Search

SummaryBiomolecular condensates assemble in living cells through phase separation and related phase transitions. An underappreciated feature of these dynamic molecular assemblies is that they form interfaces with cellular structures, including membranes, cytoskeleton, DNA and RNA, and other membraneless compartments. These interfaces are expected to give rise to capillary forces, but there are few ways of quantifying and harnessing these forces in living cells. Here, we introduce VECTOR (ViscoElasticChromatinTethering andORganization), which uses light-inducible biomolecular condensates to generate capillary forces at targeted DNA loci. VECTOR can be utilized to programmably reposition genomic loci on a timescale of seconds to minutes, quantitatively revealing local heterogeneity in the viscoelastic material properties of chromatin. These synthetic condensates are built from components that naturally form liquid-like structures in living cells, highlighting the potential role for native condensates to generate forces and do work to reorganize the genome and impact chromatin architecture.

The mammalian SWI/SNF (mSWI/SNF or BAF) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes collectively represent one of the most frequently mutated cellular entities in cancer, second only to TP53. Mutations across the 29 human genes that encode mSWI/SNF complex subunits occur in over 20% of human cancers, with mutations affecting ARID1A and ARID1B, the largest BAF subunits, being the most frequent. However, the functional contributions of these subunits, particularly their commonly mutated N-terminal intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and a highly conserved ARID DNA-binding domain, to BAF function remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the IDRs of ARID1A/B, coupled with the ARID domain, drive biomolecular condensate formation and BAF chromatin localization in cells. We define ARID1A/B IDRs as two-part systems, facilitating homotypic BAF complex interactions (i.e., valence generated by localized condensation) and heterotypic complex interactions, that together establish a highly specific, sequence-encoded protein interaction network within condensates. Both types of interactions are required for appropriate genome-wide targeting of BAF complexes, DNA accessibility generation, and appropriate gene expression. Replacement of the ARID1A N-terminal IDR with IDRs derived from two unrelated proteins FUS and DDX4, rescues generic condensation of BAF but not chromatin occupancy, DNA accessibility, and heterotypic interactions, highlighting the sequence-specificity embedded in the IDR of ARID1A. Taken together, these data establish a role for the largest and most frequently perturbed IDRs within a major chromatin remodeler and explain how biomolecular condensate formation enables both genomic localization and functional partner recruitment. Furthermore, these findings lay the groundwork for mapping IDR sequence specificity or “grammar”, that dictates the co-condensation network formation, and suggests that targeted disruption of these mechanisms may represent new targeted therapeutic opportunities across multiple cancers. Citation Format: Ajinkya Patil, Amy R. Strom, Clayton K. Collings, Joao A. Paulo, Tobias Wauer, Akshay Sankar, Jessica D. St.Laurent, Kasey S. Cervantes, Steven P. Gygi, Clifford P. Brangwynne, Cigall Kadoch. Intrinsically disordered regions of the ARID1A/B tumor suppressors encode an interaction network within biomolecular condensates that directs mSWI/SNF chromatin remodeler complex activity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3485.

The cell nucleus can be thought of as a complex, dynamic, living material, which functions to organize and protect the genome and coordinate gene expression. These functions are achieved via intricate mechanical and biochemical interactions among its myriad components, including the nuclear lamina, nuclear bodies, and the chromatin itself. While the biophysical organization of the nuclear lamina and chromatin have been thoroughly studied, the concept that liquid–liquid phase separation and related phase transitions play a role in establishing nuclear structure has emerged only recently. Phase transitions are likely to be intimately coupled to the mechanobiology of structural elements in the nucleus, but their interplay with one another is still not understood. Here, we review recent developments on the role of phase separation and mechanics in nuclear organization and discuss the functional implications in cell physiology and disease states.

Chromatin, which consists of DNA and associated proteins, contains genetic information and is a mechanical component of the nucleus. Heterochromatic histone methylation controls nucleus and chromosome stiffness, but the contribution of heterochromatin protein HP1α (CBX5) is unknown. We used a novel HP1α auxin-inducible degron human cell line to rapidly degrade HP1α. Degradation did not alter transcription, local chromatin compaction, or histone methylation, but did decrease chromatin stiffness. Single-nucleus micromanipulation reveals that HP1α is essential to chromatin-based mechanics and maintains nuclear morphology, separate from histone methylation. Further experiments with dimerization-deficient HP1αI165Eindicate that chromatin crosslinking via HP1α dimerization is critical, while polymer simulations demonstrate the importance of chromatin-chromatin crosslinkers in mechanics. In mitotic chromosomes, HP1α similarly bolsters stiffness while aiding in mitotic alignment and faithful segregation. HP1α is therefore a critical chromatin-crosslinking protein that provides mechanical strength to chromosomes and the nucleus throughout the cell cycle and supports cellular functions.

Telomeres form unique nuclear compartments that prevent degradation and fusion of chromosome ends by recruiting shelterin proteins and regulating access of DNA damage repair factors. To understand how these dynamic components protect chromosome ends, we combine invivo biophysical interrogation and invitro reconstitution of human shelterin. We show that shelterin components form multicomponent liquid condensates with selective biomolecular partitioning on telomeric DNA. Tethering and anomalous diffusion prevent multiple telomeres from coalescing into a single condensate in mammalian cells. However, telomeres coalesce when brought into contact via an optogenetic approach. TRF1 and TRF2 subunits of shelterin drive phase separation, and their N-terminal domains specify interactions with telomeric DNA invitro. Telomeric condensates selectively recruit telomere-associated factors and regulate access of DNA damage repair factors.We propose that shelterin mediates phase separation of telomeric chromatin, which underlies the dynamic yet persistent nature of the end-protection mechanism.

Cells organize membrane-less internal compartments through a process called liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) to create chemically distinct compartments, referred to as condensates, which emerge from interactions among biological macromolecules. These condensates include various cytoplasmic structures such as P-granules and stress granules. However, an even wider array of condensates subcompartmentalize the cell nucleus, forming liquid-like structures that range from nucleoli and Cajal bodies to nuclear speckles and gems. Phase separation provides a biophysical assembly mechanism underlying this non-covalent form of fluid compartmentalization and functionalization. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we term these phase-separated liquids that organize the nucleus the liquid nucleome; we discuss examples of biological phase transitions in the nucleus, how the cell utilizes biophysical aspects of phase separation to form and regulate condensates, and suggest interpretations for the role of phase separation in nuclear organization and function.

Membraneless organelles or condensates form through liquid-liquid phase separation

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) mediates formation of membraneless condensates such as those associated with RNA processing, but the rules that dictate their assembly, substructure, and coexistence with other liquid-like compartments remain elusive. Here, we address the biophysical mechanism of this multiphase organization using quantitative reconstitution of cytoplasmic stress granules (SGs) with attached P-bodies in human cells. Protein-interaction networks can be viewed as interconnected complexes (nodes) of RNA-binding domains (RBDs), whose integrated RNA-binding capacity determines whether LLPS occurs upon RNA influx. Surprisingly, both RBD-RNA specificity and disordered segments of key proteins are non-essential, but modulate multiphase condensation. Instead, stoichiometry-dependent competition between protein networks for connecting nodes determines SG and P-body composition and miscibility, while competitive binding of unconnected proteins disengages networks and prevents LLPS. Inspired by patchy colloid theory, we propose a general framework by which competing networks give rise to compositionally specific and tunable condensates, while relative linkage between nodes underlies multiphase organization.

HP1a can nucleate into foci that display liquid properties during the early stages of heterochromatin domain formation in Drosophila embryos, suggesting that the repressive action of heterochromatin may be mediated in part by emergent properties of phase separation. The gene-silencing action of heterochromatin is thought to arise from the spread of proteins such as HP1 that compact the underlying chromatin and recruit repressors. Two papers in this issue demonstrate that HP1α has the ability to form phase-separated droplets. Gary Karpen and colleagues show that HP1α can nucleate into foci that display liquid properties during the early stages of heterochromatin domain formation in Drosophila embryos. Geeta Narlikar and colleagues demonstrate that human HP1α protein also forms phase-separated droplets. Phosphorylation or DNA binding promotes the physical partitioning of HP1α out of the soluble aqueous phase into droplets. These related findings suggest that the repressive action of heterochromatin may be in part mediated by the phase separation of HP1, with the droplets being initiated or dissolved by various ligands depending on nuclear context. Constitutive heterochromatin is an important component of eukaryotic genomes that has essential roles in nuclear architecture, DNA repair and genome stability1, and silencing of transposon and gene expression2. Heterochromatin is highly enriched for repetitive sequences, and is defined epigenetically by methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 and recruitment of its binding partner heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). A prevalent view of heterochromatic silencing is that these and associated factors lead to chromatin compaction, resulting in steric exclusion of regulatory proteins such as RNA polymerase from the underlying DNA3. However, compaction alone does not account for the formation of distinct, multi-chromosomal, membrane-less heterochromatin domains within the nucleus, fast diffusion of proteins inside the domain, and other dynamic features of heterochromatin. Here we present data that support an alternative hypothesis: that the formation of heterochromatin domains is mediated by phase separation, a phenomenon that gives rise to diverse non-membrane-bound nuclear, cytoplasmic and extracellular compartments4. We show that Drosophila HP1a protein undergoes liquid–liquid demixing in vitro, and nucleates into foci that display liquid properties during the first stages of heterochromatin domain formation in early Drosophila embryos. Furthermore, in both Drosophila and mammalian cells, heterochromatin domains exhibit dynamics that are characteristic of liquid phase-separation, including sensitivity to the disruption of weak hydrophobic interactions, and reduced diffusion, increased coordinated movement and inert probe exclusion at the domain boundary. We conclude that heterochromatic domains form via phase separation, and mature into a structure that includes liquid and stable compartments. We propose that emergent biophysical properties associated with phase-separated systems are critical to understanding the unusual behaviours of heterochromatin, and how chromatin domains in general regulate essential nuclear functions.

Heterochromatin is enriched for specific epigenetic factors including Heterochromatin Protein 1a (HP1a), and is essential for many organismal functions. To elucidate heterochromatin organization and regulation, we purified Drosophila melanogaster HP1a interactors, and performed a genome-wide RNAi screen to identify genes that impact HP1a levels or localization. The majority of the over four hundred putative HP1a interactors and regulators identified were previously unknown. We found that 13 of 16 tested candidates (83%) are required for gene silencing, providing a substantial increase in the number of identified components that impact heterochromatin properties. Surprisingly, image analysis revealed that although some HP1a interactors and regulators are broadly distributed within the heterochromatin domain, most localize to discrete subdomains that display dynamic localization patterns during the cell cycle. We conclude that heterochromatin composition and architecture is more spatially complex and dynamic than previously suggested, and propose that a network of subdomains regulates diverse heterochromatin functions. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16096.001, eLife digest If the DNA in a single human cell is stretched from end to end it is about two meters long, yet it all fits into a space that is just six thousandths of a millimeter across. This feat is possible because protein complexes package the cell’s DNA into a form called chromatin to make it more compact. One type of chromatin – called “heterochromatin” – is needed to ensure that the DNA is positioned properly inside the cell’s nucleus and segregated correctly when the cell divides. Heterochromatin contains many repeated DNA sequences that are repressed or ‘silenced’, as well as some active genes. Though heterochromatin accounts for about 25% of the human genome, little is known about the basic molecular processes that occur in this type of chromatin. This is in part because it is not clear which proteins are present in heterochromatin or how these proteins contribute to its structure and roles within the cell. Swenson, Colmenares et al. have now combined two different approaches to search for proteins that are present in heterochromatin and genes that are needed to regulate heterochromatin’s structure. These searches were conducted using fruit fly cells grown in the laboratory, and identified 118 candidate proteins and 374 candidate genes. Next, Swenson, Colmenares et al. looked more closely at 89 of the proteins and confirmed that 30 did indeed localize to heterochromatin. Unexpectedly, more detailed imaging studies showed that these proteins were often localized to restricted regions within heterochromatin (referred to as subdomains). This closer look also revealed that many of the subdomains are dynamic, because the proteins change where they are localized as the cells grow and divide. Finally, many of the candidate proteins were shown to alter the ability of heterochromatin to silence genes. These findings identify a host of new proteins and genes that bind and regulate heterochromatin. More importantly, Swenson, Colmenares et al. reveal that heterochromatin is structurally complex and contains many dynamic, smaller subdomains. The next critical challenges are to find the molecular mechanisms responsible for this unusual organization and to explore the roles of individual heterochromatin proteins or subdomains. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16096.002

the experiment), and uses this information to design the next experiment. Because winning depends on reducing the 6 4 =1,296 possible solutions to one in the fewest possible experiments, sound logical reasoning and good experimental design are essential. The game therefore provides a simple, practical framework for the discussion and practice of important scientific skills. It’s also fun to play. In this report, we will describe opportunities for lessons and discussions concerning scientific reasoning that often occur during gameplay. We will also present ideas for adapting the game as a classroom or lab exercise.