1. Prostate Artery Embolization in Patients With Acute Urinary Retention
- Author
-
Marc Sapoval, Francois Desgranchamps, Carole Déan, Amaury de Gouvello, Paul Meria, Olivier Pellerin, Alberto Kenny, Nicolas Thiounn, Charles Dariane, Helena Pereira, and Gregory Amouyal
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Prostatic Hyperplasia ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Prostate ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Embolization ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,First episode ,Aged, 80 and over ,Urinary retention ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,Hyperplasia ,Middle Aged ,Urinary Retention ,medicine.disease ,Embolization, Therapeutic ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Urinary Catheterization - Abstract
Background This prospective study assessed the efficacy of prostate artery embolization after failure of a trial without catheter in patients suffering a first episode of acute urinary retention as a result of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Patients with failure of a trial without catheter despite alpha-blocker therapy were invited to participate in this protocol. Twenty patients were included in the study, and all underwent prostate artery embolization with calibrated polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres (Bead Block, BTG Ltd., Farnham, UK). Results Successful removal of the indwelling bladder catheter and spontaneous voiding was achieved in 15 of 20 (75%) patients, and the overall clinical success at 6 months after prostate embolization was 14 of 20 (70%). No patient experienced severe adverse events. Conclusions Prostate artery embolization might be a valuable treatment after a failure of a trial without catheter. Further studies are needed to better define its place in this setting.
- Published
- 2019