Search

Study Objective: To determine the optimal solution to use when anesthetizing the airway by aspiration of lidocaine. Design: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 96 adult ASA physical status 1,II, and III patients, scheduled for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive one of 5 solutions of lidocaine: Group A (n = 16): 1% lidocaine, 0.2 mL · kg −1 ; Group B (n = 16): 1.5% 0.2 mL · kg −1 ; Group C (n = 32): 2% 0.2 mL · kg −1 ; Group D (n = 16): 1% 0.3 mL · kg −1 , and Group E (n = 16): 2% 0.3 mL · kg −1 . Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed after the airway was anesthetized with this aspiration technique, using the assigned lidocaine solution. The scope was manipulated in the trachea to test for anesthesia. Measurements and Main Results: Successful airway anesthesia was determined by tolerance to bronchoscopy without sustained coughing, and also by the number of lidocaine supplements, if any, that were given via the bronchoscope. Arterial plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured in 33 patients from Groups C, D, and E. All solutions provided equally effective anesthesia of the airway. All patients tolerated endoscopy through the vocal cords, and 94 patients required no supplementary anesthesia, or only one dose of lidocaine, during bronchoscopy to the carina. The highest peak plasma concentrations of lidocaine were 5.02 and 6.28 μg · mL. No patient had signs of toxicity. Conclusions: This technique produced anesthesia of the airway to the carina, safely, suitable for awake intubation, in 94 of 95 patients. The use of 1% lidocaine, 0.2 to 0.3 mL · kg −1 , so that the volume is 10 to 20 mL, is recommended.

Lidocaine instilled onto to the back of the tongue of a supine subject and aspirated has been reported to provide effective topical anesthesia of the airway. The purpose of this study was to observe endoscopically the fate of lidocaine so instilled and document the efficacy of anesthesia for awake fibreoptic intubation. In Part I of the study, a fibreoptic bronchoscope was positioned in the pharynx of three volunteers lying supine and the route followed by tinted lidocaine solution instilled onto the back of the protruded tongue during mouth breathing was observed. In Part 2, the airway of 39 patients requiring awake fibreoptic intubation was anesthetized by having them gargle twice with 5 ml lidocaine 2%, followed by instillation of 0.2 ml·kg−1 or 20 ml lidocaine 1.5% (whichever was less) onto the dorsum of their tongues as described above. The efficacy of anesthesia was scored by the patient reaction (coughing or gagging) to instrumentation in the pharynx, at the glottis, and in the trachea; to passage of the tracheal tube into the trachea; and to the presence of the tube in the trachea. Lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue was swallowed initially but ultimately pooled in the pharynx and was aspirated. In all patients the trachea was intubated without requiring supplemental lidocaine, and all but one patient tolerated the tracheal tubein situ. A combination of lidocaine gargles and lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue and aspirated provides effective anesthesia of the pharynx, larynx, and trachea for awake fibreoptic intubation.