Search

Our objective was to identify the influencing factors associated with the implementation of the INTERACT (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers) Quality Improvement program within a national healthcare system. INTERACT focuses on early identification and management of changes in residents' condition leading to a reduction in potentially preventable hospital transfers. The Consolidated Framework was used to evaluate implementation data from eight VA Community Living Centers. Qualitative implementation data suggest two influencing Consolidated Framework domains had a strong influence: 1) key attributes of the intervention (e.g., adaptability or complexity) and 2) internal organizational factors (e.g., culture or compatibility). Using the Consolidated Framework can assist future adaptations to this and other complex quality improvement initiatives.

Objectives To assess whether prevailing antipsychotic use rates in community nursing homes (CNH) influence new initiation of antipsychotics and diagnosis with antipsychotic indications among Veterans. Methods We used linked 2013-2016 Veterans Administration (VA) data, Medicare claims, Nursing Home Compare, and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The exposure was the proportion (in quintiles) of all CNH residents prescribed antipsychotics in the quarter preceding a Veteran's admission date. Using adjusted logistic regression, we analyzed two outcomes measured using MDS: antipsychotic initiation, and new diagnosis of an antipsychotic quality-measure exclusionary condition (i.e., schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, or Huntington's disease). Results Among 8201 Veterans without an indication for antipsychotics at baseline, 21.1% initiated antipsychotics and 3.5% were newly diagnosed with any exclusionary diagnosis after CNH admission. Schizophrenia accounted for almost all (96.8%) the new diagnoses. Antipsychotic initiation increased with higher CNH antipsychotic use rates: OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.08--3.12, quintile 5 versus 1. CNHs with the highest prevalent use of antipsychotics were associated with increased odds of Veterans acquiring an exclusionary diagnosis (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.32-3.32, quintile 5 vs. 1). Conclusions Incident antipsychotic use is common among Veterans admitted to CNHs. CNH antipsychotic prescribing practices are associated with Veterans being newly diagnosed with antipsychotic prescription indications, primarily schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) purchases community nursing home care; however, the administrative burden may lead nursing homes to avoid contracting with the VHA. This study aimed to describe how the VHA’s purchasing policies impede or facilitate contracting with nursing homes. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews of key stakeholders in the VHA’s community nursing home contracting process. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 15 VHA and 21 nursing home staff at 6 VHA medical centers and 17 nursing homes. VHA medical centers were selected from sites with the greatest magnitude of difference in quality rankings between VHA contracted and noncontracted nursing homes in the same market area. METHODS: Qualitative content analysis of interviews. RESULTS: Five themes emerged: (1) VHA purchases nursing home care to fill gaps in geographic, specialty, and quality care needs; (2) business opportunities and the mission to care for Veterans motivate nursing homes to work with the VHA; (3) the VHA’s reputation for unreliable or insufficient payment and inability of nursing homes to comply with federal wage standards serve as barriers to establishing contracts; (4) complexity of establishing a contract, ambiguity about new policies, and inadequate VHA staffing for the nursing home inspection team hinder the VHA’s ability to establish contracts with nursing homes; and (5) nursing homes that have established corporate processes, nursing home administrators with prior experience working with the VHA, and relationships between VHA and nursing home staff serve as facilitators to establishing new nursing home contracts. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Nursing homes will work with the VHA, but the process of executing VHA contracts is burdensome. Streamlining and standardizing the purchasing processes and ensuring timely payment may expand the number of nursing homes willing to contract with the VHA, thereby increasing choices for Veterans and becoming a model for other long-term care networks.

Studies have shown that hospitalizations of nursing home (NH) residents lead to complications and poorer quality of life. The Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) Quality Improvement (QI) Program assists licensed NH staff in avoiding such hospitalizations. INTERACT aims to improve the management of acute changes in residents' conditions by providing tools to help staff recognize subtle changes in condition, improve communication, and implement QI strategies. INTERACT has been vetted by national clinical leaders and experts in long term care (LTC). Multiple NHs have implemented INTERACT and it has been adopted in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. QI initiatives involve adaptation to the organizational context in which it is being implemented. We report adaptation of the INTERACT QI program and implementation training into Veteran Affairs (VA) Community Living Centers (CLCs) (VA equivalent NH) and summarize the efforts to introduce and train nursing leadership to integrate the intervention into selected CLCs.

Because nursing homes are both a residence and a treatment setting, care providers are faced with the challenge of balancing resident autonomy and safety on a daily basis. While there are standardized approaches for determining a capacity to make larger decisions such as providing consent for medical procedures, there are virtually no methods for assessing capacity to make everyday decisions (e.g., food choices, smoking, navigating outside the nursing home). While it is easier for staff to prevent residents from making decisions they deem risky, to truly offer person-centered care, it is important to support a resident’s right to make decisions if they have the capacity to do so. Currently, little is known about how nursing home staff conceptualize and determine everyday decision-making capacity and how that information is used in care planning. To understand the current processes and language nursing home staff use when considering a resident’s decision-making capacity, we conducted interviews with 37 staff at two Veterans Affairs (VA) Community Living Centers (VA-operated nursing homes; CLCs). Using qualitative content analysis, we coded the transcribed interviews and identified several overarching themes: autonomy vs. safety, communication (e.g., pathways, with caregivers, with residents), determining capacity (e.g., information gathering, assessment, assumptions, indicators, interdisciplinary team member roles, referrals), interventions (e.g., legal and staff-led), and terminology used. We will describe how the findings from this study can be used to tailor development and adaptation of tools to help nursing home staff assess resident everyday decision-making capacity and to incorporate the results into person-centered care approaches.