Search

An historical population-based cohort study was conducted aiming to estimate the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the South Region of Portugal between Jan 2016 and June 2017; to clinically characterize the diagnosed individuals; to describe instituted treatment; and to estimate survival outcomes. Data were extracted from a cancer registry (ROR-Sul) covering 4,800,000 inhabitants (46% of the Portuguese population) and included a total of 789 individuals meeting eligibility criteria. The crude incidence rate (18 months) of melanoma was 13.36/100,000 inhabitants and the Age-Standardized Incidence Rate per 100,000 World population was 9.65/100,000 inhabitants. The most common histological subtypes identified were superficial extension, followed by malignant melanoma and nodular melanoma. Most cases were diagnosed in stage I (50.39%), equally distributed by sex and with a median age of 65 years. During the study period, 174 recurrence events were recorded (23.45%) and recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in more advanced stages. Patients had a two-fold risk of recurrence/death when in presence of ulcerated tumors [adjusted hazard ratio (adj HR) = 2.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40–3.70]. Overall survival rate at 3-years was 80.54% (95% CI 77.58–83.15), higher than previous national reports, and considerably higher for individuals diagnosed at earlier stages (p < 0.001). We have also identified differential survival outcomes in stages II–III explained by the uptake of sentinel lymph node biopsy. The epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of malignant melanoma patients studied are consistent with international literature. The incidence and rates observed suggests additional public health campaigns are needed to modify behaviours of the Portuguese population and thus reduce their risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to summarize activities being undertaken by the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe to prevent and control COVID-19 in and beyond prisons, activities specifically designed to increase information sharing and to support Member States, to comment on potential impacts of these initiatives at country-level responses and to underline the need for a rights-based approach to managing the pandemic, including the right to vaccination. Design/methodology/approach: The Health in Prisons Programme (HIPP) of the WHO Regional Office for Europe worked with partner organizations to review regularly the evidence on best practices in prison health and use it to inform policy recommendations at the global level. HIPP issued overarching guidance and specific tools to support implementation of measures to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 in prisons and other custodial settings. Moreover, to monitor the emergence of outbreaks, the HIPP developed a minimum data set for countries voluntarily to report COVID-19 cases and identify situations in need of direct support. Findings: Since May 2020, the WHO has periodically received data from Member States, leading to the development of country-specific bulletins to support countries and, whenever appropriate, to organize virtual missions to further support ministries and public health bodies responsible for managing COVID-19 in prisons. Originality/value: The development of a specific set of indicators for prisons enables exploring data in a disaggregated manner. Monitoring response measures developed in prison enables judging their appropriateness to minimize the spread of SARS-CoV2 in prisons and alignment with guidance issued by the WHO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• APs with high affinity for Adrenergic alfa-1, Histaminic H 1 , Muscarinic M 1 , and Serotoninergic 5-HT 2A were associated with a higher risk of reporting of MACCE compared to low affinity. • MACCE reporting rates might be related to those receptors antagonism as ziprasidone, olanzapine, and clozapine presented the highest RORs. • APs with higher-risk of MSE were associated with higher risk of reporting of MACCE compared to the lower-risk. Antipsychotics (APs) have been associated with major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Our aim was to elucidate the association between APs, stratified for receptor affinity and metabolic side effects (MSE), in the reporting of MACCE. A case/non-case study was conducted using data from the WHO global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database, VigiBase, among all reports associated with an AP. Cases were ICSRs of MACCE, while non-cases were all other adverse drug reactions (ADRs). APs were classified by AP group, the degree of receptor affinity for adrenergic, dopaminergic, muscarinic, histaminic, and serotoninergic receptors and by MSE profile. The strength of the association was estimated with logistic regression and expressed as crude and adjusted reporting odds ratios (ROR adj.) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). We identified 4987 reports of MACCE and 328,907 reports of other ADRs. Atypical APs (ROR adj. 2.46; 95%CI 2.20–2.74) were significantly associated with the reporting of MACCE compared to typical ones. APs with high affinity for Adrenergic alfa-1 (ROR adj. 2.98; 95%CI 1.93–4.59), Histaminic H 1 (ROR adj. 2.31; 95%CI 1.98–2.68), Muscarinic M 1 (ROR adj. 1.87; 95%CI 1.74–2.01), and Serotoninergic 5-HT 2A (ROR adj. 3.19; 95%CI 2.07–4.92) were associated with a higher risk of reporting of MACCE compared to low affinity. APs with higher-risk of MSE were associated with higher risk of reporting of MACCE (ROR adj. 1.88; 95%CI 1.73–2.05) compared to the lower-risk. APs with high affinity for Adrenergic alfa-1, Histaminic H 1 , Muscarinic M 1 , and Serotoninergic 5-HT 2A receptors and with high-risk of MSE may explain the occurrence of those events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This position paper highlights the opportunistic integral role of the pharmacist across the patient pathway utilizing cardiovascular care as an example. The paper aims to highlight the potential roles that pharmacists worldwide can have (or already have) to provide efficient patient care in the context of interprofessional collaboration. Methods: It results from a literature review and experts seeking advice to identify existing interventions and potential innovative interventions. We developed a conceptual framework highlighting seven critical phases in the patient pathway and for each of those listed some of the initiatives identified by our experts worldwide. Results: Existing pharmacists' interventions in each of these phases have been identified globally. Various examples in the area of prevention and self‐management were found to exist for long; the contribution for early detection and subsequently to timely diagnosis were also quite clear; integration of care was perhaps one of the areas needing greater development, although interventions in secondary care were also quite common. Tertiary care and end of life interventions were found to often be left for other healthcare professionals. Conclusion: On the basis of the findings, we can argue that much has been done but globally consider that pharmacists are still an untapped resource potentially useful for improved patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SARS-CoV2 is dramatically impacting the global population. Worldwide, pharmacists are changing their roles and being increasingly recognized for their role as essential service providers. This commentary provides some examples collected from Asia, Europe, the Americas and Africa, ranging from essential services to meet human rights basic needs, extended generalist services developed to ensure continuity of care and supply of essential medicines to the development of differentiated extended responsibilities in emergency care. All examples were collected using a network of pharmacists from 27 countries, representing various areas of pharmacy practice, education and research and outreaching to include patient advocates. Selected services illustrate good practice, capability to adapt and contribution to universal health coverage. Above all, it demonstrates the commitment and innovation of the pharmaceutical workforce in the fight against COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Physical activity (PA) promotion in healthcare systems is one of the priority areas highlighted by the World Health Organization, which recognizes that progress has been slow largely due to a lack of awareness and investment while requiring a system-based approach. Community pharmacies are one of the health structures that are more easily accessible to populations, thus constituting an ideal venue for developing health promotion activities. This research aimed to describe PA-enabling interventions developed in community pharmacies by pharmacists. Methods: An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and reference lists of the different papers until June 2023. Studies were eligible if performed in community pharmacies by pharmacists, focused on interventions aimed at increasing PA levels and if at least one PA-specific outcome was measured at two different time points. Results: We identified 7076 publications in the initial search, plus 31 records identified through backward citation tracking from relevant studies. After an initial screening, 236 were selected for full-text analysis. Of the 29 selected papers, 10 presented a low risk of bias for the measurement of PA levels. PA outcomes were generally self-reported outcomes where the change in terms of the percentage of individuals considered active or who increased PA because of the intervention. Conclusion: Several interventions to improve PA through community pharmacies were found although with a high level of heterogeneity and with only few with a low risk of bias. More targeted research that aims to capture PA levels and support the training of healthcare professionals is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: What is known and objective: In the last decades, many lists have been developed to screen for inappropriate prescribing. However, information on which potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) could increase the cardiovascular risk in the elderly is not objectively presented. This review aimed to identify and quantify those PIMs by extracting information from published PIM‐lists. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Statement (PRISMA), a systematic review of PIM‐lists was conducted. The search strategy was run in PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar (1991‐09/2017). All PIMs described in those lists were extracted and stratified by their potential cardiovascular risk (including major adverse cardiovascular events—MACE). The number of times each PIM was reported on those lists was also assessed. Results and discussion: We identified 724 papers, and 24 were retained. From those, a total of 17 PIMs to be avoided by the elderly and 21 drug‐disease interactions were retrieved. The reporting of PIMs with risk of cardiovascular adverse events was 15.3%, whereas the reporting of those with MACE risk was 7.2%. PIMs most frequently described were tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; 12/24), centrally acting antiadrenergic agents (11/24), NSAIDs (7/24), antiarrhythmics (Class I and III; 6/24), peripherally acting antiadrenergic agents (6/24) and antithrombotic agents (5/24). Most frequently described PIMs with MACE risk were NSAIDs (7/24), antiarrhythmics (Class I and III) (7/24), selective calcium channel blockers with vascular effects (6/24) and antipsychotics (4/24). What is new and conclusion: Data suggest that PIM‐lists focus mainly on common adverse events and often poorly describe the potential consequence for MACE occurrence. This systematic review could help healthcare professionals in the identification and deprescribing of these medicines in older patients with high cardiovascular risk during medication review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]