Search

Surgery is performed more frequently now at days, due to the increasing incidence of melanoma and no-melanoma skin cancer. There are different opinions among dermatologic surgeons between to continue or discontinue antithrombotic therapy prior to the procedure, which increases the risk of thromboembolic events. Prophylaxis with oral antibiotics in the postsurgical period is controversial.To report the safety of surgery without suspending antithrombotic therapy and without oral antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatology surgery of patients with multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy.We designed a retrospective study. We included a total of 655 patients; 96.6% had at least one comorbidity; 27.7% used aspirin and 4.3% some type of antithrombotic therapy. The most common type of skin tumor was basal cell carcinoma with 69.8% .The complication rate was 4.2%; the most was wound dehiscence (1.1%), followed by partial necrosis (0.9%), infection (0.9%), reaction to foreign body (0.6%), complete necrosis (0.3%), bleeding (0.2%) and fistulae (0.2%).Based on the literature and our experience, dermatologic surgery is safe without suspending antithrombotic therapy or antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with multiple comorbidity.La cirugía es uno de los procedimientos que se realizan con mayor frecuencia en dermatología debido a la mayor incidencia de cáncer de piel melanoma y no melanoma. Se han encontrado distintas posturas entre los cirujanos dermatólogos sobre continuar o suspender antiagregantes y anticoagulantes antes del procedimiento, lo cual incrementa el riesgo de eventos tromboembólicos, además de la preferencia de utilizar profilaxis antibiótica de forma posquirúrgica por algunos dermatólogos.Reportar nuestra experiencia en cuanto a la seguridad de la cirugía dermatológica sin la suspensión de anticoagulantes/antiagregantes y sin profilaxis antibiótica en pacientes con múltiple comorbilidad y polifarmacia.Se revisaron 655 pacientes. El 96.6% tenían al menos otra enfermedad. El 27.7% utilizaba ácido acetilsalicílico y el 4.3% algún tipo de anticoagulante. El tipo de neoplasia más frecuente fue el carcinoma basocelular con 69.8%.La tasa total de complicaciones fue del 4.2%. La complicación más frecuente fue la dehiscencia de la herida (1.1%), seguida de la necrosis parcial (0.9%), la infección (0.9%), la reacción a cuerpo extraño (0.6%), la necrosis total (0.3%), la hemorragia (0.2%) y la fístula cutánea (0.2%).Basándonos en la literatura y nuestra experiencia, la cirugía dermatológica es segura sin suspender antitrombóticos ni indicar profilaxis antibiótica en pacientes con múltiple comorbilidad.

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common cause of primary liver neoplasms and is one of the main causes of death in patients with liver cirrhosis. High Alpha fetoprotein serum levels have been found in 60–70% of patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma; nevertheless, there are other causes that increase this protein. Alpha fetoprotein levels ≥200 and 400 ng/mL in patients with an identifiable liver mass by imaging techniques are diagnostic of hepatocellular carcinoma with high specificity. Methods We analysed the sensitivity and specificity of the progressive increase of the levels of alpha fetoprotein for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis. Seventy-four patients with cirrhosis without hepatocellular carcinoma and 193 with hepatic lesions diagnosed by biopsy and shown by image scans were included. Sensitivity and specificity of transversal determination of alpha fetoprotein ≥ 200 and 400 ng/mL and monthly progressive elevation of alpha fetoprotein were analysed. Areas under the ROC curves were compared. Positive and negative predictive values adjusted to a 5 and 10% prevalence were calculated. Results For an elevation of alpha fetoprotein ≥ 200 and 400 ng/mL the specificity is of 100% in both cases, with a sensitivity of 36.3 and 20.2%, respectively. For an alpha fetoprotein elevation rate ≥7 ng/mL/month, sensitivity was of 71.4% and specificity of 100%. The area under the ROC curve of the progressive elevation was significantly greater than that of the transversal determination of alpha fetoprotein. The positive and negative predictive values modified to a 10% prevalence are of: 98.8% and 96.92%, respectively; while for a prevalence of 5% they were of 97.4% and 98.52%, respectively. Conclusion The progressive elevation of alpha fetoprotein ≥7 ng/mL/month in patients with liver cirrhosis is useful for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients that do not reach αFP levels ≥200 ng/mL. Prospective studies are required to confirm this observation.