1. The incidence of hoarseness after mediastinoscopy and outcome of video-assisted versus conventional mediastinoscopy in lung cancer staging*
- Author
-
Songül Büyükkale, Alper Çelikten, Adnan Sayar, Necati Çitak, Muzaffer Metin, Atilla Gürses, and Abdulaziz Kök
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,Databases, Factual ,Video-Assisted Surgery ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Risk Assessment ,Mediastinoscopy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Age Distribution ,0302 clinical medicine ,Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Humans ,Sex Distribution ,Risk factor ,Lung cancer ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies ,Analysis of Variance ,Hoarseness ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Dissection ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Multivariate Analysis ,Female ,Radiology ,Lung cancer staging ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Objectives Theoretically, video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VM) should provide a decrease in the incidence of hoarseness in comparison with conventional mediastinoscopy (CM). Methods An investigation of 448 patients with the NSCLC who underwent mediastinoscopy (n = 261 VM, n = 187 CM) between 2006 and 2010. Results With VM, the mean number of sampled LNs and of stations per case were both significantly higher (n = 7.91 ± 1.97 and n = 4.29 ± 0.81) than they were for CM (n = 6.65 ± 1.79 and n = 4.14 ± 0.84) (p
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF