Search

Objectives: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a hybrid procedure that allows reversal of blood flow away from the brain while placing a stent through direct surgical access of the common carotid artery. It has been shown to have a lower risk of perioperative stroke compared with any prospective trial of transfemoral carotid artery stenting. However, intraoperative injuries related to the procedure and its management are not well characterized. One of the intraoperative complications seen in TCAR is iatrogenic carotid artery dissection (CD). We aim to add qualitative insight in further characterizing CDs and its management in this emerging technology. Methods: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for surveillance of all medical devices approved for use. This database was queried for all cases associated with Silk Road Medical's ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System from September 2016 to October 2020. Case narratives related to CD were individually analyzed to determine time of injury (intraoperative, recovery, and post-discharge follow-up). CD reporting was further analyzed for the associated procedural event at the time of injury, number of access attempts to CD repair, and type of CD repair. Reports associated with CD repair were further categorized into endovascular repair and open surgical repair. Results: Of the 115 unique adverse events in the database, there were 58 CDs. Most were identified intraoperatively (n = 55), while three were incidentally found postoperatively. Overall, sheath placement was the most common procedural event attributed to CD (N = 34). There was adequate narrative information about CD repair in 54 patients. Intraoperative repair was performed in 52 cases and two were repaired after post-discharge follow-up imaging was performed. Among CDs that did not require additional access to engage the true lumen, the proportion of endovascular repair (62.5%) was significantly higher (p =.044) compared to the proportion of open surgical repair (37.5%). However, the proportion of open surgical repair (75%) was significantly higher than the proportion of endovascular repair (25%) in CDs with persistent failure to engage the true lumen despite ≥2 access attempts (p =.039). Conclusion: CD is the most common injury related to TCAR as reported on MAUDE. The most commonly reported procedural event associated with CD was sheath placement. The rate of intraoperative endovascular and open surgical CD repair was associated with whether the access to the true lumen of the carotid artery required additional access attempts or not. This should add qualitative insight among the vascular surgery community regarding intraoperative management of CDs from a TCAR procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Use of radial and ulnar access has increased due to its perceived benefits over femoral access. Ulnar artery catheterization can place patients at risk of significant complications, including pseudoaneurysm, expanding hematoma, compartment syndrome, ulnar nerve injury, and critical hand ischemia. The purpose of this study was to describe complications specific to ulnar artery catheterization. Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent ulnar artery catheterization at our institution between 2019 and 2021. Complications were assessed, and complication rates were compared with previously published studies on ulnar artery catheterization for coronary angiography (percutaneous coronary intervention). Results: A total of 41 patients were available for review with a mean age of 59 years. Of these, 17 patients (41%) sustained complications in the immediate postprocedural period. These complications included hematoma (12 patients, 29%), pseudoaneurysm (1 patient, 2%), ulnar artery thrombosis (1 patient, 2%), ulnar neuropathy (3 patients, 7%), arterial damage requiring repair (2 patients, 5%), transient ischemia (3 patients, 7%), and compartment syndrome (2 patients, 5%). Three of these patients (7%) required operative intervention, and several were admitted to the hospital for an additional period of observation. Conclusions: This series highlights the significant risks associated with ulnar artery catheterization for percutaneous procedures. Complications include pseudoaneurysm, expanding hematoma, compartment syndrome, ulnar nerve damage, and critical hand ischemia. Several of these patients required urgent or emergent surgical intervention, with some patients experiencing ongoing ulnar nerve symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]