Search

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been adopted as an alternative to surgery in severe aortic stenosis treatment, even in low-intermediate risk. The aim of this study is to retrospectively report our single-centre 13-year TAVI experience with emphasis on learning curve, referral indication and trends in outcomes over time.We included 361 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from January 2008 to December 2020, grouped according to similar per-year volume of procedures: G1 (2008-2014), G2 (2015-2017) and G3 (2018-2020).The number of procedures increased (group size: 59Favourable trends were observed across the groups, with an improvement in periprocedural outcomes and cardiovascular mortality at 1-year. These improvements could depend on increased expertise because mortality reduction was noted only after reaching a significant procedure volume. A trend towards lower risk patients selection was present in our cohort, as previously described worldwide.

Antegrade wiring using only antegrade guiding catheter without contralateral injection (defined as "blind antegrade wiring") may represent a valid initial treatment strategy for selected chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs) due to the potentially lower risk of vascular complications. A careful selection of lesions eligible for this strategy as well as an accurate balance between the likelihood of success and failure is paramount. The aim of the study is to determine the rate of successful revascularization, the potential predictors of failure and the incidence of major complications, when using a "blind antegrade wiring" technique.In this multicentric study, consecutive patients with CTO undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively screened. All cases approached using "blind antegrade wiring" technique were included.Out of 155 consecutive CTO-PCIs, 94 involved initial "blind antegrade wiring" strategy. Successful revascularization by means of "blind antegrade wiring" technique was achieved in 73 (78%) patients. Final successful revascularization was obtained in 19 of the remaining 21 procedures with "blind antegrade wiring" failure using other techniques (by adding a second contralateral guiding catheter; 98% total successful revascularization). Logistic regression analysis identified higher J-CTO score as the only predictor of "blind antegrade wiring" failure. One complication occurred (wire-based coronary perforation)."Blind antegrade wiring" may be considered as initial strategy for selected CTO-PCI, mainly for CTOs with low J-CTO score. This strategy would allow in a substantial number of cases to avoid "a priori" dual injection, keeping it as secondary strategy in case of "blind antegrade wiring" failure.

The minimalistic hybrid approach (MHA) is an algorithm to perform chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current study aims to evaluate the distribution of patients among the five different treatment strategies, the different techniques used in each strategy, the overall procedural success, and the safety of the MHA algorithm.Data from a consecutive series of patients with a CTO who underwent elective PCI between February 2019 and July 2021 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.One hundred and forty-three CTOPCI in 135 patients were approached according to the MHA algorithm: 134 CTO (93.7%) were successfully recanalized and 9 procedures failed. About half of the procedures (48.3%) were approached using strategy A: antegrade "blind wiring" with contralateral retrograde options, making this the most popular strategy. A total of 89 procedures (62.2%) were completed with a single guiding catheter; in 86 (96.6%) a forearm approach was used. The remaining 54 cases were performed with dual access; in the majority of these patients (90.7%), a bilateral forearm approach was used. The only reason to use the femoral access was inadequate forearm access. One hundred and fifty-four out of 197 (78.2%) access sites were 6 French sheaths.MHA is a stepwise approach focused on the forearm approach to reduce the number of access sites and catheter size used in CTOPCI while maintaining proficiency and safety. Operators should be warned that this approach should be adopted only by experienced CTO operators who master all the strategies of the classic hybrid algorithm and the forearm approach.

Background After the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak, social isolation measures were introduced to contain infection. Although there is currently a slowing down of the infection, a reduction of hospitalizations, especially for myocardial infarction, was observed. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of the infectious disease on ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, through the analysis of recent cases of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results Consecutive patients affected by STEMI from March 1 to 31, 2020, during social restrictions of Italian government, were collected and compared with patients with STEMI treated during March 2019. During March 2020, we observed a 63% reduction of patients with STEMI who were admitted to our catheterization laboratory, when compared with the same period of 2019 (13 versus 35 patients). Changes in all time components of STEMI care were notably observed, particularly for longer median time in symptom‐to‐first medical contact, spoke‐to‐hub, and the cumulative symptom‐to‐wire delay. Procedural data and in‐hospital outcomes were similar between the 2 groups, whereas the length of hospitalization was longer in patients of 2020. In this group, we also observed higher levels of cardiac biomarkers and a worse left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline and discharge. Conclusions The coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak induced a reduction of hospital access for STEMI with an increase in treatment delay, longer hospitalization, higher levels of cardiac biomarkers, and worse left ventricular function.