Search

Treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) is advantageous over previous treatment options due to high efficacy, short treatment duration, and relatively few drug interactions. Similarly, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are generally preferred over warfarin for the management of thrombosis and atrial fibrillation due to a favourable safety profile. Direct-acting antivirals inhibit DOAC transport through P-glycoprotein inhibition leading to a theoretical increase in bleeding risk. We evaluated the incidence of bleeding in patients who received concurrent DAA and DOAC therapy and stratified the analysis based on the patient's cirrhosis status. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study to evaluate bleeding in patients with HCV and cirrhosis compared to patients with HCV without cirrhosis. Patients receiving at least 1 month of overlapping DAA and DOAC therapy between May 2017 and August 2020 at 11 medical centers in the United Kingdom and three medical centers in the United States were included. Charts were manually reviewed to identify baseline characteristics as well as thromboembolic or bleeding events. Bleeding events were categorized as major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Of 204 total patients, 36 patients (18%) had cirrhosis and 168 patients (82%) did not have cirrhosis. The majority of patients were male (79%) and Caucasian (75%). Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (32%) and rivaroxaban (57%) were the most commonly prescribed DAA and DOAC, respectively. Leading indications for anticoagulation included thrombosis (75%) and atrial fibrillation (21%). There were three MB events (1.5%) all of which occurred in patients with additional risk factors (age over 65 and on antiplatelet therapy) and no CRNMB occurred while on DOAC and DAA therapy. Of the three MB, one occurred in a patient with cirrhosis and two in patients without cirrhosis, RR 1.23 (0.56-2.76). In conclusion, in this multicenter cohort study of concurrent DAA and DOAC use, MB was uncommon and there was no CRNMB. There was no significant difference in bleeding events among patients with cirrhosis compared to those without cirrhosis. These findings support the use of DAA among patients requiring DOAC.

Item does not contain fulltext Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (NMV/r) is now being used to treat high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. This article provides advice to clinicians regarding recognition of medications likely to interact with NMV/r and suggests approaches to managing such drug–drug interactions. An algorithm is provided to assist in decision making.

Summary Twelve weeks sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is a highly effective pan‐genotypic regimen for hepatitis C. Phase 2 data suggest 8 weeks of treatment may be sufficient for previously untreated noncirrhotic patients with genotype 3 (GT3) infection. To maximize the number of patients potentially cured within a fixed treatment budget, we elected to treat such patients locally eligible for treatment (F2/3), with 8 weeks of SOF/VEL. By local protocol, treatment‐naive patients with F2 (LSM > 6.9kPa

Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has demonstrated good efficacy, tolerability, and safety for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection in phase III clinical trials. Doravirine achieved non-inferiority when compared with efavirenz- and darunavir/ritonavir-based regimens. Fewer adverse effects, including neuropsychiatric effects were observed with doravirine compared with efavirenz. Key pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics as well as drug-drug interactions and the resistance profile were assessed in this clinical review. Doravirine is a pyridinone NNRTI with potent antiviral activity against wild-type HIV-1 virus and common NNRTI variants. Studies in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected individuals have shown that doravirine has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for once-daily dosing, with an elimination half-life of around 15 h, median time to maximum plasma concentrations of 1-4 h, and time to steady-state concentration of 7 days. The pharmacokinetics of doravirine are not greatly influenced by sex, age, race, or hepatic impairment. Although no dose adjustment is required for doravirine in renal impairment when given as a single tablet, the fixed-dose combination tablet of doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is not recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance of

Contains fulltext : 232502.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, an outbreak of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began, resulting in a number of antivirals and immune modulators being repurposed to treat the associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Many patients requiring treatment for COVID-19 may have either pre-existing renal or hepatic disease or experience acute renal/hepatic injury as a result of the acute infection. Altered renal or hepatic function can significantly affect drug concentrations of medications due to impaired drug metabolism and excretion, resulting in toxicity or reduced efficacy. The aim of this paper is to review the pharmacokinetics and available study data for the experimental COVID-19 therapies in patients with any degree of renal or hepatic impairment to make recommendations for dosing. METHODS: COVID-19 agents included in these recommendations were listed as primaries on the University of Liverpool COVID-19 drug interaction website ( www.covid19-druginteractions.org ), initially identified from Clinicialtrials.gov and ChicCTR.org.cn. A literature search was performed using PubMed and EMBASE as well as product licences and pharmacokinetic databases. FINDINGS: Remdesivir, dexamethasone, azithromycin, favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir, atazanavir, hydroxychloroquine, interferon beta, ribavirin, tocilizumab, anakinra and sarilumab were identified as experimental drugs being used in COVID-19 trials as of November 2020. Limited study data was found for these drugs in patients with renal or hepatic impairment for COVID-19 or other indications. Recommendations were made based on available data, consideration of pharmacokinetic properties (including variability), the dosing and anticipated treatment duration of each regimen in COVID-19 and known toxicities. CONCLUSION: Dosing of drugs used to treat COVID-19 in patients with renal or hepatic impairment is complex. These recommendations were produced to provide guidance to clinicians worldwide who are treating patients with COVID-19, many of whom will have some degree of acute or chronic renal or hepatic impairment.

In a recent issue of Br J Clin Pharmacol Smith et al1 published an outstanding commentary titled ‘Dosing will be a key success factor in repurposing antivirals for Covid-19’. They highlighted that the success in our repurposing efforts will be dependent on ‘getting the dose right’ for drugs which have been developed for different indications and stressed some of the unique challenges of treating this particular disease. They pointed the reader to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as an example of a repurposed antiviral and the limited experience of this drug regimen (and other treatments) in the elderly population with comorbidities – ie those most at risk from Covid-19. It is on the issue of comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that we wish to comment.

The universal roll-out of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents has revolutionised the treatment of hepatitis C infection resulting in a treatment and cure option for nearly every individual who wants treatment. Those patients that still remain difficult to treat are often due to the management of complex drug interactions. As we move into an era of increased access to treatment, we widen the pool of healthcare providers who treat patients to include general practitioners, drug treatment teams, prison staff and pharmacists. The understanding of the role of drug interactions becomes even more important in making sure patients safely complete treatment successfully.

In a recent issue of Br J Clin Pharmacol Smith et al1 published an outstanding commentary titled ‘Dosing will be a key success factor in repurposing antivirals for Covid-19’. They highlighted that the success in our repurposing efforts will be dependent on ‘getting the dose right’ for drugs which have been developed for different indications and stressed some of the unique challenges of treating this particular disease. They pointed the reader to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as an example of a repurposed antiviral and the limited experience of this drug regimen (and other treatments) in the elderly population with comorbidities – ie those most at risk from Covid-19. It is on the issue of comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that we wish to comment.

Contains fulltext : 229144.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) As global health services respond to the coronavirus pandemic, many prescribers are turning to experimental drugs. This review aims to assess the risk of drug-drug interactions in the severely ill COVID-19 patient. Experimental therapies were identified by searching ClinicalTrials.gov for 'COVID-19', '2019-nCoV', '2019 novel coronavirus' and 'SARS-CoV-2'. The last search was performed on 30 June 2020. Herbal medicines, blood-derived products and in vitro studies were excluded. We identified comorbidities by searching PubMed for the MeSH terms 'COVID-19', 'Comorbidity' and 'Epidemiological Factors'. Potential drug-drug interactions were evaluated according to known pharmacokinetics, overlapping toxicities and QT risk. Drug-drug interactions were graded GREEN and YELLOW: no clinically significant interaction; AMBER: caution; RED: serious risk. A total of 2378 records were retrieved from ClinicalTrials.gov, which yielded 249 drugs that met inclusion criteria. Thirteen primary compounds were screened against 512 comedications. A full database of these interactions is available at www.covid19-druginteractions.org. Experimental therapies for COVID-19 present a risk of drug-drug interactions, with lopinavir/ritonavir (10% RED, 41% AMBER; mainly a perpetrator of pharmacokinetic interactions but also risk of QT prolongation particularly when given with concomitant drugs that can prolong QT), chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine (both 7% RED and 27% AMBER, victims of some interactions due to metabolic profile but also perpetrators of QT prolongation) posing the greatest risk. With management, these risks can be mitigated. We have published a drug-drug interaction resource to facilitate medication review for the critically ill patient.

This paper examines how modern physics was collected and displayed in the UK over the (long) twentieth century, focusing on the national collections in the Science Museum, London. The emergence and establishment of modern physics roughly overlaps with the development of distinct science and technology museums. This provides an opportunity to explore how collections are shaped in response to scientists’ own narratives of their professional identities, institutional or political priorities, and how certain aspects of the material culture of a scientific area can become closely intertwined with its public image. By tracing the movement of a well-known artefact of modern physics – a cathode-ray tube used by J. J. Thomson in his ‘electron’ experiments – I show how collection boundaries could be porous, although overall collection framings persisted.

CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest particle physics facility, provides museological opportunities and challenges. Visitor interest in cutting-edge physics, with its high media profile, is tempered by anxiety about understanding complex content. The topic does not readily lend itself to traditional museum showcase-dominated displays: the technology of modern particle physics is overwhelmingly large, while the phenomena under investigation are invisible. For Collider, a major temporary exhibition, the Science Museum adopted a ‘visit to CERN’ approach, recreating several of the laboratory’s spaces. We explore the effectiveness of this approach, at a time when historical studies of scientific laboratories and museum reconstructions of spaces are subject to renewed interest.

In her introduction to this volume on Nevil Maskelyne, the first major account of his life since Derek Howse's Nevil Maskelyne: the seaman's astronomer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)...

Purpose Licensed in 2002 for severe sepsis, drotrecogin alfa-activated (DAA) remains a much debated therapy particularly with respect to outcomes and a potentially increased risk of serious bleeding events (SBEs). Recent publications have suggested a significantly increased incidence of SBEs and death in those with baseline bleeding risks (BBRs). Our center is one of the highest prescribers of DAA worldwide; we describe our experience of SBEs and other clinical outcomes. Methods Prospectively collected data using a clinical guideline audit tool and database to track outcome and adverse events of DAA-treated severe sepsis patients were analyzed. Results Four hundred ninety-eight patients received DAA over an 8-year period. Hospital, critical care, and 28-day mortalities were 46.2%, 39.6%, and 35.1%, respectively. Contraindications were identified for 40 (8.0%) patients, of whom 24 (4.8%) had BBRs. Hospital mortality was 47.5% (19/40) for patients with any contraindication and 45.8% (11/24) for those with a BBR. Seventy-six (15.3%) bleeding events were reported; 22 (4.4%) were considered serious. Hospital mortality was 60.5% for patients with any bleeding event and 77.3% for those with SBEs. Conclusions This large single-center case series demonstrates that DAA has an incidence of SBEs similar to initial clinical trials. As expected, SBEs were associated with a poor outcome.

There cannot be too many jobs in physics that combine shaking hands with the Queen and rummaging around in filthy sheds, but I have one of them. As curator of astronomy and modern physics at London's Science Museum, I am responsible for about 10 000 of the museum's 200 000 collected objects, concentrating on physics from the late 20th century onwards, as well as astronomy and timekeeping. As a result, I like to think of myself as "curator of the space–time continuum".

International audience