Search

Background The impact of extent of resection (EOR), residual tumor volume (RTV), and gross-total resection (GTR) in glioblastoma subgroups is currently unknown. This study aimed to analyze their impact on patient subgroups in relation to neurological and functional outcomes. Methods Patients with tumor resection for eloquent glioblastoma between 2010 and 2020 at 4 tertiary centers were recruited from a cohort of 3919 patients. Results One thousand and forty-seven (1047) patients were included. Higher EOR and lower RTV were significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across all subgroups, but RTV was a stronger prognostic factor. GTR based on RTV improved median OS in the overall cohort (19.0 months, P Conclusions Maximum resection was especially beneficial in the subgroups aged

Background: Awake mapping has been associated with decreased neurological deficits and increased extent of resection in eloquent glioma resections. However, its effect within clinically relevant glioblastoma subgroups remains poorly understood. We aimed to assess the benefit of this technique in subgroups of patients with glioblastomas based on age, preoperative neurological morbidity, and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). Methods: In this propensity score-matched analysis of an international, multicentre, cohort study (GLIOMAP), patients were recruited at four tertiary centres in Europe (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam and Haaglanden MC, The Hague, Netherlands, and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) and the USA (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA). Patients were eligible if they were aged 18–90 years, undergoing resection, had a histopathological diagnosis of primary glioblastoma, their tumour was in an eloquent or near-eloquent location, and they had a unifocal enhancing lesion. Patients either underwent awake mapping during craniotomy, or asleep resection, as per treating physician or multidisciplinary tumour board decision. We used propensity-score matching (1:3) to match patients in the awake group with those in the asleep group to create a matched cohort, and to match patients from subgroups stratified by age (

OBJECTIVE The aim of glioblastoma surgery is to maximize the extent of resection while preserving functional integrity. Standards are lacking for surgical decision-making, and previous studies indicate treatment variations. These shortcomings reflect the need to evaluate larger populations from different care teams. In this study, the authors used probability maps to quantify and compare surgical decision-making throughout the brain by 12 neurosurgical teams for patients with glioblastoma. METHODS The study included all adult patients who underwent first-time glioblastoma surgery in 2012–2013 and were treated by 1 of the 12 participating neurosurgical teams. Voxel-wise probability maps of tumor location, biopsy, and resection were constructed for each team to identify and compare patient treatment variations. Brain regions with different biopsy and resection results between teams were identified and analyzed for patient functional outcome and survival. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 1087 patients, of whom 363 underwent a biopsy and 724 a resection. Biopsy and resection decisions were generally comparable between teams, providing benchmarks for probability maps of resections and biopsies for glioblastoma. Differences in biopsy rates were identified for the right superior frontal gyrus and indicated variation in biopsy decisions. Differences in resection rates were identified for the left superior parietal lobule, indicating variations in resection decisions. CONCLUSIONS Probability maps of glioblastoma surgery enabled capture of clinical practice decisions and indicated that teams generally agreed on which region to biopsy or to resect. However, treatment variations reflecting clinical dilemmas were observed and pinpointed by using the probability maps, which could therefore be useful for quality-of-care discussions between surgical teams for patients with glioblastoma.

Background: Traditionally, surgical removal of glioblastoma is performed with general anaesthesia but a recent meta-analysis revealed that awake surgery in glioblastoma resulted in better surgical outcomes than non-awake surgery. Preoperative severe aphasia is one of the exclusion criteria for awake surgery because of difficulties in intraoperative interpretation of language deterioration and the distinction between preoperative vs. intraoperative induced paraphasias. As severe aphasia is common in glioblastoma patients, many potential patients who may benefit from awake surgery are excluded. Aims: We aim to investigate the feasibility of awake surgery in glioblastoma patients with severe aphasia using a patient-tailored approach with adapted intraoperative language tasks. We also examined the effect of awake surgery on language outcomes. Methods & Procedures: We discuss five case studies of patients elected for awake surgery with presumed glioblastoma in eloquent language areas and severe aphasia. Pre- and postoperatively, an extensive test-protocol was administered at different linguistic levels and modalities. A patient-tailored intraoperative language test-protocol was applied. Outcomes & Results: Preoperatively, all patients had severe impairments on all language and cognitive tests. Intraoperative language tasks for direct electrical stimulation and resection were selected and adapted to patients’ preoperative level. Despite preoperative severe aphasia, functional boundaries for critical language areas could be identified in each patient. Postoperatively, all patients had stable or improved language outcome. One of the patients recovered to maximum scores on nearly all language tests. Conclusions: Our cases demonstrate that awake surgery in severely aphasic glioblastoma patients is feasible and did not cause further deterioration of aphasia. An extensive preoperative neurolinguistic examination is necessary for adequate patient-tailored intraoperative monitoring with maximal tumour resection and to consequently increase the chance of language preservation and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE Decisions in glioblastoma surgery are often guided by presumed eloquence of the tumor location. The authors introduce the “expected residual tumor volume” (eRV) and the “expected resectability index” (eRI) based on previous decisions aggregated in resection probability maps. The diagnostic accuracy of eRV and eRI to predict biopsy decisions, resectability, functional outcome, and survival was determined. METHODS Consecutive patients with first-time glioblastoma surgery in 2012–2013 were included from 12 hospitals. The eRV was calculated from the preoperative MR images of each patient using a resection probability map, and the eRI was derived from the tumor volume. As reference, Sawaya’s tumor location eloquence grades (EGs) were classified. Resectability was measured as observed extent of resection (EOR) and residual volume, and functional outcome as change in Karnofsky Performance Scale score. Receiver operating characteristic curves and multivariable logistic regression were applied. RESULTS Of 915 patients, 674 (74%) underwent a resection with a median EOR of 97%, functional improvement in 71 (8%), functional decline in 78 (9%), and median survival of 12.8 months. The eRI and eRV identified biopsies and EORs of at least 80%, 90%, or 98% better than EG. The eRV and eRI predicted observed residual volumes under 10, 5, and 1 ml better than EG. The eRV, eRI, and EG had low diagnostic accuracy for functional outcome changes. Higher eRV and lower eRI were strongly associated with shorter survival, independent of known prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The eRV and eRI predict biopsy decisions, resectability, and survival better than eloquence grading and may be useful preoperative indices to support surgical decisions.

OBJECTIVE Patients with glioblastoma are often scheduled for urgent elective surgery. Currently, the impact of the waiting period until glioblastoma surgery is undetermined. In this national quality registry study, the authors determined the wait times until surgery for patients with glioblastoma, the risk factors associated with wait times, and the risk-standardized variation in time to surgery between Dutch hospitals. The associations between time to surgery and patient outcomes were also explored. METHODS Data from all 4589 patients who underwent first-time glioblastoma surgery between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands were collected by 13 hospitals in the Quality Registry Neuro Surgery. Time to surgery comprised 1) the time from first MR scan to surgery (MTS), and 2) the time from first neurosurgical consultation to surgery (CTS). Long MTS was defined as more than 21 days and long CTS as more than 14 days. Potential risk factors were analyzed in multivariable logistic regression models. The standardized rate of long time to surgery was analyzed using funnel plots. Patient outcomes including Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score change, complications, and survival were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression and proportional hazards models. RESULTS The median overall MTS and CTS were 18 and 9 days, respectively. Overall, 2576 patients (56%) had an MTS within 3 weeks and 3069 (67%) had a CTS within 2 weeks. Long MTS was significantly associated with older age, higher preoperative KPS score, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity class, season, lower hospital case volume, university affiliation, and resection. Long CTS was significantly associated with higher baseline KPS score, university affiliation, resection, more recent year of treatment, and season. In funnel plots, considerable practice variation was observed between hospitals in patients with long times to surgery. Fewer patients with KPS score improvement were observed after a long time until resection. Long CTS was associated with longer survival. Complications and KPS score decline were not associated with time to surgery. CONCLUSIONS Considerable between-hospital variation among Dutch hospitals was observed in the time to glioblastoma surgery. A long time to resection impeded KPS score improvement, and therefore, patients who may improve should be identified for more urgent resection. Longer survival was observed in patients selected for longer time until surgery after neurosurgical consultation (CTS).

Simple Summary Neurosurgical decisions for patients with glioblastoma depend on tumor characteristics in the preoperative MR scan. Currently, this is based on subjective estimates or manual tumor delineation in the absence of a standard for reporting. We compared tumor features of 1596 patients from 13 institutions extracted from manual segmentations by a human rater and from automated segmentations generated by a machine learning model. The automated segmentations were in excellent agreement with manual segmentations and are practically equivalent regarding tumor features that are potentially relevant for neurosurgical purposes. Standard reports can be generated by open access software, enabling comparison between surgical cohorts, multicenter trials, and patient registries. Abstract Treatment decisions for patients with presumed glioblastoma are based on tumor characteristics available from a preoperative MR scan. Tumor characteristics, including volume, location, and resectability, are often estimated or manually delineated. This process is time consuming and subjective. Hence, comparison across cohorts, trials, or registries are subject to assessment bias. In this study, we propose a standardized Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting and Data System (GSI-RADS) based on an automated method of tumor segmentation that provides standard reports on tumor features that are potentially relevant for glioblastoma surgery. As clinical validation, we determine the agreement in extracted tumor features between the automated method and the current standard of manual segmentations from routine clinical MR scans before treatment. In an observational consecutive cohort of 1596 adult patients with a first time surgery of a glioblastoma from 13 institutions, we segmented gadolinium-enhanced tumor parts both by a human rater and by an automated algorithm. Tumor features were extracted from segmentations of both methods and compared to assess differences, concordance, and equivalence. The laterality, contralateral infiltration, and the laterality indices were in excellent agreement. The native and normalized tumor volumes had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Multifocality, but not the number of foci, had good agreement and equivalence. The location profiles of cortical and subcortical structures were in excellent agreement. The expected residual tumor volumes and resectability indices had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Tumor probability maps were in good agreement. In conclusion, automated segmentations are in excellent agreement with manual segmentations and practically equivalent regarding tumor features that are potentially relevant for neurosurgical purposes. Standard GSI-RADS reports can be generated by open access software.

BackgroundThe impact of time-to-surgery on clinical outcome for patients with glioblastoma has not been determined. Any delay in treatment is perceived as detrimental, but guidelines do not specify acceptable timings. In this study, we relate the time to glioblastoma surgery with the extent of resection and residual tumor volume, performance change, and survival, and we explore the identification of patients for urgent surgery.MethodsAdults with first-time surgery in 2012–2013 treated by 12 neuro-oncological teams were included in this study. We defined time-to-surgery as the number of days between the diagnostic MR scan and surgery. The relation between time-to-surgery and patient and tumor characteristics was explored in time-to-event analysis and proportional hazard models. Outcome according to time-to-surgery was analyzed by volumetric measurements, changes in performance status, and survival analysis with patient and tumor characteristics as modifiers.ResultsIncluded were 1033 patients of whom 729 had a resection and 304 a biopsy. The overall median time-to-surgery was 13 days. Surgery was within 3 days for 235 (23%) patients, and within a month for 889 (86%). The median volumetric doubling time was 22 days. Lower performance status (hazard ratio [HR] 0.942, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.893–0.994) and larger tumor volume (HR 1.012, 95% CI 1.010–1.014) were independently associated with a shorter time-to-surgery. Extent of resection, residual tumor volume, postoperative performance change, and overall survival were not associated with time-to-surgery.ConclusionsWith current decision-making for urgent surgery in selected patients with glioblastoma and surgery typically within 1 month, we found equal extent of resection, residual tumor volume, performance status, and survival after longer times-to-surgery.

Introduction For decisions on glioblastoma surgery, the risk of complications and decline in performance is decisive. In this study, we determine the rate of complications and performance decline after resections and biopsies in a national quality registry, their risk factors and the risk-standardized variation between institutions. Methods Data from all 3288 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 13 hospitals were obtained from a prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017. Patients were stratified by biopsies and resections. Complications were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grades II and higher. Performance decline was considered a deterioration of more than 10 Karnofsky points at 6 weeks. Risk factors were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patient-specific expected and observed complications and performance declines were summarized for institutions and analyzed in funnel plots. Results For 2271 resections, the overall complication rate was 20 % and 16 % declined in performance. For 1017 biopsies, the overall complication rate was 11 % and 30 % declined in performance. Patient-related characteristics were significant risk factors for complications and performance decline, i.e. higher age, lower baseline Karnofsky, higher ASA classification, and the surgical procedure. Hospital characteristics, i.e. case volume, university affiliation and biopsy percentage, were not. In three institutes the observed complication rate was significantly less than expected. In one institute significantly more performance declines were observed than expected, and in one institute significantly less. Conclusions Patient characteristics, but not case volume, were risk factors for complications and performance decline after glioblastoma surgery. After risk-standardization, hospitals varied in complications and performance declines.

Simple Summary Neurosurgical decisions for patients with glioblastoma depend on visual inspection of a preoperative MR scan to determine the tumor characteristics. To avoid subjective estimates and manual tumor delineation, automatic methods and standard reporting are necessary. We compared and extensively assessed the performances of two deep learning architectures on the task of automatic tumor segmentation. A total of 1887 patients from 14 institutions, manually delineated by a human rater, were compared to automated segmentations generated by neural networks. The automated segmentations were in excellent agreement with the manual segmentations, and external validity, as well as generalizability were demonstrated. Together with automatic tumor feature computation and standardized reporting, our Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting And Data System (GSI-RADS) exhibited the potential for more accurate data-driven clinical decisions. The trained models and software are open-source and open-access, enabling comparisons among surgical cohorts, multicenter trials, and patient registries. Abstract For patients with presumed glioblastoma, essential tumor characteristics are determined from preoperative MR images to optimize the treatment strategy. This procedure is time-consuming and subjective, if performed by crude eyeballing or manually. The standardized GSI-RADS aims to provide neurosurgeons with automatic tumor segmentations to extract tumor features rapidly and objectively. In this study, we improved automatic tumor segmentation and compared the agreement with manual raters, describe the technical details of the different components of GSI-RADS, and determined their speed. Two recent neural network architectures were considered for the segmentation task: nnU-Net and AGU-Net. Two preprocessing schemes were introduced to investigate the tradeoff between performance and processing speed. A summarized description of the tumor feature extraction and standardized reporting process is included. The trained architectures for automatic segmentation and the code for computing the standardized report are distributed as open-source and as open-access software. Validation studies were performed on a dataset of 1594 gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI volumes from 13 hospitals and 293 T1-weighted MRI volumes from the BraTS challenge. The glioblastoma tumor core segmentation reached a Dice score slightly below 90%, a patientwise F1-score close to 99%, and a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance slightly below 4.0 mm on average with either architecture and the heavy preprocessing scheme. A patient MRI volume can be segmented in less than one minute, and a standardized report can be generated in up to five minutes. The proposed GSI-RADS software showed robust performance on a large collection of MRI volumes from various hospitals and generated results within a reasonable runtime.

Background: Surgery of GBM nowadays is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) and resections are often not as aggressive as possible, due to the chance of seriously damaging the patient with a rather low life expectancy. A surgical technique optimizing resection of the tumor in eloquent areas but preventing neurological deficits is necessary to improve survival and quality of life in these patients. Awake craniotomy (AC) with the use of cortical and subcortical stimulation has been widely implemented for low-grade glioma resections (LGG), but not yet for GBM. AC has shown to increase resection percentage and preserve quality of life in LGG and could thus be of important value in GBM surgery. Methods/design: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Consecutive patients with a glioblastoma in or near eloquent areas (Sawaya grading II/III) will be 1:1 randomized to awake craniotomy or craniotomy under general anesthesia. 246 patients will be included in neurosurgical centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Primary end-points are: 1) Postoperative neurological morbidity and 2) Proportion of patients with gross-total resections. Secondary end-points are: 1) Health-related quality of life; 2) Progression-free survival (PFS); 3) Overall survival (OS) and 4) Frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Effects in each group. Also, a cost-benefit analysis will be performed. All patients will receive standard adjuvant treatment with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Discussion: This RCT should demonstrate whether AC is superior to craniotomy under GA on neurological morbidity, extent of resection and survival for glioblastoma resections in or near eloquent areas. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03861299 Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NL7589

Various surgical procedures can be applied in the treatment of meralgia paresthetica. The two main ones are neurolysis and neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. To date, no prospective or randomized controlled trial has compared the effectiveness of these procedures with standardized outcome measures. In this study we present our results for two prospectively followed cohorts and we present the protocol for a double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT).All patients that had an indication for surgical treatment of idiopathic meralgia paresthetica between August 2012 and April 2014 were included in the study. The patient decided on the type of treatment (neurolysis or neurectomy) after informed consent had been given. Primary outcome was measured using the Likert scale obtained 6 weeks after the surgery. Successful pain reduction was defined as Likert 1 or 2. Secondary outcome measures were the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Bothersomeness Index (BSI). In case of neurectomy the BSI for numbness was also obtained.A total of 22 consecutive patients were included: neurolysis was performed in 8 patients and neurectomy in 14 patients (one bilateral case). Successful pain reduction was observed more frequently after neurectomy (93.3%) than after neurolysis (37.5%, P0.05). Secondary outcome scores (NRS and BSI pain) were also better after neurectomy, although not significantly (respectively P=0.07 and 0.05). Paired analysis of the scores before and after the surgery showed an improvement in both the NRS and BSI after the neurectomy procedure (both P0.001), while scores were not significantly different before and after the neurolysis procedure. Patient's scores for the BSI numbness after the neurectomy procedure were low (mean 1.4, SD±1.0, range 0-3).The results of our prospective study confirm results previous studies reported in the literature in that the percentage pain relief was better after neurectomy than after neurolysis. A RCT is needed to further investigate potential differences in effectiveness. The protocol for such a trial is presented in this article.

The development of modern neurosurgery in the Netherlands, which took place in the 1920s, was highly influenced by the personal involvement of both Harvey Cushing and Walter Dandy, each in his own way. For the present article, the authors consulted the correspondence (kept at the Cushing/Whitney Medical Library in New Haven and the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives in Baltimore) of Cushing and Dandy with their Dutch disciples. The correspondence provides a unique inside view into the minds of both neurosurgical giants. After the neurologist Bernard Brouwer had paved the way for sending the Dutch surgeon Ignaz Oljenick overseas, Cushing personally took the responsibility to train him (1927-1929). On his return to Amsterdam, Oljenick and Brouwer established the first neurosurgical department in the country. Encouraged by Oljenick's favorable results, a number of Dutch general surgeons started asking Cushing for support. Cushing strategically managed and deflected these requests, probably aiming to increase the advantage of Oljenick and Brouwer. However, the University Hospital in Groningen persisted in the plans to establish its own neurosurgical unit and sent Ferdinand Verbeek to the US in 1932. Although staying at Cushing's department initially, Verbeek ultimately applied to Walter Dandy for a position of visiting voluntary assistant, staying until the end of 1934. Verbeek and Dandy became lifelong friends. On his return to Groningen, Verbeek started practicing neurosurgery, isolated in the northern part of the country. He relied on the support of Dandy, with whom he kept up a regular correspondence, discussing cases and seeking advice. Dandy, on his part, used Verbeek as the ambassador in Europe for his operative innovations. At the beginning of World War II, Oljenick had to flee the country, which concluded the direct line with the Cushing school in the Netherlands. After Dandy's death (1946), Verbeek continued practicing neurosurgery following his style and philosophy. By the time Verbeek died in 1958, the strong American influence on everyday practice of Dutch neurosurgeons had been established. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.12.JNS12601)

Surgical treatment options for meralgia paresthetica include neurolysis and neurectomy procedures. Reported success rates for pain relief are generally higher after neurectomy, but an obvious disadvantage compared with neurolysis is the loss of sensation in the anterolateral part of the thigh. In this study we analyzed our results on pain relief after both procedures, and we determined the impact of loss of sensation with a questionnaire. Between 1999 and 2009, all patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica who presented to our clinic after failure of conservative treatment were offered a neurectomy procedure. After this period, the surgical strategy was changed to first neurolysis followed by neurectomy in case of failure. We retrospectively analyzed our results for both strategies with a questionnaire that was focused on pain relief, numbness and the impact of numbness. Ten patients underwent a neurolysis with a 60 % pain relief rate compared to 87.5 % of the eight patients that primarily underwent a neurectomy. Most neurectomy patients (62.5 %) were not hindered by the numbness, 25 % sometimes and only one patient was frequently bothered, but was still satisfied with the outcome. The failures of neurolysis were secondarily treated by neurectomy, which resulted in pain relief in three out of four patients. This series confirms previous reports in the literature that have shown higher success rates for the neurectomy procedure. In addition, it shows that most patients are not bothered by the numbness following this procedure. These observations can be used in the surgical decision making for meralgia paresthetica.

Although the Netherlands played a major role in the revival of craniotomy in the late 19th century, modern neurosurgery made a late start there. Unlike the situation in other European countries, Dutch neurosurgery lacked a protagonist when, at the turn of the last century, craniotomy became less popular due to discouraging results. During two lecture tours in the US in the 1920s and 1930s, the influential Dutch neurologist Bernard Brouwer also visited the leading neurosurgical centers. He was deeply impressed by the high standards and results in the New World, and upon his return to Amsterdam, he decided to try to change the dismal state of Dutch neurosurgery. Funds were raised to send the general surgeon Ignaz Oljenick for training to Harvey Cushing, and close ties between Amsterdam and neuroscientists in the US remained. Several American neurosurgeons received part of their basic training in Amsterdam. A second Dutch surgeon, Ferdinand Verbeek, honed his neurosurgical skills under Dr. Walter Dandy. The strong American influence on the philosophy and everyday actions of Dutch neurosurgeons continues until this day.

Many high-grade glioma (HGG) patients have cognitive impairments, which impact daily functioning. Cognitive impairments can be caused by tumour-, treatment-, and patient-related factors. The effect of the tumour and of surgical resection on cognition is, however, not well known. We investigated tumour and surgical effects on cognitive functioning in patients with HGG. At baseline, preceding surgery, 62 patients with HGG underwent neuropsychological testing concerning seven cognitive domains: verbal and working memory, attention, executive functioning, psychomotor function, information processing speed, and visuoconstructive abilities. Thirty-nine patients were included in follow-up testing after surgery, but before subsequent treatment. Tumour size and site, use of anti-epileptic drugs and corticosteroids, and extent of resection were recorded. Compared to healthy controls, cognitive functioning of patients was significantly impaired in all domains. Prior to surgery 79 % (49 of 62) of patients had cognitive impairment in at least one domain. At median follow-up of 5 weeks after surgery, 59 % (23 of 39) of patients were cognitively impaired in at least one domain. At follow-up, 49 % showed improvement, while 23 % declined. Left hemisphere tumour localization was associated with worse verbal memory (P=0.004), and larger tumours in this hemisphere with poorer executive functioning (P

Preservation of cognition is an important outcome measure in eloquent area glioma surgery. Glioma patients may have pre-operative deficits in one or more cognitive domains which could deteriorate post-operatively. It is assumed that these impairments recover within 3 months; some studies however, still detected cognitive decline. Longer follow-up is necessary to elucidate the conclusive effects of surgery. 45 patients with gliomas (low- and high-grade, but without contrast enhancement at diagnosis) in eloquent areas were assessed pre-operatively, 3 months and 1 year post-operatively with a neuropsychological test-protocol. Patients' performance was compared to normal population and between test-moments. Univariate analyses were performed between cognitive change and tumor-characteristics (localization, grade, volume, extent of resection [EOR]) and treatment-related factors (radio-/chemotherapy). Pre- and post-operatively, impairments were found in all cognitive domains; language, memory, attention and executive functions (p < 0.05). Post-operatively, permanent improvement was observed on a memory test (verbal recall: t = -1.931, p = 0.034), whereas deterioration was found on a language test (category fluency: t = 2.517, p = 0.030). Between 3 months and 1 year, patients improved on 2 language tests (naming: t = -2.781, p = 0.026 and letter fluency: t = -1.975, p = 0.047). There was no influence of tumor- or treatment-related factors on cognitive change. The findings underline the importance of cognitive testing at longer term post-operatively, as cognitive recovery took longer than 3 months, especially within the language domain. However, this longitudinal follow-up study showed that glioma surgery is possible without major long-term damage of cognitive functions. Tumor characteristics and EOR are no additional risk factors for cognitive outcome.

We describe a patient (KO) with reduced spontaneous speech, resembling dynamic aphasia, after awake glioma surgery in the proximity of the supplementary motor area. Naming, repetition, and comprehension were intact. He was tested with an extensive neuropsychological test-battery and a protocol for dynamic aphasia at 1 year. He presented with postoperative reduced spontaneous speech and selective executive function deficits. Most language recovery took place at 3 months postoperatively, whereas the executive functions improved between 3 months and 1 year. Results suggest that resection near the supplementary motor area could increase the risk of cognitive disturbances at long term, especially language.

Ganglioneuroblastoma is a rare tumor variant of neuroblastoma. Only five cases have been observed in the adult brain, and we report here on two more adult patients with cerebral ganglioneuroblastoma. Additionally, a review was carried out on all 50 published adult cases with ganglioneuroblastoma, located in the adrenal gland (9), mediastinum (8), retroperitoneal area (7), the brain parenchyma (7), or the spinal cord (3). Median age at onset was 39 years, and 52% of patients were female. For extracranial locations, treatment usually consisted of surgery followed by radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Of the cases with cerebral involvement only one patient did not receive any treatment. The other six patients underwent surgical resection and radiation therapy, in four cases followed by chemotherapy with temozolomide. The median survival of cerebral ganglioneuroblastomas was 14 months and did not differ from the whole group of ganglioneuroblastomas (12 months). For cerebral ganglioneuroblastoma, the preferred regimen would seem to be neurosurgical removal, followed by chemoradiotherapy including temozolomide.

Although the Netherlands played a major role in the revival of craniotomy in the late 19th century, modern neurosurgery made a late start there. Unlike the situation in other European countries, Dutch neurosurgery lacked a protagonist when, at the turn of the last century, craniotomy became less popular due to discouraging results. During two lecture tours in the US in the 1920s and 1930s, the influential Dutch neurologist Bernard Brouwer also visited the leading neurosurgical centers. He was deeply impressed by the high standards and results in the New World, and upon his return to Amsterdam, he decided to try to change the dismal state of Dutch neurosurgery. Funds were raised to send the general surgeon Ignaz Oljenick for training to Harvey Cushing, and close ties between Amsterdam and neuroscientists in the US remained. Several American neurosurgeons received part of their basic training in Amsterdam. A second Dutch surgeon, Ferdinand Verbeek, honed his neurosurgical skills under Dr. Walter Dandy. The strong American influence on the philosophy and everyday actions of Dutch neurosurgeons continues until this day.

The bobble-head doll syndrome (BHDS) is characterized by a back-and-forth movement of the head with a frequency of 2 to 3 Hz, which increases during walking and excitement and decreases during concentration. The head movements are accompanied by macrocephaly, ocular disturbances, psychomotor retardation, and sometimes endocrine dysfunction. The BHDS is frequently associated with a suprasellar arachnoid cyst. The authors present the case of a 4-year-old patient with BHDS; an endoscopic cystoventriculostomy was performed by fenestrating a cyst in the suprasellar region. After wide fenestration of the cyst wall that was protruding and obstructing the foramen of Monro, the cyst was entered with the endoscope and a small, natural, valvelike communication of the cyst with the basal prepontine cistern was seen close to the basilar artery. This communication was widened by balloon dilation. After completion of the ventriculocystocisternostomy, the cyst collapsed and the obstruction of the aqueduct was resolved. In view of the source mechanism and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics of the suprasellar arachnoid cyst, a ventriculocystocisternostomy is an important treatment option for BHDS arising from a suprasellar cyst. Three years after treatment, the head bobbing had resolved completely and psychomotor development was improving. Delay of diagnosis and treatment of this condition can cause permanent neurological dysfunction and psychomotor retardation. The authors recommend early ventriculocystocisternostomy as a physiologically based treatment for BHDS originating from a suprasellar cyst.