Search

A triagem neonatal da fibrose cística (FC) é realizada por meio da quantificação da tripsina imunorreativa. O objetivo desse estudo foi validar o kit AutoDELFIA® Neonatal immunoreactive trypsinogen. Realizou-se um estudo comparativo entre dois equipamentos. Como resultado, encontrou-se o erro aleatório = 26,6%, erro sistemático = 4,9% e erro total = 31,5%. Diversos fatores contribuem para a variação dos ensaios em papel filtro, como efeito cromatográfico, efeito do hematócrito e efeito do volume total de sangue. Esses fatores devem sem considerados na avaliação dos resultados da validação. O proposto kit pode ser implantado na rotina de triagem neonatal para FC. Neonatal screening programs for cystic fibrosis (CF) usually consist of an immunoreactive trypsinogen assay. The objective of this study was to validate the AutoDELFIA® Neonatal immunoreactive trypsinogen kit. We carried out a comparative study between two equipments. The following results were yielded: random error = 26.6%, systematic error = 4.95% and analytical error = 31.5%. Several factors contributed to the assay variations in dried blood spot, namely chromatographic, hematocrit and total blood volume effects. These factors should be taken into account in the assessment of validation results. The studied kit can be deployed in neonatal screening routine.

The collection of dried blood spots (DBSs) on filter paper has been a powerful tool in newborn screening (NBS) programs and in other fields. However, filter paper has been associated with some level of imprecision due to the filter paper matrix effect. In order to minimize measurement variations, these interferences should be evaluated by NBS assays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of genetic screening processor (GSP) equipment in comparison with a widely used AutoDELFIA and to discuss the limitations and advantages of this new technology in NBS. We evaluated the performance of 3 NBS assays in DBS using GSP in comparison with AutoDELFIA. To determine the inaccuracy and the intra-assay precision, a comparative study and a replication experiment were performed. In the comparative study, human thyroid-stimulating hormone (hTSH) assay showed the highest correlation coefficient, followed by 17α-OH-progesterone and immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) assays. The results of the present study suggest that the GSP equipment and kits are suitable for implementation and have acceptable performance for NBS routine. Genetic screening processor assay tends to underestimate hTSH and IRT concentrations in the clinically relevant range when compared to AutoDELFIA assays. More studies are necessary to reevaluate cutoff values. Furthermore, the equipment has advantages when compared with AutoDELFIA, such as methodology with more specificity, reduction in the processing time, and randomized routine. This helps promoting faster dynamic technical processes and faster report generation.