Search

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating chronic lung disease characterized by irreversible scarring of the lung parenchyma. Despite various interventions aimed at mitigating several different molecular aspects of the disease, only two drugs with limited clinical efficacy have so far been approved for IPF therapy., Objective: We investigated the therapeutic efficacy of amifostine, a detoxifying drug clinically used for radiation-caused cytotoxicity, in bleomycin-induced murine pulmonary fibrosis., Methods: C57BL6/J mice were intratracheally instilled with 3 U/kg of bleomycin. Three doses of amifostine (WR-2721, 200 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally on days 1, 3, and 5 after the bleomycin challenge. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected on day 7 and day 21 for the assessment of lung inflammation, metabolites, and fibrotic injury. Human fibroblasts were treated in vitro with transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), followed by amifostine (WR-1065, 1-4 µg/mL) treatment. The effects of TGF-β1 and amifostine on the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were assessed by live cell imaging of MitoSOX. Cellular metabolism was assessed by the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), the oxygen consumption rate (OCR), and the concentrations of various energy-related metabolites as measured by mass spectrum (MS). Western blot analysis was performed to investigate the effect of amifostine on sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and adenosine monophosphate activated kinase (AMPK)., Results: Three doses of amifostine significantly attenuated lung inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis. Pretreatment and post-treatment of human fibroblast cells with amifostine blocked TGF-β1-induced mitochondrial ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction in human fibroblast cells. Further, treatment of fibroblasts with TGF-β1 shifted energy metabolism away from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and towards glycolysis, as observed by an altered metabolite profile including a decreased ratio of NAD + /NADH and increased lactate concentration. Treatment with amifostine significantly restored energy metabolism and activated SIRT1, which in turn activated AMPK. The activation of AMPK was required to mediate the effects of amifostine on mitochondrial homeostasis and pulmonary fibrosis. This study provides evidence that repurposing of the clinically used drug amifostine may have therapeutic applications for IPF treatment., Conclusion: Amifostine inhibits bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by restoring mitochondrial function and cellular metabolism., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Despite high incidence rates and severe complications, the management of xerostomia lacks clinical guidelines. The aim of this overview was to summarize the clinical experience derived from the last 10 years of treatments and prevention using systemic compounds. Results showed that the cytoprotective drug amifostine, and its antioxidant agents, are the most discussed as preventive agents of xerostomia in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. In the presence of the disease, the pharmacological treatments have been mainly directed to stimulate secretion of the damaged salivary glands, or to counteract a decreased capacity of the antioxidant system, in view of an increasing of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the data demonstrated low ability of the drugs, together with a great number of side effects, which strongly limit their use. Concerning traditional medicine (TM), valid clinical trials are so limited that neither the efficacy nor the absence of interferences to concomitant chemical therapies can be validated. Consequently, the management of xerostomia and its devastating complications remain a very significant void in daily clinical practice.

Amifostine is a radioprotector with high efficacy but poor safety, short half-life, no oral formulation, and poor compliance, which limits its application. With the increasing risk of exposure to radiation, the development of new radioprotective agents is critical. We previously synthesized a new amifostine derivative, the small molecule compound HL-003. In this study, we focused on evaluating the radioprotective properties of HL-003. Using the in vitro 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl assay, we initially confirmed HL-003 as a strong antioxidant and demonstrated that its free radical scavenging activity was stronger than that of amifostine. Then, we performed an acute toxicity test, a 28-day toxicity test, a 30-day survival rate test, and a pharmacokinetic study, all of which provided aggregate evidence that HL-003 functioned as a small molecule radioprotector with high efficacy, a favorable safety profile, a long half-life, and oral administration. The intestinal radioprotective mechanism of HL-003 was explored in male C57 mice after abdominal irradiation by analyzing intestinal tissue samples with hematoxylin-eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, TUNEL staining, and immunofluorescence detection. The results showed that HL-003 protected intestinal DNA from radiation damage and suppressed the expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX, phosphorylated p53, and the apoptosis-related proteins caspase-8 and caspase-9, which contributed to maintaining the normal morphology of the small intestine and provided insights into the mechanism of radioprotection. Thus, HL-003 is a small molecule radioprotector with a potential application in radiation medicine., Competing Interests: The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Yahong Liu et al.)

Introduction: We prospectively tested in a phase II study high-dose aracytin and idarubicin plus amifostine as induction regimen in 149 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) aged ≥ 60 years, evaluated by a simplified multidimensional geriatric assessment (MGA)., Methods: Ninety-one fully or partially fit patients (61%) were allocated to intensive chemotherapy and 58 (39%) frail patients to best supportive care (BSC). Intensively treated patients, showing early death and complete response (CR) rate respectively of 5.5% and 73.6%, received 61 consolidations, followed by autologous transplant (ASCT), stem cell transplantation (SCT) or gemtuzumab ozogamicin, depending on mobilization outcome and donor availability., Results: The 8-year overall survival (OS) of these patients was 20.4%, with median duration of 11.4 months significantly superior to the 1.5 months of BSC arm (p < 0.001). Hyperleukocytosis and cytogenetics were predictors of survival with a relative risk of 1.8 in patients with poor karyotype without hyperleukocytosis (p = 0.02) and 3 in those with hyperleukocytosis (≥ 50,000/μl) (p = 0.002)., Conclusion: MGA allowed tailored post-consolidation in 53.8% of patients after high-dose aracytin induction, with long-term survival doubling that reported in the literature after standard-dose cytarabine regimens., Trial Registration: The study was registered with the Umin Clinical Trial Registry (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr), number R000014052.

Background: Radiation therapy is a cornerstone of the therapeutic modalities used in modern oncology. However, it is sometimes limited in its ability to achieve optimal tumor control by radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity. In delivering radiation therapy, a balance must be achieved between maximizing the dose to the tumor and minimizing any injury to the normal tissues. Amifostine was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical radiation protector intended to reduce the impact of radiation on normal tissue, lessening its toxicity and potentially allowing for increased tumor dose/control. Despite being FDA-approved almost 20 years ago, Amifostine has yet to achieve widespread clinical use., Summary: A thorough review of Amifostine's development, mechanism of action, and current clinical status were conducted. A brief history of Amifostine is given, from its development at Walter Reid Institute of Research to its approval for clinical use. The mechanism of action of Amifostine is explored. The results of a complete literature review of all prospective randomized trials to date involving the use of Amifostine in radiation therapy are presented. The results are arranged by treatment site and salient findings discussed. Side effects and complications to consider in using Amifostine are reviewed. Key Messages: Amifostine has been explored as a radiation protectant in most radiation treatment sites. Studies have demonstrated efficacy of Amifostine in all treatment sites reviewed, but results are heterogeneous. The heterogeneity of studies looking at Amifostine as a clinical radiation protectant has precluded a definitive answer on its efficacy. Complicating its clinical use is its toxicity and delivery requirements. Amifostine has largely fallen out of use with the advent of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). However, side effects with IMRT remain a challenge and concern. The use of Amifostine in the IMRT era has been poorly explored and is worthy of future study., (© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction : A radiation countermeasure that can be used prior to radiation exposure to protect the population from the harmful effects of radiation exposure remains a major unmet medical need and is recognized as an important area for research. Despite substantial advances in the research and development for finding nontoxic, safe, and effective prophylactic countermeasures for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS), no such agent has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Area covered : Despite the progress made to improve the effectiveness of amifostine as a radioprotector for ARS, none of the strategies have resolved the issue of its toxicity/side effects. Thus, the FDA has approved amifostine for limited clinical indications, but not for non-clinical uses. This article reviews recent strategies and progress that have been made to move forward this potentially useful countermeasure for ARS. Expert opinion : Although the recent investigations have been promising for fielding safe and effective radiation countermeasures, additional work is needed to improve and advance drug design and delivery strategies to get FDA approval for broadened, non-clinical use of amifostine during a radiological/nuclear scenario.

Purpose: Despite the development of high-precision radiation therapy, ionizing radiation inevitably damages healthy tissues. Radiodermatitis and radioinduced oral mucositis are frequent and significant side effects among patients with breast and head and neck cancer, respectively. These radiation-related injuries negatively affect patient quality of life and can lead to unplanned therapeutic breaks and compromise treatment outcomes. Currently, no preventive or mitigating agent has emerged to address these issues. Although amifostine, a well-known free radical scavenger, has proven efficacy against specific radio- and chemo-induced toxicities, severe adverse side effects (reversible hypotension, nausea, emesis, etc) combined with logistical hurdles are associated with its recommended intravenous route of administration, limiting its use., Methods and Materials: We developed a thermogel containing the active thiol metabolite of amifostine (CPh-1014) that polymerizes at body temperature and serves as a matrix for topical application onto the skin or mucosa., Results: Applied before irradiation, CPh-1014 greatly reduced the severity of oral mucositis and dermatitis induced by either a single dose or fractionated irradiation regimens in in vivo mouse models. The cytoprotective effect of CPh-1014 was confirmed by the decrease in DNA double-strand breaks in the irradiated epithelium. Noticeably, CPh-1014 did not affect radiation therapy efficacy against tumors grafted at submucosal and subcutaneous sites. In contrast to the intravenous administration of amifostine, CPh-1014 oral application did not induce hypotension in dogs., Conclusions: CPh-1014 confers radioprotective effects in healthy tissues with reduced systemic side effects without compromising radiation therapy efficacy. We propose CPh-1014 as an easy-to-implement therapeutic approach to alleviate radiation therapy toxicity in patients with breast and head and neck cancer., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A biweekly administration of sustained-release microsphere dosage form of amifostine, a radioprotective drug used in radiotherapy, was performed to examine the feasibility to minimize injection frequency and blood concentration-associated side effects. Model animal trials indicated that this subcutaneously injecting microspheres, 50-100 μm in diameter, achieved bi-weekly prolonged radio-protective efficacy and, at the same time, significantly reduced skin irritation than the solution form of amifostine given by the same administration route. In addition, the hypertension associated with blood concentration of amifostine was not observed in the drug-treated rats. The animals given the amifostine microspheres and amifostine showed significantly differences in white blood cell, red blood cell, hematocrit, hemoglobin and spleen tissue histopathology after exposed under a cobalt-60 γ-radiation at a dose rate of 1.0 Gy/min for 6 min. The in vitro release profile of amifostine from the micropsheres showed a minor initial burst (less than 20% of total drug loading in the first day of administration), consisting with the side effects observations. The results suggest that amifostine encapsulated in sustained-release microspheres may be an ideal dosage form for prolonged radio-protective efficacy and improved patient compliance.

Background/aim: The addition of amifostine to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) in advanced, inoperable NSCLC presents varying toxicity. The present study examined amifostine's effect on toxicity and efficacy of CRT or RT alone., Materials and Methods: Database searches yielded 16 eligible trials comprising of 1,057 patients. Results of randomised trials were pooled and used to estimate the overall effect., Results: Amifostine reduced the risk of >grade 2 acute oesophagitis by 26% [risk ratio (RR), 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.65-0.86; p<0.0001] and the risk of acute pulmonary toxicity by 44% (RR, 0.56; 95%CI=0.41-0.75; p=0.0001). Risk of complete response was unchanged (RR, 1.64; 95%CI=0.99-2.73; p=0.06), partial response was unchanged (RR, 0.92; 95% CI=0.73-1.16; p=0.48). Statistical heterogeneity was high for toxicity but low for response., Conclusion: Statistical heterogeneity of retrived results casts doubt over amifostine's efficacy in this setting, despite decreased acute oesophageal and pulmonary toxicity. Amifostine did not compromise treatment efficacy., (Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to review the available literature from 1966 until December 31, 2010 and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of amifostine for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients., Methods: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology. The body of evidence for the use of amifostine, in each cancer treatment setting was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible., Results: Thirty papers were reviewed for evidence on amifostine as an intervention for oral mucositis. No guideline was possible for amifostine in any cancer treatment setting due to inadequate and conflicting evidence., Conclusion: Review of the amifostine studies for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis has found insufficient evidence to support its use in any cancer treatment setting for this purpose. Additional well-designed research is needed to clarify the role of amifostine as an intervention for oral mucositis.

Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) for bladder cancer is as an effective alternative of cystectomy. Although rapid cancer clonogen repopulation contributes to radio-resistance, accelerated RT schemes based on ≤ 2 Gy fractions have failed to improve results. We suggest that accelerated hypofractionation (HypoARC) may be more effective, as it targets both tumors with increased clonogenic activity and tumors with low radio-sensitivity., Patients and Methods: Eighty-two bladder cancer patients were treated with concomitant-boost conformal RT (14 × 2.7 Gy to the pelvis and 15 × 3.4 Gy to the bladder, within 19 days). Patients received a daily dose of 0/500/750/1,000 mg of amifostine using a dose-individualization algorithm (15.8%, 8.5%, 19.5%, and 56.1% of patients respectively)., Results: Early frequency grade 2-3, dysuria grade 1-2, diarrhea grade 2, and proctitis grade 2 appeared in 10.9%, 15.8%, 8.5%, and 13.4% of patients, respectively. The incidence of late sequelae was low (1.2% grade 2 frequency, 2.4% grade 2-3 dysuria, 2.4% grade 2-3 hematuria, 2.4% grade 2-3 incontinence). Patients receiving 1,000 mg of amifostine experienced significantly lower toxicities. The complete response rate, 3-year local control and disease specific survival rates were 86.6%, 56%, and 63%, respectively., Conclusions: HypoARC is linked with low early and late radiation toxicity, which is further reduced with the administration of high dose daily amifostine. The control and survival rates compare favorably with previously published data., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In a previous study, we found that amifostine provides some protection to the seminiferous epithelium of prepubertal doxorubicin-treated male rats but does not improve their fertility status as adults. Based on these results, a long-term study was undertaken to evaluate the DNA damage caused to spermatogonia and the consequences for embryo development., Methods: Twenty-four male prepubertal rats (30-day-old) were divided into four equal groups and treated with: doxorubicin (D--5 mg/kg), amifostine (A--400 mg/kg), amifostine/doxorubicin (AD--amifostine 15 min before doxorubicin) and control (C--0.9% saline solution). Sixty-four days after the treatment, animals were euthanized and the testes and epididymides were excised. The testes were fixed in Bouin's solution and historesin-embedded for histopathological analysis. Spermatozoa from the cauda epididymides were collected for chromatin structure analyses (Comet Assay and SCSA™). Adult rats (100-day-old) were mated with fertile females for embryo analyses on 2.5, 4.5 and 20 days post-coitum (d.p.c.)., Results: The seminiferous epithelium histopathology of AD group was better preserved compared with the D group. On the other hand, rats from the D and AD groups presented an increased percentage of sperm DNA strand breaks, as assessed by the comet assay, as well as an increased level of sperm chromatin denaturation, as assessed by the SCSA™ assay. In amifostine-treated groups (A and AD) there was a significant increase in the number of arrested embryos, as observed by the number of oocytes/zygotes on 2.5 d.p.c., when compared with control and doxorubicin groups; however, this number was increased when the AD group was compared with the A group., Conclusions: These results raise a concern about the effects of the association of these two drugs on the germ cell genome. Amifostine-doxorubicin-exposed rat spermatogonia produced long-term damage on sperm DNA, compromised conceptus development and reduced pregnancy outcome.

Both 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate sodium (mesna) and amifostine's active metabolite WR-1065 are thiol-based cytoprotective agents that are critical components of high-dose chemotherapy regimens used to treat various cancers in both adults and children. This case report describes a patient with a supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor who developed severe drug reactions to both mesna and amifostine/WR-1065, suggesting that the thiol component of these agents triggered the adverse reactions. This report highlights the clinical presentation of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in the context of pediatric oncology and the supportive care measures that, if implemented rapidly, may diminish the reaction severity and allow successful completion of chemotherapy.

With the eventual goal of reducing relapse and thus improving overall survival in selected lymphoma patients, a Phase I study was performed using the cytoprotectant amifostine to permit safe dose-augmentation of melphalan in the carmustine (BCNU), etoposide, cytarabine (arabinosylcytosine), and melphalan (BEAM) regimen before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Between 30 July 2003 and 25 November 2008, a total of 32 lymphoma patients were entered, of which 28 were evaluable. We found the melphalan dose in BEAM could be safely escalated to at least 260 mg/m², a substantial increase from the usual dose of 140 mg/m² in BEAM while the trial was terminated early due to poor accrual, no maximal tolerated dose or dose-limiting toxicity was found. A Phase II trial is planned., (2011 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Bevacizumab has established therapeutic activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy enhances the activity of radiotherapy in experimental models. We assessed the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in patients with rectal cancer., Methods and Materials: Nineteen patients with radiologic T3 and/or N+ rectal carcinoma were treated with preoperative conformal hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy (3.4 Gy in 10 consecutive fractions) supported with amifostine (500-1,000 mg daily), capecitabine (600 mg/m(2) twice daily, 5 days per week), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 2 cycles). Surgery followed 6 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. A cohort of 14 sequential patients treated with the same regimen without bevacizumab was available for comparison., Results: Grade 2 or 3 diarrhea was noted in 7 of 19 patients (36.8%), which was statistically worse than patients receiving the same regimen without bevacizumab (p = 0.01). A higher incidence of Grade 2 or 3 proctalgia was also noted (21.1%) (p = 0.03). Bladder and skin toxicity was negligible. All toxicities regressed completely within 2 weeks after the end of therapy. Pathologic complete and partial response was noted in 7 of 19 cases (36.8%) and 8 of 19 cases (42.1%). Within a median follow-up of 21 months, none of the patients has had late complications develop and only 1 of 18 evaluable cases (5.5%) has had locoregional relapse., Conclusions: Bevacizumab can be safely combined with hypofractionated radiotherapy and capecitabine as a preoperative radiochemotherapy regimen for patients with rectal cancer. The high pathologic complete response rates urges the testing of bevacizumab in randomized studies., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Fever/rash is a side-effect of amifostine that demands immediate interruption of the drug. Here, we focus on the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a putative marker linked with amifostine fever/rash., Materials and Methods: The CRP serum values were analyzed in 496 patients receiving radiotherapy supported with amifostine (500-1000 mg/d). CRP levels were recorded before the onset of radiotherapy (day 0), on day 15 and when the fever/rash appeared. For 121 out of 496 patients, CRP values on day 7 were also available. About 79 patients (15.9%) developed fever/rash symptoms., Results: The CRP levels before the onset of therapy were 0 to 20.7 mg/dL (normal, ≤0.5 mg/dL). For patients who did not develop fever/rash, the CRP levels increased from a median of 0.30 to 0.50 on day 15; P = 0.001. Patients who developed fever/rash showed a more than 7-fold increase of the median CRP levels (median, 3.50; P < 0.0001). This sharp CRP rise was specific for amifostine-related fever/rash. Initially abnormal CRP levels were linked with a 2-fold risk for fever/rash (P = 0.01), while abnormal levels on day 7 were linked with a 3-fold higher risk (P = 0.08). The occurrence of fever/rash was independent of the amifostine dose level., Conclusions: Sharp rise of CRP levels on the day after the fever/rash development suggest amifostine-related etiology of fever/rash. Abnormal initial CRP levels and/or high CRP levels on day 7 should be considered as an alert signal as the probability to develop fever/rash reaches the 30%.

Purpose: To compare compliance with and efficacy of intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) amifostine for the treatment of patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, who were eligible for radiotherapy and who were not receiving concurrent chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive either IV amifostine (200 mg/m(2) daily for 3 minutes, 15 to 30 minutes before irradiation) or SC amifostine (500 mg; two sites; 20 to 60 minutes before irradiation). The primary end point was late xerostomia at 1 year as indicated by unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates, a patient benefit questionnaire score, and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late toxicity grade., Results: Results for IV (n = 143) versus SC (n = 148) administration were as follows. There was no significant difference in compliance (69% for IV v 71% for SC) in patients receiving a full dose of amifostine. Reasons for dose reduction were acute toxicity (25% for IV v 27% for SC; P = .51) and logistics (18% for IV v 9% for SC administration; P = .09). Acute toxicity differed significantly in terms of grade 1 to 2 hypotension (19% for IV v 8% for SC; P = .01), grade 1 to 2 skin rash (9% for IV v 21% for SC; P = .01), and local pain (0% for IV v 8% for SC; P = .003). The incidence of grade 2 or greater xerostomia was significantly higher for patients who received amifostine via SC administration (37% for IV v 62% for SC; P = .005) in the 127 patients (n = 67, IV; n = 60, SC) evaluable at 1 year but not at 2 or 3 years (36% for IV v 51% for SC administration; P = .19; 32% for IV v 41% for SC; P = .63). A generalized linear mixed-model analysis of all data revealed no significant difference in patient self-assessment of salivary function (P = .25), unstimulated or stimulated salivary flow rates (P = .054 and .82, respectively), or grade 2 or greater xerostomia (P = .23)., Conclusion: SC amifostine administration was not significantly superior to IV amifostine administration in terms of patient compliance or efficacy.

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of antibodies against platelet surface antigens, resulting in platelet destruction. ITP is generally treated using glucocorticoids, splenectomy, immunosuppressants, platelet transfusions, and also rituxan and rituximab. However, as these treatments are not effective in some refractory ITP patients, especially the elderly, who are also at greater risk of cerebral hemorrhage, we have undertaken this study to find a safe and effective way of treating these patients. In a clinical protocol, we have examined the efficacy of the cytoprotective adjuvant, amifostine, on 24 ITP patients, consisting of 21 Chinese (age: 13-92 years), and 3 Caucasians (age: 46-73 years). In order to prevent the side effects associated with amifostine treatment, an alternative dosing and anti-emetic regimen was developed as part of this protocol, which significantly improved patient acceptance. The protocol consisted of daily intravenous infusions of amifostine 5 × 400 mg per week, for a total of 4-5 weeks. All the patients experienced a long-lasting and continuing remission, defined as platelet counts greater than 100,000. Two patients relapsed: one after an upper respiratory tract infection, and another due to Helicobacter pylori. However, both these patients had complete remission, after they were treated again with amifostine. In this clinical study, we report for the first time, the successful use of amifostine for ITP treatment in refractory patients. In conclusion, amifostine may have good therapeutic effect on ITP patients, especially in refractory and/or elderly. The long-term clinical outcome and the mechanism of action of this drug still need further investigation.

Objectives: To assess the effects of amifostine on salivary glands in radioactive iodine-treated differentiated thyroid cancer., Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled clinical trials which compared the effects of amifostine with those of placebo or acid-stimulating agents., Results: Two randomized controlled clinical trials with a total of 130 patients were included. Both studies had a low risk of bias. There were no statistically significant differences between the effects of amifostine and acid-stimulating agents on the incidence of xerostomia (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.01 to 9.52), the decrease of scintigraphically measured uptake of (99m)Tc by the parotid (RR 0.30, 95% CI -2.28 to 2.88) or submandibular glands (RR 1.90, 95% CI -1.46 to 5.26) at 12 months, or the reduction in blood pressure (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 99.16). Neither of the included trials investigated death from any cause, morbidity, health-related quality of life or costs., Conclusion: The results of two randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that amifostine has no significant radioprotective effects on salivary glands in radioactive iodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. The use of acid-stimulating agents to increase salivation should remain the first choice during radioactive iodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Patients should also be well informed of the importance of hydration and acid stimulation.

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) combined with cisplatin or cetuximab is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced head/neck cancer (LA-HNC). The feasibility of radiochemotherapy with cisplatin and cetuximab, supported with amifostine, was herein investigated., Methods and Materials: Forty-three patients with LA-HNC were recruited. Conformal hypofractionated/accelerated RT with amifostine cytoprotection (2.7 Gy/fraction, 21 fractions in 4 weeks) was combined with cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)/week) and cetuximab (standard weekly regimen) therapy. The dose of amifostine was individualized according to tolerance., Results: A high daily amifostine dose (750-1,000 mg) was tolerated by 41.8% of patients, and a standard dose (500 mg) was tolerated by 34.9% of patients. A high amifostine dose was linked to reduced RT delays (p = 0.0003). Grade 3 to 4 (3-4) mucositis occurred in 7/43 (16.2%) patients, and fungal infections occurred in 18/43 (41.8%) patients. Radiation dermatitis was not aggravated. Interruption of cetuximab due to acneiform rash was necessary in 23.3% of patients, while amifostine-related fever and rash were not observed. Severe late radiation sequelae consisted of laryngeal edema (9% laryngeal cases) and cervical strictures (33% of hypopharyngeal cases). Good salivary function was preserved in 6/11 (54.5%) nasopharyngeal cancer patients. The complete response rate was 68.5%, reaching 77.2% in patients with minor radiotherapy delays. The 24-month local control and survival rates were 72.3% and 91%, respectively (median follow-up was 13 months.)., Conclusions: In this feasibility study, weekly administration of cisplatin and cetuximab was safely combined with accelerated RT, supported with amifostine, at the cost of a high incidence of acneiform rash but a reduced incidence of amifostine-related fever/rash. A high daily dose of amifostine allows completion of therapy with minor delays.

Purpose: Short radiotherapy schedules might be more convenient for patients and overloaded radiotherapy departments, provided late toxicity is not increased. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a hypofractionated and highly accelerated radiotherapy regimen supported with cytoprotection provided by amifostine in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery., Methods and Materials: A total of 92 patients received 12 consecutive fractions of radiotherapy (3.5 Gy/fraction for 10 fractions) to the breast and/or axillary/supraclavicular area and 4 Gy/fraction for 2 fractions to the tumor bed). Amifostine at a dose of 1,000 mg/d was administered subcutaneously. The follow-up of patients was 30-60 months (median, 39)., Results: Using a dose individualization algorithm, 77.1% of patients received 1,000 mg and 16.3% received 750 mg of amifostine daily. Of the 92 patients, 13% interrupted amifostine because of fever/rash symptoms. Acute Grade 2 breast toxicity developed in 6.5% of patients receiving 1,000 mg of amifostine compared with 46.6% of the rest of the patients (p < .0001). The incidence of Grade 2 late sequelae was less frequent in the high amifostine dose group (3.2% vs. 6.6%; p = NS). Grade 1 lung fibrosis was infrequent (3.3%). The in-field relapse rate was 3.3%, and an additional 2.2% of patients developed a relapse in the nonirradiated supraclavicular area. c-erbB-2 overexpression was linked to local control failure (p = .01). Distant metastasis appeared in 13% of patients, and this was marginally related to more advanced T/N stage (p = .06)., Conclusion: Within a minimal follow-up of 2.5 years after therapy, hypofractionated and accelerated radiotherapy with subcutaneous amifostine cytoprotection has proved a well-tolerated and effective regimen. Longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term late sequelae.

Background: Radiation toxicity is an important problem that limits treatment intensity and adversely affects patients' quality of life. Amifostine is a cytoprotector that can reduce toxicity and potentially improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy., Objective: To discuss the role of amifostine in modern radiotherapy and compare and contrast with alternative approaches to reducing radiation toxicity., Methods: We conducted a literature search through Medline to identify randomized clinical trials pertaining to keyword 'amifostine'. We also consulted reviews, book chapters and selected articles regarding amifostine and normal tissue protection., Results/conclusion: Amifostine is an effective normal tissue protector with level I evidence supporting its use in head and neck and gynecologic cancers but studies in other disease sites, although promising, are inconclusive. Further study is needed to demonstrate conclusively the benefits of wider amifostine use.

The aim of this study was to investigate the curative effects of amifostine (AMF) combined with recombinant human beta-erythropoietin (rhbeta-EPO) on patients with pure erythroid aplasia (PEA). Two patients with PEA were treated with amifostine and rhbeta-EPO. The therapeutic regimen was adopted with AMF 0.4 g/day given by intravenous injection for 5 days first, then after a break of 2 days it went on for 3 weeks consecutively, that was considered as one treatment cycle. The rhbeta-EPO 6 000 U was used by subcutaneous injection for 3 times per week. The results showed that the red cell count, hemoglobin and reticulocyte count of two patients obviously increased after treatment. The erythroid ratio in bone marrow increased. Bone marrow biopsy showed that the erythroid proliferation improved. Intervals of red cell transfusions (RCT) in the two patients who live by red cell transfusion were prolonged after AMF treatments, and the amounts of each RCT was decreased obviously. The main side effect of amifostine was discomfort of digestive system, but was tolerated by all patients. In conclusion, amifostine plus rhbeta-EPO may be a new, effective and safety method especially for the elder PEA patients. The long-term curative effects and mechanism of amifostine still need further evaluation.

Background: This is a report on the feasibility and efficacy of hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy combined with amifostine cytoprotection (hypoARC) and capecitabine in the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma., Patients and Methods: Twenty-seven patients (pts) received pre- (14 pts) or postoperative (13 pts) conformal radiotherapy with 10 consecutive fractions of 3.4 Gy in 12 days, supported with subcutaneously administered high-dose amifostine (up to 1000 mg) and capecitabine (daily dose of 600 mg/m2 twice a day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks). Ten additional patients with inoperable tumors received a higher dose (15 fractions of 3.4 Gy) as a radical intervention and 5 received a lower dose for palliation., Results: Chemotherapy-related toxicity was minimal and radiation grade 2 diarrhoea and proctitis was noted in 3/42 and 4/42 cases, respectively. No peri- or postoperative complications were noted in patients receiving pre-operative radiochemotherapy. Significant tumor regression was confirmed in post- RT CT-imaging and major histological responses were noted in 85% of cases treated before surgery. Late toxicity (median follow-up 26 months) was negligible. The 2-year local relapse-free survival was 85-90% in patients treated with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy and 35% in patients with inoperable tumors., Conclusion: Capecitabine-based hypoARC is feasible with only minimal early and late toxicity and encouraging efficacy.

Purpose: To determine the role of amifostine as a protectant against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in patients with average-risk (AR) medulloblastoma treated with craniospinal radiotherapy and four cycles of cisplatin-based, dose-intense chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue., Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to determine whether, in patients with AR medulloblastoma (n = 62), amifostine would decrease the need for hearing aids (defined as >or= grade 3 ototoxicity in one ear) compared with a control group (n = 35), 1 year from initiating treatment. Ninety-seven patients received craniospinal irradiation (23.4 Gy) followed by 55.8 Gy to the primary tumor bed using three-dimensional conformal technique, and four cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide (4,000 mg/m(2)/cycle), cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)/cycle), and vincristine (two 1.5 mg/m(2) doses/cycle) and stem-cell rescue. When used, amifostine (600 mg/m(2)/dose) was administered as a bolus immediately before and 3 hours into the cisplatin infusion., Results: The median age of the 97 patients was 8.7 years (range, 3.2 to 20.2 years). The study and control groups were similar in age and sex distribution. Amifostine was well-tolerated. One year after treatment initiation, 13 patients (37.1%) in the control group versus nine (14.5%; one-sided chi(2) test P = .005) of the amifostine-treated patients had at least grade 3 ototoxicity, requiring hearing aid in at least one ear., Conclusion: Amifostine administered before and during the cisplatin infusion can significantly reduce the risk of severe ototoxicity in patients with AR medulloblastoma receiving dose-intense chemotherapy.

We and others have demonstrated that the milieu created by ionizing radiation (IR) used for conditioning plays a major role in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). We reasoned that antioxidants that could inhibit IR induction of inflammatory cytokines and/or apoptosis might reduce the incidence or severity of aGVHD. Therefore, BALB/c mice were treated with amifostine, n-acetyl cysteine (NAC) or pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) prior to transplantation with allogeneic C57Bl/6 bone marrow and spleen cells. None of 30 amifostine-pretreated mice developed weight loss or other signs of aGVHD and they rejected their allogeneic transplants. However, pretreatment to groups of five mice each with molar equivalent doses of NAC or PDTC accelerated death, and lower doses did not prevent aGVHD. In vitro tests demonstrated that PDTC and NAC acted as pro-oxidants when incubated with isolated normal mouse lymphocytes, whereas amifostine and its active metabolite WR-1065 did not. The conclusion that amifostine protected immune function from IR in vivo was further supported by the fact that amifostine and WR-1065 preserved the response of radiated normal lymphocytes to respond to PHA and both stimulated growth of non-radiated, non-PHA-treated normal lymphocytes in vitro. Taken together, these data caution the use of amifostine in allogeneic transplantation.

Amifostine is an organic thiophosphate prodrug used for cytoprotection against toxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In a European prospective study of SJS/TEN, six patients were suspected to have SJS/TEN associated with amifostine. Our findings suggest that the risk of life-threatening cutaneous adverse reactions to amifostine could be significantly increased.

Limited information is available regarding the use of amifostine in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Melphalan, carboplatin, etoposide +/- cyclophosphamide is a commonly used preparatory regimen in pediatric solid tumor HSCT. Therefore, we decided to determine the feasibility of the addition of amifostine (750 mg/m b.i.d. x 4 d) to melphalan (200 mg/m), carboplatin (1200 mg/m), and etoposide (800 mg/m) (level 1) and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m and 3800 mg/m, levels 2 and 3, respectively) followed by autologous HSCT. Thirty-two patients with a variety of pediatric solid tumors were studied. Seventeen patients were accrued at level 1, 9 at level 2, and 6 at level 3. Major toxicities during the administration of the preparatory regimen were hypocalcemia, emesis, and hypotension. Hypocalcemia required aggressive calcium supplementation during the conditioning phase. No dose limiting toxicities were encountered at level 3. Amifostine at 750 mg/m b.i.d. for 4 days can be administered with a double alkylator regimen consisting of melphalan (200 mg/m), cyclophosphamide (up to 3800 mg/m), carboplatin (1200 mg/m), and etoposide (800 mg/m) with manageable toxicities.

Background: Combined radiochemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). In the present study, the feasibility of hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy with cytoprotection (HypoARC) in combination with vinorelbine and liposomal doxorubicin was evaluated., Patients and Methods: Fourteen patients (pts) with LA-NSCLC (PS 0-2) were recruited. Patients received 15 fractions for 3.5 Gy within four consecutive weeks (1 week split after the 10th fraction), supported with subcutaneously administered amifostine (500-1000 mg/day). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was administered at a standard dose of 20 mg/m2 every two weeks, for 3 consecutive cycles. Vinorelbine was administered at 3 dose levels: a) 20 mg/m2 every week (5 pts), b) 25 mg/m2 thrice every two weeks (5 pts) and c) 30 mg/m2 thrice every two weeks (4 pts)., Results: Grade 3 neutropenia enforcing chemotherapy delays was noted in 2/5 and 2/4 patients in the groups b and c respectively. Fatigue was a common but not dose-defining feature. Radiation grade 2 esophagitis was noted in 6/14 patients. No case of severe radiation pneumonitis was noted. Partial response was documented in 9/14 patients, minimal response in 3/14 and stable disease in 2/14. The median local progression-free survival was 12 months and the median overall survival was 8 months., Conclusion: It is concluded that the administration of 25 mg/m2 of vinorelbine thrice a week together with liposomal doxorubicin and thoracic radiotherapy is feasible for patients with LA-NSCLC, providing high response rates. Further studies are required to better assess benefits in terms of local and distant control of the disease.

The objective of this study was to explore the effect of amifostine (AMF) in treating patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and its adverse effects. 17 ITP patients (aged from 13 to 92, mean 65 years) were treated with AMF and their therapeutic regimen was following: 0.4 g AMF was dissolved in 100 ml physiological saline, the intravenous drop was performed at day and lasted 5 days per week, with interval 2 days, 4 weeks were considered as a course of treatment. The results showed that the normal counts of platelets were observed in 17 ITP patients after 1 course of treatment, and remained unchanged for 2 months following stop of therapy. In that time, no any drugs such as hormonal preparation, gamma-globulin, blood transfusion and so on were given in all treated patients, the main adverse effect of AMF was discomfort in digestive system that all patients could endure. Therefore, the patient's life quality was obviously improved. It is concluded that the AMF has been initially and successfully used to treat ITP patients with positive response, and may be considered as a safe-effective drug for treating old patients with ITP, but the long-term effect and pharmacological mechanism of this drug needs further evaluation.

Purpose: To report long-term data from a prospective trial of subcutaneous (s.c.) amifostine in patients who received chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)., Methods and Materials: Patients >or=18 years of age with previously untreated Stage III/IV SCCHN received fractionated radiotherapy, 1.8-2.0 Gy/day, 5 days per week, to a total dose of 70-72 Gy, plus weekly paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and carboplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously (i.v.) for 6 weeks. All patients received 500 mg s.c. amifostine 30-60 min before radiotherapy with antihistamine and antiemetic prophylaxis., Results: Twenty patients were evaluable (median age, 55 years). The incidence of Grade 2 xerostomia was 42% and 29% at 12 and 18 months, respectively; there were no reports of Grade >or=3 xerostomia. Grade >or=3 mucositis occurred in 30% of patients, with median time to resolution of 12.5 weeks (range, 5-17 weeks). Survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 95% and 71%, respectively. All patients experienced Grade 2 weight loss; 7 patients (35%) experienced Grade /=3 amifostine-related adverse events., Conclusions: Subcutaneous amifostine was well tolerated by patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for SCCHN, with lower rates of nausea/vomiting than reported in trials with i.v. amifostine. Xerostomia and mucositis rates were similar to those reported in trials with i.v. amifostine.

Skin reactions to amifostine are considered to be rare. Here we describe the case of a patient who developed a severe skin eruption (Stevens-Johnson syndrome) during radiotherapy probably due to amifostine. As in most of the patients described so far, the worst lesions were located in the skin areas previously treated with radiotherapy.

Unlabelled: Amifostine has emerged as a pancytoprotectant shown protection against nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity in preclinical studies., Methods: We designed a prospective comparative randomized trial to evaluate the cytoprotective effects of amifostine in patients with osteosarcoma receiving cisplatin and doxorrubicin. Patients were evaluated for renal, hearing and cardiac toxicity., Results: We included 28 patients, mean age was 11.6 years, five had metastatic disease. Fifteen patients received amifostine and 13 did not. 20% of patients receiving amifostine developed renal toxicity compared to 30% in the control group (p = 0.318). Grade 1 and 2 audiologic toxicity was present in 100% of the experimental group against 85% of the controls (p = 0.501). Grade 1 cardiac toxicity was present in 2 patients in the control group (p = 0.175). There were no statistical significant differences between the two groups for chemotherapy-related toxicity. Response to chemotherapy was significantly better in the amifostine group., Conclusion: amifostine did not reduce the ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity of our treatment regime. It was not well tolerated due to emesis. It is a selective cytoprotectant without reducing the effect of chemotherapy.

Background: Concurrent radiochemotherapy and altered radiotherapy fractionation are under thorough investigation in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: The efficacy and tolerance of hypofractionated accelerated radiochemotherapy supported with high dose (up to 1000 mg daily) amifostine cytoprotection (hypoARC) was examined in 31 patients. Fifteen fractions of 3.5 Gy were delivered within 28-35 days. Liposomal doxorubicin and oxaliplatin were concurrently given., Results: A total of 65% of patients tolerated a daily amifostine dose of 750-1000 mg. Chemotherapy had an excellent tolerance. Grade 3 oesophagitis was noted in 7/31 (22.5%) patients. Radiation pneumonitis was absent and radiation fibrosis minimal. Complete and partial response were observed in 12/31 (38.6%) and 17/31 (54.8%) patients, respectively. The 2-year estimated local progression-free and overall survival interval were 58% and 45%, respectively., Conclusion: Given the simplicity of HypoARC, the very low morbidity, and the high complete response and survival rates obtained, HypoARC regimens deserve further testing.

Objective: We evaluated the feasibility of a new regimen in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The main end points were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity; secondary end points were feasibility of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) collection, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival (OS)., Patients and Methods: We treated 42 fit elderly patients with high-dose (HD) idarubicin plus HD-cytarabine (Ara-C), with amifostine., Results: We observed one treatment-related death (2%). The main extrahematological toxicity was represented by grade III to IV infections in 64% of patients. Hematological toxicity was acceptable with 15 days (range, 9-29 days) to reach >500 x 10(6)/L absolute neutrophil count and 16 days (range, 3-39 days) to achieve an unsupported platelet count >20,000 x 10(6)/L. Median duration of severe neutropenia was 12 days (range, 1-36) and median number of febrile days and intravenous antibiotics therapy was 6 (range, 0-17) and 17 days (range, 0-34), respectively, Median duration of hospitalization was 31 days (range, 20-61). ORR was 83% (34 of 41); 32 patients received intensive consolidation therapy; 15 patients were able to mobilize a sufficient number of CD34+ cells; and 14 were transplanted., Conclusion: According to the intention to treat criteria all patients were analyzed for outcomes. Five-year OS was 19%, with median follow-up of 38 months. Patients with unfavorable cytogenetic and those with secondary AML had poorer OS; about 40% of patients could mobilize a sufficient amount of PBSC for autologous stem cell transplantation.

Salivary hypofunction, the most common complication of high-dose radiation therapy (RT) to the head and neck, has a significant impact on quality of life, and requires careful planning of long-term dental and oral care. This report documents the results and conclusions of an evidence-based literature review on multidisciplinary team management of salivary hypofunction during and after RT. An update is provided on the pathophysiology of salivary hypofunction during and after RT, and recommendations for clinical management. The paper presents aspects managed by dental professionals (use of cholinergic agonists and other saliva stimulants, prevention of hyposalivation-induced rampant caries, and use of saliva substitutes), as well as the role of the radiation oncologist in minimizing salivary gland damage (parotid-sparing RT; cytoprotectants). This summary includes basic science, translational and clinical research topics with respect to radiation-induced salivary hypofunction, and provides an evidence-based management algorithm.

The study was aimed to investigate the curative effects and adverse effects of amifostine in the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Amifostine (AMF) was used alone (4/12) or combined with recombinant human erythropoietin (rh-EPO) (8/12) in 12 MDS patients. The therapeutic regimen was adopted with AMF 0.4 g/day for 5 days, then took a break of 2 days and then went on for 3 weeks consecutively, that was reputed as one treatment cycle. rh-EPO 6 000 U was used for 3 days per week. The results showed that 12 patients all attained hematological improvement in peripheral blood. 11 cases showed major effective response rate (91.7%), while 1 case showed minor response rate (8.3%). The effective response rate of hemoglobin, leukocytes and platelets was 100%, 75% and 58.3% respectively. The intervals of red cell transfusions (RCT) in 2 cases living on red cell transfusion before AMF treatment were prolonged after AMF treatments, and the amount of each RCT was decreased obviously. The side effect was usually discomfort of digestive system, but all patients can endure. In conclusion, Amifostine is a potential drug in the treatment of MDS patients with safety especially to those elder patients who often suffered from other multiple organ disfunctions, and the curative effect will be improved by more treatment cycles.

Purpose: Intravenous amifostine 200 mg/m2 reduces xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients. This Phase II study evaluated subcutaneous (s.c.) amifostine in a similar patient population., Patients and Methods: Patients received amifostine 500 mg, administered as two 250-mg s.c. injections 60 min before once-daily radiation for head-and-neck cancer (50-70 Gy in 5-7 weeks). The primary endpoint was the incidence of > or =Grade 2 acute xerostomia., Results: Fifty-four patients received s.c. amifostine and radiotherapy. The incidence of > or =Grade 2 acute xerostomia was 56% (95% CI, 43-69%) and the incidence of > or =Grade 2 late xerostomia at 1 year was 45% (95% CI, 29-61%). The incidence of acute xerostomia was lower than reported previously with no amifostine in a controlled study; rates of acute xerostomia were similar between s.c. and i.v. amifostine in the two studies. The rate of late xerostomia with s.c. amifostine was intermediate between rates for i.v. amifostine and no amifostine, and not statistically significantly different from either historical control. Grades 1-2 nausea and emesis were the most common amifostine-related adverse events. Grade 3 amifostine-related adverse events reported by >1 patient included: dehydration (11%); rash (6%); and weight decrease, mucositis, dyspnea, and allergic reaction (each 4%). Seven patients (13%) had serious cutaneous adverse events outside the injection site. One-year rates of locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 78%, 75%, and 85%, respectively., Conclusions: Subcutaneous amifostine provides a well-tolerated yet simpler alternative to i.v. amifostine for reducing acute xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients.

Background: The main objective of this study was to investigate whether nondaily intravenous administration of amifostine was as effective as daily intravenous administration with regard to the reduction of the incidence of Grade 2 or greater xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer., Methods: Ninety-one patients who received bilateral irradiation for head and neck cancer were included. Thirty patients received no amifostine (AMI-0), 31 patients received amifostine at a dose of 200 mg/m2 3 times weekly (AMI-3), and 30 patients received amifostine at a dose of 200 mg/m2 daily (5 times weekly) (AMI-5). Acute and late xerostomia and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks later, and at 6-month intervals from 6 months to 24 months postradiotherapy., Results: Grade 2 or greater late xerostomia differed significantly at 6 months (AMI-0 74% vs. AMI-3 67% vs. AMI-5 52%; P = .03), but not thereafter. During follow-up, patient-rated xerostomia deteriorated more in AMI-0 patients (mean difference score:, 52 for AMI-0 compared with 25 for AMI-3, and 29 for AMI-5; P = .01). Nausea and emesis were reported most frequently as side effect, but Grade 2 or greater toxicity was observed in only 4 patients. However, 28% of patients discontinued amifostine before the end of radiotherapy., Conclusions: Long-term, patient-rated xerostomia was less for the AMI-3 and AMI-5 groups through 2-year follow-up, but no difference was noted between the AMI-3 and AMI-5 groups. For late xerostomia according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, the same effect was observed at 6 months, but not thereafter., (Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose of Review: As part of the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck cancer patients, radiation therapy plays an essential role, improving locoregional control. Radiation therapy-induced xerostomia is a late side-effect that increases the risk for developing dental caries and compromises oral mucosal integrity, resulting in oral pain, loss of taste, difficulties with swallowing and chewing, sleep disorders and worse quality of life. This review focuses on evaluation, prevention and management of radiation therapy-induced xerostomia., Recent Findings: In terms of xerostomia prevention, some clinical trials evaluating amifostine and intensity-modulated radiation therapy have shown positive results. Pilocarpine is a useful agent as a treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients., Summary: Despite some advances in radiation therapy-induced xerostomia prevention, its treatment is an area in which advances are urgently needed.

Background: Individualization of the daily dose of amifostine may prove of value in achieving maximum cytoprotection during radiotherapy., Patients and Methods: Using an algorithm based on: i) the gradual increase of the amifostine dose, ii) an amifostine tolerance-recording scale and iii) the intermittent administration of dexamethasone, the individualization of the subcutaneous amifostine dose was prospectively attempted in a large cohort of 132 cancer patients, treated with 12-15 consecutive fractions of 3.4-3.5 Gy (hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy with cytoprotection, HypoARC)., Results: Using the above algorithm, a daily dose of 1000 mg of amifostine was successfully delivered in 62% of patients. An additional 20% of patients tolerated well a mean daily dose of 750-975 mg. Nausea and fatigue were minimal, while fever/rash enforced amifostine interruption in 7% of cases., Conclusion: Individualization of the amifostine dose allowed an up to two-fold increased daily-dose administration of amifostine and can be tested as a support to aggressive radio-chemotherapy schemes aiming at improving the cure rates of cancer patients, while avoiding excess toxicity.

Purpose: Clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of intravenous (i.v.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) amifostine for reducing xerostomia and mucositis after radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of i.v. amifostine during radiochemotherapy for head-and-neck cancer., Methods and Materials: Patients from European and American study centers received i.v. amifostine 300 mg/m2 (n = 67) or placebo (n = 65) before carboplatin 70 mg/m2 and radiotherapy on Days 1 to 5 and 21 to 25, and i.v. amifostine 200 mg/m2 or placebo before radiotherapy on other days., Results: Toxicity incidences were (amifostine, placebo, p value): Grade 2 or higher acute xerostomia (39%, 34%, 0.715), Grade 3 or higher acute mucositis (39%, 22%, 0.055), Grade 2 or higher late xerostomia (37%, 24%, 0.235), and Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (42%, 20%, 0.008). One-year rates of locoregional failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between treatments., Conclusions: The used amifostine doses were not able to reduce the toxicity of simultaneous radiochemotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. The safety of amifostine and the lack of tumor protection were consistent with previous studies.

Purpose: Prognosis is poor for Ewing sarcoma patients with metastasis at diagnosis. We intensified a five-drug therapy (ifosfamide, etoposide alternated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) using filgrastim but not stem-cell support. We studied topotecan alone and combined with cyclophosphamide in therapeutic windows before the five-drug therapy. A randomly assigned proportion of patients received amifostine as a cytoprotective agent., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were < or = 30 years old and had histologically proven Ewing sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) and metastasis at diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic cycles began every 21 days, after recovery from toxicities., Results: One hundred ten of the 117 patients enrolled were eligible. Thirty-six patients received initial topotecan. Three had partial responses (PRs), and 17 had progressive disease (PD). Thirty-seven patients were administered topotecan and cyclophosphamide; 21 of these patients achieved PR, and one patient had PD. In a randomly assigned group of 69 patients, amifostine did not provide myeloprotection, which was measured by absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, or cycle intervals. The best responses to the overall therapy included 45 complete responses, 41 PRs, stable disease in 14 patients, and PD in five patients. For all patients, the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 24% (+/- 4%), and the overall survival rate was 46% (+/- 5%). For the 39 patients with isolated pulmonary metastases, the 2-year EFS rate was 31% (+/- 7%) compared with 20% (+/- 5%) for patients with more widespread disease., Conclusion: Topotecan had limited activity in patients with Ewing sarcoma or PNET metastatic at diagnosis. The topotecan-cyclophosphamide combination was active. Amifostine was not myeloprotective. Overall results showed no improvement compared with previous studies.

This study evaluated whether amifostine protects against mucositis and other toxicities in patients with advanced, refractory, or recurrent hematologic malignancies undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation. Thirty-five patients (20 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 12 with Hodgkin disease, and 3 with acute myelogenous leukemia) who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation were conditioned with total body irradiation 2 Gy twice daily on days -8 through -6; cyclophosphamide 6 g/m(2), etoposide 1.8 g/m(2), and carboplatin 1 g/m(2) on days -5 through -3; and amifostine 500 mg/m(2) on days -8 through -2. Prior institutional experience in patients treated without amifostine was used as a historical comparison (no-amifostine group). Severe mucositis occurred in 14 (40%) of 35 patients in the amifostine group, compared with 33 (94%) of 35 in the no-amifostine group (P < .0001). Total parenteral nutrition was used by 4 (11%) of 35 amifostine-treated patients and 34 (97%) of 35 no-amifostine patients (P < .0001). The median duration of narcotic use decreased from 15.5 days with no amifostine to 11 days with amifostine (P = .002). Granulocyte and platelet engraftment times were similar. Prospective trials with innovative designs and clearly defined stopping rules are warranted to confirm whether amifostine reduces the toxicities of a myelosuppressive conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation without compromising therapeutic response.