Search

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies are approved for the treatment of RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but the emergence of resistance mutations restricts their efficacy. We previously showed that RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutant alleles, which appear in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during EGFR blockade, decline upon therapy withdrawal. We hypothesized that monitoring resistance mutations in blood could rationally guide subsequent therapy with anti-EGFR antibodies. We report here the results of CHRONOS, an open-label, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial exploiting blood-based identification of RAS/BRAF/EGFR mutations levels to tailor a chemotherapy-free anti-EGFR rechallenge with panitumumab (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03227926; EudraCT 2016-002597-12). The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety and tolerability of this strategy. In CHRONOS, patients with tissue-RAS WT tumors after a previous treatment with anti-EGFR-based regimens underwent an interventional ctDNA-based screening. Of 52 patients, 16 (31%) carried at least one mutation conferring resistance to anti-EGFR therapy and were excluded. The primary endpoint of the trial was met; and, of 27 enrolled patients, eight (30%) achieved partial response and 17 (63%) disease control, including two unconfirmed responses. These clinical results favorably compare with standard third-line treatments and show that interventional liquid biopsies can be effectively and safely exploited in a timely manner to guide anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy with panitumumab in patients with mCRC. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to formally compare panitumumab rechallenge with standard-of-care therapies in this patient setting.

The majority of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) are mismatch repair (MMR) proficient and unresponsive to immunotherapy, whereas MMR-deficient (MMRd) tumors often respond to immune-checkpoint blockade. We previously reported that the treatment of colorectal cancer preclinical models with temozolomide (TMZ) leads to MMR deficiency, increased tumor mutational burden (TMB), and sensitization to immunotherapy. To clinically translate these findings, we designed the ARETHUSA clinical trial whereby O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)–deficient, MMR-proficient, RAS-mutant mCRC patients received priming therapy with TMZ. Analysis of tissue biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revealed the emergence of a distinct mutational signature and increased TMB after TMZ treatment. Multiple alterations in the nucleotide context favored by the TMZ signature emerged in MMR genes, and the p.T1219I MSH6 variant was detected in ctDNA and tissue of 94% (16/17) of the cases. A subset of patients whose tumors displayed the MSH6 mutation, the TMZ mutational signature, and increased TMB achieved disease stabilization upon pembrolizumab treatment. Significance: MMR-proficient mCRCs are unresponsive to immunotherapy. We provide the proof of concept that inactivation of MMR genes can be achieved pharmacologically with TMZ and molecularly monitored in the tissue and blood of patients with mCRC. This strategy deserves additional evaluation in mCRC patients whose tumors are no longer responsive to standard-of-care treatments. See related commentary by Willis and Overman, p. 1612. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1599

Supplementary Figure from Temozolomide Treatment Alters Mismatch Repair and Boosts Mutational Burden in Tumor and Blood of Colorectal Cancer Patients

Supplementary Figure S1. LMNA-NTRK1 genetic rearrangement detected in patient's plasma and xeno. Supplementary Figure S2. Acquisition of mutations in the TRKA kinase domain drives secondary resistance to entrectinib in Ba/F3 TRKA WT cells. Supplementary Figure S3. NTRK1 mutations confer resistance to TRKA inhibition. Supplementary Figure S4. Homology alignment of NTRK1 p.G595 and p.G667 variants. Supplementary Table S1. NGS analysis of NTRK1 gene in patient's plasma and xeno. Supplementary Table S2. NGS analysis of patient's derived samples. Supplementary Table S3. Summary of serial ctDNA analyses. Supplementary Table S4. The p.G595R and p.G667C mutations confer resistance to multiple TRK inhibitors. Supplementary Table S5. NTRK1 p. G595R, p.G667C and LMNA-NTRK1 fusion probes for ddPCR.

PDF file - 635K, Supplementary Figure S1. Genotypes included in the combinatorial genetic matrix. PTEN or RB1 were silenced by shRNA in isogenic KI cells.

XLSX file - 144K, Supplementary table S1. List of compounds employed in the present work. Supplementary Table S2. List of t-tests p values comparing the responses of the different mutant cell lines to a given drug concentration with the response of the WT Scramble control cells. Supplementary Table S3. List of the drugs included in the library and tested on HME-1 cell lines.

A critical step toward defining tailored therapy in patients with cancer is the identification of genetic interactions that may impair—or boost—the efficacy of selected therapeutic approaches. Cell models able to recapitulate combinations of genetic aberrations are important to find drug–genotype interactions poorly affected by the heterogeneous genetics of human tumors. In order to identify novel pharmacogenomic relationships, we employed an isogenic cell panel that reconstructs cancer genetic scenarios. We screened a library of 43 compounds in human hTERT-HME1 epithelial cells in which PTEN or RB1 were silenced in combination with the targeted knockin of cancer-associated mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA oncogenes. Statistical analysis and clustering algorithms were applied to display similar drug response profiles and mutation-specific patterns of activity. From the screen, we discovered that proteasome inhibitors show selectivity toward BRAF V600E–mutant cells, irrespective of PTEN or RB1 expression. Preferential targeting of BRAF-mutant cells by proteasome inhibitors was corroborated in a second BRAF V600E isogenic model, as well as in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines by the use of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Notably, carfilzomib also showed striking in vivo activity in a BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors is dependent on persistent BRAF signaling, because BRAF V600E blockade by PLX4720 reversed sensitivity to carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells. Our findings indicated that proteasome inhibition might represent a valuable targeting strategy in BRAF V600E–mutant colorectal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(12); 2950–61. ©2013 AACR.

Purpose: KRAS mutations confer adverse prognosis to colorectal cancer, and no targeted therapies have shown efficacy in this patient subset. Paracrine, nongenetic events induced by KRAS-mutant tumor cells are expected to result in specific deregulation and/or relocation of tumor microenvironment (TME) proteins, which in principle can be exploited as alternative therapeutic targets.Experimental Design: A multimodal strategy combining ex vivo/in vitro phage display screens with deep-sequencing and bioinformatics was applied to uncover TME-specific targets in KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Expression and localization of BCAM and LAMA5 were validated by immunohistochemistry in preclinical models of human hepatic metastasis and in a panel of human specimens (n = 71). The antimetastatic efficacy of two BCAM-mimic peptides was evaluated in mouse models. The role of BCAM in the interaction of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells with TME cells was investigated by adhesion assays.Results: BCAM and LAMA5 were identified as molecular targets within both tumor cells and TME of KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer, where they were specifically overexpressed. Two BCAM-mimic peptides inhibited KRAS-mutant hepatic metastasis in preclinical models. Genetic suppression and biochemical inhibition of either BCAM or LAMA5 impaired adhesion of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells specifically to endothelial cells, whereas adhesion to pericytes and hepatocytes was unaffected.Conclusions: These data show that the BCAM/LAMA5 system plays a functional role in the metastatic spreading of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer by mediating tumor–TME interactions and as such represents a valuable therapeutic candidate for this large, currently untreatable patient group. Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4923–33. ©2016 AACR.

The file lists Supplementary Materials and Methods and relative References.

Supplementary Table S3

Supplementary Legends and Figures

Although recent clinical trials of BRAF inhibitor combinations have demonstrated improved efficacy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, emergence of acquired resistance limits clinical benefit. Here, we undertook a comprehensive effort to define mechanisms underlying drug resistance with the goal of guiding development of therapeutic strategies to overcome this limitation. We generated a broad panel of BRAF-mutant resistant cell line models across seven different clinically relevant drug combinations. Combinatorial drug treatments were able to abrogate ERK1/2 phosphorylation in parental-sensitive cells, but not in their resistant counterparts, indicating that resistant cells escaped drug treatments through one or more mechanisms leading to biochemical reactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Genotyping of resistant cells identified gene amplification of EGFR, KRAS, and mutant BRAF, as well as acquired mutations in KRAS, EGFR, and MAP2K1. These mechanisms were clinically relevant, as we identified emergence of a KRAS G12C mutation and increase of mutant BRAF V600E allele frequency in the circulating tumor DNA of a patient at relapse from combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. To identify therapeutic combinations capable of overcoming drug resistance, we performed a systematic assessment of candidate therapies across the panel of resistant cell lines. Independent of the molecular alteration acquired upon drug pressure, most resistant cells retained sensitivity to vertical MAPK pathway suppression when combinations of ERK, BRAF, and EGFR inhibitors were applied. These therapeutic combinations represent promising strategies for future clinical trials in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Res; 76(15); 4504–15. ©2016 AACR.

The supplementary material includes Supplementary Methods, two Supplementary Tables, and six Supplementary Figures Table S1. Complete set of BCAM-mimic peptides. Table S2. Characterization of human CRC cell lines in animal models. Figure S1. Quality control of the phage display experiments: sequencing readout. Figure S2. BCAM protein expression in the complete panel of human hepatic metastases. Figure S3. BCAM protein expression in human primary CRCs. Figure S4. BCAM protein and mRNA expression in all cell lines. Figure S5. Photographic documentation of the experimental hepatic metastasis models. Figure S6. HT-55, DLD-1, LIM1215 and SW-48 cells cannot be reduced to adhesion-functional monocellular suspensions.

Supplementary Tables S1-S3 - List of drug concentrations to generate resistant cell lines (S1); Drug concentrations applied in the screening depicted in Figure 6 (S2); Primers for gene amplification and sequencing (S3). Supplementary Figure S1. Synergistic activity of targeted therapy combinations in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells. Supplementary Figure S2. Amplification of mutant BRAF V600E confers resistance to combined EGFR and MEK targeting in colorectal cancer cells. Supplemental Figure S3. Cytotoxicity induced by ERK inhibition in VACO432 resistant to BRAF combination therapies.

Legends

Purpose:Defects in the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway are of clinical interest due to sensitivity of HR-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors. We were interested in defining PARP vulnerability in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carrying KRAS and BRAF mutations who display poor prognosis, have limited therapeutic options, and represent an unmet clinical need.Experimental Design:We tested colorectal cancer cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDO), and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) enriched for KRAS and BRAF mutations for sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor olaparib, and the chemotherapeutic agents oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Genomic profiles and DNA repair proficiency of colorectal cancer models were compared with pharmacologic response.Results:Thirteen of 99 (around 13%) colorectal cancer cell lines were highly sensitive to clinically active concentrations of olaparib and displayed functional deficiency in HR. Response to PARP blockade was positively correlated with sensitivity to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cell lines as well as patient-derived organoids. Treatment of PDXs with olaparib impaired tumor growth and maintenance therapy with PARP blockade after initial oxaliplatin response delayed disease progression in mice.Conclusions:These results indicate that a colorectal cancer subset characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options is vulnerable to PARP inhibition and suggest that PDO-based drug-screening assays can be used to identify patients with colorectal cancer likely to benefit from olaparib. As patients with mCRC almost invariably receive therapies based on oxaliplatin, “maintenance” treatment with PARP inhibitors warrants further clinical investigation.

Supplemental Figure 4: neuroblastoma cells migrate towards microenvironment-derived cells

Supplemental Methods and Figure Legends

Supplemental Figure 1: ephrin A1 and α11 integrin are barely detectable in mouse models of neuroblastoma

Supplemental Figure 2: expression levels of NPTX2 and NPTXR in vitro and in vivo

Supplemental Figure 5: NPTX2 and NPTXR are barely or not expressed in normal human tissues

Supplemental Figure 3: NPTX2 and NPTXR are barely or not expressed in normal mouse tissues

Introduction: Immunotherapy based on PD1/PDL1 and/or CTLA4 blocking antibodies has shown efficacy in the molecular subgroup of colorectal cancers (CRCs) characterized by deficient mismatch repair (MMRd). This feature, present in only 4-5% of metastatic CRCs, causes a significant increase of tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigens, ultimately leading to immune rejection. On the other hand, for the majority of MMR proficient (MMRp) CRCs, cytotoxic chemotherapy ± targeted agents still constitute the mainstay of the treatment Interestingly, even though it is known that cytotoxic agents induce mutations, their immunogenic potential is still not fully understood. The aim of this work is to systematically investigate the immunogenicity of chemotherapy-induced mutations in CRC. Methods: We performed a two-step experiment: first, murine CRC models were exposed to chemotherapy agents in an immune-free context (priming phase) and then challenged in immune-deficient and -proficient contexts (editing phase). Chemotherapy agents included the commonly used cytotoxic drugs 5-fluorouracil (5FU), oxaliplatin, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), cisplatin, and temozolomide, used as single drugs or combinations, in a pulsatile schedule using weekly ‘cycles’ (2 days on/5 days off) in order to mimic drug exposure in clinical settings. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed at baseline, and after both the priming and the editing phases. Results and discussion: WES analysis showed that cisplatin-based treatment is associated with the highest increase in TMB and predicted neoantigens when compared to 5FU-based combinations. Multiple mutational processes contribute to the accumulation of mutations upon exposure to chemotherapy, as revealed by analysis of mutational signatures. A statistically significant growth delay and increased survival was reported for tumors primed with cisplatin/temozolomide and 5FU/Oxaliplatin/SN38 (FOLFOXIRI) combinations compared to unprimed tumors in immunocompetent but not in immunodeficient mice, suggesting the active involvement of the immune system in controlling tumor growth. Sequencing data of residual (escaped) tumors at the end of the editing phase revealed a preferential loss of mutations etiologically linked to chemotherapy in the immunocompetent models, pinpointing an active immune-editing of chemotherapy-induced mutations. Conclusions: Cisplatin/temozolomide and FOLFOXIRI treatment effectively prime murine CRC models for subsequent immune rejection. These results suggest that the anticancer effect of chemotherapy treatment may be in part mediated by the immune-editing of chemotherapy-induced mutant cancer subclones. Citation Format: Pietro Paolo Vitiello, Rosaria Chilà, Giuseppe Rospo, Gaia Grasso, Giovanni Crisafulli, Alice Bartolini, Vito Amodio, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Giovanni Germano, Alberto Bardelli. The effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy on colorectal cancer immunogenicity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6402.

Patients affected by colorectal cancer (CRC) with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), often respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapies, while those with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) tumors generally do not. Interestingly, a subset of MMRp CRCs contains variable fractions of MMRd cells, but it is unknown how their presence impacts immune surveillance. We asked whether modulation of the MMRd fraction in MMR heterogeneous tumors acts as an endogenous cancer vaccine by promoting immune surveillance. To test this hypothesis, we use isogenic MMRp (Mlh1+/+) and MMRd (Mlh1-/-) mouse CRC cells. MMRp/MMRd cells mixed at different ratios are injected in immunocompetent mice and tumor rejection is observed when at least 50% of cells are MMRd. To enrich the MMRd fraction, MMRp/MMRd tumors are treated with 6-thioguanine, which leads to tumor rejection. These results suggest that genetic and pharmacological modulation of the DNA mismatch repair machinery potentiate the immunogenicity of MMR heterogeneous tumors.

The majority of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) are mismatch repair (MMR) proficient (MMRp) and unresponsive to immunotherapy, while MMR deficient (MMRd) tumors often respond to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We previously reported that treatment of CRC preclinical models with temozolomide (TMZ) leads to MMR deficiency, increased tumor mutational burden (TMB) and, sensitization to immunotherapy. To clinically translate these findings, we designed the ARETHUSA clinical trial whereby O6-Methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) deficient, MMR proficient and KRAS mutant mCRC patients receive priming therapy with TMZ. Analysis of solid tissue biopsies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) obtained after TMZ treatment revealed the emergence of TMZ mutational signature, alterations in MMR genes and increased TMB in 14 out of 16 patients. Genetic mutations induced by TMZ were dose-dependent and multiple alterations in the nucleotide context favored by the TMZ signature emerged in MMR genes such as the MSH6 T1219I variant which was detected in ctDNA and tissue of 13/14 (93%) of the cases. A subset of the patients whose tumors after TMZ priming displayed the MSH6 mutation, the TMZ mutational signature and increased TMB, achieved disease stabilization upon pembrolizumab treatment. Overall, we provide proof-of-concept that treatment of MGMT deficient/MMR proficient KRAS mutant mCRCs with TMZ can be tracked by mutational signature analysis and lead to inactivation of the MMR pathway, emergence of the TMZ mutational signature, TMB increase, and, in some cases, to disease stabilization during ICB. Citation Format: Giovanni Crisafulli, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Luca Lazzari, Filippo Pietrantonio, Alessio Amatu, Marco Macagno, Ludovic Barault, Andrea Cassingena, Alice Bartolini, Paolo Luraghi, Gianluca Mauri, Paolo Battuello, Nicola Personemi, Valeria Pessei, Pietro Paolo Vitiello, Federica Tosi, Laura Idotta, Emanuele Valtorta, Emanuela Bonoldi, Giovanni Germano, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Silvia Marsoni, Salvatore Siena, Alberto Bardelli. Emergence of tumor mismatch repair deficiency and increased mutational burden in blood and tissue of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with temozolomide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 6262.

Purpose: Defects in the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway are of clinical interest due to sensitivity of HR-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors. We were interested in defining PARP vulnerability in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) carrying KRAS and BRAF mutations who display poor prognosis, have limited therapeutic options, and represent an unmet clinical need. Experimental Design: We tested colorectal cancer cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDO), and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) enriched for KRAS and BRAF mutations for sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor olaparib, and the chemotherapeutic agents oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Genomic profiles and DNA repair proficiency of colorectal cancer models were compared with pharmacologic response. Results: Thirteen of 99 (around 13%) colorectal cancer cell lines were highly sensitive to clinically active concentrations of olaparib and displayed functional deficiency in HR. Response to PARP blockade was positively correlated with sensitivity to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cell lines as well as patient-derived organoids. Treatment of PDXs with olaparib impaired tumor growth and maintenance therapy with PARP blockade after initial oxaliplatin response delayed disease progression in mice. Conclusions: These results indicate that a colorectal cancer subset characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options is vulnerable to PARP inhibition and suggest that PDO-based drug-screening assays can be used to identify patients with colorectal cancer likely to benefit from olaparib. As patients with mCRC almost invariably receive therapies based on oxaliplatin, “maintenance” treatment with PARP inhibitors warrants further clinical investigation.

BackgroundNeoantigens that arise as a consequence of tumour-specific mutations can be recognized by T lymphocytes leading to effective immune surveillance. In colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumour types, a high number of neoantigens is associated with patient response to immune therapies. The molecular processes governing the generation of neoantigens and their turnover in cancer cells are poorly understood. We exploited CRC as a model system to understand how alterations in DNA repair pathways modulate neoantigen profiles over time.MethodsWe performed Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) in CRC cell lines,in vitroandvivo, and in CRC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to track longitudinally genomic profiles, clonal evolution, mutational signatures and predicted neoantigens.ResultsThe majority of CRC models showed remarkably stable mutational and neoantigen profiles, however those carrying defects in DNA repair genes continuously diversified. Rapidly evolving and evolutionary stable CRCs displayed characteristic genomic signatures, and transcriptional profiles. Downregulation of molecules implicated in antigen presentation occurred selectively in highly mutated and rapidly-evolving CRC.ConclusionsThese results indicate that CRC carrying alterations in DNA repair pathways display dynamic neoantigen patterns that fluctuate over time. We define CRC subsets characterized by slow and fast evolvability and link this phenotype to downregulation of antigen-presenting cellular mechanisms. Longitudinal monitoring of the neoantigen landscape could be relevant in the context of precision medicine.

Although recent clinical trials of BRAF inhibitor combinations have demonstrated improved efficacy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, emergence of acquired resistance limits clinical benefit. Here, we undertook a comprehensive effort to define mechanisms underlying drug resistance with the goal of guiding development of therapeutic strategies to overcome this limitation. We generated a broad panel of BRAF-mutant resistant cell line models across seven different clinically relevant drug combinations. Combinatorial drug treatments were able to abrogate ERK1/2 phosphorylation in parental-sensitive cells, but not in their resistant counterparts, indicating that resistant cells escaped drug treatments through one or more mechanisms leading to biochemical reactivation of the MAPK signaling pathway. Genotyping of resistant cells identified gene amplification of EGFR, KRAS, and mutant BRAF, as well as acquired mutations in KRAS, EGFR, and MAP2K1. These mechanisms were clinically relevant, as we identified emergence of a KRAS G12C mutation and increase of mutant BRAF V600E allele frequency in the circulating tumor DNA of a patient at relapse from combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. To identify therapeutic combinations capable of overcoming drug resistance, we performed a systematic assessment of candidate therapies across the panel of resistant cell lines. Independent of the molecular alteration acquired upon drug pressure, most resistant cells retained sensitivity to vertical MAPK pathway suppression when combinations of ERK, BRAF, and EGFR inhibitors were applied. These therapeutic combinations represent promising strategies for future clinical trials in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Res; 76(15); 4504–15. ©2016 AACR.

Background: The analysis of circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood, commonly referred to as liquid biopsy, is being used to characterize patients with solid cancers. Tumor-specific genetic variants can also be present in DNA isolated from other body fluids such as urine. Unlike blood, urine sampling is noninvasive, can be self-performed, and allows recurrent longitudinal monitoring. The features of tumor DNA that clears from the glomerular filtration barrier (transrenal tumor DNA, hereafter trtDNA) are largely unexplored. Patients and Methods: Specimens were collected from 24 patients with KRAS or BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Driver mutations were assessed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in ctDNA from plasma and trtDNA from urine. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in DNA isolated from tissue, plasma, and urine. Results: Out of the 24 CRC cases, only four had sufficient DNA to allow WES analyses in urine and plasma. We found that tumor alterations reside primarily in low-molecular-weight fragments. In patients where trtDNA was more than 2.69% of the urine-derived DNA, cancer-specific molecular alterations, mutational signatures, and copy number profiles identified in urine DNA are comparable with those detected in plasma ctDNA. Conclusions: With current technologies, WES analysis of trtDNA is feasible in a small fraction of mCRC patients. Tumor-related genetic information is mainly present in shorter DNA fragments. Although the limited amounts of trtDNA pose analytical challenges, enrichment of low-molecular-weight DNA and optimized computational tools improve detection of tumor-specific genetic information in urine. Citation Format: Giovanni Crisafulli, Benedetta Mussolin, Andrea Cassingena, Monica Montone, Alice Bartolini, Ludovic Barault, Antonio Martinetti, Federica Morano, Filippo Pietrantonio, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolatonio, Silvia Marsoni, Alberto Bardelli, Giulia Siravegna. Whole-exome sequencing analysis of urine transrenal tumor DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr B11.

Entrectinib is a first-in-class pan-TRK kinase inhibitor currently undergoing clinical testing in colorectal cancer and other tumor types. A patient with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring an LMNA–NTRK1 rearrangement displayed a remarkable response to treatment with entrectinib, which was followed by the emergence of resistance. To characterize the molecular bases of the patient's relapse, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was collected longitudinally during treatment, and a tissue biopsy, obtained before entrectinib treatment, was transplanted in mice (xenopatient), which then received the same entrectinib regimen until resistance developed. Genetic profiling of ctDNA and xenopatient samples showed acquisition of two point mutations in the catalytic domain of NTRK1, p.G595R and p.G667C. Biochemical and pharmacologic analysis in multiple preclinical models confirmed that either mutation renders the TRKA kinase insensitive to entrectinib. These findings can be immediately exploited to design next-generation TRKA inhibitors. Significance: We provide proof of principle that analyses of xenopatients (avatar) and liquid biopsies allow the identification of drug resistance mechanisms in parallel with clinical treatment of an individual patient. We describe for the first time that p.G595R and p.G667C TRKA mutations drive acquired resistance to entrectinib in colorectal cancers carrying NTRK1 rearrangements. Cancer Discov; 6(1); 36–44. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Okimoto and Bivona, p. 14. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

Summary Background Trabectedin is an alkylating drug with a unique mechanism of action causing single-strand and double-strand DNA breaks that activate DNA damage-response pathways. Based on our preclinical data, we hypothesised that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors might be an ideal partner of trabectedin and aimed to assess the safety, identify the recommended phase 2 dose, and explore preliminary signs of activity of trabectedin and olaparib combination treatment in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study, recruiting patients from the national Italian sarcoma network aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed bone and soft-tissue sarcoma progressing after standard treatments with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. In a classic 3 + 3 design, patients received a 24 h infusion of trabectedin on day 1 and olaparib orally twice a day in 21-day cycles across six dose levels (trabectedin 0·675–1·3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; olaparib 100–300 mg twice a day from day 1 to 21). Intermediate dose levels were permitted to improve safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (the maximum tolerated dose). Safety and antitumour activity were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. We report the results of the dose-escalation and dose-expansion cohorts. The trial is still active but closed to enrolment, and follow-up for patients who completed treatment is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02398058. Findings Between Nov 17, 2014, and Jan 30, 2017, of 54 patients assessed for eligibility, we enrolled 50 patients: 28 patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 22 patients in the dose-expansion cohort. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (IQR 2–6; range 1–17 [the patients who received the highest number of cycles are still on treatment]) with a median follow-up of 10 months (IQR 5–23). Considering all dose levels, the most common grade 3–4 adverse events were lymphopenia (32 [64%] of 50 patients), neutropenia (31 [62%]), thrombocytopenia (14 [28%]), anaemia (13 [26%]), hypophosphataemia (20 [40%]), and alanine aminotransferase concentration increase (9 [18%]). No treatment-related life-threatening adverse events or deaths occurred. One (2%) patient interrupted treatment without progression without reporting any specific toxicity. Observed dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia for more than 7 days, and febrile neutropenia. We selected intermediate dose level 4b (trabectedin 1·1 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus olaparib 150 mg twice a day) as the recommended phase 2 dose. Seven (14%; 95% CI 6–27) of 50 patients achieved a partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1. Interpretation Trabectedin and olaparib in combination showed manageable toxicities at active dose levels for both drugs. Preliminary data on antitumour activity are encouraging. Two dedicated phase 2 studies are planned to assess activity of this combination in both ovarian cancer (EudraCT2018-000230-35) and soft-tissue sarcomas. Funding Italian Association for Cancer Research, Italian Sarcoma Group, Foundation for Research on Musculoskeletal and Rare Tumors, and Italian Ministry of Health.

Targeting HER2 is effective in 24% of ERBB2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer; however, secondary resistance occurs in most of the cases. We studied the evolution of individual metastases during treatment to discover spatially resolved determinants of resistance. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis identified alterations associated with resistance in the majority of refractory patients. ctDNA profiles and lesion-specific radiographic reports revealed organ- or metastasis-private evolutionary patterns. When radiologic assessments documented progressive disease in target lesions, response to HER2 blockade was retained in other metastases. Genomic and functional analyses on samples and cell models from eight metastases of a patient co-recruited to a postmortem study unveiled lesion-specific evolutionary trees and pharmacologic vulnerabilities. Lesion size and contribution of distinct metastases to plasma ctDNA were correlated.

Success in eradicating human cancer with targeted therapies is limited by the emergence of secondary resistance. The prevalent view is that resistance is a fait accompli: when treatment is initiated, tumors already contain drug-resistant mutant cells. However, when cancer cells are challenged with targeted agents, the emergence of drug tolerant ‘persister’ cell population is often observed. Persisters survive exposure to targeted therapies through non-genetic, poorly understood mechanisms, and constitute a reservoir from which genetically divergent, drug-resistant derivatives eventually emerge. Analogously, when bacteria are exposed to stress, such as antibiotic treatment, persister cells can survive and, by switching from high-fidelity to low-fidelity DNA replication process, increase transiently their mutation rate (adaptive mutability), thus improving chances of survival. We used colorectal cancer (CRC) as model system to explore the hypothesis that, in addition to pre-existing drug resistant cells, resistance to targeted therapies could be fostered by a transient increase in genomic instability during treatment, leading to de novo genetic alterations. We found that, when exposed to EGFR and/or BRAF inhibition, mismatch repair proficient (MMRp) CRC cell lines exhibited a down-modulation of MMR and Homologous Recombination (HR) DNA repair genes, and a concomitant up-regulation of error-prone polymerases, resulting in reduced MMR and HR proficiency. Therapy-induced modulation of DNA repair genes was transient and returned to initial levels upon removal of the drugs, or when the cells developed permanent resistance to targeted agents. Notably, MLH1 and MSH2 MMR genes were down-regulated in patients-derived xenografts and tissue samples obtained at clinical response (minimal residual disease) compared to pre-treatment samples, confirming the clinical relevance of our findings. Activation of error-prone polymerases was associated with increased ROS production and accumulation of DNA damage marker γ-H2AX, in a time- a dose-dependent manner upon drug administration. The combination of DNA repair down-modulation and error-prone polymerases upregulation increases mutagenic ability and triggers microsatellite instability under drug-induced stress in CRC cells. Our results demonstrate that cancer cells, like unicellular organisms, evade therapeutic pressures by enhancing mutability. The notion that cancer cells exposed to targeted therapies activate a stress-induced adaptive mutability process may prompt the design of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at interfering with clonal evolution, reducing the generation of new variants during therapeutic treatment. Citation Format: MARIANGELA RUSSO, Giovanni Crisafulli, Alberto Sogari, Nicole Megan Reilly, Sabrina Arena, Simona Lamba, Alice Bartolini, Vito Amodio, Alessandro Magrì, Luca Novara, Ivana Sarotto, Zachary Nagel, Cortt Piett, Alessio Amatu, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena, Andrea Bertotti, Livio Trusolino, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Adaptive mutability of colorectal cancers in response to targeted therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A120. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A120

Background The diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is routinely accomplished through histopathologic examination. Prognostic information and treatment decisions are mainly determined by TNM classification, first defined in 1968. In the last decade, patient-specific CRC genomic landscapes were shown to provide important prognostic and predictive information. Therefore, there is a need for developing next generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatic workflows that can be routinely used for the assessment of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Materials and Methods To foster the application of genomics in the clinical management of CRCs, the IDEA workflow has been built to easily adapt to the availability of patient specimens and the clinical question that is being asked. Initially, IDEA deploys ad-hoc NGS assays to interrogate predefined genomic target sequences (from 600 kb to 30 Mb) with optimal detection sensitivity. Next, sequencing data are processed through an integrated bioinformatic pipeline to assess single nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, gene copy-number alterations, and chromosomal rearrangements. The overall results are gathered into a user-friendly report. Results We provide evidence that IDEA is capable of identifying clinically relevant molecular alterations. When optimized to analyze circulating tumor DNA, IDEA can be used to monitor response and relapse in the blood of patients with metastatic CRC receiving targeted agents. IDEA detected primary and secondary resistance mechanisms to ERBB2 blockade including sub-clonal RAS and BRAF mutations. Conclusions The IDEA workflow provides a flexible platform to integrate NGS and bioinformatic tools for refined diagnosis and management of patients with advanced CRC.

A critical step toward defining tailored therapy in patients with cancer is the identification of genetic interactions that may impair—or boost—the efficacy of selected therapeutic approaches. Cell models able to recapitulate combinations of genetic aberrations are important to find drug–genotype interactions poorly affected by the heterogeneous genetics of human tumors. In order to identify novel pharmacogenomic relationships, we employed an isogenic cell panel that reconstructs cancer genetic scenarios. We screened a library of 43 compounds in human hTERT-HME1 epithelial cells in which PTEN or RB1 were silenced in combination with the targeted knockin of cancer-associated mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA oncogenes. Statistical analysis and clustering algorithms were applied to display similar drug response profiles and mutation-specific patterns of activity. From the screen, we discovered that proteasome inhibitors show selectivity toward BRAF V600E–mutant cells, irrespective of PTEN or RB1 expression. Preferential targeting of BRAF-mutant cells by proteasome inhibitors was corroborated in a second BRAF V600E isogenic model, as well as in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines by the use of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Notably, carfilzomib also showed striking in vivo activity in a BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer xenograft model. Vulnerability to proteasome inhibitors is dependent on persistent BRAF signaling, because BRAF V600E blockade by PLX4720 reversed sensitivity to carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells. Our findings indicated that proteasome inhibition might represent a valuable targeting strategy in BRAF V600E–mutant colorectal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(12); 2950–61. ©2013 AACR.

Molecular alterations in genes involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) promote cancer initiation and foster tumour progression. Cancers deficient in MMR frequently show favourable prognosis and indolent progression. The functional basis of the clinical outcome of patients with tumours that are deficient in MMR is not clear. Here we genetically inactivate MutL homologue 1 (MLH1) in colorectal, breast and pancreatic mouse cancer cells. The growth of MMR-deficient cells was comparable to their proficient counterparts in vitro and on transplantation in immunocompromised mice. By contrast, MMR-deficient cancer cells grew poorly when transplanted in syngeneic mice. The inactivation of MMR increased the mutational burden and led to dynamic mutational profiles, which resulted in the persistent renewal of neoantigens in vitro and in vivo, whereas MMR-proficient cells exhibited stable mutational load and neoantigen profiles over time. Immune surveillance improved when cancer cells, in which MLH1 had been inactivated, accumulated neoantigens for several generations. When restricted to a clonal population, the dynamic generation of neoantigens driven by MMR further increased immune surveillance. Inactivation of MMR, driven by acquired resistance to the clinical agent temozolomide, increased mutational load, promoted continuous renewal of neoantigens in human colorectal cancers and triggered immune surveillance in mouse models. These results suggest that targeting DNA repair processes can increase the burden of neoantigens in tumour cells; this has the potential to be exploited in therapeutic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Combined MET and BRAF inhibition showed clinical benefit in a patient with rectal cancer carrying BRAF(V600E) and MET amplification. However after 4 months, acquired resistance emerged and the patient deceased shortly after disease progression. The mechanism of resistance to this drug combination is unknown.METHODS: We analysed plasma circulating tumour DNA obtained at progression by exome sequencing and digital PCR. MET gene and mRNA in situ hybridisation analyses in two bioptic specimens obtained at progression were used to confirm the plasma data.RESULTS: We identified in plasma MET gene hyper-amplification as a potential mechanism underlying therapy resistance. Increased MET gene copy and transcript levels were detected in liver and lymph node metastatic biopsies. Finally, transduction of MET in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells conferred refractoriness to BRAF and MET inhibition.CONCLUSIONS: We identified in a rectal cancer patient MET gene hyper-amplification as mechanism of resistance to dual BRAF and MET inhibition.

Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with the monoclonal antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab is effective in a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but the emergence of resistance limits the efficacy of these therapeutic agents. At relapse, the majority of patients develop RAS mutations, while a subset acquires EGFR extracellular domain (ECD) mutations. Here we find that patients who experience greater and longer responses to EGFR blockade preferentially develop EGFR ECD mutations, while RAS mutations emerge more frequently in patients with smaller tumour shrinkage and shorter progression-free survival. In circulating cell-free tumour DNA of patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies, RAS mutations emerge earlier than EGFR ECD variants. Subclonal RAS but not EGFR ECD mutations are present in CRC samples obtained before exposure to EGFR blockade. These data indicate that clonal evolution of drug-resistant cells is associated with the clinical outcome of CRC patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies., Some colorectal cancer patients respond well to treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies, however response is almost invariably followed by acquired resistance. Here, the authors show that patients with shorter responses acquire RAS mutations, while those relapsing later preferentially develop mutations in the extracellular domain of EGFR.