occurrence of arterial thrombosis remained independently associated with the risk of carcinoma (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.41), suggesting that MPN patients experiencing arterial events after MPN diagnosis deserve careful clinical surveillance for early detection of carcinoma. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03745378.

Introduction Malignancy can be heralded by unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) but also by arterial thrombosis. To date it is unknown whether this association is present also in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), in which arterial thrombosis is more frequent that venous thrombosis and solid tumors are reported with an increased frequency. The MPN-K nested case-control study addressed the impact of cytoreductive drugs on the risk of developing second cancer in MPN patients (Barbui T et al, Leukemia 2019); here we re-examined the study database to evaluate the frequency and type of vascular complications in MPN patients with second cancer excluding leukemia and to establish whether arterial and venous thrombosis during follow-up after diagnosis of MPN could predict the occurrence of a second cancer. Patients and methods Cases were patients with second cancer diagnosed concurrently or subsequent to the diagnosis of MPN. Controls were MPN patients without second cancer. For each case with second cancer, up to 3 cancer-free controls were matched by each center for sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of MPN diagnosis, and MPN disease duration. Each set consisting of one case and their matched-controls had a similar observational period (from MPN diagnosis until the index date of diagnosis for the second cancer). The study included 647 cases with second cancer (carcinoma, non-melanoma-skin cancers, hematological secondary cancer and melanoma). The most frequent category was carcinoma (n=426, 65.8%). Cases were comparable with the 1,234 matched controls for demographics, type of MPN, and exposure to potential confounders such as mutational profile, abnormal karyotype and cardiovascular risk factors. The thrombotic events of interest were ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attacks, acute coronary syndromes, peripheral arterial thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis (including thrombosis of cerebral and splanchnic veins) and pulmonary embolism. Thrombosis had to be concurrent with or in the 2 years before MPN diagnosis or occurring after MPN diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of either arterial or venous thrombosis from MPN diagnosis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared between cases and controls using the log-rank test. A conditional logistic regression model estimated the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of second cancer associated with the occurrence of thrombosis before/at diagnosis of MPN and during follow-up. Other covariates were patient age, cardiovascular risk factors, the JAK2V617F mutation, and treatment during follow-up. Results Approximately 20% of either MPN cases or controls had thrombosis before MPN or at diagnosis (19.8% vs. 21.1%, respectively, p=0.462). After a median observation time from diagnosis of MPN to an index date of 4.5 years (interquartile range 1.5-8.2) in cases and 3.7 years (interquartile range 1.5-7.5) in controls, cases showed a percentage of thrombosis higher than in controls (75/647, 11.6% vs. 100/1234, 8.1%, respectively, p=0.013). Approximately one-third of thrombosis preceding cancer occurred in the 12 months before the diagnosis of second cancer (22/75, 29.3%). The excess of thrombosis in cases was due to a higher frequency of arterial thrombosis (6.2% vs. 3.7%, p=0.015), whereas no significant difference was found for venous thrombosis (5.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.277). While the cumulative incidence of venous thrombosis over time was similar among cases and controls (p=0.864), the cumulative incidence of arterial thrombosis was higher in cases with second cancer (p=0.006) (Figure 1). The excess of arterial thrombosis after MPN diagnosis was limited to cases with carcinoma (6.8% vs 3.9%, p=0.027). In a multivariable model, arterial thrombosis during the follow-up was confirmed to be an independent predictor factor for carcinoma, with an odds ratio of 1.97 (95%CI 1.14-3.41, p=0.015). Conclusions. These findings reveal an association of arterial thrombosis with subsequent second cancer (namely carcinoma) in MPN patients. A possible biological plausibility for this link may be related to an underlying common pathogenic mechanism such as an aberrant inflammatory response consistently found in MPN. This observation may have practical implications and suggests careful clinical surveillance for early diagnosis of second cancer in MPN patients with arterial thrombosis during the follow-up. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Bonifacio:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Rumi:novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lunghi:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. McMullin:Italopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiko Sanyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griesshammer:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rambaldi:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

We designed a trial in which postremission therapy of young patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was decided combining cytogenetics/genetics and postconsolidation levels of minimal residual disease (MRD). After induction and consolidation, favorable-risk patients (FR) were to receive autologous stem cell transplant (AuSCT) and poor-risk patients (PR) allogeneic stem cell transplant (AlloSCT). Intermediate-risk patients (IR) were to receive AuSCT or AlloSCT depending on the postconsolidation levels of MRD. Three hundred sixty-one of 500 patients (72%) achieved a complete remission, 342/361 completed the consolidation phase and were treatment allocated: 165 (48%) to AlloSCT (122 PR, 43 IR MRD-positive) plus 23 rescued after salvage therapy, for a total of 188 candidates; 150 (44%) to AuSCT (115 FR, 35 IR MRD-negative) plus 27 IR patients (8%) with no leukemia-associated phenotype, for a total of 177 candidates. Overall, 110/177 (62%) and 130/188 (71%) AuSCT or AlloSCT candidates received it, respectively. Two-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the whole series was 56% and 54%, respectively. Two-year OS and DFS were 74% and 61% in the FR category, 42% and 45% in the PR category, 79% and 61% in the IR MRD-negative category, and 70% and 67% in the IR MRD-positive category. In conclusion, AuSCT may still have a role in FR and IR MRD-negative categories. In the IR MRD-positive category, AlloSCT prolongs OS and DFS to equal those of the FR category. Using all the available sources of stem cells, AlloSCT was delivered to 71% of the candidates.This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01452646 and EudraCT as #2010-023809-36.

We conducted a large international nested case-control study including 1881 patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Cases (n = 647) were patients with second cancer (SC: carcinoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma) and controls (n = 1234) were patients without SC, matched with cases for sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of MPN diagnosis, and MPN disease duration. The aim was to evaluate the risk of SC after exposure to cytoreductive drugs. Patients exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) (median: 3 years) had a risk of SC similar to unexposed patients (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.82-1.38). In contrast, in cancer-specific stratified multivariable analysis, HU had two-fold higher risk of non-melanoma (NM) skin cancer (OR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.15-4.51). A significantly higher risk of NM-skin cancer was also documented for pipobroman (OR = 3.74, 95% CI 1.00-14.01), ruxolitinib (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.18-12.75), and for drug combination (OR = 3.47, 95% CI 1.55-7.75). These three drugs did not show excess risk of carcinoma and hematological second cancer compared with unexposed patients. Exposure to interferon, busulfan, and anagrelide did not increase the risk. In summary, while it is reassuring that no excess of carcinoma was documented, a careful dermatologic active surveillance before and during the course of treatments is recommended.

The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.

Introduction: Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive red cell production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in increased thrombotic risk, presence of systemic symptoms and reduced overall survival (OS). Abnormal body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities, as categorized by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), were found to influence treatment success and survival in several hematological malignancies, including myelofibrosis (MF). We evaluated the impact of CCI and BMI on the outcome of PV pts on the basis of real-world data. Methods: A network called "PV-NET" started in January 2019 including clinical/laboratory data of 2016 WHO-defined PV pts diagnosed and followed in 16 European Hematology Centers. Data cut-off was June 2019. OS was calculated from PV diagnosis to last contact or death (log-rank p). Cumulative incidences of events (thromboses, hemorrhages, infections, second neoplasia, and evolution into blast phase [BP] or MF) were conducted with Fine & Gray model with death as competing risk. Therapies were treated as time-to-event variables. Results: A total of 530 PV pts were collected. Median follow-up was 5.4 yrs (0.5-34) (total observation: 3633 pt-yrs). Main characteristics at diagnosis were: median age: 62.4 yrs (18.3-89.5); males: 53.4%; median (range) leukocyte/platelet count, x109/l: 9.8 (1.1-33)/448 (143-1386); median hemoglobin (g/dl)/hematocrit (%): 18.6/56 (males); 17.6/54.4 (females). Sixty-four (12.1%) and 34 (6.4%) pts had a thrombosis prior to or at diagnosis, respectively. At least one cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) among smoke, diabetes, and hypertension was present in 343 pts (64.7%). Age-adjusted CCI was 0 (15.9%), 1 (18.9%), 2 (23.8%), and ≥3 (41.5%). Median BMI was 24 (17.4-37.3); 3.3%, 51.2%, 35.9% and 9.6% were underweight (BMI During follow-up, 64 all-grades thromboses (arterial, 56.3%), 29 bleedings, 56 infections and 66 second neoplasia were recorded. Overall, 13 pts progressed to BP and 32 to MF. Thirty-three pts died, because of BP (27.3%), second neoplasia (24.2%), MF (15.2%), old age (9.1%), thrombosis (6.1%) or other causes (18.1%). Incidence rates per 100 pt-yrs of all-grades events were: 1.5 (thromboses), 0.7 (bleedings), 1.4 (infections), 1.6 (second neoplasia), 0.4 (BP) and 0.9 (MF). Pts with CCI≥2 had a significantly higher rate of second neoplasia (p=0.01) and infections (p=0.03) over time and a worse OS (p Pts received phlebotomies (PHL) (92.1%), hydroxyurea (HU) (82.6%), interferon (IFN) (7.9%), busulfan (2.6%), and ruxolitinib (RUX) (10.9%). Pts with CCI≥2 were significantly less treated with IFN (p18.5; both underweight pts discontinued IFN due to intolerance. Overall, 0.8%, 19.4%, and 38.1% of pts had grade≥2 toxicity and/or stopped therapy because of intolerance during PHL, HU, and IFN, respectively. IFN intolerance tended to be more frequent in pts with CCI≥2 (p=0.06). Conclusions: CCI and BMI are rarely assessed in PV but may influence treatment strategy and survival. Particularly, CCI/BMI oriented the choice of IFN, but not RUX. Overweight PV pts had an improved survival, mimicking the "obesity paradox" observed in non-malignant CV diseases (Elagizi, et al. 2018). However, BMI may not be a reliable measure of adiposity. In cancer pts, an under/normal-weight may mask a hypercatabolic state with lean mass loss caused by a more aggressive disease, as supported by a higher rate of MF evolutions in pts with BMI Disclosures Benevolo: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Latagliata:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heidel:Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio:Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cuneo:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Hospira: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Palandri:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction. Blast phase (BP) is the terminal and most incurable phase of myelofibrosis (MF) and occurs in a not negligible fraction of patients (pts). In the pre-ruxolitinib (RUX) era, peripheral blasts, thrombocytopenia, unfavorable cytogenetics, and high risk category were identified as predictors of BP. RUX is the standard of care for symptomatic MF; however, information on clinical/laboratory correlates of BP in RUX-treated pts is not available. Aims. The primary objective of the study is to assess real-world data on incidence, risk factors and outcome of BP in RUX-treated MF pts. Methods. A multicentre observational retrospective study on RUX-treated MF pts was conducted in 20 European Hematology Centers. Data were extracted from an electronic database that included consecutive pts treated with RUX from June 2011. Data cut-off was June 2019. Risk category was assessed at RUX start according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (DIPSS) or the Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET Collaboration Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) in pts with post-Polycythemia Vera (PV)/post-Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) MF (secondary MF, SMF). A time-to-event (BP) analysis was conducted with Fine & Gray model with death/time of stem cell transplant as competing risks. Variables tested for association with BP were: age≥65yr, sex, transfusion-dependency, PLT Results . Overall, 589 MF pts were included and observed for 1833 pt-yrs from RUX start (median, 35.4 mos). Diagnosis was PMF in 304 pts (51.6%), PPV-MF in 164 pts (27.8%) or PET-MF in 121 (20.6%); 58.4% males. Molecular status was: JAK2V617F (82.5%), CALR (11.3%) and MPLW515K/L (1.1%); 5.1% were triple negatives. Overall, 368 (62.5%) pts received ≥1 cytoreductive therapy before RUX, specifically: HU, n. 357; alkylating agents, n. 47; anagrelide, n. 33; and IFN, n. 29. Median time from MF diagnosis to RUX start was 1.3 yrs. DIPSS for the whole cohort was: INT-1 (52.9%), INT-2 (40.1%), and HIGH (7%). DIPSS distribution in PMF pts was: INT-1 (47.8%), INT-2 (45.7%), and HIGH (6.5%), while SMF pts were categorized at LOW (11.1%), INT-1 (43.1%), INT-2 (31.2%) and HIGH (14.6%) risk according to the MYSEC-PM. Overall, 65 (11%) developed BP. In 61 pts, BP caused RUX withdrawal after a median time of 1.2 yrs (0.7-6.2); in 4 pts BP occurred after RUX stop (median time: 2.4 yrs). BP incidence rate was 3.6 x100 pt-yrs and was comparable in PMF and SMF (p=0.1). In univariate analysis, the probability of BP evolution for the PMF cohort was significantly reduced by previous IFN use (p=0.001). In SMF, predictors for BP in univariate analysis were PLT High DIPSS risk significantly predicted BP in PMF (p=0.04, HR [95% CI]: 2.6 [1.1-6.5]) but not in SMF (p=0.40). In this latter cohort, only the MYSEC-PM was associated with BP (p=0.02, HR 1.7 [95% CI]: [1.1-2.8]) (Fig.1). Estimated HRs, in reference to the lower score category, were: 1.10 for INT-1, 1.82 for INT-2, and 4.04 for HIGH risk. HR for HIGH risk, comparing to all lower risk groups, was 3.53 (95% CI: 1.53-8.11). Overall, 54 (81.8%) BP pts died and median survival was 2.8 mos. Survival after BP was not influenced by type of MF, previous response to RUX, and type of salvage treatment. Conclusions. Thrombocytopenia and peripheral blasts at RUX start identified pts at higher risk of BP in SMF, while previous IFN use was associated with reduced BP evolution in both PMF and SMF, suggesting a possible disease-modifying action of this agent. Also, this analysis supports the ability of MYSEC-PM in predicting BP in pts with SMF. Despite RUX use, outcome after BP remained dismal, confirming the need for newer treatment strategies. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iurlo:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sgherza:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Isidori:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy. Latagliata:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Trawinska:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavo:takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Hospira: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria.

Introduction: Hydroxyurea (HU) is the recommended treatment in patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) at high thrombotic risk. In 2013, European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines defined criteria for response to HU including hematology and clinical parameters (Barosi G, Blood 2013). Yet, estimates of ELN response rates and of their influence on clinical outcomes are lacking. Methods: The "PV-NET" is a European multicentre observational clinical study including now 530 cases of PV followed in 16 European Hematology Centers. Inclusion criteria are: 2016 WHO diagnosis of PV; availability of clinical/laboratory data at diagnosis and during follow-up; age≥18 yrs. Data cut-off was June 2019. A time-to-event (thrombosis, hemorrhage, evolution into blast phase [BP] or myelofibrosis [MF]) analysis was calculated from HU start with Fine & Gray model with death as competing risk. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from HU start to last contact/death (log-rank p). Response to HU was defined per ELN criteria: Complete (CR): Hematocrit (Hct) Results: Overall, 438 required HU and were observed for 3069 pt-yrs. Characteristics at diagnosis were: median age: 62.3 yrs (22.3-89.5); males: 52.5%; median (range) WBC/PLT count, x109/l: 10.8 (1.1-33)/490 (143-1070); median hemoglobin (g/dl)/Hct (%): 18.6/56 (males); 17.6/54.7 (females); 56 (12.8%) and 30 (6.9%) pts had a thrombosis prior to or at diagnosis, respectively. Overall, 327 (74.7%) pts reported at least one PV-related symptom and 166 pts (37.9%) had a palpable spleen (≥10 cm: 8.4%). Median time from diagnosis to HU start was 2.9 (0.07-238) mos. At HU start, 350 (79.9%) pts were at high thrombotic risk. HU was used first-line in 426 (97.3%) pts and second-line in 12 pts (10 pts after interferon). Median HU dose was 0.5 g/d (0.25-2); 21.7% of pts received ≥ 1 g/d. After HU start, 36 pts presented 50 all-grades thromboses (arterial: 50%; grade ≥3: 51.1%), for an incidence rate of 1.6 per 100 pt-yrs (grade ≥3: 0.7). Thromboses were: deep/superficial vein thrombosis (32%/10%), acute myocardial infarction (12%), stroke (10%), transient ischemic attack (12%), spleen infarction (12%), retinal artery occlusion (4%), pulmonary embolisms (6%), and one splanchnic vein thrombosis. Thirteen bleedings (gastrointestinal: 61.5%; mucocutaneous: 30.8%; one hemothorax) occurred in 11 pts, for an incidence rate of 0.5 (grade ≥3: 69.2%). Overall, 12 progressions to BP and 29 MF evolutions were recorded (incidence rates: 0.5 and 1.3 X 100 pt-yr); 31 pts died. At the time of best response to HU, 62.3% of pts had at least one elevated hematology value; 231 (52.7%) pts continued PHL during HU (median PHL per yr: 2.5 [1-4]) (Fig.1). Per ELN criteria, 125 pts (28.6%) and 228 (52%) achieved a CR and PR, respectively, while 85 (19.4%) had no response (NR). The type of ELN response to HU (CR vs PR vs NR) did not affect the probability of thrombosis (p=0.56), hemorrhages (p=0.70), evolution to BP (p=0.60) or MF (p=0.14), and OS (p=0.37). After a median follow-up from HU start of 4.2 yrs, 95 (21.7%) patients discontinued HU. The percentage of pts who discontinued HU was 8.4%, 16.2% and 19.4% at 5, 10 and 15 yrs and was significantly lower in CR pts compared to pts with PR and NR (p=0.02). The overall HU discontinuation rate was 4.1 per 100 pt-yr. Reasons for HU discontinuations were: failure to control hct and/or leucocytosis and/or thrombocytosis (16.9%), failure to reduce splenomegaly and/or symptoms (7.4%), MF (12.6%) or BP (4.2%) evolution, second neoplasia (4.2%). A total of 52 pts (54.7%) discontinued due to HU-related toxicity, specifically: skin lesions (46.3%), oral aftosis (14.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (12.2%), fever (9.8%), thrombocytopenia (9.8%), and anemia (7.3%). Survival was not influenced by HU discontinuation (p=0.50). Conclusions: ELN-defined CR was rarely achieved by HU-treated pts, mainly due to low HU doses and PHL requirement, and did not influence outcome parameters. These data outline the relatively low utility in the current clinical practice of ELN criteria for the evaluation of HU treatment; their implementation would be relevant to base therapy changes on prognostic considerations. Finally, around 20% of pts discontinued HU, confirming that there is room for improvement in PV treatment strategy. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Elli:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Tiribelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Cavazzini:Pfize: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Hospira: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cuneo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavo:sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Latagliata:Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

We analyzed 597 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) who presented transient ischemic attacks (TIA, n = 270) or ischemic stroke (IS, n = 327). Treatment included aspirin, oral anticoagulants, and cytoreductive drugs. The composite incidence of recurrent TIA and IS, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and cardiovascular (CV) death was 4.21 and 19.2%, respectively at one and five years after the index event, an estimate unexpectedly lower than reported in the general population. Patients tended to replicate the first clinical manifestation (hazard ratio, HR: 2.41 and 4.41 for recurrent TIA and IS, respectively); additional factors for recurrent TIA were previous TIA (HR: 3.40) and microvascular disturbances (HR: 2.30); for recurrent IS arterial hypertension (HR: 4.24) and IS occurrence after MPN diagnosis (HR: 4.47). CV mortality was predicted by age over 60 years (HR: 3.98), an index IS (HR: 3.61), and the occurrence of index events after MPN diagnosis (HR: 2.62). Cytoreductive therapy was a strong protective factor (HR: 0.24). The rate of major bleeding was similar to the general population (0.90 per 100 patient-years). In conclusion, the long-term clinical outcome after TIA and IS in MPN appears even more favorable than in the general population, suggesting an advantageous benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic and cytoreductive treatment.

Patients with myelofibrosis at intermediate-1 risk according to the International Prognostic Score System are projected to a relatively long survival; nonetheless, they may carry significant splenomegaly and/or systemic constitutional symptoms that hamper quality of life and require treatment. Since registrative COMFORT studies included only patients at intermediate-2/high International Prognostic Score System risk, safety and efficacy data in intermediate-1 patients are limited. We report on 70 intermediate-1 patients treated with ruxolitinib according to standard clinical practice that were evaluated for response using the 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. At 6 months, rates of spleen and symptoms response were 54.7% and 80% in 64 and 65 evaluable patients, respectively. At 3 months, ruxolitinib-induced grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 40.6% and 2.9% of evaluable patients, respectively. Notably, 11 (15.9%) patients experienced at least one infectious event ≥grade 2. Most (82.6%) patients were still on therapy after a median follow-up of 27 months. These data support the need for standardized guidelines that may guide the decision to initiate ruxolitinib therapy in this risk category, balancing benefit expectations and potential adverse effects.

An accurate histological diagnosis may distinguish essential thrombocythaemia (ET) from early primary myelofibrosis (early-PMF), which is associated with worse outcome. Outcome of ET is also negatively affected by the presence of the JAK2V617F mutation. To investigate the impact of JAK2V617F mutation burden and histology on outcome, we collected 475 WHO-diagnosed ET (69.2%) or early-PMF JAK2V617F-positive patients followed in 4 Italian haematology centers. JAK2V617F allele burden was ≤50% in 90% and 87% of ET and early-PMF patients, respectively (P = .34). During follow-up, 32 (9.7%) ET and 18 (12.3%) early-PMF patients experienced 59 thrombotic events, and 27 patients (5.6%) and 6 (1.2%) patients evolved to myelofibrosis and acute leukemia, respectively. At last contact, 28 (5.8%) patients had died. In early-PMF compared to ET, the 10-year mortality rates (6.7% and 4.3%, P = .73), leukemic transformation rates (1.4% and 1.2%, P = .45), and thrombosis rates (16.7% and 12.2%, P = .12) were comparable. Only progression to overt myelofibrosis at 10 years was significantly worse (11.4% and 1.5%, P = .004). In multivariate analysis, a higher (>50%) JAK2V617F burden was significantly correlated with fibrotic progression and histology. Considering JAK2V617F-positive disease, a higher (>50%) JAK2V617F burden and histological classification are independent prognostic risk factors for disease progression. These findings reinforce the need for standardized detection of this mutation.

Recently, the myelofibrosis secondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC-PM) was introduced to assess prognosis in myelofibrosis (MF) secondary to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (post-PV and post-ET MF), replacing the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and/or Dynamic IPSS (DIPSS) that was applied for primary MF (PMF). In a cohort of 421 ruxolitinib (RUX)-treated patients (post-PV and post-ET MF: 44.2%), we evaluated the following: (1) disease phenotype, responses, and toxicity to RUX; and (2) performance of the MYSEC-PM in post-PV or post-ET ME. While the IPSS failed to correctly stratify post-PV or post-ET MF patients at diagnosis, the MYSEC-PM identified 4 risk categories projected at significantly different survival probability (P < .001). Additionally, the MYSEC-PM maintained a prognostic value in post-PV and post-ET MF also when used over time, at RUX start. Notably, the MYSEC-PM reclassified 41.8% and 13.6% of patients into a lower and higher risk category, respectively. Finally, patients at intermediate-1 risk had significantly higher spleen responses and lower hematological toxicities compared to higher risk patients. Compared to PMF, post-PV and post-ET MF presented a more hyperproliferative disease, with higher leukocyte and/or platelet count and hemoglobin levels both at diagnosis and at RUX start. Despite comparable response rates, post-PV and post-ET MF had lower rate of RUX-induced anemia and thrombocytopenia at 3 and 6 months. The study validates MYSEC-PM in post-PV and post-ET MF prognostication. Post-PV or post-ET MF represents a separate entity compared to PMF in terms of clinical manifestations and toxicity to RUX. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

In this prospective observational single-center study, 55 patients with essential thrombocythemia who were candidates for second line treatment with anagrelide (ANA) received a preliminary cardiovascular (CV) clinical, instrumental and biochemical evaluation (CV history and symptoms, CV risk factors, blood pressure, heart rate, ECG and ECHO-cardio parameters, Troponin I, NT-proBNP). After this in-depth CV screening, 54 out of 55 patients were deemed to be fit for ANA treatment. Thirty-eight of the 55 patients received ANA treatment for a median of 36 months (range 3-48), and were monitored using the same CV evaluation. Fourteen of these 38 patients manifested CV adverse events (10 palpitation, 4 edema, 2 arterial hypertension, 2 acute myocardial infarction) that were not predicted by the in-depth CV evaluation, and that led to ANA withdrawal in only one case (non-cardiac refractory edema). In conclusion, the planned in-depth CV evaluation did not appear to be necessary in ET patients to evaluate their suitability for ANA treatment, and, moreover, was not able to predict the occurrence of CV adverse events during ANA treatment. Nevertheless, the CV adverse events (mostly palpitations and edema) were easily managed by the hematologists, and required the cardiologist involvement in very few selected cases.

none 18 no We investigated the influence of molecular status on disease characteristics and clinical outcome in young patients (⩽ 40 years) with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined essential thrombocythemia (ET) or early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (early-PMF). Overall, 217 patients with ET (number 197) and early-PMF (number 20) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up time was 10.2 years. The cumulative incidence of thrombosis, hemorrhages and disease evolution into myelofibrosis/acute leukemia were 16.6%, 8.6% and 3% at 15 years, respectively. No differences were detectable between ET and early-PMF patients, although the latter cohort showed a trend for worse combined-event free survival (EFS). Mutation frequency were 61% for JAK2V617F, 25% for CALR and 1% for MPLW515K, and were comparable across WHO diagnosis; however, JAK2V617F allele burden was higher in the early-PMF group. Compared with JAK2V617F-positive patients, CALR-mutated patients displayed higher platelet count and lower hemoglobin level. CALR mutations significantly correlated with lower thrombotic risk (9.1% versus 21.7%, P = 0.04), longer survival (100% versus 96%, P = 0.05) and better combined-EFS (86% versus 71%, P = 0.02). However, non-type 1/type 2 CALR mutations ('minor' mutations) and abnormal karyotype were found to correlate with increased risk of disease evolution. At last contact, six patients had died; in five cases, the causes of death were related to the hematological disease and occurred at a median age of 64 years (range: 53-68 years). Twenty-eight patients (13%) were unmutated for JAK2, CALR and MPL: no event was registered in these 'triple-negative' patients. Palandri, F; Latagliata, R.; Polverelli, N.; Tieghi, A.; Crugnola, M.; Martino, B.; Perricone, M.; Breccia, M.; Ottaviani, E.; Testoni, N.; Merli, F.; Aversa, F.; Alimena, G.; Cavo, M.; Martinelli, G.; Catani, L.; Baccarani, M.; Vianelli, N. Palandri, F; Latagliata, R.; Polverelli, N.; Tieghi, A.; Crugnola, M.; Martino, B.; Perricone, M.; Breccia, M.; Ottaviani, E.; Testoni, N.; Merli, F.; Aversa, F.; Alimena, G.; Cavo, M.; Martinelli, G.; Catani, L.; Baccarani, M.; Vianelli, N.

Although infectious complications represent a relevant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), little is known about their incidence, outcome and risk factors. We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 507 MF patients, diagnosed between 1980 and 2014 in five Italian hematology centers, to define the epidemiology of infections and describe the impact of ruxolitinib (RUX) treatment. Overall, 112 patients (22%) experienced 160 infectious events (grade 3-4, 45%) for an incidence rate of 3.9% per patient-year. Infections were mainly bacterial (78%) and involving the respiratory tract (52% of cases). Also, viral (11%) and fungal infections (2%) were recorded. Overall, infections were fatal in 9% of the cases. Among baseline features, high/intermediate-2 IPSS category (HR 1.8, 95%CI:1.2-2.7; P = 0.02) and spleen length ≥10 cm below left costal margin (HR 1.6, 95%CI:1.1-2.5; P = 0.04) were associated with higher infectious risk in multivariate analysis. Overall, the rate of infections was higher in the cohort of 128 RUX-treated patients (44% vs. 20%, P