Search

Hip arthroscopy (HA) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) are common hip preservation procedures pursued in borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), yet there is no consensus on the preferred treatment. This systematic review aims to synthesize the present literature on HA and PAO for the management of BHD. A review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All studies that reported outcomes of patients with BHD treated by PAO or HA with capsular closure were included. PROs, complications, and rates of subsequent surgery were evaluated. A total of 14 studies met criteria for inclusion. Eight reported outcomes following PAO and seven reported outcomes following HA. One study reported outcomes of both procedures. Both PAO and HA studies demonstrated significant improvement in PROs. Complication rates in PAO patients ranged from 0% to 7.8% compared to 0% in HA patients. Total hip arthroplasty (THO) conversion rates in PAO patients ranged from 0% to 10.5% compared to 0% to 23.7% in HA patients. Hardware removal was performed in 25–51% of PAO patients. PAO conversion following failed HA occurred in 0–6.1% of patients. Rates of other reoperation (excluding hardware removal) in PAO patients ranged from 0% to 22.2% compared to 0% to 7.9% in HA patients. Based on the current evidence, both PAO and HA demonstrate significant improvement in PROs with a low conversion rate to THA, yet additional long-term follow-up studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have shown that short-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) predict midterm outcomes, but a limited number of studies have evaluated whether short-term outcomes predict long-term outcomes and survivorship. Purpose: To evaluate whether achieving clinically significant outcomes at 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAIS can predict patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at 10 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between June 2012 and December 2012 with a minimum 10-year follow-up were identified. Using previously established thresholds, we classified patients who achieved the 2-year Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the visual analog scale (VAS) for satisfaction as the high satisfaction group and patients who did not as the low satisfaction group. Minimum 10-year PROs were then compared between the groups, including scores for the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)–Activities of Daily Living and –Sports Specific, the modified Harris Hip Score, the VAS for pain, and the VAS for satisfaction. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared. Results: Of 120 eligible consecutive patients, 85 patients were included (70.8% follow-up rate), of whom 61.2% were female. The mean age was 34.0 ± 12.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 25.4 ± 4.6. Of the 85 patients, 29 (34.1%) did not achieve PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively compared with 56 (65.9%) who did. The low satisfaction group had significantly worse acetabular chondral grades at the time of surgery (P =.008). At minimum 10-year follow-up, the high satisfaction group showed significantly better HOS-Activities of Daily Living, HOS-Sports Specific, modified Harris Hip Score, VAS pain, and VAS satisfaction scores (P ≤.031). Compared with the low satisfaction group, the high satisfaction group had a significantly lower rate of secondary surgery (1.8% vs 24.1%, respectively; P =.002). Conclusion: Patients who achieved PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years after hip arthroscopy demonstrated superior minimum 10-year outcomes compared with patients who did not, including greater PRO scores and a higher survivorship rate. The high satisfaction group had lower grade acetabular cartilage damage at the time of surgery compared with those who did not achieve PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chondral defects in the athlete's hip are a relatively common occurrence, often presenting with debilitating pain and activity limitation. Preoperative identification of cartilage defects is challenging and there are many different modalities for treatment. Nonsurgical interventions, including activity modification, physical therapy, and injections, play a vital role, especially in less severe cases and as adjuncts to surgical intervention. Treating surgeons must be familiar with the cartilage restoration procedures available, including debridement, microfracture, and various implantation and transplantation options. Safe and effective management of cartilage defects is imperative to an athlete's return to sport. It is also imperative that surgeons are aware of all these various treatment options to determine what modality is best for their patients. This review serves to outline these options, cover the published literature, and provide general guidelines for surgeons when they encounter chondral defects in the office and the operating room. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sport participation has been associated with favorable outcomes following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) at short- and mid-term follow-up; however, few studies have evaluated the 10-year outcomes in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the achievement of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation-free survivorship between patients with and without regular preoperative sport participation who underwent HA for FAI and had a minimum of 10 years of follow-up., Methods: Data were prospectively collected for patients who underwent primary HA for FAI between January 2012 and September 2013. Patients who participated in weekly sport participation at the time of surgery ("athletes") were matched 1:1 to patients who denied sport participation ("nonathletes"), controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Preoperative and 10-year postoperative PROMs were collected, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports (HOS-Sports) subscales, the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and the visual analog scale for pain (VAS Pain) and satisfaction (VAS Satisfaction). Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement and reoperation-free survivorship were compared between the groups., Results: Sixty-four athletes were matched to 64 nonathletes of similar age, sex, and BMI (p ≥ 0.411). In the athlete group, 85.9% were recreational-level athletes. The groups had similar preoperative PROMs, except for the HOS-ADL subscale, where the athlete group demonstrated a higher preoperative score (67.8 ± 16.7 versus 59.9 ± 21.1, p = 0.029). Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in all PROMs (p < 0.001) at the minimum 10-year follow-up10.3 ± 0.4 years). At the time of the final follow-up, the athlete group demonstrated significantly higher scores across all of the measured PROMs (p ≤ 0.036). Athletes showed a higher cumulative PASS achievement compared with nonathletes for the HOS-ADL subscale (73% versus 50%, p = 0.033), the HOS-Sports subscale (85% versus 61%, p = 0.010), the mHHS (69% versus 43%, p = 0.013), and the VAS Pain (78% versus 51%, p = 0.006). Reoperation-free survivorship frequencies were 87.5% and 82.8%, respectively (p = 0.504)., Conclusions: Athletes who underwent contemporary HA for FAI showed superior PROMs and PASS achievement compared with nonathletes at the 10-year follow-up. Athletes and nonathletes showed reoperation-free survivorship frequencies of 87.5% and 82.8%, respectively., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: No external funding was received for this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I425)., (Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)