1. The consolidated European synthesis of CO2emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990-2018
- Author
-
Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana, McGrath, Matthew M.J., Andrew, Robbie R.M., Peylin, Philippe, Peters, Glen P., Ciais, Philippe, Broquet, Grégoire, Tubiello, Francesco Nicola, Gerbig, Christoph, Pongratz, Julia, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Grassi, Giacomo, Nabuurs, Gert-Jan, Regnier, Pierre, Lauerwald, Ronny, Kuhnert, Matthias, Balkovič, Juraj, Schelhaas, Mart Jan, van der Gon, Hugo Denier H.A.C.D., Solazzo, Efisio, Qiu, Chunjing, Pilli, Roberto, Konovalov, Igor I.B., Houghton, R.A., Günther, Dirk, Perugini, Lucia, Crippa, Monica, Ganzenmüller, Raphael, Luijkx, I.T., Smith, Pete, Munassar, Saqr, Thompson, Rona L., Conchedda, Giulia, Monteil, Guillaume, Scholze, Marko, Karstens, Ute, Brockmann, Patrick, Dolman, Albertus Johannes Han A.J., Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana, McGrath, Matthew M.J., Andrew, Robbie R.M., Peylin, Philippe, Peters, Glen P., Ciais, Philippe, Broquet, Grégoire, Tubiello, Francesco Nicola, Gerbig, Christoph, Pongratz, Julia, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Grassi, Giacomo, Nabuurs, Gert-Jan, Regnier, Pierre, Lauerwald, Ronny, Kuhnert, Matthias, Balkovič, Juraj, Schelhaas, Mart Jan, van der Gon, Hugo Denier H.A.C.D., Solazzo, Efisio, Qiu, Chunjing, Pilli, Roberto, Konovalov, Igor I.B., Houghton, R.A., Günther, Dirk, Perugini, Lucia, Crippa, Monica, Ganzenmüller, Raphael, Luijkx, I.T., Smith, Pete, Munassar, Saqr, Thompson, Rona L., Conchedda, Giulia, Monteil, Guillaume, Scholze, Marko, Karstens, Ute, Brockmann, Patrick, and Dolman, Albertus Johannes Han A.J.
- Abstract
Reliable quantification of the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), including that of their trends and uncertainties, is essential to monitoring the progress in mitigating anthropogenic emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. This study provides a consolidated synthesis of estimates for all anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of CO2 for the European Union and UK (EU27 + UK), derived from a combination of state-of-the-art bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) data sources and models. Given the wide scope of the work and the variety of datasets involved, this study focuses on identifying essential questions which need to be answered to properly understand the differences between various datasets, in particular with regards to the less-well-characterized fluxes from managed ecosystems. The work integrates recent emission inventory data, process-based ecosystem model results, data-driven sector model results and inverse modeling estimates over the period 1990-2018. BU and TD products are compared with European national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) reported under the UNFCCC in 2019, aiming to assess and understand the differences between approaches. For the uncertainties in NGHGIs, we used the standard deviation obtained by varying parameters of inventory calculations, reported by the member states following the IPCC Guidelines. Variation in estimates produced with other methods, like atmospheric inversion models (TD) or spatially disaggregated inventory datasets (BU), arises from diverse sources including within-model uncertainty related to parameterization as well as structural differences between models. In comparing NGHGIs with other approaches, a key source of uncertainty is that related to different system boundaries and emission categories (CO2 fossil) and the use of different land use definitions for reporting emissions from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities (CO2 land). At the EU27 + UK leve, SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published
- Published
- 2021