Search

Background Intracranial dissecting aneurysms present clinical challenges, demanding immediate intervention due to their high bleeding risk. While traditional treatments have limitations, the potential of flow diverters shows promise but remains a subject of ongoing debate for optimal management. The aim of this study was assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of intracranial dissecting aneurysms. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following established guidelines. The search encompassed PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to July 20, 2023. Eligible studies reporting outcomes of interest were included, and relevant data were extracted and analyzed using R software. Results The analysis, based on data pooled from 20 included studies involving 329 patients, revealed a favorable functional outcome rate of 89.7% at the last follow-up. The mortality rate during the follow-up period was 2.4%, decreasing to 0.9% when excluding the outlier study. In the final angiographic follow-up, a complete occlusion rate of 71.7% and an adequate occlusion rate of 88.3% were observed. Notably, studies with longer angiographic follow-up times exhibited lower rates of complete (P=0.02) and adequate (P<0.01) occlusion. A minimal aneurysm recurrence/rebleeding rate of 0.1% was noted, while in-stent stenosis/ thrombosis occurred at a rate of 1.14%. Additionally, ischemic events/infarctions were seen in 3.3% of cases. The need for retreatment was minimal, with a rate of 0.9%, and the technical success rate was impressively high at 99.1%. Conclusion This study highlights the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in treating intracranial dissecting aneurysms. Further research, encompassing larger multicenter studies with extended follow-up periods, is crucial for comprehending occlusion dynamics, refining treatment strategies, improving long-term outcomes, and addressing methodological limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke guideline statements are important references for clinicians due to the rapidly evolving nature of treatments. Guideline statements should be informed by up-to-date systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) because they provide the highest level of evidence. To investigate the utilization of SRs/MAs in stroke management guidelines, we conducted a literature review of guidelines and extracted relevant information regarding SRs/MAs. Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed with supplementation using the Trip medical database with the term "stroke" as the target population, followed by using the filter "guidelines". We extracted the number of included SRs/MAs, the years of publication, the country of origin, and other characteristics of interest. Descriptive statistics were generated using the R software version 4.2.1. Results: We included 27 guideline statements. The median number of overall SRs or MAs within the guidelines was 4.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 2–9). For MAs only, the median number included in the guidelines was 3.0 (IQR = 2.0–5.5). Canadian guidelines had the oldest citations, with a median gap of 12.0 (IQR = 5.2–18.0) years for the oldest citation, followed by European (median = 12; IQR = 9.5–13.5) and US (median = 10.0; IQR = 5.2–16) guidelines. Conclusions: Stroke guideline writing groups and issuing bodies should devote greater effort to the inclusion of up-to-date SRs/MAs in their guideline statements so that clinicians can reference recent data with the highest level of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intracranial dissecting aneurysms present a challenging subset linked to considerable morbidity and mortality, necessitating effective therapeutic strategies to prevent complications. Traditional treatments face technical limitations, while emerging endovascular modalities like stent-assisted coiling, multiple stenting, and flow-diverting devices (FDDs) offer promise in reducing periprocedural risks and enhancing patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes of endovascular treatment for intracranial dissecting aneurysms using FDDs versus stents (with or without coiling).A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following established guidelines. The search included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to July 30, 2023. Eligible studies reporting outcomes of interest in both FDD and stent-treated groups were included, and the data was extracted and analyzed using STATA software.Six studies were analyzed, involving 131 patients in the FDD group and 199 patients in the stent group. The pooled rates for favorable functional outcomes (86.8% vs. 86%), mortality (3.9% vs. 6%), adequate occlusion (79.7% vs. 86.3%), aneurysm recurrence (1.3% vs. 13.3%), in-stent stenosis/thrombosis (7% vs. 6.9%), ischemic events/infarctions (6.7% vs. 7.8%), retreatment (7% vs. 8.6%), and technical success (100% vs. 98.7%) were comparable in individuals treated with FDDs and stents (p > 0.05 in all cases). Additionally, complete occlusion rates were not significantly different between FDD (62.7%) and stent-treated patients (75.2%) (p = 0.06). However, after excluding one study in a leave-one-out analysis of the random effects meta-analysis, a significant difference in the pooled rates of this outcome was observed between the FDD (59.2%) and stent (75.2%) groups (p = 0.034).FDDs present a promising approach for the treatment of intracranial dissecting aneurysms, yielding outcomes that are roughly comparable to stent-based methods. However, the absence of randomized trials and data limitations highlight the need for further research to enhance treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) has been specifically developed to manage wide neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms. A wide range of aneurysm occlusion rates and device-related complications are reported in different papers, and a lack of collective evidence in this regard.To clarify the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of intracranial aneurysm treatment with WEB devices.A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases on April 25, 2023. Considering the eligibility criteria, all the studies reporting the outcomes of the intracranial aneurysm treatment with WEB device at 1 and/or more than 1 year were included. Data elements of interest were extracted and analyzed using R software version 4.2.1.Twenty-seven articles were included. Complete occlusion rate was 56.85%, 67.10%, and 56.34% at one year, beyond one year, and at/beyond two years of follow-up, respectively. Adequate occlusion rate was 87.11% at one year, 91.16% beyond one year, and 88.87% at/beyond two years of follow-up. WEB compression and aneurysm recurrence rates increased from 17.62% and 0.58% at one year to 42.59% and 18.99% beyond one year of follow-up, respectively. An increase in retreatment rate from 3.45% at one year to 7.15% beyond one year of follow-up was found.The current study supports the long-term efficacy of WEB devices for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, an increase in WEB compression, aneurysm recurrence, and retreatment rates beyond one year reveals the importance of follow-ups after the first year of WEB placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Smoking represents a leading risk factor for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Previous literature has described a “smoking paradox”, wherein smokers experience better outcomes following intravenous thrombolysis for AIS. It is unclear whether such a phenomenon exists in smokers undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for AIS. To assess outcomes in smokers following EVT for AIS, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase Web of Science, and Scopus. Outcomes of interest included 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b-3, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. We calculated mean difference (MD), pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).Eight studies with 2633 patients comprised our analysis. On average, smokers were 10.14 years (MD  =  10.14, [95% CI  =  −14.49 to −5.79], P-value < 0.001) younger than non-smokers. Smokers achieved mRS 0–2 (OR =  1.82, [95% CI, 1.34–2.48], P-value < 0.001) and TICI 2b-3 (OR =  1.61, [95% CI, 1.19–2.19], P-value  =  0.002) at a higher rate than non-smokers. sICH rates were comparable between smokers and non-smokers (OR =  1.07, [95% CI, 0.62–1.85], P-value  =  0.81). Smokers had a lower rate of 90-day mortality than non-smokers (OR =  0.54, [95% CI, 0.41–0.71], P-value < 0.001).In this meta-analysis of eight studies, we found that smokers with AIS undergoing EVT experienced better 90-day outcomes and higher rates of TICI 2b-3. This may be due to baseline differences between smokers and non-smokers, but future studies should explore alternative reasons that could explain this relationship between smoking and AIS treated with EVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Ischemic stroke, a leading cause of mortality, necessitates understanding its mechanism for effective prevention. Echocardiography, especially transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), is the gold standard for detection of cardiac sources of stroke including left atrial thrombus, although its invasiveness, operator skill dependence, and limited availability in some centers prompt exploration of alternatives, such as cardiac CT (CCT). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ability of CCT in the detection of intracardiac thrombus compared with echocardiography., Methods: We searched 4 databases up through September 8, 2023. Major search terms included a combination of the terms "echocardiograph," "CT," "TEE," "imaging," "stroke," "undetermined," and "cryptogenic." The current systematic literature review of the English language literature was reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. We assessed risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool and used random-effects meta-analysis to calculate different diagnostic metrics., Results: The meta-analysis investigating CCT vs echocardiography for intracardiac thrombus detection yielded a total of 43 studies of 9,552 patients. Risk-of-bias assessment revealed a predominantly low risk of bias in the flow and timing, index test, and patient selection domains and a predominantly unclear risk of bias in the reference standard domain. The analysis revealed an overall sensitivity of 98.38% (95% CI 89.2-99.78) and specificity of 96.0% (95% CI 92.55-97.88). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that delayed-phase, electrocardiogram-gated CCT had the highest sensitivity (100%; 95% CI 0-100) while early-phase, nongated CCT exhibited a sensitivity of 94.31% (95% CI 28.58-99.85). The diagnostic odds ratio was 98.59 (95% CI 44.05-220.69). Heterogeneity was observed, particularly in specificity and diagnostic odds ratio estimates., Discussion: CCT demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios in detecting intracardiac thrombus compared with traditional echocardiography. Limitations include the lack of randomized controlled studies, and other cardioembolic sources of stroke such as valvular disease, cardiac function, and aortic arch disease were not examined in our analysis. Large-scale studies are warranted to further evaluate CCT as a promising alternative for identifying intracardiac thrombus and other sources of cardioembolic stroke.

Introduction: Finding easily accessible and non-invasive methods for differentiating various sources of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding before performing endoscopy and colonoscopy is of great interest. The present study was designed with the aim of evaluating the screening performance characteristics of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to Creatinine (Cr) ratio in this regard., Methods: The present diagnostic accuracy study was performed on patients with acute GI bleeding presenting to emergency department from 2011 to 2016, in a retrospective manner. BUN/Cr ratio was calculated for all patients and its accuracy in differentiation of upper and lower GI bleedings, confirmed via endoscopy or colonoscopy, was evaluated., Results: A total of 621 patients with the mean age of 59.49±17.94 (5 - 93) years were studied (60.5% male). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of BUN/Cr ratio for predicting the source of GI bleeding was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57 - 0.68). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of BUN/Cr ratio at 35 cut-off point were 19.63% (95%CI: 16.69 - 23.45), 90.16% (95%CI: 83.11 - 94.88), 89.09 (95%CI: 81.35 - 93.98), 21.53 (95%CI: 18.09 - 25.39), 8.16 (95%CI:4.76 - 13.98), and 3.65 (95%CI: 3.44 - 3.87), respectively., Conclusion: Considering the relatively proper specificity and positive predictive value of BUN/Cr ratio, in cases that bleeding source cannot be determined using other non-invasive methods, values higher than 35 can predict upper GI bleeding with high probability. However, due to the low sensitivity, values less than 35 are not diagnostic., Competing Interests: Hereby, the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the present study.