Search

Objective: Previously, only the HLA–DRB1 alleles have been assessed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study was to identify the key major histocompatibility complex (MHC) susceptibility factors showing a significant association with anti–carbamylated protein antibody–positive (anti‐CarP+) RA. Methods: Analyses were restricted to RA patients who were anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody negative (anti‐CCP−), because the anti‐CCP status dominated the results otherwise. Therefore, we studied samples from 1,821 anti‐CCP− RA patients and 6,821 population controls from Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. The genotypes for ~8,000 MHC biallelic variants were assessed by dense genotyping and imputation. Their association with the anti‐CarP status in RA patients was tested with logistic regression and combined with inverse‐variance meta‐analysis. Significance of the associations was assessed according to a study‐specific threshold of P < 2.0 × 10−5. Results: The HLA–B*08 allele and its correlated amino acid variant Asp‐9 showed a significant association with anti‐CarP+/anti‐CCP− RA (P < 3.78 × 10−7; I2 = 0). This association was specific when assessed relative to 3 comparator groups: population controls, anti‐CarP−/anti‐CCP− RA patients, and anti‐CCP− RA patients who were positive for other anti–citrullinated protein antibodies. Based on these findings, anti‐CarP+/anti‐CCP− RA patients could be separated from other antibody‐defined subsets of RA patients in whom an association with the HLA–B*08 allele has been previously demonstrated. No other MHC variant remained associated with anti‐CarP+/anti‐CCP− RA after accounting for the presence of the HLA–B*08 allele. Specifically, the reported association of HLA–DRB1*03 was observed at a level comparable to that reported previously, but it was attributable to linkage disequilibrium. Conclusion: These results identify HLA–B*08 carrying Asp‐9 as the MHC locus showing the strongest association with anti‐CarP+/anti‐CCP− RA. This knowledge may help clarify the role of the HLA in susceptibility to specific subsets of RA, by shaping the spectrum of RA autoantibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the outcome of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a country where early clinics were established versus the outcome of patients in nonprotocolized clinics. Methods We compared 2 multicenter cohorts: an RA cohort derived from an early arthritis registry set in 36 reference hospitals in which a specific intervention was established (Evaluation of a Model for Arthritis Care in Spain [SERAP]), and a historical control cohort of patients with early RA attending 34 rheumatology departments (Prognosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis [PROAR] cohort). Effectiveness was tested by comparing the change in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), the change in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the change in the Sharp/van der Heijde radiologic score using marginal structural models. Results A total of 161 early RA patients were recruited in the PROAR cohort and 447 in the SERAP cohort. Being a SERAP patient was inversely correlated with activity, resulting in a decrease of −0.24 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] −0.39, −0.08) units in the population average of the DAS28 after adjustment was made. Moreover, intervention may be seen as a protective factor of radiologic damage, with a decrease of −0.05 (95% CI −0.09, −0.01) units in the logarithm of the total Sharp/van der Heijde score. On the other hand, a decrease in functional impairment was detected, but intervention was not statistically associated with HAQ changes. Conclusion Preventing major radiographic progression in a 2-year term inside structured and organized special programs for the management of disease, such as early arthritis clinics, are effective compared to nonprotocolized referrals, treatment, and followup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which investigated whether the MEFV gene is implicated in the pathogenesis of palindromic rheumatism (PR) and examined its clinical presentation and its evolution in a Spanish cohort of PR patients. The familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) control group included 84 Spanish FMF patients. Results showed that patients with MEFV mutations had higher mean age and age at disease onset, but lower mean serum levels of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA).

Objectives: The performance of many outcome measures for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is almost unknown in real clinical practice. Our objective was to study the correlation and sensitivity to change of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) index and the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire in a real practice setting., Methods: This was a prospective, open, non-controlled study that included 60 consecutive patients with PsA treated with ustekinumab. Most had been previously treated with one or more biologic therapeutic agents. The correlation (Spearman's rho coefficient) and the sensitivity to change [Standardized Mean Response (SMR)] of DAPSA and PsAID were studied. Effect size values of 0.20, 0.50 and 0.80 corresponded to low, moderate and high sensitivity to change, respectively., Results: More than 70% of patients achieved therapeutic goals (21.7% were in remission and 50% in low disease activity according to DAPSA categories). Two out of three patients reached an acceptable symptomatic state (PsAID <4). The correlation between final values of both instruments was substantial (Spearman's rho: 0.62, p<0.0001). The SMR for the PsAID was 1.08 (0.95-1.21) and for DAPSA was 1.5 (1.37-1.63), both values corresponding to instruments with a high sensitivity to change (>0.80). The best PsAID cut-off value for identifying DAPSA remission was 3.32 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82., Conclusions: DAPSA and PsAID seem to be useful instruments for a more comprehensive assessment of PsA in daily practice. Our results can help to disseminate the use of these instruments in the clinical practice of many rheumatologists.

Background/aims: Ustekinumab (UST) is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody approved for treating moderate to severe psoriasis and, more recently, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as well. However, information regarding its clinical usefulness in a real-world setting is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UST in a real-world clinical setting., Methods: This single-center observational study included PsA outpatients (n = 50) treated with UST from March 2015 to March 2017. Only patients who used at least 3 doses of UST were analyzed. The percentage of patients who achieved a minimal disease activity (MDA) response was collected. The impact of the disease was also evaluated according to the recently developed Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire. A binary logistic regression multivariate model was performed to look for variables predicting MDA., Results: Twenty-seven patients (54%) reached an MDA state. Mean PsAID in MDA group was 3.5 ± 2.9 versus 6.8 ± 5.1 in non-MDA patients (p < 0.001). Among the patients who achieved MDA, 19 (70.4%) had a patient-acceptable symptom state according to the PsAID, whereas only 5 (21.7%) of the 23 patients who did not reach an MDA achieved a patient-acceptable symptom state (p < 0.001). Higher basal Psoriasis Area and Severity Index decreased the odds of achieving MDA (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99; p = 0.038), whereas a longer use of UST (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13-2.06; p = 0.015) and a previous failure to 1 anti-tumor necrosis factor α (OR, 18; 95% CI, 2.52-128.63; p = 0.004) increased this odds. We found no major safety problems., Conclusions: Ustekinumab was effective and safe in this PsA population. Minimal disease activity and PsAID may be useful tools in the evaluation of PsA therapeutic interventions in routine clinical practice.