Search

The molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) predicts tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitor (TNFi) non-response in rheumatoid arthritis. This study evaluates decision-making, validity, and utility of MSRC testing. This comparative cohort study compared an MSRC-tested arm (N = 627) from the Study to Accelerate Information of Molecular Signatures (AIMS) with an external control arm (N = 2721) from US electronic health records. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Patients initiated a biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, or continued TNFi therapy. Odds ratios (ORs) for six-month response were calculated based on clinical disease activity index (CDAI) scores for low disease activity/remission (CDAI-LDA/REM), remission (CDAI-REM), and minimally important differences (CDAI-MID) . In MSRC-tested patients, 59% had a non-response signature and 70% received MSRC-aligned therapy . In TNFi-treated patients, the MSRC had an 88% PPV and 54% sensitivity. MSRC-guided patients were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to respond to b/tsDMARDs than those treated according to standard care (CDAI-LDA/REM: 36.0% vs 21.9%, OR 2.01[1.55–2.60]; CDAI-REM: 10.4% vs 3.6%, OR 3.14 [1.94–5.08]; CDAI-MID: 49.5% vs 32.8%, OR 2.01[1.58–2.55]). MSRC clinical validity supports high clinical utility: guided treatment selection resulted in significantly superior outcomes relative to standard care; nearly three times more patients reached CDAI remission. Clinicians can offer rheumatoid arthritis patients many types of therapies but the response rate for each of these drugs is low. For example, within the first year of treatment, just about one-half of patients respond to the first-line drug, csDMARD. Only one-third of methotrexate-unresponsive patients will respond to the most common second-line agent, a tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor. These low response rates present a critical challenge to treating patients. Clinicians try different cs- and b/tsDMARD and fail to quickly identify the most effective options. Then, disease will progress, irreversibly destroying patient joints, diminishing patient health-related quality of life, and increasing risks of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and death. To help clinicians quickly identify the best drugs for patients in a treat-to-target approach, a precision-medicine test was developed to identify patients unlikely to respond to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. This molecular signature response classifier considers both molecular features (patient RNA-expression levels) and clinical features (e.g. body mass index, sex) to predict patient response. To evaluate the effectiveness of this test, the outcomes of patients treated with classifier-selected drugs (in a large, tested cohort) were compared with outcomes of patients treated with conventionally selected therapies (in an external cohort of electronic-health-record data). Patients treated with classifier-selected therapies were approximately three times as likely to achieve remission than were patients treated with conventionally selected drugs. These results suggest that this molecular signature response classifier is a valuable tool for more quickly identifying optimal therapies to treat rheumatoid arthritis.

This cross-cohort study aimed to (1) determine a network-based molecular signature that predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to the tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitor (TNFi) therapy, infliximab, in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and (2) address biomarker irreproducibility across different cohort studies. Whole-transcriptome microarray data were derived from biopsies of affected colon tissue from 2 cohorts of infliximab-treated UC patients (training N = 24 and validation N = 22). Response was defined as endoscopic and histologic healing at 4-6 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively. From the training cohort, genes with RNA expression that significantly correlated with clinical response outcomes were mapped onto the Human Interactome network map of protein-protein interactions to identify a largest connected component (LCC) of proteins indicative of infliximab response status in UC. Expression levels of transcripts within the LCC were fed into a probabilistic neural network model to generate a classifier that predicts inadequate response to infliximab. A classifier predictive of inadequate response to infliximab was generated and tested in a cross-cohort, blinded fashion; the AUC was 0.83 and inadequate response was predicted with a 100% positive predictive value and 64% sensitivity. Genes separately identified from the 2 cohorts that correlated with response to infliximab appeared distinct but mapped onto the same network region of the Human Interactome, reflecting a common underlying biology of response among UC patients. Cross-cohort validation of a classifier predictive of infliximab response status in UC patients indicates that a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapies is present in patients' baseline gene expression data. The goal is to develop a diagnostic test that predicts which patients will have an inadequate response to targeted therapies and define new targets and pathways for therapeutic development.

Introduction Timely matching of patients to beneficial targeted therapy is an unmet need in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) that predicts which patients with RA are unlikely to respond to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy would have wide clinical utility. Methods The protein–protein interaction map specific to the rheumatoid arthritis pathophysiology and gene expression data in blood patient samples was used to discover a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapy. Inadequate response predictions were validated in blood samples from the CERTAIN cohort and a multicenter blinded prospective observational clinical study (NETWORK-004) among 391 targeted therapy-naïve and 113 TNFi-exposed patient samples. The primary endpoint evaluated the ability of the MSRC to identify patients who inadequately responded to TNFi therapy at 6 months according to ACR50. Additional endpoints evaluated the prediction of inadequate response at 3 and 6 months by ACR70, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI. Results The 23-feature molecular signature considers pathways upstream and downstream of TNFα involvement in RA pathophysiology. Predictive performance was consistent between the CERTAIN cohort and NETWORK-004 study. The NETWORK-004 study met primary and secondary endpoints. A molecular signature of non-response was detected in 45% of targeted therapy-naïve patients. The MSRC had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64 and patients were unlikely to adequately respond to TNFi therapy according to ACR50 at 6 months with an odds ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.0–8.3, p value 0.0001). Odds ratios (3.4–8.8) were significant (p value, Plain Language Summary A blood-based molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) integrating next-generation RNA sequencing data with clinical features predicts the likelihood that a patient with rheumatoid arthritis will have an inadequate response to TNFi therapy. Treatment selection guided by test results, with likely inadequate responders appropriately redirected to a different therapy, could improve response rates to TNFi therapies, generate healthcare cost savings, and increase rheumatologists’ confidence in prescribing decisions and altered treatment choices. The MSRC described in this study predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to TNFi therapies among targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi-exposed patients in a multicenter, 24-week blinded prospective clinical study: NETWORK-004. Patients with a molecular signature of non-response are less likely to have an adequate response to TNFi therapies than those patients lacking the signature according to ACR50, ACR70, CDAI, and DAS28-CRP with significant odds ratios of 3.4–8.8 for targeted therapy-naïve patients and 3.3–26.6 for TNFi-exposed patients. This MSRC provides a solution to the long-standing need for precision medicine tools to predict drug response in rheumatoid arthritis—a heterogeneous and progressive disease with an abundance of therapeutic options. These data validate the performance of the MSRC in a blinded prospective clinical study of targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi therapy-exposed patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00330-y.

Objectives: For rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients failing to achieve treatment targets with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (...

The First International Conference in Systems and Network Medicine gathered together 200 global thought leaders, scientists, clinicians, academicians, industry and government experts, medical and graduate students, postdoctoral scholars and policymakers. Held at Georgetown University Conference Center in Washington D.C. on September 11-13, 2019, the event featured a day of pre-conference lectures and hands-on bioinformatic computational workshops followed by two days of deep and diverse scientific talks, panel discussions with eminent thought leaders, and scientific poster presentations. Topics ranged from: Systems and Network Medicine in Clinical Practice; the role of -omics technologies in Health Care; the role of Education and Ethics in Clinical Practice, Systems Thinking, and Rare Diseases; and the role of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. The conference served as a unique nexus for interdisciplinary discovery and dialogue and fostered formation of new insights and possibilities for health care systems advances.

This study describes complementary network-based and sequence similarity methods to identify drug repurposing opportunities predicted to directly target viral proteins, highlighting results for five human pathogens., This study describes two complementary methods that use network-based and sequence similarity tools to identify drug repurposing opportunities predicted to modulate viral proteins. This approach could be rapidly adapted to new and emerging viruses. The first method built and studied a virus–host–physical interaction network; a three-layer multimodal network of drug target proteins, human protein–protein interactions, and viral–host protein–protein interactions. The second method evaluated sequence similarity between viral proteins and other proteins, visualized by constructing a virus–host–similarity interaction network. Methods were validated on the human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human papillomavirus, then deployed on SARS-CoV-2. Comparison of virus–host–physical interaction predictions to known antiviral drugs had AUCs of 0.69, 0.59, 0.78, and 0.67, respectively, reflecting that the scores are predictive of effective drugs. For SARS-CoV-2, 569 candidate drugs were predicted, of which 37 had been included in clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2 (AUC = 0.75, P-value 3.21 × 10−3). As further validation, top-ranked candidate antiviral drugs were analyzed for binding to protein targets in silico; binding scores generated by BindScope indicated a 70% success rate.

This cross-cohort study aimed to (1) determine a network-based molecular signature that predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to the tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitor (TNFi) therapy, infliximab, in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and (2) address biomarker irreproducibility across different cohort studies. Whole-transcriptome microarray data were derived from biopsies of affected colon tissue from 2 cohorts of infliximab-treated UC patients (training N = 24 and validation N = 22). Response was defined as endoscopic and histologic healing at 4–6 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively. From the training cohort, genes with RNA expression that significantly correlated with clinical response outcomes were mapped onto the Human Interactome network map of protein-protein interactions to identify a largest connected component (LCC) of proteins indicative of infliximab response status in UC. Expression levels of transcripts within the LCC were fed into a probabilistic neural network model to generate a classifier that predicts inadequate response to infliximab. A classifier predictive of inadequate response to infliximab was generated and tested in a cross-cohort, blinded fashion; the AUC was 0.85 and inadequate response was predicted with a 90% positive predictive value and 82% sensitivity. Genes separately identified from the 2 cohorts that correlated with response to infliximab appeared distinct but mapped onto the same network region of the Human Interactome, reflecting a common underlying biology of response among UC patients. Cross-cohort validation of a classifier predictive of infliximab response status in UC patients indicates that a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapies is present in patients’ baseline gene expression data. The goal is to develop a diagnostic test that predicts which patients will have an inadequate response to targeted therapies and define new targets and pathways for therapeutic development.

Objective The annual cost of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the US is estimated to be as high as $14.9 billion, of which therapeutics account for up to 45%. The mean annual drug cost per patient with moderate to severe UC is $28,586. However, only 49% of patients achieve endoscopic healing on their first anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and up to half of UC patients on biologics discontinue therapy within 12 months of initiation which leads to high rates of hospitalization and surgery. We performed a health care payer budget impact analysis to assess the influence of a precision medicine RNA-based classifier (PrismUC) that predicts, at baseline, anti-TNF non-response in patients with moderate to severe UC. Methods We developed a 12-month budget impact model for a 1-million-member health plan by analyzing peer-reviewed literature of treatment patterns in commercial and Medicare populations moderate to severe UC patients. Inputs included drug and medical costs, UC prevalence, biologic assignment patterns, therapy response rates, therapy persistence, therapy cycling, endoscopic healing rates, and risk of surgery. Drug and medical costs were obtained from published literature. A Markov model was created to estimate indirect effects of treatment efficacy, timing and cost of disease progression in subjects identified as anti-TNF non-responders (patients who fail to achieve endoscopic healing). Non-responders were assigned either to an alternative first-line therapy (vedolizumab) or to the standard of care (SOC) as determined by clinician judgments and payer formularies. The SOC included cycling patients through various biologics such as anti-TNF, vedolizumab, tofacitinib and ustekinumab. The cost of SOC was compared that of implementing a classifier to stratify patients by primary non-response to anti-TNF. Final cost savings included the cost of drugs, hospitalizations, and surgeries. Results Introducing a classifier that identifies anti-TNF non-responder UC patients to a 1-million-member health plan resulted in annual cost savings ranging from $6.8 to $9.6 million total (Table 1) within a 12-month period with and $9.0 to $12.7 thousand per patient (Table 2), depending on classifier performance metrics. Conclusion The PrismUC precision medicine classifier test that identifies non-responders to anti-TNF therapy will provide significant economic savings to payers by decreasing expenditures on unnecessary drugs and shortening times to endoscopic healing. These savings provide an economic incentive for payers to proactively engage with diagnostics manufacturers and encourage development of such tools to improve care management. A subsequent classifier that predicts response to therapies with alternative mechanisms of action is in development and expected to yield even higher cost savings.